Waste Reception and Handling Plan WRHP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Waste Reception and Handling Plan WRHP

Description:

Part 1 : Amsterdam Port Authority. Geographical view ... (Velsen, Beverwijk, Zaandam and Amsterdam). Responsible regional organisation for: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: ICT31
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Waste Reception and Handling Plan WRHP


1
Waste Reception and Handling Plan (WRHP)
Henri van der Weide Amsterdam Port Authority
IAPHRiga 02-03-2006
2
Purpose of this presentation
  • Sharing information and experiences
  • Part 1 Amsterdam Port Authority
  • Geographical view
  • Organisation position of the port authority
  • Role/task in respect to the waste plan
  • Part 2 Waste Reception and Handling Plan
  • Legal backgrounds
  • Scope of WRHP and some definitions
  • Crucial elements of WRHP
  • Fee system
  • Experiences during last year
  • Evaluation changes for 2006

3
Part 1
  • Amsterdam Port Authority

4
The Netherlands and geographical position of the
Amsterdam Seaports
5
North Sea Canal Area Ports of Velsen, Beverwijk,
Zaandam and Amsterdam
6
Position Amsterdam Port Authority
  • Organisation structure of the Netherlands

Layer 1 Government and Ministries
Layer 2 Province/regions
Amsterdam Port Authority A municipal
organisation
Layer 3 Municipalities
7
Role/task of the Amsterdam port authority
  • On behalf of 4 municipal seaports in geographical
    area
  • (Velsen, Beverwijk, Zaandam and Amsterdam).
  • Responsible regional organisation for
  • Plan (WRHP) making, evaluating and updates
  • Capacity operational permits port reception
  • facilities (
    waste collectors)
  • Operational waste reports(receive and
  • store in
    data-system (ICT)
  • signals to others for enforcement
  • Financial cashing and paying
  • Reporting to government , and

8
No tasks of the Amsterdam port authority
  • Enforcement ships
  • task of Port State Control
  • Enforcement waste collectors (environmental
    permits)
  • task of Ministry of Environment
  • Enforcement waste processors (treatment and
    disposal)
  • task of Ministry of Environment

9
Part 2
  • Waste Reception and Handling Plan

10
Legal backgrounds
  • MARPOL
  • EU-Directive 2000/59/EC

11
Legal backgrounds MARPOL 73/78
  • International Convention for the Prevention of
    Pollution from Ships (IMO)

12
Contents of MARPOL 73/78
  • Categorisation of waste
  • Annex I oil
  • Annex II liquid chemicals
  • Annex III harmful substances in packaged form
  • Annex IV sewage
  • Annex V garbage
  • Construction regulations to prevent pollution
  • Discharging forbidden or under conditions
  • inside special areas
  • outside special areas
  • Obligation for seaports to have adequate
    reception facilities ( receiving annex I, II, IV
    and V)

13
Marine pollution also means coastal pollution
14
Legal backgrounds EU-directive
  • Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities
    for ship-generated waste and cargo residues

15
EU- directive 2000/59/EC
  • In force 28th of december 2002
  • In operation 01st of November 2004
  • Goal
  • Reducing (illegal) discharge of ships waste and
    cargo-residues
  • Improving availability and use of port reception
    facilities
  • Enhancing protection of marine environment
  • Domain Ships and Seaports

16
Scope EU-directive 2000/59/EC
  • Ports
  • Waste Plan- reception (collecting)
  • - handling (treatment/disposal)
  • Ships
  • Compulsory reporting procedure
  • Compulsory delivery of
  • Ships waste
  • Cargo residues
  • Compulsory indirect fee of minimal 30 of the
    cost for reception and handling of ships waste,
    use or no use (encouragement)

17
Scope ships to which this plan does apply
  • Obligations for all sea-going vessels, except
    governmental ships
  • Reporting
  • Discharge
  • Indirect fee, use or no use
  • Exemptions
  • Exemption for reporting separate fee-system
  • Fishing vessels and recreational craft ( less 12
    persons)
  • Exemption for reporting, indirect fee (and
    discharge)
  • Vessels in line traffic services (every 14 days)
    with contracts in port of call in this line
    traffic route
  • Non-discharge
  • Sufficient storage-capacity till next port of
    call
  • (point of particular interest for Brussels, as
    there is no EU-interpretation of this rule)

18
DefinitionsCargo-residues and Ships waste
Living quarters and engineroom
Cargo-area
19
Ships waste vs cargo-residues
  • Annex I liquid cargo-residues (slops)
  • Annex II liquid cargo-residues (slops)
  • Annex V dry cargo-residues e.g
  • Coal
  • Grain
  • Annex I (engineroom)
  • Sludge
  • Bilge
  • Waste Oil
  • Annex IV
  • Sewage
  • Annex V
  • Garbage/domestic waste
  • Food-residues
  • Plastic
  • Maintenance waste including small chemical waste
    (hazardous waste)
  • Cargo-associated waste e.g.dunnage

20
Crucial elements of waste reception and handling
plan(annex I of directive 2000/59/EC)
  • assessment of the need for port
  • reception facilities
  • description of procedures operational
  • proces
  • description of charging system (fees)

21
Assessment of the need for port reception
facilities (1)
  • How many calls ? Excluded
  • recreational craft less 12 passengers
  • fishing vessels
  • liners (definition ?)
  • Divided in categories.
  • choice of category / sub-category
  • GT-class / type of vessel / engine power etc.
  • Model for type and quantity of waste generated by
    all these vessels.
  • Result is needed maximum capacity at certain
    moment.

22
Number of calls(total 4045)
23
Assessment of the need for port reception
facilities (2)
  • Choice to be made
  • Fixed contracts with port reception facilities
  • Contract conditions
  • Limited number of port reception facilities
  • Free market principle
  • Permit/license needed from port authority
  • Quality criteria
  • No limitation in number of port reception
    facilities
  • Other model ?

24
Description of procedures operational proces
  • Central reporting point for vessels for waste
    reporting form (24 hours)
  • Invoice with fee to shipsagent
  • Delivery of waste, operational reporting by waste
    collector by telepone or VHF
  • Form to be signed by captain/waste collector
  • Copy of this form sent by waste collector to
    central reporting point with specifications about
    types of waste and quantities
  • Financial transactions by central reporting point
  • All actions to be recorded in ICT-system by
    central reporting point

25
Our new fee-system from 01/04/2006
  • General aspects
  • Indirect fee (30 encouragement)
  • Tariffs fixed for one year (evaluation)
  • Classification ships gross tonnage (5 classes)
  • Model for type/quantity of ship generated waste
    for each GT-class, based on experience figures
    from past year
  • Per GT-class
  • Actual discharge figures annex I
  • Average quantity in m3 number of vessels ( 6 )
  • Actual discharge figures annex V
  • Average quantity in m3 number of vessels (30 )
  • Annex IV waste excluded
  • Based on principle in out

26
Tariffs from 01/04/2006
  • Financial procedure
  • Port Authority will send invoice to agent.
  • Agent has to pay this fee.
  • Agent can choose max. two waste collectors, one
    for annex I and one for
  • annex V.
  • Waste collector already gives a reduction on
    invoice to agent (waste right
  • already deducted).
  • Waste collector sends declaration to Port
    Authority.
  • Port Authority will pay the waste collector up to
    the max. waste right.

27
Experiences in 2005
  • Amsterdam Port Authority

28
Experiences facts (1)
  • Number of waste reports above 95, contents of
    waste reports unreliable. Value of reports
    doubtful.
  • 30 of vessels discharging annex V, 6 annex I
    (average figure).
  • At shoreside legal aspects do not match with
    Marpol, a.o
  • Annex V in Marpol includes both garbage and
    hazardous waste environmental legislation
    separates these wastes.
  • Definition of port reception facility
  • Difference between normal garbage and
    cargo-associated annex V hard to determine.

29
Experiences facts(2)
  • After 1 year 1.000.000,-- because
  • Not assumed 75 number of vessels discharging,
    but only 30.
  • Not optimal use of allowed -rights most for
    annex V only.
  • Administration/financial process a lot of work.
  • Definition of the indirect percentage
    (contribute sifnificantly) in directive
    2000/59/EC is not clear. Can only be calculated
    afterwards.

30
Percentage of delivery(Total 1198 vessels
30)
31
Figures6 of vessels discharging annex I
32
Figures30 of vessels discharging annex V
33
Changes in 2006
  • Amsterdam Port Authority

34
Changes 2006 from 01/04/2006
  • Lower fee, raise the right to discharge.
  • This will give extra encouragement for
    discharging.
  • Split the waste right in separate right for annex
    V and annex I. Include cargo-associated waste.
  • This will give extra opportunity to discharge
    both annex V and I.
  • Simplify administration process.
  • Payment of direct to waste collectors, not to
    agents.
  • Put more emphasis on enforcement.
  • Negotiate with government.

35
Thank you.
  • www.portofamsterdam.nl
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com