Observation: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Observation:

Description:

... Rudder/Speed Brake Hydraulic Valve Module at Moog, the Rudder channel D bypass ... Unbypassed channel failure results in A 3-on-1 force fight which is an ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: george112
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Observation:


1
  • Observation
  • During the acceptance testing of the Rudder/Speed
    Brake Hydraulic Valve Module at Moog, the Rudder
    channel D bypass solenoid valve failed to
    energize
  • Concern
  • Inability to bypass a failed servo valve in
    flight
  • Discussion
  • RSB HVM S/N006 was sent to Moog for repair due to
    power spool stop being out of its end cap
    restricting movement of the power valve
  • Unit was repaired by replacing the old stops with
    vented stops with tightest fit stop/end cap
  • S/N006 HVM Rudder channel D bypass solenoid valve
    failed the pull-in test requirement of the ATP

2
  • Actions Taken
  • Failed solenoid valve was removed from the power
    valve assembly
  • Good solenoid valve from S/N010 HVM (10 year old)
    was tested and validated the test equipment
  • S/N006 HVM solenoid valve was then tested, and
    failed the pull-in requirement
  • Current to the solenoid coil was increased to
    maximum allowable value
  • Solenoid valve exhibited a small amount of
    leakage indicating small armature movement
  • Disassembly of the failed solenoid valve revealed
    that the ID of the pole piece o-ring was damaged
  • O-ring particles were found between the pole
    piece and the armature, restricting armature
    movement
  • Removed o-ring particles and changed all o-rings
    with new ones and re-tested the solenoid valve
  • Valve passed all ATP requirements

3
DISASSEMBLY OF THE FAILED SOLENOID VALVE FROM RSB
HVM S/N006
O-RING PARTICLES FOUND BETWEEN POLE PIECE AND
ARMATURE
DAMAGED POLE PIECE O-RING
4
  • Actions Taken (Cont)
  • Tear down and inspection of three other solenoid
    valves from the S/N006 HVM (21 year old) revealed
    only debris on 2 of the solenoids, the third
    solenoid had similar damage as the failed unit
    but no particles
  • Review of the solenoid valve drawings revealed
    that there was a drawing change which modified
    the pole piece in June of 1979 by adding a
    groove/relief for the o-ring
  • Design change was because of the problems with
    meeting the drop out voltage requirements of the
    ATP
  • Review of the build papers revealed that all
    OV-103 actuators incorporate the new design
    except for engine 1 Yaw actuator
  • All o-rings recovered from the disassembled
    solenoid valves were examined by Boeing Materials
    and Processes
  • All o-rings show compression set
  • O-ring hardness ranges from 80 to 88 (requirement
    for new o-rings is 60-85)
  • 12 out of 16 O-rings inspected meet all
    specification requirements
  • No degradation due to age was noticed on any of
    the O-rings

5
O-ring Most likely pinched
O-ring particles
Original Design Without O ring groove
Modified Design with recessed groove is less
likely to pinch O ring
Servo Bypass Solenoid
6
  • Actions Taken (Cont)
  • Dimensional analysis of the o-ring groove
    revealed
  • Pole piece o-rings have formed a square shape
    cross section after being in the groove for 12 to
    21 years
  • Original o-ring width was .070 in diameter and
    round
  • O-ring recovered from the solenoid valves look
    almost square in cross section and measure
    .06X.08
  • Original groove dimensions are .045X.085
  • 1979 design change groove dimensions are
    .045X.095
  • Parker O-ring recommends .050X.095 groove
  • Pole piece and sleeve dimensional checks (at
    Moog) are complete and meet drawing requirements

7
21 year old valve HVM006
12 year old valve HVM010
8
  • Risk Assessment
  • Solenoid valve failure to energize is criticality
    1R3
  • Bypass function is required to isolate any
    channel failure in an aerosurface or TVC actuator
    subsystem
  • Unbypassed channel failure results in A 3-on-1
    force fight which is an acceptable operational
    mode
  • Actuator system is vulnerable to next (third)
    failure on another channel of the same actuator
  • Flight rule 8.1.3-8 requires FCS channels be
    placed in override for the three remaining good
    channels
  • Third failure must be identified by ground
    monitoring and isolated manually

9
  • Risk Assessment(continued)
  • Worse case flight condition (three failure case)
  • One channel fails hardover
  • Channel Remains Unbypassed due to solenoid
    failure
  • Second Channel fails hardover in same polarity
  • Condition Results in 2-on-2 force fight
  • Following ground call crew must place FCS channel
    switch back to auto to bypass second channel
    failure and restore actuator control
  • Bypass function is verified each flight during
    ground turnaround and during Ops 8 FCS Checkout

10
  • Acceptable for STS-92 Flight
  • Servo valve bypass solenoid valve criticality is
    1R3
  • All OV-103 actuators incorporate the new design
    with the o-ring relief/groove, except for engine
    1 Yaw actuator
  • OV-103 has successfully passed all OMRSD testing
    which include the servo bypass solenoid check
  • This O-ring installation is unique to the bypass
    solenoid valve and is not found anywhere else in
    the actuators
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com