Harnischfeger - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Harnischfeger

Description:

... you think investors will 'see through' these changes? Harnischfeger ... Investors see through? ... Stock market may or may not see through these managements. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2922
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: NCSU1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Harnischfeger


1
Harnischfeger
2
Harnischfeger
  • We recommend the stock of Harnischfeger
    Corporation for purchase in speculative accounts
    because we expect the company to report a modest
    profit this year and untaxed earnings of 3 per
    share in 1985, following ten years of
    deteriorating financial statements and two years
    of large losses. Earnings power, assuming a
    sustained recovery of the companys markets,
    could be 4.00-6.00 per share in the 1986-1987
    time period. The Harnischfeger stock is selling
    at less than three times these peak earnings
    (were they taxed) and at a slight discount to
    book value.

3
Harnischfeger
4
Harnischfeger
  • What was responsible for Harnischfegers turn
    around?
  • Identify all the accounting policy changes and
    accounting estimates that Harnischfeger made
    during 1984. Estimate, as accurately as possible,
    the effect of these changes on the companys 1984
    reported profits.

5
Harnischfeger
  • Accounting Changes
  • Depreciation method add 11M
  • Depreciation estimate add 3.2M
  • Pension gain rate of return assumption for
    pension add 3.9M and 0.1M
  • LIFO liquidation add 2.4M
  • Provision for doubtful accounts add 2.6M

6
Harnischfeger
  • Harder to determine for these changes
  • Fiscal year change for subsidiary 15 months in
    1984, insignificant change to net income, sales
    increase by 5.4M
  • RD expense reduced expenditures to below Kobe
    reimbursement
  • Included sales from Kobe Steel why? Help build
    topline

7
Harnischfeger
  • What do you think are the motives of
    Harnischfegers management in making the changes
    in its financial reporting policies?
  • Do you think investors will see through these
    changes?

8
Harnischfeger
  • Incentives
  • Boost stock price to raise new capital
  • Meet earnings targets for compensation
  • Avoid violating debt covenants
  • Improve image with customers, suppliers, etc.
  • Internal pricing tied to external reporting
    numbers. Accelerated depreciation makes cost
    appear too high.

9
Harnischfeger
  • Investors see through?
  • Considerable evidence in finance and accounting
    that capital markets are generally efficient
  • For stock prices to reflect reality in an
    unbiased manner, not necessary to have everyone
    see through marginal investors are the price
    setter.

10
Harnischfeger
  • From the management side - why manage earnings
  • Investors didnt adjust their original
    conservative accounting
  • Unpleasant experience with debt covenant
  • Interaction between mgmt accounting and external
    accounting.

11
Harnischfeger
  • Harnischfeger managements perspective on
    earnings management
  • In accounting there is no such thing as absolute
    truth. The same underlying reality can be
    accounted for using a range of assumptions. The
    earlier philosophy of this company was to choose
    the conservative alternative whenever there was a
    choice. Now we have decided to change this. We
    would like to tell the world that we are alive
    and well. We wish to tell the truth but do not
    want to be overly conservative in doing so.

12
Harnischfeger
  • Harnischfeger managements perspective on
    earnings management
  • As a company you have to put the best foot
    forward if you want to raise capital, convince
    customers that you are a viable company, and
    attract talented people to work for the company.
    I feel that the financial reporting should help
    rather than hinder the implementation of our
    operating strategy. In my opinion, the changed
    accounting format highlights the effectiveness of
    our strategy better than the old policies do.

13
Harnischfeger
  • Harnischfeger managements perspective on
    earnings management
  • When the outside world compares our financial
    performance with that of other companies, they
    may or may not take the time and effort to
    untangle the effects of the differences in
    financial policies that various companies follow.
    My own belief is that people adjust for the
    obvious things like one-time gains and losses but
    have difficulty in adjusting for ongoing
    differences. In any case, these adjustments
    impose a cost on the user.

14
Harnischfeger
  • Harnischfeger managements perspective on
    earnings management
  • If people adjust for the differences in
    accounting policies when they compare us with
    other companies, then it should not matter
    whether we follow conservative or liberal
    policies. But suppose they do not adjust. Then
    clearly we are better off following the more
    liberal policies than conservative policies. I am
    not sure whether people make the adjustments or
    not, but either way we wish to present an
    optimistic version of the picture and let people
    figure out what to do with the numbers.

15
Harnischfeger
  • Assess the companys future prospects given your
    insights and the information in the case on the
    companys turnaround strategy.

16
Harnischfeger SCF
17
Harnischfeger
  • Assessing their turnaround strategy
  • Changes in top management
  • Cost reductions to lower the companys breakeven
    point
  • Reorientation of the companys business
  • Restructuring the companys finances to
    facilitate the implementation of the
    reorientation strategy

18
Harnischfeger
  • Subsequent events
  • 1985
  • Changed accounting for the cost of duration
    patterns and tooling, from expensing to
    capitalizing
  • Reported a net profit of 0.74 per share for
    fiscal 1985. The accounting changes described
    above contributed 0.24 per share to the reported
    profits.
  • Raised 147M by issuing preferred stock.

19
Harnischfeger
  • Subsequent events
  • 1986
  • Mr. Goessel was appointed the chairman and CEO of
    the company Mr. Grade as president and COO. Mr.
    Goessels previous appointment was president and
    COO and Mr. Grade CFO.
  • Acquired Beloit corporation for 175 million in
    cash. Later sold 20 of the stake for 60 million
    in cash.

20
Harnischfeger
  • Subsequent events
  • 1986
  • Report a 1.14 per share loss (2.15 profit from
    continuing operations 4.45 loss from
    discontinued operations and 1.16 per share from
    the adoption of new pension accounting rules.)

21
Harnischfeger
22
Harnischfeger
  • Wrap up
  • Managers exert significant discretion in choosing
    accounting method and estimates.
  • These choices affect the reported financial
    statements.
  • Various incentives exist for earnings management
  • Understanding these incentives is essential for
    evaluating current performance and assessing
    future aspects of a firm.
  • Stock market may or may not see through these
    managements.
  • A sophisticated and diligent analyst can uncover
    more information than average investors.

23
Corporate Governance and SOX
  • Effect on Auditors
  • Auditors must register with PCAOB
  • Annual quality inspections every year for
    registrants that audit more than 100 issuers
  • Lead and reviewing partners must rotate off every
    5 years
  • no movement by auditor into CEO/CFO/Chief
    Accountant position for two years

24
Corporate Governance and SOX
  • New audit committee requirements
  • members must be independent
  • financial expert financially literate
  • responsible for appointment, compensation and
    oversight of independent auditors

25
Corporate Governance and SOX
  • Management assessment of internal controls,
    Section 404
  • Management is responsible for Internal controls
  • annual assessment of effectiveness (section 404)
  • Benefit - fewer misleading and fraudulent
    financial statements assuming...

26
Corporate Governance and SOX
  • Cost vs. Benefit
  • Cost from Foley and Lardner 2005 study
  • average cost of being public in 2004 increased
    33 over 2003 for a company with annual revenue
    under 1B 223 in total since SOX
  • for companies with revenues over 1B cost of
    being public 14.3M, 1M in lost productivity

27
Corporate Governance and SOX
  • Cost from Foley and Lardner 2005 study
  • Small cap audit fees rose 84 to 1.04M in 2004
    from 2003
  • Mid-Cap audit fees rose 92 to 2.18M in 2004
    from 2003
  • Large cap audit fees rose 55 to 4.81M in 2004
    from 2003
  • Self reported results

28
Corporate Governance and SOX
  • Corporate Responsibility for financial reports
  • CEO CFO must certify
  • They reviewed the financial reports
  • report (to their knowledge) does not contain any
    untrue statement or omit material information
  • Disclosures present operations and financial
    condition fairly
  • Internal controls were evaluated and are
    effective
  • Have disclosed material deficiencies and frauds
    to auditors

29
Corporate Governance and SOX
  • Limitations on auditor services
  • Specified non-audit services cannot be provided
    to client
  • Financial information systems design and
    implementation
  • Investment management securities services
  • Legal, actuarial and expert services unrelated to
    the audit
  • tax preparation allowed, tax strategies not
    allowed

30
Corporate Governance and SOX
  • Limitations on auditor services
  • Cost vs. Benefit
  • Raises the cost of both audits and other services
    as it reduces the economies of scale and
    knowledge enjoyed by the auditor
  • There is no evidence that auditor performing
    other services led to substandard auditing
    (although a lot of anecdotal evidence, but is
    this what we should base policy on...)

31
Corporate Governance and SOX
  • How big was the problem?
  • First point - not all restatements are a result
    of fraudulent information or inadequate audits
  • GAO study of restatements 1997-2002 found on
    average 169 restatements per year
  • restatements have increased in recent years,
    but probably due changes in rules conservatism
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com