Naturally Occurring Contaminants In Drinking Water - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Naturally Occurring Contaminants In Drinking Water

Description:

CT (northeastern , i.e.; South Woodstock) 8% 50 ppb (ATSDR, 1998) ... Woodstock Area. 8/20 wells above DL. 6/8 detects near S Woodstock. 2/20 MCL (10 ug/l) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Chu50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Naturally Occurring Contaminants In Drinking Water


1
Naturally Occurring Contaminants In Drinking
Water
  • Arsenic
  • Uranium
  • Manganese
  • Fluoride

Are they in drinking water?
Is contamination a public health concern?
What can health officials do about it?
2
Q Where is the problem?
A We dont know because
  • The problem could show up anywhere as
    hydrological factors vary locally
  • Arsenic, which occurs more frequently in Northern
    New England, tends to be found more often in NE
    CT wells
  • Past results suggest that uranium is more often
    found in western CT wells
  • High manganese may be caused by nearby activity
    such as excavating and composting
  • Though recent reviews conclude that the fluoride
    MCL is high, the impact of fluoride in CT
    groundwater has not been evaluated.

Contaminated wells could be anywhere in the state
3
Q Should We Be Concerned?
A Yes, for these reasons
  • Arsenic is a known human carcinogen
  • Uranium is toxic to kidneys, and EPA recently
    established an MCL based on this endpoint
  • There is not enough water data to estimate the
    extent of exposure to the 600 K CT residents with
    private wells
  • Because these are natural contaminants, DEP does
    not have the authority to intervene.

4
Uranium Isotopes Relative Abundance Radiation
  • 238U to 234Th
  • alpha
  • t1/24.5X109 years
  • 235U to 231Th
  • alpha
  • gamma
  • t1/2700X106 years
  • U has been surveyed
  • Newtown area (2000)
  • Brookfield area (2006)

5
Case Study Toxicity/Activity of 210Po Relative
to 238U
Should 210Po be more toxic than 238U?
Radiologically, one gram of 210Po is equivalent
to is 13 million killograms 238U
6
Heavy Metals (e.g. Uranium) Affect Kidney
Function
E.G mercury, cadmium, lead, uranium, chromium,
platinum, etc.
Toxicokinetics
Toxicodynamics
  • Low (
  • non-biodegradable
  • long half life
  • Partial mimicry of nutrients
  • (Zn, Cu, Fe)
  • Bioaccumulation
  • U is hard to get rid of
  • Sequestered by SH groups
  • Partially resorbed in kidney
  • Renal toxicity
  • Concentrated in nephron
  • Damage to proximal tubule
  • Caused by free U ion
  • apoptosis

7
Uranium in Connecticut Public Groundwater Wells
Frequency of wells with U 10 ug/l
8
Uranium in Connecticut Public Groundwater Wells
Average detectable U concentration by town
9
Fluoride Health Concerns/Benefits
  • 1 mg/l optimal to promote oral health
  • 19-13-B102 mandates monthly average of added Fl
  • 0.8 to 1.2 mg/l
  • WHO guideline is 1.5 mg/l

Higher exposures can cause fluorosis of teeth and
bones
How much is too much?
  • Dental fluorosis (children under 8 yrs)
  • Rarely serious (i.e. pitted), mostly cosmetic
  • NOAEL- ? (maybe below 1 mg/l)
  • Moderate and severe forms not seen below 2 mg/l
  • Skeletal fluorosis (can be crippling)
  • Clear effects at 14 mg/day total exposure
  • Suggestive effects at 6 mg/day

10
Fluoride in CT Groundwater Wells
It is rare to find fluoride above 1.2 mg/l in CT
groundwater wells
11
Arsenic in Groundwater
  • New England Region
  • ME (statewide)
  • 1-3 50 ppb 12-13 10 ppb (Loiselle et al.,
    2001)
  • NH (southeastern)
  • 10-15 50 ppb (Boudette et al., 1985)
  • MA (eastern, i.e. Pepperell)
  • 12 50 ppb (Zeuna Keane, 1985)
  • CT (northeastern , i.e. South Woodstock)
  • 8 50 ppb (ATSDR, 1998)
  • 2/20 10 ppb (Brown Chute, 2001

12
Arsenic in New England Wells (from Ayotte et al.,
1999)
A Bedrock wells
B Stratified drift wells
13
Survey areas
14
Results Dissolved Arsenic
  • Colchester Area
  • All wells below DL
  • Woodstock Area
  • 8/20 wells above DL
  • 6/8 detects near S Woodstock
  • 2/20 MCL (10 ug/l)

Localized problem Contamination is not
widespread but also, not predictable.
15
What can be done?
Note DEP does not have a role and will not
supply bottled water
  • Use compliance information to flag potential
    areas of concern
  • Recommend additional testing of wells in areas of
    concern
  • Target well owners
  • New wells
  • Existing wells adjacent to known sources
  • Provide information on treatment and health
    effects
  • E.g. fact sheets

16
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com