Title: Overview of Financial Markets in the US
1Overview of Financial Markets in the US
- What makes a good market?
- Major equity markets NYSE and NASDAQ
- U.S. Market Indicies
- Types of Orders
- Margin Trading and Short Selling
- Market Efficiency
- Historical Performance of Financial Assets
- Global Perspective
2What makes a good market?
- Availability of information
- Liquidity
- Price continuity (depth)
- Moderate transaction costs
3Major U.S. Equity Markets
- Buttonwood Agreement - 1792
- New York Stock Exchange
- The Curb prior to 1910
- American Stock Exchange
- NASDAQ - 1971
- Regionals - Chicago, Pacific, Cincinnati, Boston,
etc.
4The NYSE
- Its an auction market
- 1366 members
- Commission Brokers
- Floor Brokers
- Registered Traders
- Specialists
5The NYSE
- The Specialist
- Market maker, broker, and dealer
- Physical location
- All trades recorded
- Maintain order book
- Trade for themselves
- Monopolist?
6The NASDAQ
- Its a dealers market
- No physical location
- Multiple dealers compete for trading volume
- Collusion? Preferencing?
7Market Indicies
- Price Weighted (DJIA, Nikkei)
- Value Weighted (SP 500, FT100)
- Equally Weighted (Value Line, FT OSI)
- Does selection of an index matter?
8Investing in Stock Indexes
- Investor may buy stock or stock derivative
securities - The value of derivative securities follow
underlying stock prices or prices of specific
stock portfolios (index) - Lower transaction costs
- Stock index returns have matched actively managed
portfolios - Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) designed to match
major stock indexes
9Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) vs. Indexed Mutual
Funds
- Both ETFs and indexed mutual funds
- Share price adjusts in response to change in
index - Pay dividends earned in added shares
- Lower management fees than actively managed
mutual funds - ETFs are different from mutual funds in that they
- May be traded on an exchange any time during the
day - May be purchased on margin and sold short
- Capital gains tax only
- Value of ETF shares underlying value of shares
- Investor must pay transaction costs when
buying/selling
10Types of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
- Cube (QQQ)
- Tracks Nasdaq100 index
- Traded on Amex
- Investors may speculate on future of technology
stocks - Purchase on margin
- Sell short
- Spider (SP Depository Receipt)
- Tracks SP 500 index
- Trade at one-tenth SP 500 Index level
11Trading Types of Orders
- Market Order
- Buy/Sell at best available price
- Limit Order
- typically triggered if conditions improve
- Price trigger
- Time tag (FOK, day, GTC)
- Stop-Loss Order
- typically triggered if conditions worsen
- Used to close a position
12Margin Trading
- Can borrow funds from broker and amplify
position. Why? - Margin Equity / MV (Assets -
Liabilities) / MV - How much can you borrow
- Initial Margin max 50 (Fed)
- Maintenance Margin min 25 (Fed)
- Examples
13Short Selling
- Opposite of Long position
- Borrow and sell shares with expectation that
their price will fall - After price falls, buy shares, cover short
position (repay loan of shares) - Uptick rule
- All short sales are margin trades
14Program Trading
- Trading completed by computer program
- Initial use with institutional, large order, high
volume to take advantage of technology - NYSE listed stocks dominate program trading
- Trading a function of parameters set in
program, such as over-valued shares - Used also to manage portfolio risk
- Portfolio insuranceuse of stock index futures
- Protect gain or minimize loss in portfolio
15Program Trading, cont.
- Program trading associated with increased
volatility of stock market or inciting
significant market declines - Research has refuted claim that program trading
has increased stock market volatility - Has not been the initial starter of sharp
market declines - NYSE implemented collars or curbs to program
trading in volatile periods - Circuit breakersmarket time out
16Regulation of Stock Trading
- Purpose of stock trading regulation
- To make market more efficient
- Promote and preserve competition
- Prevent unfair or unethical trading practices
- Provide adequate disclosure of information
- To prevent market failurecircuit breakers
- Securities Act of 1933 and SEC Act of 1934
- SEC uses surveillance system to watch trading
- Insider trading
- Attempts to corner market
17Securities and Exchange Commission
- Congress provided SEC with broad powers to
regulate stock markets - May prescribe accounting standards and the extent
of financial disclosure - Establish regulations for stock trading and
disclosure from insiders - Regulates stock market participants to maintain a
fair and orderly market
18Structure of the SEC
- Five Commissioners
- Appointed by president
- Confirmed by Senate
- Five-year staggered terms
- President appoints Chair
- SEC Divisions
- Division of Corporate Finance
- Division of Market Regulation
- Division of Enforcement
19SEC Oversight of Corporate Disclosure
- Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD), October, 2000
- Requires corporations to disclose relevant
information broadly to investors at the same time - Forbade old practice of providing selected
analysts new information during teleconference
calls - Means of disclosing new information
- Company Web siteWeb cast
- 8-k form filing
- News release
- Above simultaneously with conference call
20Market Efficiency
- What is an efficient market?
- The Efficient Market Hypothesis
- Technical Analysis
- Fundamental Analysis
- Tests of EMH
21Efficient Capital Markets
- In an efficient capital market, security prices
adjust rapidly to the arrival of new information,
therefore the current prices of securities
reflect all information about the security - Whether markets are efficient has been
extensively researched and remains controversial
22Why Should Capital MarketsBe Efficient?
- The premises of an efficient market
- A large number of competing profit-maximizing
participants analyze and value securities, each
independently of the others - New information regarding securities comes to the
market in a random fashion - Profit-maximizing investors adjust security
prices rapidly to reflect the effect of new
information - Conclusion the expected returns implicit in the
current price of a security should reflect its
risk
23Efficient Market Hypothesis
- Depending on the information set, we can
designate three forms of the EMH - Weak form
- prices already reflect all information contained
in past prices (and other historical data) - Semistrong form
- prices reflect all publicly available information
- Strong form
- prices reflect all relevant information including
inside information
24Types of Stock Analysis
- Technical Analysis - using prices and volume
information to predict future prices. - Weak form efficiency technical analysis
- Fundamental Analysis - using economic and
accounting information to predict stock prices. - Semi strong form efficiency fundamental analysis
25Weak-Form EMH
- Current prices reflect all security-market
information, including the historical sequence of
prices, rates of return, trading volume data, and
other market-generated information - This implies that past rates of return and other
market data should have no relationship with
future rates of return
26Testing Market Efficiency
- Weak form
- autocorrelation testsRt a bRt-1 cRt-2
dRt-3 . . . - runs tests------------
- filter rulesIf 5, sell and short if -5,
cover and buy
27Tests and Results of Weak-Form EMH
- Results generally support the weak-form EMH, but
results are not unanimous - some statistical evidence that there is serial
correlation for many individual stocks for
certain periods of time - difficult to generate an economic profit from
this result. (momentum trading)
28Semistrong-Form EMH
- Current security prices reflect all public
information, including market and non-market
information - This implies that decisions made on new
information after it is public should not lead to
above-average risk-adjusted profits from those
transactions
29Testing Market Efficiency
- Semistrong form
- Event studiesAbnomal return Actual -
ExpectedExpected return forecast - rit ai birmt eit
- ARit eit
- CAR Cumulative abnormal return
- Examples
30Keown-Pinkerton Study of Merger Announcements
31Tests of Semistrong-Form EMH
- Stock split studies show that splits do not
result in abnormal gains after the split
announcement, but before - Initial public offerings seems to be underpriced
by almost 18, but that varies over time, and the
price is adjusted within one day after the
offering - Listing of a stock on an national exchange such
as the NYSE may offer some short term profit
opportunities for investors
32Tests of Semistrong-Form EMH
- Stock prices quickly adjust to unexpected world
events and economic news and hence do not provide
opportunities for abnormal profits - Announcements of accounting changes are quickly
adjusted for and do not seem to provide
opportunities - Stock prices rapidly adjust to corporate events
such as mergers and offerings - The above studies provide support for the
semistrong-form EMH
33Other tests of semistrong form
- Post-earnings announcement drift
- SUE Standardized Unexpected Earnings
- EPSActual EPSEstimated
- SUE ------------------------
- Std Error of Estimate
34Results of SUE analysis
35Tests of Semistrong-Form EMH
- Quarterly Earnings Reports
- Large Standardized Unexpected Earnings (SUEs)
result in abnormal stock price changes, with over
50 of the change happening after the
announcement - Unexpected earnings can explain up to 80 of
stock drift over a time period - These results suggest that the earnings surprise
is not instantaneously reflected in security
prices
36Anomalies
- Small firm effect
- January effect
- Neglected firm effect
- Market-to-Book ratios
- Reversals (Overreaction)
- Day of the week
- Weather
37Strong-Form EMH
- Stock prices fully reflect all information from
public and private sources - This implies that no group of investors should be
able to consistently derive above-average
risk-adjusted rates of return - This assumes perfect markets in which all
information is cost-free and available to
everyone at the same time
38Tests of the Strong Form of EMH
- Strong form
- Corporate insiders
- Stock exchange specialists
- Professional money managers
39Corporate Insider Trading
- Corporate insiders include major corporate
officers, directors, and owners of 10 or more of
any equity class of securities - Insiders must report to the SEC each month on
their transactions in the stock of the firm for
which they are insiders - These insider trades are made public about six
weeks later and allowed to be studied
40Corporate Insider Trading
- Corporate insiders generally experience
above-average profits especially on purchase
transaction - This implies that many insiders had private
information from which they derived above-average
returns on their company stock
41Stock Exchange Specialists
- Specialists used to have monopolistic access to
information about unfilled limit orders - You would expect specialists to derive
above-average returns from this information - The data generally supports this expectation
42Professional Money Managers
- Trained professionals, working full time at
investment management - If any investor can achieve above-average
returns, it should be this group - If any non-insider can obtain inside information,
it would be this group due to the extensive
management interviews that they conduct
43Performance of Professional Money Managers
- Most tests examine mutual funds
- New tests also examine trust departments,
insurance companies, and investment advisors - Risk-adjusted, after expenses, returns of mutual
funds generally show that most funds did not
match aggregate market performance - Persistence in MF performance is weak when we
adjust for expenses
44Are Markets Efficient?
- Its not a yes or no question.
- Anomalies indicate that its not perfectly
efficient - Evidence generally supports semistrong form
- Markets are very efficient
45Implications for Investment Analysis
- Technical analysis cant work if markets are
perfectly efficient. There is some support of
momentum trading strategies, though - Fundamental analysis is necessary to make markets
efficient. Superior analysis should produce
superior estimates of relevant variables - Attend to anomalies.
- Risk can be diversified whether markets are
efficient or not
46Historical Performance of Financial Assets
- What are our investment alternatives?
- How have stocks, bonds, cash, and other financial
assets performed in terms of risk and return? - Why is a global perspective on investing
important? - How does historical performance influence the
asset allocation decision?
47Historical Performance of Financial Assets
- Investment alternatives?
- Real vs. financial?
- Capital Market vs. Money Market?
- Equity
- US
- Foreign (ADRs)
- Mutual Funds
48Historical Performance of Financial Assets
- Investment alternatives
- Cash Equivalents (rates from 10/27/04)
- Savings Accounts (0.90 at Fleet)
- CDs (1.50 at Fleet)
- T-bills (0.97)
- Commercial Paper (1.41 GMAC)
- MMMF
49Historical Performance of Financial Assets
- Investment alternatives
- Fixed Income
- US Treasury securities (notes 4.55, bonds 5.38)
- US Agency Securities (FNMA 5.63, FHLB, FHA)
- Municipal Bonds (GO vs. Revenue, 3.98 for AAA)
- Corporate Bonds (collateral, subordination, etc.,
6.02) - Preferred Stock (tax issues)
- International Bonds (domestic, Euro, Yankee)
50Historical Performance of Financial Assets
- Investment alternatives?
- Derivatives
- Options (calls, puts, warrants)
- Futures (financial, commodity, index)
- Real Estate
- Precious Metals
- Art
51Historical Performance of Financial Assets
- Issues which should matter in return performance
- Risk!
- Seniority of claim (bonds vs. stock)
- Business risk
- Financial risk
- Liquidity!
- Secondary market issues
52Historical Performance of Financial Assets
- Ibbotson and Sinquefield (IS) examined nominal
and real rates of return for seven major classes
of assets in the United States - 1. Large-company common stocks
- 2. Small-capitalization common stocks
- 3. Long-term U.S. government bonds
- 4. Long-term corporate bonds
- 5. Intermediate-term U.S. Treasury bills
- 6. U.S. Treasury bills
- 7. Consumer goods (inflation)
53Basic Series Historical Highlights (1926 - 2002)
- Geometric Mean Arithmetic Mean Standard
Deviation - Large Stocks 10.01 12.04 20.55
- Small Stocks 11.64 17.74 39.30
- LT US Govt Bonds 5.38 5.68 8.24
- US Tbills 3.78 3.82 3.18
- CPI 3.05 3.14 4.37
54Importance of the Global Perspective
- 1. Absolute and relative sizes of U.S. and
foreign markets for stocks and bonds - U.S. about 52 of total value of securities
- More opportunities globally
- 2. Rates of return available on non-U.S.
securities often exceed U.S. Securities - Higher returns on equities are justified by
higher growth rates for the countries where they
are issued - 3. Diversification with foreign securities can
reduce portfolio risk
55Importance of the Global Perspective Market
Size, 2.3 Trillion in 1969
56Importance of the Global Perspective Market
Size, 49.1 Trillion in 1997
57Importance of the Global Perspective Better
Equity Returns? (1986-1997)
58Importance of the Global Perspective
Diversification of Risk
- Returns from risky assets can stabilize one
another when held together. - Why?
- Some sources of risk are different (unsystematic)
- Some sources of risk are common (systematic)
- Unsystematic sources of risk tend to offset.
Only systematic risk matters in a well
diversified portfolio.
59Importance of the Global Perspective
Diversification of Risk (Correlation!)
60Importance of the Global Perspective
Diversification of Risk
- Correlation Coefficients for Equity Markets
- CN EU JP SW UK US
- EU .193 .700
- JP .409 .319
- SW .353 .907 .359
- U.K. .428 .392 .262 .568
- U.S. .618 .386 .334 .505 .616
- W .652 .516 .698 .631 .686 .818
61Diversification of Risk Computing Covariance
and Correlation
- Covariance absolute measure of comovement
between two rate of return series - Correlation relative measure of comovement
- can be positive or negative
- can be strong or weak
- Example
62Importance of the Global Perspective Summary
- Many opportunities to invest outside the US
- May be able to enhance expected return
- Opportunity to exploit weaker correlations among
country returns to diversify risk