Title of your presentation here - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Title of your presentation here

Description:

Some background about me and my research center. Educated entirely at MIT ... Supply chaining e.g. Wall-Mart streamlining steps ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Your207
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Title of your presentation here


1
Information Technology in Education Lessons
from Computing in a Large Research University
Steven R. Lerman Class of 22 Professor and
Director, MIT Center for Educational Computing
Initiatives
2
Some background about me and my research center
  • Educated entirely at MIT
  • Joined MIT faculty in 1975 in Civil Engineering
  • Shifted to Educational Technology as Director of
    Project Athena in 1983
  • Founded Center for Educational Computing
    Initiatives in 1991
  • Incoming Dean for Graduate Students

3
Revising Our Thinking About Teaching Learning
  • Teaching Learning
  • Teacher Mentor or Coach
  • Student Learner
  • Synchronous Asynchronous
  • Passive Active
  • Linear Nonlinear
  • Scheduled On-demand
  • Teaching material Accomplishing a Goal

4
Research Areas at CECI
Educational Applications
Enabling Technologies
Evaluation
5
Approach in this Course
  • Universities are large, complex organizations
    facing strategic and tactical issues in IT use
  • MIT has been one of the leading universities in
    the world in using IT as part of its overall
    leadership strategy
  • Can we learn about IT strategy and technology
    more generally from MITs processes and
    decisions?
  • Well use some MIT based case studies and try to
    generalize key lessons learned

6
Outline of Course
  • Background Technology Shifts and Organizational
    Responses
  • Case 1 A historical look at Project Athena
  • Case 2 Organizational Structure for Provision of
    IS
  • Case 3 Processes for Strategy Formation
  • Case 4 MIT OpenCourseWare
  • Case 5 Lab Experiments over the Internet
  • Case 6 Singapore-MIT Alliance
  • Case 7 Revising Freshman Physics with Technology
    Enabled Active Learning
  • Some other examples (as time allows)

7
Background How has IT and the world changed?
8
Moores Law and Metcalfes Law
  • Moores Law In 1965, Moore noted processing
    power doubles every 18 months
  • Metcalfes Law The value of a network grows as
    the square of the number of connected users

9
The World is Flat
  • Tom Friedmans book argues that technology
    enables global competition
  • He list 10 flatteners
  • Collapse of Berlin Wall - symbolic shift to
    global economy rather than economic blocs
  • Netscape the World Wide Web
  • Workflow software computer to computer comm
  • Open sourcing

10
The World is Flat
  • Outsourcing using most efficient providers for
    aspects of service provision and manufacturing
  • Supply chaining e.g. Wall-Mart streamlining
    steps
  • Insourcing company A providing services beyond
    usual mission to Company B, e.g. UPS reparing
    Toshiba computers
  • In-forming data gathering, as in Google
  • "The Steroids" Personal digital equipment like
    mobile phones, iPods, personal digital
    assistants, instant messaging, and voice over IP
    or VOIP

11
IT becoming ubiquitous
  • Extension of Internet globally
  • Leapfrogging of technology cell phone adoption
    in LDCs rather than building of wired
    telecommunications
  • Barriers still exist example of university
    access to Internet in East Africa

12
Case 1The Athena Experience (1983-1991)
  • Athena was in its time the single largest
    educational technology initiative in the world
  • 100 million USD (1983 dollars) over 8 years in
    equipment, personnel and cash
  • Single largest MIT-wide educational program we
    have ever undertakes

13
Educational Computing at MIT circa 1982
  • Era of mainframe and minicomputer
  • Almost all computing available was for research
    or administration
  • Student access for coursework virtually
    non-existent except for 2 departments
  • Faculty could not innovate using computing
    because there was no way to deliver course

14
Ad hoc committee
  • Dean of Engineering began series of meetings with
    interested faculty
  • Original vision was for School of Engineering,
    not all of MIT
  • Key leaders saw major issues at MIT
  • Access to computing
  • Incompatible computing environments
  • Lack of funding and incentives for faculty led
    innovation in education

15
Seeking industry partners
  • Large scale project envisioned requiring
    technical and financial partners
  • Industry leaders on verge of releasing personal
    computers and workstations
  • Period of high profitability for computer
    industry
  • Willingness to work collaboratively with MIT to
    create environment of the future

16
Formalization of Project Athena
  • Proposal to 2 largest computer vendors of time
    IBM and Digital
  • Expansion of project to all of MIT
  • Benefits and complexity of multi-corporation
    partnership at MIT
  • Staff, equipment and money

17
Organizational options
  • Integrate project into current IT organization
  • Create totally new organization to subsume all IT
    at MIT
  • Incubate Athena as separate organization to serve
    as change agent for central IT

18
Athenas goals
  • Technological goal coherence
  • Infrastructure goal build first campus network
    and deploy O(1000) networked workstations
  • Educational goal develop, use and evaluate new
    educational software, e.g. simulations, new tools

19
Athenas goals - accomplishments
  • Technological goal Kerberos authentication, X
    Window System, Zephyr instant messaging
  • Infrastructure goal connected all major
    educational buildings, Athena clusters in
    educational and residential areas, printers
    MIT-wide, server rooms
  • Educational goal internal grant program, high
    cost of implementation, difficulty with
    sustainability

20
Lessons from Athena (I)
  • Balancing three potentially competing goals is
    difficult
  • High cost of innovation with educational
    technologies at early stages of technology
  • Experimentation vs. service delivery
  • Management of expectations of faculty, staff and
    students
  • Price of the bleeding edge

21
Lessons from Athena (II)
  • Concentration of resources needed in educational
    innovation too many projects (about 80) each
    with too little funding
  • Sustainability of innovation-education,
    technology and infrastructure innovation easier
    than sustainability rapid technology change
    makes educational use expensive
  • Relationships with competing industrial partners
    can work, with university as neutral broker

22
Where should we be headed (I)?
  • MIT leadership in educational technology no
    longer unquestionable.
  • Educational improvements should be our first
    priority.
  • Market changes and technology changes require us
    to re-examine computing model.
  • Innovation should involve a small number of large
    initiatives.

23
Where should we be headed (II)?
  • We may need to run parallel systems that
    separates service delivery from experiment.
  • We should examine sustainability of innovation
    early in process.
  • We should partner with industry again.
  • Organizational structure for innovation (and
    relationship to other units at MIT) needs to be
    carefully planned.

24
For more information
  • MIT Project AthenaA Model for Distributed Campus
    Computing, by George Champine, Digital Press,
    1991.
  • Project Athena The First Five Years, Seven
    volume report.
  • Report of the MIT Technology Council, W. Mitchell
    and M. Derouzos (eds), October, 1991.

25
For More Information
  • Professor Steven R. Lerman, Director
  • Center for Educational Computing Initiatives
  • 9-317
  • MIT
  • Cambridge, MA 02139
  • USA
  • web http//ceci.mit.edu/research
  • email lerman_at_mit.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com