R. James Rockwell, Jr. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

R. James Rockwell, Jr.

Description:

... beam long enough - without penetration - so that the operator ... Penetration (NMP) occurs would be determined: ... Then penetration occurs almost immediately! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: jimroc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: R. James Rockwell, Jr.


1
A LASER PROTECTIVE BARRIER TESTING METHOD
  • R. James Rockwell, Jr.
  • ROCKWELL LASER INDUSTRIES

2
LASER BARRIERS AS A CONTROL
  • As the scope of laser controls more frequently
  • include an area barrier as a means of either
  • temporary or permanent protection, it
  • becomes important to determine if the barrier
  • can provide the protection that is needed.
  • Simply stated...will the barrier withstand the
  • laser beam long enough - without penetration -
  • so that the operator can turn off the laser or
  • take other actions to avoid the beam?

3
TYPICAL LASER BARRIER USE
Laser barrier used in a laboratory facility as a
room divider to establish
a temporary laser controlled area
4
ANSI Z136.1 RECOMMENDS
  • 4.6.4 Laser Protective Barriers and Curtains,
  • (Class 3b or Class 4).
  • A blocking barrier, or screen, or curtain which
    can block or filter the laser beam at the
    entryway should be used inside the controlled
    area to prevent the laser light from exiting the
    area at levels above the applicable MPE level.

5
ANSI Z136.1 RECOMMENDS
  • 4.6.4 Laser Protective Barriers and Curtains,
  • (Class 3b or Class 4).
  • Such laser barriers shall be specifically
    selected to withstand direct and diffusely
    scattered beams. In this case, the barrier shall
    exhibit a damage threshold for beam penetration
    for a specified exposure time commensurate with
    the total hazard evaluation for the facility and
    specific application. (See appendix C).

6
ANSI Z136.1 RECOMMENDS
  • 4.6.4 Laser Protective Barriers and Curtains,
  • (Class 3b or Class 4).
  • Important in the selection of the barrier are the
    factors of flammability and decomposition
    products of the barrier material. It is essential
    that the barrier not support combustion or
    release toxic fumes following a laser exposure.

7
A METHOD TO RATE LASER BARRIERS
  • One testing protocol would be to establish
  • that no measurable beam penetration occurs
  • For a maximum incident irradiance level
  • For a pre-selected exposure time (10-100 seconds
    have been suggested)
  • For a range of beam sizes

8
A METHOD TO RATE LASER BARRIERS
  • The irradiance level where No Measurable beam
  • Penetration (NMP) occurs would be determined
  • From this data, the highest exposure where
    penetration does not occur would be established
    as the Penetration Threshold Level (PTL)
  • The PTL could then provide a rating of whether
    such a barrier would withstand a specific "real
    world" laser exposure.

9
A METHOD TO RATE LASER BARRIERS
  • The PTL may be laser parameter dependent
  • Previous studies have shown that laser exposures
    of some barrier designs yeild a PTL that is
    dependent on the laser beam size.
  • This raises the question as to what beam diameter
    size is the most appropriate in effecting the PTL
    rating - or - whether a range of diameters may be
    chosen?

10
A METHOD TO RATE LASER BARRIERS
  • At this time there is no testing protocol that
    has
  • been established to rate the laser barriers
  • The proposed protocol suggests to establish the
    PTL's for 100 seconds for a range of irradiance
    values and beam spot sizes, and...
  • To determine whether different PTL's are obtained
    using CW, pulsed and repetitively pulsed, and...
  • The PTL's at different laser wavelengths

11
A METHOD TO RATE LASER BARRIERS
  • This report will cover only
  • Exposures for two CW lasers for a range of
    irradiance values and beam spot sizes
  • The two laser wavelengths are
  • NdYAG at 1064 nm
  • Argon at 514 nm
  • The other factors must await yet further
    testing...

12
A METHOD TO RATE LASER BARRIERS
  • Thus, the testing reported here was done so-as-to
    determine the highest laser beam irradiance for
    which no measureable penetration occurred for a
    total exposure of 100 seconds for beam spot size
    diameter ranging from 4 - 6 mm.

13
A METHOD TO RATE LASER BARRIERS
  • It is argued that during an accidental
    over-exposure condition, the laser would be
    turned-off or the beam otherwise terminated
    within the 100 second time factor

14
TYPICAL LASER BARRIER TESTING
Laser barrier test showing various test spots
at different
radiant exposure levels
15
Laser Protective BarrierPenetration Threshold
levels for four different barriers
NdYAG Laser _at_ 1064 nm Argon Laser _at_ 514 nm
for 100 s.
PTL 300 W/cm2 200 W/cm2 100 W/cm2
Irradiance (Wcm2)
PTL criteria set at a 5 mm beam diameter
2 W/cm2
Laser Beam Diameter (mm)
16
A SUMMARY OFTHE BARRIER TESTING
  • The results showed
  • The multi-layered laser barriers designs that
    were tested are usually not penetrated until a
    critical irradiance level is reached for a given
    beam size...
  • Then penetration occurs almost immediately!
  • Otherwise, the barrier would withstand the
    exposure for at least 100 seconds - if not
    significantly longer.

17
CONCLUSION...
  • The laser barrier testing protocol used
  • appears to provide the desired end point...
  • A rating method for laser barriers that indicates
    the maximum exposure level where no measurable
    beam penetration occurs, ...and
  • The PTL value seems to provide a very simple
    rating which directly relates to typical real
    world" laser exposure conditions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com