Title: Logistics Network Configuration
1Logistics Network Configuration
2The Logistics Network
- Facilities
- Suppliers, warehouses, DCs, and retail outlets
- Goods
- Raw materials, WIP and FGI that flow between the
facilities
3(No Transcript)
4Key strategic decisions
- Determining the appropriate number of warehouses
- Determining the location of each warehouse
- Determining the size of each warehouse
- Allocating space for products in each warehouse
- Determining which products customers will receive
from each warehouse
5Objective
- Minimize total cost consisting of
- Production/procurement costs
- Inventory holding costs
- Facility costs (storage, handling, and fixed
costs) - Transportation costs
- Subject to meeting a specified service level
6Increasing the number of warehouses
- Yields
- Improvement in service level
- Average travel time is reduced
- Increase in inventory costs
- Increased safety stocks at each warehouse
- Increase in ordering costs
- More orders are placed to keep the entire system
operating
7Increasing the number of warehouses
- Yields
- Reduction in outbound transportation costs
- From the warehouses to the customers
- Usually, an increase in inbound transportation
costs - From the suppliers to the warehouses
8Supply Chain Modeling Ford Case Study
- The Logistics Institute
- Jarod Goentzel
- Paul Griffin
- Don Ratliff
- Ford Motor Company
- Glenn Collier
- Les Ellis
9Supply Chain
10(No Transcript)
11Ford Customer Service Division
- Distribute Ford/Motorcraft parts to U.S. dealers
- Service is priority
- Sales over 3 billion annually
- Stock 220,000 parts
- Regional distribution centers carry 60,000 parts
- National Depot carries remainder
12North American supply chain
- 1,800 suppliers
- Packagers
- Two Replenishment Centers
- National Depot (slow movers)
- 13 Regional DCs
- 6,000 Ford dealers
- Motorcraft distributors
- Wholesalers
13Supply chain model
- Transportation
- RC to DC
- DC to dealer
- Routes
- Direct
- Material Handling
- Regional DC
- Inventory
- Regional DC
14Geocode sites
- U.S.--5 digit zip
- Canada--zip
- Mexico--city names
- Spelling
- Multiple locations
Juarez
Juarez
Juarez
15North American sites
16North American network
17DC inbound transportation cost
- Dedicated truck and rail used from RC
- Use contract costs by Origin-Destination pair
- Fix ratio of truckrail
- Container utilization
18DC to dealer transportation
- Route contract carriage
- Direct LTL, parcel ground, express
- Mixed sometimes on a route, sometimes direct
- Mode varies by shipment size and priority
19Current Routes
20Model outbound routes
- Assign dealers to a route
- Create a point to represent the route
(RoutePoint) - Could locate at centroid of all stops
- Smaller network 4,300 demand points to 235
- Calculate route distance instead of direct
distance - Does not matter where RoutePoint is located
DC1
21RoutePoints
22Benchmark
23Option
24End of Ford Example
25Large amount of data is available
- Location of customers, retailers, existing
warehouses and distribution centers,
manufacturing facilities and suppliers - All products including volumes, special transport
requirements (such as refrigeration) - Annual demand for each product by customer
location
26Large amount of data is available
- Transportation rates by mode
- Warehousing costs
- Shipment sizes and frequencies for customer
delivery - Order processing costs
- Customer service goals
27Data aggregation
- Too much data
- 1000s of customers for a Coca-Cola DC
- Wal-Mart has 1000s of products
- Aggregation is needed
28Aggregate customers located in close proximity to
each other
- Replace all customers in a certain cluster as a
single customer located at the center of the
cluster
29Aggregate items into product groups
- Distribution pattern
- All products picked up at the same source and
destined to the same customers are aggregated - Product type
- Aggregate variations of the same product into one
product group
30Impact of aggregating
- Loss of accuracy versus needless complexity
- Consider the number of aggregated zones
- Researchers say that aggregating into 150 to 200
zones results in an error lt 1 - More accuracy when customers are distributed
uniformly within the zone
31Other considerations when aggregating
- Make sure that each cluster or zone has equal
demand - Aggregate products into 20 to 50 product groups
32Aggregating demand over years
- Customer 1 and Customer 2 on next slide
- Demand over the past five years
- Note that aggregate CV lt CV of each customer
33Aggregating demand over years
34Transportation rates
- Next step is to estimate transportation costs
- Rates are almost linear with distance
- Internal rates and external
- External
- TL
- LTL
35US transportation rates for TL
- Zones
- Every state is a zone
- Except for some large states such as FL
- Two zones in FL
- Zone to zone table costs
- Determine mileage between two cities
- Then, multiply by cost/mile for the origin and
destination zone - Cost from Zone A to B not the same as Zone B to A
36UPS 2nd day by noon 30319 to 22201
37UPS 5 pounds30319 to 22201
- Next day by 830 AM US57.02
- Next day by 1030 AM US29.32
- Next day by 300 PM US25.54
- 2nd day by Noon US12.74
- By end of 2nd day US11.43
- By end of 3rd day US7.70
- Ground US4.71
38Frugal customers are taking the air out of
express delivery (WSJ,6/18/02)
- Express delivery is a US25 billion a year
business in the US - Dominated by FedEx and UPS
- Packages are moved by air and ground
- Typical ground delivery brings in about US6
- Typical air delivery brings in about US13
39Frugal customers are taking the air out of
express delivery (WSJ,6/18/02)
- FedEx, UPS and Airborne have spent millions over
the past few years to make their ground
deliveries as reliable and high-tech as their air
counterparts - Shipments lt500 miles will get there by the end of
next day by ground
40Frugal customers are taking the air out of
express delivery (WSJ,6/18/02)
- Boston to New York, 214 miles
- UPS charges US19.14 by 1030 AM next-day
- Air
- UPS charges US4.74 by end of next-day
- Most likely by truck
41Frugal customers are taking the air out of
express delivery (WSJ,6/18/02)
- About 1/3rd of last years packages marked Air
never saw the inside of an airplane - So says U.S. Xpress
- They have a contract with the major airfreight
carriers to haul by truck
42LTL Freight Rates
- CNF
- Class 50, 55, 60, , 100, 110, , 400, 500
- 2000 pounds shipped from 30319 to 22201
- Class 50 costs US36.29/100 pounds
- Class 100 costs US63.87/100 pounds
- Class 500 costs US319.34/100 pounds
- So, 2000 pounds of Class 100 shipped from Atlanta
to Washington would cost 1277.40
43LTL classes
- Depend on
- Density
- Difficulty in handling
- Liability of carrier
44Mileage estimation
- Straight line distance (Dab) between a and b
- Approximation
45Example
- ATL is at lat 33.64 and lon -84.44
- DCA is at lat 38.85 and lon -77.04
- So the approximate straight line distance is
- 69 SQRT(-84.4477.04)2 (33.64-38.85)2
- Or, 624 miles
- The approximate road distance is 624r
- Or, 711 miles where r, the circuitry factor, is
1.14 in the continental US
46Example
- Note
- Mapquest says the distance is 642 miles
47Mileage estimation
- To account for the earths curvature over longer
distances use
48Facility costs
- Warehouses and DCs
- Handling costs
- Labor and utilities
- Proportional to the flow of goods
- Fixed costs
- Capital costs, administration
- Not proportional to the flow of goods
49Facility costs
- Warehouses and DCs
- Storage costs
- Inventory holding costs
- Proportional to average inventory level
- Inventory turnover ratio (l)
- (Annual sales)/(Average inventory level)
- Or, Average inventory level (Annual sales)/l
50Facility size
- Warehouse or DC must be sized for the maximum,
not the average - Maximum inventory level
- 2(Average inventory level)
- Approximation
- But, space must be left for aisles, material
handling systems, place to put an empty pallet - So, use a factor of 3 (rather than 2)
51Facility size
- Annual flow through the warehouse 1000 units
- Turnover ratio 10
- Average inventory level 100
- Size of unit 20 square feet
- Square feet required 100203 6000
52Facility location problem
- Consider
- Geographical conditions
- Infrastructure condition
- Natural resources
- Labor availability
- Taxation
- Public interest
53Facility location problem
- A limited number of locations will meet all of
the considerations - Facility location problems are generally
difficult to solve
54Complexity increases with
- Number of customers
- Number of products
- Number of possible facility locations
- Number of facilities to be located
55Network design problems
- Much easier to solve
- Several products are produced at several plants
- Plants may have a limited capacity stated
- There is a known demand for each customer
- Transshipment may be permitted through DCs
- There may be an upper bound on total throughput
at the DCs
56Solution techniques
- Mathematical
- Heuristics
- A good solution
- Not necessarily optimal
- Exact
- Optimal, i.e., least cost
- Simulation
- To evaluate a specified design
57Problem statement
- Single product
- Plant p1 has unlimited capacity
- Plant p2 has an annual capacity of 60 units
- The plants have the same production cost
- Warehouses w1 and w2 have the same handling cost
- Customers with demands c150, c2100 and c350
- Distribution costs shown on the following slide
58Distribution costs
59Heuristic 1
- w2 dominates w1 for costs to supply c1, c2, and
c3 - Thus, choose w2 to supply c1, c2, and c3
- Distribute the maximum from p2
- Set p2 60
- Then, p1 provides (5010050) - 60 140
- Total cost (250) (1100) (250)
(5140) (260) 1120
60Heuristic 2
- Consider inbound and outbound costs for each path
- p1 to w1 to c1 costs 0 3 3
- p1 to w2 to c1 costs 5 2 7
- p2 to w1 to c1 costs 4 3 7
- p2 to w2 to c1 costs 2 2 4
- means lowest cost
61Heuristic 2
- Consider inbound and outbound costs for each path
- p1 to w1 to c2 costs 0 4 4
- p1 to w2 to c2 costs 5 1 6
- p2 to w1 to c2 costs 4 4 8
- p2 to w2 to c2 costs 2 1 3
- means lowest cost
62Heuristic 2
- Consider inbound and outbound costs for each path
- p1 to w1 to c3 costs 0 5 5
- p1 to w2 to c3 costs 5 2 7
- p2 to w1 to c3 costs 4 5 9
- p2 to w2 to c3 costs 2 2 4
- means lowest cost
63Heuristic 2
- Consider c1
- Assign 50 from p1 to w1 to c1
- Cost 350 150
- Consider c2
- Assign 60 from p2 to w2 to c2 (max 60)
- Cost 360 180
- Assign 40 from p1 to w1 to c2 (2nd lowest)
- Cost 440 160
64Heuristic 2
- Consider c3
- Assign 50 from p1 to w1 to c3 (p2 maxed)
- Cost 550 250
- Total cost 150160180250 740
65Optimization
- Uses linear programming
- Optimal 740
- Same as Heuristic 2
- But, this does not always happen
- Many computer codes are available
- Real problems are much more complex
- They require integer programming
- Very difficult to solve
66Transportation simplex solution
67What is a feasible solution and how much does it
cost?
68BFS using NW corner rule US640
69How do we know if this solution is optimal?
70Compute ui and vj values
- For all basic variables
- u1 0
- u1 v1 3
- etc.
- Compute ui and vj values
- v1 3
- v2 2
- etc.
71Compute shadow prices
- For non-basic variables
- sp13 u1 v3 - c13 -2
- Any shadow prices that are lt 0, ignore
- If all shadow prices are lt 0, optimality has been
reached - Allocate as much as possible to cell with maximum
sp - sp21 sp32 2
722nd iteration US580
733rd iteration US540
744th iteration US525
755th iteration US495
766th iteration is optimal US475
77Simulation models
- Mathematical optimization models are static
- Average or annual demand
- Simulation models are dynamic
- Characterize performance for a given design
- Simulation model may include
- Trace driven inputs
- Various inventory policies
- Material handling systems
78Simulation models
- Demo of AutoMod material handling simulation
79Simulation models
- Take time to build
- Take time to run
80The reject-retooling industry
- Read the article Happy returns Heres what
happens to Many lovely gifts after Santa rides
off WSJ, 12/26/01 - Perform an economic analysis
- From the reject-retoolers perspective
- From the manufacturers perspective
- From the technicians perspective
- Be sure to include all logistics costs
- Make assumptions if necessary
81End