The PASSCSIAC Data Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

The PASSCSIAC Data Study

Description:

... 2002) of data from two large USPs in two regions (Eastern and Western) of ... One view: tracking segregates students by class and race, as well as ability, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: wes11
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The PASSCSIAC Data Study


1
The PASS/CSIAC Data Study on the Achievement Gap
WestEd The Partnership for the Assessment of
Standards-based Science Kathy Comfort, PI/PD and
Tamara Kushner, SRA Life Lab Science Program Jane
Lee Delgado, Executive Director Funded by the
National Science Foundation, ESR-0082024 (PASS
was formerly CSIAC--the California Systemic
Initiatives Assessment Collaborative)
2
Purpose
To conduct a secondary data analysis of PASS
Science Assessment results in order to address
several research questions related to the
achievement gap. To examine whether differences
in teacher and student characteristics,
attitudes, behaviors and opportunities-to-learn
are related to and can predict improved science
learning and a reduction in the achievement gap.
3
Overview of PASS
  • Funded by NSF to assist systemic initiatives
    working to reform science education
  • with the administration, scoring and reporting of
    valid and reliable
  • standards-based science assessment in order to -
  • Measure student achievement in science
  • Measure growth against local and national
    standards
  • Inform instruction and guide professional
    development
  • Provide baseline and comparison data
  • Show program improvement
  • Analyze achievement and effectiveness of
    programs for different
  • groups of students--ethnicity and gender within
    ethnicity
  • PASS was developed by interdisciplinary team of
    SI leaders, measurement specialists, scientists,
    science educators and teachers.

4
The PASS Science Assessment
  • Available at the elementary (5th), middle school
    (8th) and secondary (10th) levels
  • Test design and specifications grounded in
    research
  • Valid and reliable (good technical data)
  • Aligned to the National Science Education
    Standards and to the Benchmarks for Science
    Literacy
  • Contains multiple measures
  • Results support educational decisions
  • Meets the requirements of good science
    assessment, including NCLB

5
PASS Assessment Components
  • Teacher Survey
  • Professional Development
  • Instructional Strategies/Practices
  • Curricular Areas
  • Standards
  • Assessment
  • Performance Tasks
  • Inquiry and investigations using equipment.
  • Solve problems and communicate understandings.
  • Make observations, generate and manipulate data
    analyze data and draw conclusions based on their
    results.
  • Scoring rubrics
  • Constructed Response Investigations
  • Inquiry and investigation, no equipment.
  • Analyze a problem and conduct a secondary data
    analysis.
  • Construct questions or models.
  • Recommend solutions.
  • Scoring rubrics.
  • Open-ended Questions
  • Communicate scientific understandings.
  • Inquiry
  • Design experiments.
  • Use science to express positions on societal
    issues.
  • Scoring rubrics.

6
PASS/CSIAC Data Study Research Questions
  • Is there a gap in student achievement among
    groups?
  • If a gap exists, is it becoming smaller or
    larger?
  • Do different types of assessment components
    (multiple-choice questions, open-ended questions,
    performance tasks, constructed response
    investigations) widen or narrow the achievement
    gap among groups of students?
  • What do the correlations between PASS/CSIAC
    student data, teacher surveys and
    opportunity-to-learn results for students from
    different groups tell us?

7
Methods
  • I. Comprehensive Review of the Literature
  • - Causes of the gap
  • - Strategies and programs designed to reduce the
    gap
  • Secondary Data Analysis
  • Findings and Lessons Learned

8
I. Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Causes of the Gap Poverty and Inadequate
Resources (Johnson and Viadero, 2002
OSullivan, et. al., 1998
Kohr et al, 1991 Reyes Stanic,
1988) Academic Literacy Primary Language
(Rollnick, M., 1998 Lee, O., Fradd, S. Hl,
1996 Lee, O., Fradd, S.H.,
and Sutman, R. X., 1995) Resegregation and the
Urban Context (Wang Kovach, 1996 Yancy
Saporito, 1994 Allington Johnston, 1989
Oakes, 1985) Parenting and World View (Jenks
Phillips, 1998 Haycock, 1998 Johnson Viadero,
2000 Lee Fradd,
1998) Effects of School Practices (Phillips, et
al, 1998 Lynch, 2000 Ogbu Fordham, 1986
Oakes, 1990 Brewer, Rees Argys,
1995) Teacher Expectations and Quality (Jenks
Phillips, 1998 Good, 1987 Bamburg, 1994 Kahle,
2000 Haycock, 1998 Darling-Hammond, 2000
Ferguson, 1991 Goldhaber Brewer,
1996) Tracking and Access to Coursework
9
  • Strategies and Programs for Closing the Gap
  • Teacher Effects
  • ( Haycock, 1998 Sanders Rivers, 1996
    Wright, Horn Sanders, 1997 Goldhaber Brewer,
    1996 Darling-Hammond, 2000 Clark, 1996
    Williams, 1996)
  • School Effects
  • (Johnson and Viadero, 2002 Oakes, 1990a
    Brewer, et al, 1995 CGCS, 1998 Hoffer, 1992
    Loveless, 1998)
  • Parent Effects
  • (Scarella Rumberger, 2000 Wang Kovich,
    1996 Viadero Johnson, 2000 Kirst Kelly,
    1995)
  • Programs
  • - School Reform
  • - Programs Supporting Individual Students and
    Families

10
II. Secondary Data Analysis
  • Between 1999 and 2002, approximately 200,000
    students in grades 5, 8, and 11 in NSF systemic
    initiative programs were administered all
    components of PASS. (PASS is a self-selected
    sample not stratified or random.)
  • We initially focused our analysis on one year of
    PASS data from one large USP that used PASS over
    multiple years.
  • In order to increase the reliability of our
    results, we replicated the analysis using four
    years (1999-2002) of data from two large USPs in
    two regions (Eastern and Western) of the US.
  • Our total sample consisted of 31,000 students

11
  • FYI
  • This exploratory mapping of data is an NSF funded
    Small Grant for Exploratory Research.
  • Not reporting on data that did not have
    significant relationship to student performance.
  • Reporting our findings, not the answers!
  • Each variable were reporting on is a study in
    its own!

12
  • Variables Investigated
  • Size of the gap.
  • Academic Literacy and Primary Language
  • Teacher Expectations, Quality and preparation
  • Classroom Practice
  • Resources and Technology
  • Student Educational Motivation and Worldview
  • Tracking and Access to coursework
  • The Literature Review Preliminary Findings

13
III. Findings and Lessons Learned
  • The size of the gap.
  • Review of the Literature
  • Size of the gap varies based on type of test and
    sampling strategy.
  • On many standardized achievement tests with
    stratified random sampling the white-black score
    gap is about 1SD and the white-Hispanic gap is
    around .7 SD (NAEP, 1999 NELS, 1988).
  • On self-selected tests (SAT I, ACT, GRE, etc.),
    the white-black score gap estimates range from
    .68 and .83 SDs to 1.08 and 1.11 SD. The gap
    between whites and Hispanics is around .6 SDs.
  • Studies using simple composite SES measures of
    environmental factors have been able to to
    explain about 30 of the gap (Phillips et al.,
    1999).
  • Studies using more detailed measures of
    environmental factors account for as much as 65
    of the gap (Phillips et al., 1999 Jencks
    Phillips, 1998).

14
  • Preliminary Findings
  • Our data analysis involved twelve data sets and
    over 31,000 students.
  • Gap by item type for West district (Grades 5
    8)
  • Estimates of white-African American gap range
    from
  • 1.34 SD units on EMC to .35 SD units on PT.
  • Estimates of white-Asian American gap ranged
    from .41
  • on EMC to -.22 on PT.
  • Gap by item type for East district (grades 5,
    8, and 11)
  • Estimates of white-African American gap range
    from
  • .92 SD units on EMC to .25 on PT.
  • The trend appears to be a closing of the gap with
    use of Performance Tasks, and a widening of the
    gap with use of Multiple Choice.
  • Possible explanations for smaller gap with
    non-multiple choice items demanding verbal
    reasoning and reading comprehension required by
    EMC and student ability to communicate
    content/concept understanding while documenting
    critical thinking and hands-on activities with
    Performance Tasks.

15
2. Academic Literacy and Primary Language Issues
  • Review of the Literature
  • Cognitive academic language proficiency is
    critical for demonstrating content achievement,
    especially as students advance in the educational
    system (Rollnick, M., 1998).
  • Teachers interact differently with English
    Learner students in ways that limit their content
    and language development (Verplaetse, L. S.,
    1998).
  • English Learner instructional environments
    exhibit differences in opportunities for science
    learning and in cultural patterns of science
    knowledge, vocabulary, and science strategy use
    (Lee, O., Fradd, S. H., 1996 Lee, O., Fradd,
    S. H., and Sutman, R.X., 1995).
  • Research in cognitive psychology, learning
    theory, memory, and comprehension supports (1)
    the connection between language and conceptual
    development and (2) instructional practices that
    integrate a variety of modalities for cognitive
    processing (OMalley Chamot, 1990 Anderson,
    1990 Sadoski, Paivios Goetz, 1991, and others.

16
  • Preliminary Findings
  • Western District
  • Hispanic/Latino and Asian American students who
    come from homes where English is the primary
    language used at home do better on PASS,
    particularly on the multiple-choice items.
  • At 5th grade, difference is not significant for
    Open-Ended or Performance Task components.
  • At 8th grade, all components are related to by
    the issue of English as the primary language used
    at home for Latinos, but not for Asians.

17
3. Teacher Expectations, Quality and Preparation
  • Review of the Literature
  • Teachers behave in different ways based on their
    estimation of student potential students
    considered low achievers have a very different
    classroom experience in terms of teacher-student
    interaction (Good, 1987).
  • High quality teaching professional high
    performance expectations for all students verbal
    and mathematical competence subject-matter
    certification in science deep content knowledge
    effective pedagogical skill (Jencks Phillips,
    1998 Ferguson, 1991 Stevens, 1995 Sanders
    Rivers, 1998).
  • Schools with high concentrations of poor and
    minority students are more likely to be taught by
    under-prepared teachers (Kahle, 2000
    Darling-Hammond, 2000).
  • In one large Western urban district, 60 of
    3,000 newly hired teachers had emergency
    licenses.
  • In same district, more than half of high school
    mathematics teachers had neither a major or minor
    in mathematics.

18
  • Preliminary Findings
  • Information on academic content preparation and
    credentialing were not collected 1999 2002 for
    PASS.
  • PASS teacher surveys asked teachers about their
    experience with teacher professional development
    programs and the influence of standards. PD
    options included participation in systemic
    initiatives and other programs.
  • In the West district, there were few significant
    correlations for teacher professional
    development. Particularly in grades 5 and 8,
    options were related negatively (possible
    interpretation some professional development
    programs are only offered in low performing
    schools.)
  • In the East district, a special survey was
    created for grade 11 in 2002 referring to
    specific district PD programs. Here the effect
    size of the teacher professional development
    relationship was larger.

19
4. Classroom Practice
  • Review of the Literature
  • Low-income, minority and urban classrooms
    exhibit different instructional practices from
    those in high-performing schools (Oakes, 2001).
  • Almost all goals are less emphasized,
    expectations are lower, and instruction is less
    engaging (Oakes, 1990).
  • Students get a lower-level curriculum dominated
    by exercises, workbooks andbasic skills kits
    (Oakes, 1990).
  • Teachers with less training in science teaching
    tend to emphasize memorization rather than
    laboratory techniques or discussions on
    application of content concepts (Darling-Hammond,
    2000).
  • The difference between an effective and less
    effective teacher can be a full level of
    achievement in a single school year (Hanushek,
    1992).

20
  • Preliminary Findings
  • Students and teachers were asked to report how
    often they participated in or used various
    instructional strategies in the classroom.
  • In grades 5, 8, and 11, experimentation with
    partners or groups was positively associated with
    the test performance of African American and
    Asian American students.
  • For grades 5 and 8, spending time on a long-term
    project is consistently negatively correlated for
    all groups. (Possible explanation these students
    are spending less time on a breadth of science
    content.)
  • For grade 8, as reported by teachers, the use of
    worksheets is negatively correlated with
    achievement. It is particularly negative for
    Performance Tasks. (Possible explanation
    students not thinking critically when spending
    time on worksheets).

21
5. Resources and Technology
  • Review of the Literature
  • Schools in impoverished areas often receive less
    funding and support even when funding is
    similar, suburban schools can access more
    parental support, community resources, and other
    education supports (Viadero, 2000).
  • Disadvantaged schools more likely to have crowded
    and deteriorating school facilities, fewer
    materials, lower quality or no lab facilities,
    and fewer certified teachers in science (NSF,
    1996).
  • School conditions impact subgroups differently
    within the same school scarce resources are more
    likely to be allocated to predominantly white
    classrooms (Kohr, et al., 1991 Reyes Stanic,
    1998).
  • Students in urban schools appear to have less
    access to computers and computer staff, science
    labs, and related resources (Oakes, 1990).
  • Achievement effects have been related to both
    funding for instruction and capital expenditures
    (Wenglinsky, 1998) upkeep (Harter, 1999) and
    classroom resources (Elliott, 1998).

22
  • Preliminary Findings
  • Teachers were asked if they had the resources
    they need. Fairly positive correlation.
    Interesting note both ends were positiveif
    resources supplied by school, or if teachers
    provided their own resources. (Possible
    explanation teachers who buy their own materials
    may be more motivated teachers.)
  • Teachers were also asked how much time they
    spent using technology. In general, there was a
    negative correlation with student performance at
    grade 8 for all groups and item types.
  • Grade 8 student reports about the use of
    computers also showed a negative correlation with
    performance, although smaller. (Possible
    explanation less discussion, less attention to
    critical thinking, processing, and/or ineffective
    use of technology resources.)

23
6. Student Educational Motivation and Worldview
  • Review of the Literature
  • Traditional view interprets the effect of peer
    pressure as a means of devaluing academic
    success as a cause of the achievement gap (Jencks
    and Phillips, 1998).
  • Newer evidence suggests that negative peer
    pressure may instead be a symptom, resulting from
    real-life observation that education has failed
    to improve the conditions of life for members of
    the students home community (Jencks Phillips,
    1998 Ogbu Fordham, 1986 Ogbu, 1991).
  • Peer pressure as a symptom rather than a cause
    may especially apply to involuntary minorities,
    African American or long-term English learners
    who have developed a protective oppositional
    culture over years or generations (Ogbu, 1991).
  • Children from neighborhoods with few
    college-educated adults often have fewer
    successful role models, less encouragement to set
    high goals, and may have pressure to work or
    marry early (Hayward et al., 1997).

24
  • Preliminary Findings
  • Students were asked if knowing science would be
    helpful in the future (grades 5 8).
  • Data showed a relatively strong relationship for
    African American and Asian Americans students in
    grade 5 for grade 8, relationship was less
    consistent or widespread, still mostly positive.
  • Asked if they liked science (11th grade, East
    district), there was a relatively strong
    correlation with performance for African
    Americans.
  • Time spent doing homework showed positive
    correlation with achievement. For 5th grade, the
    relationship was strongest in the East for 8th
    grade, it was equally strong in East and West.
    (Possible explanation could be student
    motivation, could also be home support for
    homework.)
  • Time spent reading science textbooks in the
    classroom showed a positive relationship in the
    West for 8th grade, less in the East. (Question
    of time and support for reading as in homework
    effect appeared about the same for all item
    types.)

25
7. Tracking and Access to Coursework
  • Review of the Literature
  • One view tracking segregates students by class
    and race, as well as ability, and negatively
    affects performance of lower-track students
    (Oakes, 1990 Stockard Mayberry, 1992)
    tracking contributes to the achievement gap
    between low and high ability students (Brewer, et
    al., 1995).
  • Other view tracking not convincingly proven to
    be associated with achievement differentials
    (Hoffer, 1992 Kulik Kulik, 1991).
  • Science and math experiences differ by ethnic
    group as early as elementary school, become
    striking by high school--differential access by
    low income and minority students to rigorous
    coursework, less exposure to teaching goals and
    strategies most likely to generate interest and
    promote learning (Oakes, 1990).
  • Prevalent ability grouping often places African
    American and Hispanic students into course-taking
    patterns, especially in science and math, that
    preclude entrance into four-year colleges and
    universities (Hayward, et al., (1997).

26
  • Preliminary Findings
  • Teachers were asked the question about how much
    time students spent on science content and
    processes of science.
  • Grade 5 shows a positive correlation with
    achievement for all groups. This continues for
    African American students and Hispanic/Latinos in
    grade 8, but no longer for Asian Americans.
  • At grades 5 and ,8 exposure to physical science
    content, and at grade 11 (East district), taking
    physics, is positively related to performance on
    PASS.
  • Time spent on Earth Science at grade 5 (West)
    shows a positive relationship to achievement for
    Hispanic/Latino and Asian American.
  • Time spent on Earth Science at grade 8 and 11in
    general shows a negative correlation for all
    groups. (Possible explanationby middle school,
    time spent on Earth Science may be reducing time
    spent on physical and life science and maybe an
    indicator of a tracked curriculum.

27
Possible Next Steps
  • Potential next steps will focus on linking
    research and practice in science reform efforts
    related to reducing the gap, based on the
    findings described here, and in our final report.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com