IEEE 802.15 subject - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

IEEE 802.15 subject

Description:

H. Shao, J. Zhang, H. Dai, Mitsubishi Electric. Slide 1. doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0313-00-004b ... Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories. July 2004 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: roberf
Learn more at: https://grouper.ieee.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IEEE 802.15 subject


1
Project IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless
Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title
Enhancements to IEEE 802.15.4 Date Submitted
July 5, 2004 Source Huai-Rong Shao, Jinyun
Zhang, Hui Dai Company Mitsubishi Electric
Research Labs Address 8th Floor, 201 Broadway,
Cambridge, MA 02139 Voice617-621-7517, FAX
617-621-7550, EMailshao_at_merl.com Re
Response to the call for proposal of IEEE
802.15.4b, Doc Number 15-04-0239-00-004b. Abstra
ct Discussion for several enhancements to
current IEEE 802.15.4 Purpose Proposal to IEEE
802.15.4b Task Group Notice This document has
been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is
offered as a basis for discussion and is not
binding on the contributing individual(s) or
organization(s). The material in this document is
subject to change in form and content after
further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the
right to add, amend or withdraw material
contained herein. Release The contributor
acknowledges and accepts that this contribution
becomes the property of IEEE and may be made
publicly available by P802.15.
2
Enhancements to 802.15.4
  • Huai-Rong Shao, Jinyun Zhang, and Hui Dai
  • Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories

3
Proposals
  • Solutions to Direct and Indirect beacon conflicts
    in a WPAN with multiple coordinators
  • Solutions to beacon conflicts between
    coordinators at different WPANs
  • Time synchronization solutions for 802.15.4
  • Parameter mismatch problem
  • Duplicated ASSOCIATE.response
  • Priorities between commands and data
  • Multiple superframe sizes in the same WPAN
  • Error in Figure 76

4
Direct and Indirect Beacon Conflict Problems
within the same WPAN
  • Direct conflict
  • Multiple coordinators within the same POS
  • Example Two coordinators with parent-child
    relationship
  • Indirect conflict
  • Coordinators cannot reach each other directly but
    there are devices within the overlapped area of
    their POSes
  • Example Two coordinators use the same channel
    and their POSes overlap with each other

5
Three Cases for Indirect Beacon Conflicts (1)
Beacon
C1
C1
C2
C2
  • Case 1 D1 has been associated to coordinator C1
    and is keeping waking up. Then Coordinator C2
    joins the WPAN by associating to coordinator C3.
    D1 is also within C2s POS. C2 cannot hear C1s
    beacon and may use the same channel with C1 and
    send beacons at almost the same time with C1. The
    beacon conflict happens at D1. D1 will lose its
    synchronization with C1 and conduct orphan scan.
    After it gets C1s coordinator realignment
    command, it still cannot get C1s beacons.

6
Three Cases for Indirect Beacon Conflicts (2)
  • Case 2 D1 has been associated to coordinator C1
    and often goes to sleep. During its sleep period,
    Coordinator C2 joins the WPAN by associating to
    coordinator C3, and uses the same channel with C1
    and send beacons at almost the same time with C1.
    D1 is also within C2s POS. When D1 wakes up, it
    loses its synchronization with C1 and conducts
    orphan scan. After it gets C1s coordinator
    realignment command, it still cannot get C1s
    beacons.

7
Three Cases for Indirect Beacon Conflicts (3)
  • Case 3 Two coordinators C1 and C2 have been in
    the WPAN. They cannot hear to each other and may
    use the same channel and send beacons almost the
    same time. Then D1 wants to join the WPAN but it
    happens to be at the overlapped area of C1 and C2
    with indirect beacon conflicts. And there are no
    other coordinators within D1s POS to allow D1 to
    associate. D1 conducts active or passive scan but
    cannot get any beacons correctly due to indirect
    beacon conflicts. It will report no-beacon to
    upper layers. But this is a kind of fake
    no-beacon because there are actually two
    coordinators close to D1.

8
Solutions to Direct Beacon conflict (1)
  • Asynchronous superframe mode
  • If there is no superframe synchronization
    requirement among coordinators in a WPAN,
    Asynchronous mode can be used, i.e., each
    coordinator decides its superframe starting point
    randomly to avoid beacon conflicts with others.
  • However, this method introduces a new problem of
    collision between beacon and data frames.
  • In addition, most beacon-enabled WPANs require
    synchronization among coordinators.

9
Solutions to Direct Beacon conflict (2)
  • Change the superframe structure as starting with
    a Beacon period which can contain multiple beacon
    frames.
  • How does each coordinator choose a sending time
    of its own beacon frame within the Beacon period
    to avoid beacon conflicts?
  • Each coordinator maintains and updates a
    neighboring coordinator table which records the
    beacon time information of its direct and
    indirect neighboring coordinators.
  • Beacon time information is included in the beacon
    frame.
  • Before a coordinator associates or starts a new
    PAN, it conducts active scan. It can records the
    beacon times allocated to other coordinators and
    put the information into the neighboring
    coordinator table.Then it can choose its own
    beacon transmission time to avoid collisions with
    coordinators within its POS.

10
Solutions to Direct Beacon conflict (3)
  • However, if two coordinators within the same POS
    join the WPAN almost at the same time, it is
    still possible that the two coordinators choose
    the conflicted beacon transmission time.
  • A simple solution After a coordinator receives
    the association response command indicating
    successful and begins to do MLME-START, it will
    not send out a beacon in the first superframe.
    Instead, in the first one or several superframes,
    it will sense the channel during its beacon
    transmission time. If the channel idle, it will
    send beacons periodically, otherwise, it will
    re-choose its beacon transmission time to avoid
    conflicts.
  • The beacon conflict cannot be avoided completely.
    A beacon conflict notification command should be
    added to report beacon collisions.
  • But how does a coordinator know the beacon time
    information of other coordinators outside its POS
    but have potential indirect beacon collisions
    with it?
  • Indirect beacon conflict is a serious problem but
    not easy to solve!

11
Solutions to Indirect Beacon conflict (1)
  • Based on the beacon period solution
  • Two kinds of methods
  • Reactive approach
  • A coordinator doesnt do much to avoid the
    indirect beacon collisions during its association
    stage. The indirect beacon collisions can be
    detected and resolved later.
  • Simple implementation. Very small changes to
    802.15.4-2003. But long time to recover from
    indirect beacon collisions.
  • Proactive approach
  • A coordinator tries its best to avoid the
    indirect beacon collisions during association
    stage. If cannot avoided in advance, the indirect
    beacon collisions can be detected and resolved
    later.
  • Any device (FFD or RFD) needs to have the
    capability of forwarding its parent coordinators
    beacon time information.
  • A new command, beacon time notification, is
    added.
  • Complicated to maintain the neighboring
    coordinator table but lower possibility to cause
    indirect beacon conflicts.

12
Solutions to Indirect Beacon conflict (2)
  • Reactive approach
  • For the first case After D1 loses its
    synchronization with C1, it will conduct orphan
    scan. After it gets C1s coordinator realignment
    command, if it cannot get beacons from C1, it
    will do orphan scan again. After it gets the
    realignment command again but still cannot get
    beacons from C1. It will send out a beacon
    conflict notification command which contains C1s
    address and beacon time information. Coordinators
    receiving the beacon conflict notification
    command will adjust its beacon time if a beacon
    conflict is found.
  • For the second case After D1 wakes up, it will
    lose synchronization with its coordinator. It
    will conduct similar procedure with that for the
    first case.

13
Solutions to Indirect Beacon conflict (3)
  • Reactive approach
  • For the third case
  • Just do nothing if we allow the fake no-beacon
    to be reported.
  • If we want to detect this kind of fake
    no-beacon caused by beacon conflict, we can
    improve orphan scan procedure in 802.15.4-2003 as
    follows.
  • Before D1 reports no-beacon, it will do the
    improved orphan scan in which all coordinators
    who received the orphan notification command will
    respond. If a coordinator finds a device record
    of D1 in its device list, it will reply with a
    coordinator realignment command, otherwise, it
    will reply with a beacon time notification
    command the tell its own beacon time information.
    If D1 doesnt receive any coordinator realignment
    command or beacon time notification command, it
    will report no-beacon, otherwise, D1 will
    analyze the commands received and send out a
    beacon conflict notification command if finds any
    conflicts. Coordinators receiving the beacon
    conflict notification command will adjust its
    beacon time if a beacon conflict is found.
  • It can been seen the improved orphan scan
    procedure can also solve the problems in Case 1
    and 2, but introduces more signaling overhead
    and changes to 802.15.4-2003.

14
Solutions to Indirect Beacon conflict (4)
  • Proactive approach
  • First case
  • Suggest that all devices respond to the beacon
    request command actively or passively. However,
    in 802.15.4-2003, only coordinators can respond
    beacon request command.
  • After receiving a beacon request command, if a
    device is a coordinator, besides its beacons sent
    periodically, it will also reply with a beacon
    time notification command to report its parent
    coordinators beacon time information.
  • ( Another possible method allow that one beacon
    frame can contain both its own and its parent
    coordinators beacon time information, so beacon
    notification commands from coordinators can be
    avoided).
  • If a device who received the beacon request
    command is not a coordinator, it will reply with
    a beacon time notification command to report its
    parent coordinators beacon time information.
  • With the above improvement, at the association
    stage, a coordinator can get beacon time
    information of other coordinators that have
    potential indirect beacon conflict with it.
  • Solutions for the second and the third case are
    the similar with those in reactive approach.

15
Direct and Indirect Beacon Conflict among
different WPANs
  • Direct conflict
  • Multiple coordinators within the same POS but
    belong to different WPANs
  • Example Two PAN coordinators at 868Mhz close to
    each other.
  • Indirect conflict
  • Coordinators cannot reach each other directly but
    there are devices within the overlapped area of
    their POSes
  • Example Two WPANs use the same channel and their
    POSes overlap with each other

PAN1
PAN2
16
Solutions to Beacon conflicts among coordinators
in different PANs
  • If there is superframe synchronization
    requirement between two WPANs, similar solutions
    with those for the same WPAN.
  • If there is no superframe synchronization
    requirement between two WPANs, but coordinators
    are synchronized in each WPAN, the devices within
    the overlapped area need to detect the beacon
    conflict, and calculate the time relation between
    superframes from two WPANs. With the time
    relation, similar solutions to solve the beacon
    conflicts with those for coordinators within the
    same PAN.
  • If the two PANs choose different Superframe
    sizes, the coordinator with the bigger superframe
    need to maintain a table to record those time
    slots in CAP and CFP allocated to beacons in the
    other WPAN to avoid the collisions between beacon
    and data frames. Another solution is to set
    different transmission priorities for beacons and
    data frames.

17
Problem Statement for Time Synchronization in
802.15.4
  • Time synchronization is important
  • Detect the Superframe/Slot Boundary
  • Maintain superframe synchronization among
    coordinators
  • Preserve the event orders.
  • Difficulty
  • Clock drift due to various reasons including both
    software and hardware

18
Timing in Packet Transmission
Coordinator
Device
Packet reach MAC layer at t4
Packet created at t1
MAC
MAC
PHY
PHY
First bit on Channel at t2
First bit of Packet is received at t3
  • At t1, packet is created in MAC layer. t1 is the
    carried timestamp
  • At t2, the first bit of Packet is put on the
    channel by sender
  • At t3, the first bit of Packet is received by
    receiver
  • At t4, packet passes the PHY layer and is
    accepted by MAC layer

19
Timing Orders
Coors Clock
t1
t2
t3
t4
t1
t2
t3
t4
Devices Clock
At the same time point, the time readings maybe
different due to clock drift
20
In the above scenario
  • Ideal case
  • Device simply adjusts its timer from t4 to t1.
    t1 is the timestamp in the packet received.
  • However, t4 should be set to t4
  • Errors Sources
  • Propagation Delay
  • t3 t2 message propagation time in the air
  • Access Error
  • t2 t1 time needed for processing at senders
    network interface before being put in the channel
  • Receive Error
  • t4 t3 time needed for processing at receivers
    network interface
  • We need to minimize/estimate Access Error,
    Receive Error and estimate Propagation Delay

21
Propagation Delay
Beacon Interval
Coordinator
Propagation Delay
Device
  • Propagation Delay varies for different devices
  • POS is limited to 10m in 802.15.4-2003
  • Propagation Delay is small (relatively easier to calculate

22
Processing Error
  • If there is no processing delay on both sides
  • Packet Timestamp t1 should be the same as t2, i.e
    the time when the first bit is passed to the
    channel
  • Receiving time t4 should be the same as t3,
    i.e. the time when the first bit is received
  • Thus, to increase accuracy
  • Timer should be read in PHY layer in order to
    minimize the error.
  • However, packet is created at the MAC layer,
    which implies the timestamp in sender side must
    be obtained at MAC layer

23
Solution 1
  • Similar to 802.11, access error and receive error
    are estimated
  • Mechanism
  • Coordinator estimates T t2-t1 and accordingly
    adjusts the timestamp in packet as t1T
  • Device estimates T t4-t3
  • At t4, device sets its timer to t1T T.

24
Solution 2
  • Require the Physical layer support time reading
    function
  • Mechanism
  • In the coordinator side, it still estimates t2-t1
    and accordingly adjusts the timestamp in packet
    to t1T.
  • While in the device side, it reads the time at
    exactly t3 at PHY layer. Thus, the receiver
    error is minimized.
  • Device adjusts its timer by adding t1T t3.
  • Add attributes to PHY PIB
  • phyTimeOn boolean
  • switch physical timer between on and off to avoid
    overhead
  • phyRxTime
  • The receiving time of the first bit of latest
    PSDU from the physical medium

25
Solution 3 To be more accurate
  • Based on Solution 2, but the coordinator sends
    two packets to the device. The synchronization
    message carries the adjusted timerstamp while the
    following MAC command carries the actual
    transmitting time at the physical layer.
  • Mechanism
  • Coordinator estimates access error t2-t1 and
    accordingly adjusts the timestamp in
    synchronization message
  • Coordinator sends synchronization message to
    device. t2 is recorded in phyTxTime
  • Device receives synchronization message and reads
    the time t3 at physical layer
  • Coordinator sends MLME-TIME.notify to device
  • Device set its timer by adding t2 t3.
  • If the MAC command is lost due to packet
    collision, the device could still use the
    adjusted timestamp to correct the local clock.

26
Solution 3 To be more accurate (Cont.)
  • Add another attribute to PHY PIB
  • phyTxTime
  • The sending time of the first bit of previous
    PSDU at the physical medium
  • Adding a new MAC command
  • MLME-TIME.notify
  • To carry phyTxTime

27
Error Upper Bound Estimation for All Above
Solutions
  • Define new variable
  • maxProcessingError
  • maxPropagationDelay
  • Synchronization Error Upper Bound
  • maxProcessingError maxPropagationDelay

28
Other Issues in Time Synchronization
  • Time synchronization conducted at association
    procedure
  • Use Beacon for time synchronization in
    beacon-enable network
  • Add optional timestamp fields to Beacon payload
  • Adjusting lSynchronization period
  • Add a new variable aTimeSyncOrder
  • aSuperframeDurationTimeaTimeSyncOrder
  • Use specific message for time synchronization in
    non-beacon network

29
Parameter mismatch problem
  • In some parameter settings, packet size could be
    bigger than superframe size
  • 915 MHZ superframe order0 Beacon order0
  • aBaseSuperframeDuration 1660/40 24 (ms)
  • However ..
  • aMaxPHYPacketSize 127 byte
  • Time to tx maxpacket 278/40 25.4ms 24 ms
  • Maximum possible size
  • Without backoff, 120 bytes,
  • with 1 backoff 2 CCA, at most 112 bytes
  • Same problem in 868 MHZ band

30
Solutions to parameter mismatch problem
  • Solution 1 Decrease the maximum packet size for
    915 and 868 Mhz
  • Solution 2 maxSuperframeOrder and macBeaconOrder
    begins from 1 instead of 0

31
Duplicated ASSOCIATE.response Problem
Scenario
ASSOCIATE.request
Acknowledgement
Device
Coordinator
ASSOCIATE.response
Ack Lost
ASSOCIATE.response
??
(retransmission)
  • What should device do with retransmitted
    ASSOCIATE.response ?

32
Solution to Duplicated ASSOCIATE.response
  • Solution
  • When a device receives duplicated
    ASSOCIATE.response, it checks whether its the
    same as the local configuration. If they are
    matched, the device sends back ACK to the
    coordinator that sent this ASSOCIATE.response.
    Otherwise, it discards this ASSOCIATE.response.

33
Priorities between commands and data
  • Suggest to set different priorities for command,
    data and maybe ad-hoc beacon frames.
  • Why?
  • Command frame usually is more important than data
  • Some commands broadcast and cannot use ACK for
    reliable transmission
  • How? Set different backoff time between command
    and data transmissions

34
Multiple superframe sizes in the same WPAN
  • P.100, 7.1.14.1 MLME-START.request and P. 148
    7.5.2.4 Beacon generation, both PAN coordinators
    and coordinators can specify the Beacon order and
    superframe order
  • 802.15.4-2003 didnt specify all coordinators
    within the same beacon-enabled WPAN should use
    the same superframe size
  • If use different superframe sizes, collisions
    between data and beacon frames may happen
  • Solution Either distinguish priorities of data
    and beacon transmissions or specify same
    superframe size for all coordinators in the same
    WPAN.

35
Error in Figure 76
  • According to page. 148, 7.5.2.3 Starting a PAN
    requires to perform Active Scan
  • Page. 180, Figure 76 should add Active Scan after
    the Energy detection SCAN but before selecting
    PANId, shortAddress, and LogicalChannel
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com