3.1 Names of God in the O.T. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

3.1 Names of God in the O.T.

Description:

3.1.0.1 The Significance of Names in the Biblical World ... The emphasis of the name is one the connection between this deity and some ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:151
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: hebrewscri
Category:
Tags: god | names

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 3.1 Names of God in the O.T.


1
3.1 Names of God in the O.T.
  • BIB566 OTTheology

2
3.1.0.1 The Significance of Names in the Biblical
World
  • 1. Name and Reality Gen 2.19 Enuma Elish and
    the before of things named.
  • 2. Name and Personality 1 Sam 25.25 (Nabal) Gen
    27.36 (Jacob) I know you by name (Ex 33.17)
    Ps 30.27 20.1.
  • 3. Name and Presence Ex 20.24, Deut 4.7 (Where
    God's name is proclaim, God is said to be
    present.)?
  • 4. Pronouncing Names as a Legal Act Psa
    49.1112 Isa 4.1 Jer 15.16 I Kgs 8.43 Amos
    9.12

3
3.1.0.1 The Significance of Names in the Biblical
World
  • ". . . it is a common-place of Hebrew thought
    that a name may say something about the character
    of its bearer. It is therefore inherently likely
    that the use of the name of God was, at least
    sometimes, a significant theological issue for
    the writers of the Pentateuch. It is also
    unsurprising that a study of the name of God,
    together with various other designations and
    titles, has been much used down the centuries by
    Jew and Christians alike as a traditional method
    of considering theological questions about the
    character and nature of God." Moberly

4
3.1.0.1 Names not Enough?
  • ". . . the biblical God is rendered as a
    character and his acts are represented as part of
    a dramatic setting which enlists the reader's
    participation." Patrick
  • "In spite of a certain reluctance to engage him
    as such, God is, I assert, the most compelling
    character in the book. . . . I propose a reading
    in which we center our attention on the character
    God as he emerges from our engagement with the
    text of Genesis. . . . we do not engage him as
    someone in our world other than as we construct
    him from what we find in the story-world of the
    narrative" Humphreys

5
3.1.0.2 Exodus 6.2-3 3.14-15
  • A I am Yahweh.
  • B And I made myself known to Abraham, to Isaac,
    and to Jacob as El Shaddai.
  • A' And my name is Yahweh.
  • B' Did I not make myself known to them?
  • "I am the God of your fathers, God of Abraham,
    God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob."

6
3.1.0.2 Exodus 6.2-3 3.14-15
  • "First, as in Exod 3.13-15, a distinction is made
    between what God says to Moses and what Moses is
    to say to the people of Israel." Moberly
  • "Second, the thrust of God's reassurance to Moses
    is to give him reasons for the past to trust in
    God in the present. . . . the cumulative effect
    of God's appeal to what God has done in the past,
    that is, the continuity of the making and
    remembering of the covenant (64-5) with the
    divine self-revelation as El Shaddai (63a)."
    Moberly

7
3.1.0.2 Joshua 2414
  • Now therefore, fear Yahweh and serve Him in
    integrity and truth. Put away the gods which your
    fathers served beyond the Euphrates and in Egypt
    and serve Yahweh.
  • "Taken together these passages do suggest that a
    genuinely new name of God, Yahweh, was vouchsafed
    to Moses. And this is the way the ancient
    translators took it." Wenham

8
Preliminary Observation
  • 1. "In the patriarchal narratives a number of
    names of persons and places are mentioned that
    have long attracted scholarly interest Abram,
    Sarai, Jacob, Laban, Serug, Nahor, and Terah . .
    . ." Mettinger

9
Preliminary Observation
  • 2. "...the matter of the ethnic origins of the
    patriarchs. There is a well-established tradition
    that associates the patriarchs with the Arameans
    and that also manifests itself in the texts about
    Jacob, since he is said to be related to the
    Arameans through his mother, Rebecca. Rebecca was
    the daughter of the Aramean Bethuel and the
    sister of Laban, likewise referred to as Aramean
    (cf. Gen 25.20 28.5 31.20, 24). A text from the
    D-literature records that a wandering Aramean
    was my father and he went down into Egypt (Deut
    26.5)." Mettinger

10
Preliminary Observation
  • 3. Although Jerusalem and Zion played a major
    role in the cult during the monarchy there is no
    evidence of either in these pre-monarchical
    period texts. There is also no major evidence in
    this literature that points to the later conflict
    with the worship of the Canaanite Baal and
    depicted in the monarchical period.

11
Wenham's Chart
12
Wenham's Chart
  • "According to Genesis God revealed himself to the
    patriarchs under various different names, and the
    patriarchs used a variety of divine epithets in
    their prayers. Abraham knew of Yahweh, Elohim, El
    Elyon, El Shaddai, El Roi, and El Olam. Isaac
    knew of Yahweh, Elohim and El Shaddai. Jacob knew
    of Yahweh, Elohim, El Bethel, Padah Yishaq (Fear
    or relative of Isaac and El Shaddai." Wenham

13
Wenham's Chart
  • "First, in all three cycles El Shaddai only
    occurs in the dialogue, never in the narrative
    framework of the stories. This suggests that at
    least this term is an early element in the
    tradition."
  • "Secondly, in the Joseph cycle Yahweh is used
    only in the narrative framework, never in the
    speeches within the story. There, El Shaddai or
    Elohim is consistently used. . . ."
  • "Thirdly, and this apparently contradicts the
    second point, in the Abraham cycles Yahweh and
    Elohim are found both in the narrative framework
    and in the dialogue. . . ."

14
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 1. The God of my father Gen 31.5, 42 Ex 15.2
    18.4
  • 2. The God of your(2ms) father Gen 46.3
    49.25 50.17 Ex 3.6
  • 3. The God of your(2mp) father" Gen 31.29
    43.23
  • 4. The God of their father Gen 31.53
  • 5. The God of your fathers Ex 3.13, 15, 16
  • 6. The God of their fathers Ex 4.5
  • 7. The God of Abraham Gen 24.12, 27, 42, 48
    26.24 28.13 31.53
  • 8. The God of Isaac Gen 46.1

15
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 9. The God of Abraham, your father, and the God
    of Isaac Gen 28.13
  • 10. The God of my father Abraham and the God of
    my father Isaac Gen 32.910
  • 11. The God of your father(s), and God of
    Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob Ex 3.6, 15, 16 4.5

16
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • Albrecht Alt, Gott der Vater gt The God of the
    Fathers, Essays on Old Testament History and
    Religion
  • 1. Nameless First, he noted that the type of
    divine designation itself is strange. It seems as
    if we have a nameless god, a god who had no
    proper name as such. This god is instead referred
    to in terms that speak of a connection to a given
    individual my father's God, Abrahams God,
    and so forth. . . . The emphasis of the name is
    one the connection between this deity and some
    individual mortal, whom Alt assumed was the head
    of the family or tribal group." Mettinger

17
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • Later scholars like Lewy and F. M. Cross have
    argued that the patriarchal gods were not really
    anonymous.
  • "Cross maintains that the patriarchs worshipped
    the high god of Canaan, namely El. In other words
    the passages which call the God of the
    patriarchs, El Shaddai, El Elyon, El Olam, etc.,
    are not secondary later elements . . . . Phrases
    like 'the God of Abraham' . . . to bring out the
    special relationship that existed between the
    Abraham and his God, El Shaddai." Wenham

18
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 2. Siteless Second, unlike so many deities, the
    God of the fathers is not bound to the locality
    where his temple is situated. . . . he is also,
    in a manner of speaking, siteless - not bound
    to any given locality. . . . If this presumption
    is correct, then we would have in the God the
    fathers an example of interplay between way of
    life and understanding of God. . . . The
    patriarchal way of life was characterized by the
    nomadic lifestyle for the nomads it was a
    feature of their existence that God was not
    confined to any particular geographic location.
    Their god was a god who went with his own.
    Mettinger

19
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • Characteristic Features of the God of the
    Patriarchs
  • 1. Preliminary Observations
  •   1.1 The non-cultic character is predominant.
    Therefore sacred places are not too important.
  •   1.2 Focus is on the peaceful presence of God
    in contrast to the Divine Warrior image of the
    Exodus, Conquest and Monarchical period.
  • 1.3 The divine promises that are given to the
    patriarchs are unconditional in nature.
  •   1.4 There is a general lack of interest on the
    subject of sin. The connection between sin and
    guilt/punishment is almost wholly absent.

20
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 2. The Personal God
  •  2.1 Ortsgebundenkeit (local connections of
    ancient religions)
  •   2.1.1The gods of the ancient Near East were,
    to a large extent, associated with particular
    places and temples. Marduk was worshiped in
    Babylon and Sin, in Haran. Mettinger
  •   2.1.2 Early Israelite fears reflected in Ex
    17.7 may indicate that they carried this same
    baggage. Even Moses needs to be assured in this
    light (Ex 33.14-15).

21
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 2.2 Personal Names with theophoric elements
  • 2.2.1 ????, father ?????, brother ???,
    uncle
  • 2.2.2 A-ram gt Jeho-ram Abi-melech gt Eli-melech
    Abi-ezer gt Eli-ezer
  • 2.2.3 Tigay Fowler have argued that from the
    time of David YHWH is used in theophoric names in
    non-biblical artifacts, but De Moor has argued
    that the pre-Davidic biblical material tends to
    focus on El.
  • 2.2.4 See also Mark S. Smith who cautions on the
    use of theophanic name evidence.

22
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 2.3 Special Designations of the God of the
    fathers
  • 2.3.1 The Mighty One of Jacob ryba bqy Gen
    49.24 Isa 49.26 60.16 Ps 132.2, 5 and in Isa
    1.24 the ryba of Israel
  • 2.3.2 The Fear of Isaac dxp bqy Gen 31.42, 53
    Note The name means approximately the fear of
    Isaac, although this is hardly a fear
    experienced by Isaac, but rather a panic sent out
    by the God of the fathers to strike Isaac's
    enemies. The God of the fathers protects Isaac
    and his group.

23
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 2.3.3 These names, Jacobs ryba and Isaacs
    dxp have one major feature in common they speak
    of God in terms of a personal association with
    the chief of the tribal group he is a god who
    protects the group of his faithful." Mettinger

24
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 3. The Guarantor of the Promise
  • 3.1 Recent scholarly discussions
  •  3.1.1 Some prefer to, regard the promise texts
    as literary compositions the intention of which
    is to link disparate tradition complexes
    together. It has of course been observed that the
    promise of a great and numerous people arches all
    the way from Gen 12.1-2 to 46.3-4, connecting all
    that falls within its compass. Mettinger n.b.
    Westermann Rendtorff
  •  

25
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  •  3.1.2 Alt and Westermann argue that, it cannot
    be proved that the promise texts are an original
    element in the oldest tradition, but the promises
    deal with matters that would have been both
    appropriate and fitting for nomads of the
    patriarchal type. Mettinger

26
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 3.2 The Promise of Progeny (Son Gen 15.2-4
    16.11 17.15, 16, 19, 21 18.10, 14 21.1-2)?
  • 3.2.1 In Gen 18 it is the core of the text.
  • 3.2.2 The narrative of the promise of a son to
    Abraham and Sarah belongs to the substance of the
    Abraham stories which began by saying that Sarah
    was childless (11.30). Abraham saw a future only
    in the continuation of the family in a son....
    Westermann, Genesis 12-36, 282

27
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 3.2.3 In Gen 12-50 the promise of a son is
    confined to the Abraham stories, where it
    dominates accounts. Westermann, Promise to the
    Patriarchs, IDBSup
  • 3.2.4 In short, the promise is immediately
    relevant, and its fulfillment does not lie in the
    distant future. This supports the conclusion of
    the historical nature of the promise of a son.
    Mettinger

28
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 3.3 The Promise of the Land (12.1-3 13.14-17
    15.7-21)?
  • 3.3.1 Gen 15.7-21 In this passage Abraham is
    depicted solely as the recipient of the pact God
    solemnly pronounces his promise concerning the
    land, and the promise is accorded special
    emphasis via the ancient rite. Moreover, this
    rite states that God is willing to jeopardize his
    own existence in the event he should fail to keep
    his promise. With paradoxical sharpness the
    narrative describes God as the guarantor of his
    promise. Mettinger 

29
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 3.3.2The promise that Jacob would gain
    possession of the land is seen as a renewal of
    the promise to Abraham (Gen 26.3, 4 28.4 35.12
    50.24). Westermann, Promises to the
    Patriarchs, IDBSup
  •  3.3.3 In twenty-one passages in Deuteronomy the
    promise of the land is formulated as an oath and
    has the function of legitimizing the occupation
    of the land by the tribes. Westermann,
    Promises to the Patriarchs, IDBSup

30
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 3.4 The Promise of God's Presence (Gen 26.3, 24
    28.15 20 31.3 46.3 48.15, 21 50.24)?
  •  3.4.1 This promise is found only in chaps 26-50
    (sic). In 26.3, 24 it is made to Isaac, and
    elsewhere to Jacob. Just as the promise of a son
    is the dominant motif in chaps 12-25, this
    promise is dominant in chaps 26-50. Westermann,
    Promises to the Patriarchs, IDBSup
  •  Note however that Mettinger states, it also
    occurs in the Abraham stories (Gen 21.22) . . .
    . Mettinger
  •  

31
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 3.4.2 The Jacob cycle is set off by two nocturnal
    revelations in which the promise of God's
    presence I am with you, is central (Gen 28.15
    at Bethel en route from Beer-Sheba to Haran and
    Gen 46.3-4 at Beer-Sheba en route to Egypt)?
  •  3.4.3 Deus absconditus
  •  Gen 12.1 the land which I show you...
  •  Gen 20.13 when God caused me to wander from my
    fathers house i.e., ?????? being H-stem
    therefore rendered when God led me astray.

32
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 4. The Source of Blessing
  •  4.1 rb
  •  4.1.1 ...the semantic field of the notion of
    blessing is comprehended in Hebrew by a number
    of words, all of which are derived from the
    Hebrew root b-r-k. In the patriarchal narratives
    these words occur no less than eighty-two times.
    Mettinger
  •  4.1.2 The distinctive nature of the promise. An
    independent pronouncement of blessing has been
    preserved only in Gen 12.1-3. Here all the other
    promises are subordinated to that of blessing,
    while in all other passages the promise of
    blessing is made specific in, or is more fully
    developed by the promise of posterity.
    Westermann, Promises to the Patriarchs, IDBSup

33
3.1.1 The God of the Fathers
  • 4.2 In the Jacob narrative the blessing serves
    as a leimotiv. Mettinger
  • 4.2.1 Gen 27 the stolen blessing.
  • 4.2.2 Gen 31 blessing manifested as a shepherd
    working for his father-in-law.
  • 4.2.3 Gen 30.27 Laban to Jacob I have learned
    by divination that the Lord has blessed me
    because of you.
  • 4.2.4 Gen 32.26 Jacob says, I will not let you
    go unless you bless me.
  • 4.2.5 Gen 48 Jacob passes blessing to Josephs
    two sons. 

34
Wenham's Contrast with later Israelite Practices
  • "First, there is the use of the term El instead
    of Yahweh in divine revelation. From Mosaic times
    onward Yahweh was the characteristic
    self-designation of God. But in Genesis God
    usually reveals himself as E. . . . The
    exclusiveness, holiness, and strictness of the
    God of Exodus is absent from Genesis."

35
Wenham's Contrast with later Israelite Practices
  • "Secondly, the complete absence of Baal from the
    patriarchal tradition points to its antiquity. In
    the second half of the second millennium B.C.
    Baal took over from El as the leading god in the
    west Semitic pantheon, yet he is never mentioned
    in Genesis."
  • "A third feature distinguishing patriarchal
    religion is its unmediatedness. God spoke to the
    patriarchs directly in visions and dreams, and
    not through prophets."
  • "The final striking difference between the
    patriarchal period and the first-millennium scene
    is the non-mention of Jerusalem."
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com