Important Questions: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 5
About This Presentation
Title:

Important Questions:

Description:

Inherited fabrics: NE and NW older trends visible in Pre-C basement, but N ... Bigfoot receiver functions will be very valuable. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 6
Provided by: philwan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Important Questions:


1
  • Important Questions
  • Inherited fabrics NE and NW older trends visible
    in Pre-C basement, but N trends established 700
    Ma (important for edge of CO plateau).
  • What got reactivated? How important are inherited
    structures in future evolution? Where do the
    Pz-Mz terranes of central GB really start
    (isotopic boundaries quite variable)?
  • Do we really know the profile of the base of
    crust despite one or two profiles from the 1980s
    (or 70s)?
  • What is the relation between mantle velocity
    profiles and magmatic provinces? How has
    magmatism modified stress and structure?
  • What is the cause of the thick band of continuous
    seismicity just east of the Wasatch front?

2
Does the eastern GB show non-uniform extensional
geometries like the S Sierra, or is extension
generally uniform? Why does the western
(Lahontan) depression have thin crust but little
apparent upper crustal extension, whereas the
eastern GB is apparently well extended? Is the
eastern GB undergoing magmatic underplating/
inflation in places? What can vertical components
of deformation measured (from GPS, in a global
ref frame) do to resolve differences? Fundamental
at end of Earthscope to know geometry of Sierran
and Wasatch fronts. Was this the Andes before
collapse?
3
  • Solutions from Earthscope
  • Fabric Mid-scale lithospheric thickness
    variations may represent earlier strength
    variations. Perhaps anisotropy can help answer it
    but, in the crust esp., its a geophysical
    challenge?
  • Flexible array followup needed to trace deep
    geophysical structures toward the surface.
  • Crustal Profiles We really do not know profile
    of the base of crust except in limited areas.
    Bigfoot receiver functions will be very valuable.
    Expensive to address with reflection and areas
    need to be prioritized.
  • Margin seismicity, rifting Must establish mode
    of extension. Crustal thickness and rheology can
    determine contribution of GPE variation. Need
    better Eq locations to correlate seismicity with
    known faults or hidden detachments.

4
  • Magmatic provinces Should expect some
    correspondence between interpreted inherited
    fabric (velocity) and magmatic history and
    compositions. Need more work on plutonic
    complexes to better define isotopic (Prot./Pal.)
    provinces for correlation to subregional scale
    deformation.
  • General margin contrasts Despite some in the
    east, a big contrast in degree of shear in the
    west. 5-6 myr old in the west, so maybe two sides
    more similar at earlier times.
  • -Need to try to strip Lt. Cz sedimentary fill to
    restore pre-extensional differences. Contour map
    of depth to graben basement from gravity, perhaps
    jointly with seismics. Interest in basin profiles
    in urban areas in east and west, and Yucca Mtn,
    w.r.t. shaking and seismic hazard.
  • -Can combo experiments refute or verify contrast
    in extension/strike slip on the two sides of the
    GB?

5
  • Magmatic inflation, fluid movement Vertical
    components of deformation (from GPS, in a global
    ref frame) together with attenuation/bright spot/
    conductivity structure.
  • Self-Organization
  • Need agency partnerships with common purpose to
    fund expensive active source surveys.
  • Decide on an area to emphasize and determine
    which techniques will solve the questions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com