Title: Pesticide Residue Surveys; Country of Origin Labeling
1Pesticide Residue Surveys Country of Origin
Labeling Microbiological Data Program
- O. Norman Nesheim
- UF/IFAS Pesticide Information Coordinator
2FDA Pesticide Residue Survey
3Pesticide Regulation
- 3 Federal agencies share responsibility for the
regulation of pesticides - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
4Agency Roles
- EPA
- Registers pesticides sold/distributed in the US
and regulates their use. - Sets Tolerances for pesticides used on food
- Tolerances are the maximum amounts of residues
that are permitted in or on a food or feed.
5Monitoring and Enforcement of Tolerances
- FDA monitors and enforces tolerances set by EPA
in domestic and imported foods and animal feeds
shipped in interstate commerce - USDA
- Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) monitors
and enforces tolerances on meat, poultry, and egg
products. - AMS Pesticide Data Program (PDP) tests
commodities in U.S. food supply for pesticide
residues.
6FDA Monitoring
- Individual lots of domestically produced and
imported foods are sampled and analyzed for
pesticide residues - Domestic samples are collected close to point of
production in distribution system - Import samples are collected at point of entry
into U.S commerce
7FDA Monitoring
- The unwashed, whole, unpeeled, raw commodity is
analyzed. - Processed foods also are analyzed.
- FDA uses multi-residue analytical methods capable
of determining a number of pesticide residues. - FDA methods are capable of determining residues
well below tolerance levels
8Targeted Sampling
- FDA uses several factors to determine the types
and numbers of samples to collect. - Review of recent FDA and state residue data
- Regional information on pesticide use
- Dietary importance of food
- Information on the amount of domestic and
imported food entering interstate commerce - Pesticide characteristics and toxicity
- Production volume/pesticide usage patterns
9FDA Monitoring Results - 2001
- Total samples analyzed 6,475
- Domestic Samples 2,101
- Collected from 41 states
- Largest number of samples come from states that
are the largest producers of fruit and vegetables - Imported 4,374
- Collected from food shipments from 99 countries.
- Mexico had the largest number of samples. Chile
was next.
10Domestic/Import Comparison- All Samples
11Domestic/Import Comparison Fruits and Vegetables
12Sanctions for Illegal Residues
- Domestic
- Seizure of item or injunction
- Import
- Stop shipment at port of entry
- Stop future shipments for a specific grower,
geographic area, or country based on the finding
of one violative shipment, if there is reason to
believe the same situation exists in future lots
during the same shipping season.
13Web Address
- FDA Pesticide Program Residue Monitoring
- http//vm.cfsan.fda.gov/dms/pesrpts.html
14USDA Pesticide Data Program
- Tested over 50 different commodities
fresh/frozen/canned fruit and vegetables, fruit
juices, whole milk, grains, corn syrup, poultry,
beef, drinking water. - Samples collected close to time and point of
consumption and reflect what is typically
available to consumers during the year.
152002 PDP Results
- 2002 PDP tested fresh and processed fruit and
vegetables, barley, rice beef tissues and
drinking water for pesticides. - 12,889 samples
- 10,056 were fruit vegetables, including apple
juice, apple sauce, canned and frozen sweet peas,
sweet corn, fresh apples, asparagus, bananas,
broccoli, carrots, celery, cucumbers, mushrooms,
onions peaches pineapples, potatoes, spinach and
bell peppers
162002 PDP Results
- 58 of samples had no detectable residues
- 42 of samples had detectable residues
- 0.3 of samples exceeded the established
tolerance. - 2.7 of samples had no established tolerance.
These residues detected at very low levels and
may be due to spray drift, crop rotations, or use
of sanitizers in food handling facilities. - PDP reports such findings to FDA.
17Use of PDP Data
- EPA uses PDP data to prepare realistic pesticide
dietary exposure for pesticide risk assessments. - Government and ag industry use data to examine
pesticide residue issues that may affect ag
practices and U.S. Trade - PDP data are useful in promoting export of U.S.
commodities and addressing food safety issues
18PDP Information
- More information on USDAs Pesticide Data Program
can be found at - http//www.ams.usda.gov/science/pdp/
19Country of Origin Labeling
20Country of Origin Labeling(COOL)
- The 2002 Farm Bill established the requirement
for Country of Origin Labeling for beef, lamb,
pork, fish, perishable agricultural commodities
and peanuts. - USDA-AMS responsible for implementation.
- USDA published proposed regulations to implement
COOL on 10/30/2003
21COOL Implementation
- 9/30/2004 - Original Implementation date however
Congress passed legislation postponing
implementation for all covered commodities except
wild and farm raised fish and shell fish until
9/30/2006.
22COOL Requirements
- Covered commodities must be labeled at retail to
indicate their country of origin. - Country of origin for fish and shell fish must
include and distinguish between wild and farm
raised. -
23COOL Exemptions
- Covered commodities are exempt if they are an
ingredient in a processed food item. Eg. Bacon,
orange juice, mixed fruit party trays, mixed nuts - Food Service establishments, such as restaurants,
bars, cafeterias, etc.
24More COOL Information
- Information on COOL legislation and proposed
regulations can be found at - http//www.ams.usda.gov/cool/
25USDAs Microbiological Data Program (MDP)
26MDP
- FY 2001 Congress authorized funding to
establish a microbial baseline in the domestic
food supply. - USDA-AMS Monitoring Programs Office charged with
implementing the MDP.
27Congressional Intent for MDP
- Conferees expect the microbiological data
program to produce national, consistent and
statistically reliable data that may be used for
research and risk analysis purposes by federal
agencies, such as USDA, FDA, CDC, state health
departments, researchers and other stakeholders.
28MDP Objectives
- Provide comprehensive data on pathogens and
indicator organisms on fresh fruits and
vegetables in the U.S. - Establish benchmark data for Federal Agencies,
State Public Health Agencies, industry and other
interested parties to assess potentially harmful
foodborne microorganisms. - To provide uniform procedures for sampling,
testing, and reporting.
29MDP
- USDA-AMS coordinated development of the MDP with
CDC, FDA, USDA-ARS, and USDA-NASS - Sampling and/or microbiological lab activities
are conducted with 10 states and 1 federal lab.
30MDP
- MDP uses the USDA food consumption surveys to
select for sampling highly consumed commodities
that can be eaten raw. - 2002 MDP sampled and tested celery, cantaloupe,
leaf lettuce, romaine lettuce and tomatoes for
Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Salmonella spp.
31MDP Results
- 2002 10,317 samples analyzed (86 domestic, 11
imported, 3 unknown origin. (First reporting
year) - E. coli isolates with virulence factors found in
0.62 percent of samples. - Three Salmonella spp. isolates from domestic
lettuce
32Use of MDP Data
- Establish benchmarks for the incidence of target
organisms at the wholesale level, understand
trends, and improve risk communication. - Identify priorities for technology development
and modeling of risks for fresh produce in the
food chain
33Use of MDP Data
- MDP data can supplement the FDA/USDA Guidance
for IndustryGuide to Minimize Microbial Food
Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables
34MDP Future
- MDP is seeking
- to use new technologies to streamline laboratory
procedures - improved data collection methods
- to use improved microbial detection methods that
are quicker, more reliable, and more sensitive
35MDP Resources
- For more information on USDAs Microbiological
Data Program go to http//www.ams.usda.gov/Science
/mpo/quick.htm