Title: Detecting and highlighting
1- Detecting and highlighting
- inequalities, improving responses
- Researching discrimination
- The Eurobarometer as a
- case study-
Equality Summit Paris Sept. 2008 Prepared by TNS
opinion social
2AGENDA
How best to approach it? -The Eurobarometer as a
case study-
- Where are we now?
- Recent key findings EB
- Q1 2008-
Where to from here?
1
3AGENDA
How best to approach it? -The Eurobarometer as a
case study-
- Where are we now?
- Recent key findings EB
- Q1 2008-
Where to from here?
2
4WHY RESEARCH THE TOPIC?
The 3 Ds
Gender
Age
Race/ ethnicity
Challenge
Objective
Disability
Religion
- To understand
- To quantify
- To share and learn
- To develop public policies answering the various
challenges on the ground EB is a key source of
information
Sexual orientation
3
5AGENDA
How best to approach it? -The Eurobarometer as a
case study-
- Where are we now?
- Recent key findings EB
- Q1 2008-
Where to from here?
4
6HOW BEST TO APPROACH IT?
.
Researching discrimination is not easy
Guidelines and limitations
Sampling and qnaire design
- A priori targeting identifying target
respondents during sampling by assessing
ethnicity of names in telephone directories
possible in DE not in FR - Great care in questionnaire design i.e.
indirect or projected wording and
unambiguous/easy wording - Looking at this card, please show me into which
age group you fall? - Some people describe themselves as very
religious, whilst others do not. Looking at this
scale, what is closest to your view? - Always allow the respondents a DK/refusal option
- Personal data protection in particular by
reference to an identification number or to one
or more factors specific to his physical,
physiological, mental, economic, cultural or
social identity" (Directive 95/46/EC art. 2 a)
- Protection of privacy and respondent identity
(Esomar, Art.7)
- Majority of Census surveys ask citizenship or
nationality few include race/ethnicity questions
(i.e UK SA)
5
7HOW BEST TO APPROACH IT?
A brief introduction to Eurobarometer
Commissioned by European Commission
(DG Communication)
Ongoing since 1973
Size and scope up to 34 countries
Number of interviews approx. 200.000 per
year
Number of questions asked approx. 1000 per
year
National languages 44
Target market Population 15 years of age
EU residents/citizens selection
via birthday rule
Sampling Probability proportionate to
size weighted to population sizes
(N435 million)
6
8HOW BEST TO APPROACH IT?
Discrimination questions on Eurobarometer Commiss
ioned by DG Employment Asked 2006 on EU25 2008
on EU27
Relevant socio-demographics
Key topics
- Belonging to a minority group
- Additional demographic and cross
variables/questions
- Diversity in social circle
- Perception of discrimination in Europe
- Standard demographics
- Nationality
- Religion
- Country of birth parents country of birth
- Experience of discrimination
- Discrimination and employment
7
9AGENDA
How best to approach it? -The Eurobarometer as a
case study-
- Where are we now?
- Recent key findings EB
- Q1 2008-
Where to from here?
8
10WHERE ARE WE NOW?
? Few Europeans feel they are part of a minority
group
? And the average European has a reasonably
diverse social circle
9
11WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- Discrimination (especially on ethnic grounds)
seems to remain widespread
2008 figures based on EU27 2006 based on
EU25 NB Dont know and non-existent
(SPONTANEOUS) answers are not shown
10
12WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- And about one in three Europeans sees multiple
discrimination as widespread
11
13WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- Earlier results on the diverse social circle are
reflected in (claimed) comfort levels
A brief look at the Roma
12
14WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- Whilst measures on the Roma are likely reflective
of ingrained stereotypes and highly visible media
attention, rather than actual experience
- 14 of Europeans claim to have Roma friends and
acquaintances
- Having a Roma as a neighbour shows the lowest
comfortability score (6/10)
13
15WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- About one in three claimed to have witnessed
discrimination/ - harassment
14
16WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- Whilst claimed actual victimisation (one in
seven) is lower
12 one 3 multiple
15
17WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- About a third of Europeans are aware of their
rights as victims in this context
Low levels of DK suggest some overclaim
2008 figures based on EU27 2006 based on EU25
18WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- In an employment environment, a candidates
visual characteristics are seen as factors most
likely to put them at a disadvantage
NB in 2008 this item was given as The
candidates sexual orientation (for example,
being gay or lesbian)
17
19WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- And similar views emerge for perceptions around
the highest office holder
Whilst country differences emerge across the
various dimensions, it is interesting to note
that Nordic countries (SE and FI) show the
highest comfortability scores on most dimensions
18
20WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- The EU public is highly supportive of equal
opportunities measures in employment
2008 figures based on EU27 2006 based on EU25
19
21WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- High claimed support for monitoring composition
of work-force in terms of ethnicity
Support total 57
Oppose total 33
20
22WHERE ARE WE NOW?
- And strong claimed support also for monitoring
recruitment procedures
No total 21
Yes total 71
21
23AGENDA
How best to approach it? -The Eurobarometer as a
case study-
- Where are we now?
- Recent key findings EB
- Q1 2008-
Where to from here?
22
24WHERE TO FROM HERE?
23
25WHERE TO FROM HERE?
!
? The majority remain unaware of rights in
relation to discrimination ? Split views on
sufficiency of current efforts to combat
discrimination ? Strong support for a range of
measures aimed at ensuring equality in
employment.
!
24
26WHERE TO FROM HERE?
REFERENCE LINKS
- ? The surveys full report, its summary
and country sheets with key results are available
on the following web sites - http//ec.europa.eu/employment_social/fundamental
_rights/public/pubs_en.htm -
- http//ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb_spe
cial_en.htm - THANK YOU
- Â Â Â Â