Title: Emulsion chambers
1Emulsion chambers UHE families
- A.S.Borisov
- P.N.Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy
of Sciences, - Moscow, Russia
2Contents
- 1. Introduction. Historydevelopment.
- 2. CR researches with XREC.
- 3. Main results of EC experiments.
- 3. Unusual events in cosmic rays.
- 3. What we need for their explanation?
- 4. What can QGP give?
- 5. Predictions for CR energy spectrum
- 6. Conclusions
3Introduction
- Emulsion chamber technique is one of the most
elaborated one in CRparticle physics with long
history
4Bright history of photographic/emulsion technique
in CRparticle physics.
- Henri Becquerels discovery (1896) of natural
radioactivity by observing the blackening of
photographic paper with uranium salts - in 1937 two Viennese physicists, Marietta Blau
and Herta Wambacher, had exposed photographic
emulsions for five months at 2,300 m in the
Austrian Alps and had seen the tracks of low
energy protons as well as 'stars' or nuclear
disintegrations probably caused by CRs
5Bright history of photographic/emulsion technique
in CRparticle physics.
- . . .
- charged pion discovery at Bristol by Lattes,
Muirhead, Occhialini and Powell (1947) with
newly developed high sensitivity boron-loaded
photographic (nuclear) emulsions exposed to CRs
at Pic-du-Midi in the Pyrenees (2,867 m a.s.l.)
they observed multiple scattering of a meson
followed by its nuclear capture in the emulsion
and producing a nuclear disintegration as well as
two-body decay p?mnm due to Lattes proposal
new searches for double meson events were moved
in 1947 to Mt.Chacaltaya (5600 m a.s.l.)
6Complete p?m?e decays in nuclear emulsions
showing the constancy of the muon range
Type of emulsion detector Ilford nuclear
research emulsions 50 mm thick while Muon range
was 600 mm (2D detector)
7Nuclear emulsion plates
- provides tracks of ionization produced by a
charged particle due to disintegration of AgBr
microcrystals (grains) suspended in gelatin - measurements and particle identification
- - particle range RR(E)
- - multiple scattering angle ?K/pbc1/E
- - grain density g v.s. ? ? m
- - measurement of the charge is based on the
- ionization energy loss dE/dxZ2/b2
- - track density of d-electrons nen(E)
8Emulsion technique advantages
- simplicity of operation
- versatility
- comparatively low weight
- continuous sensitivity
- high efficiency for particle distinguishing
- high spatial resolution (1 mm)
- direct visual image of event
9History of EC technique and its development. Main
milestones.
- . . .
- In 1948, observations with nuclear emulsions,
exposed at high-altitude balloons, by research
groups from the University of Minnesota (Ney,
Lofgren, Oppenheimer) and the University of
Rochester (Bradt, Peters) showed that the primary
cosmic particles are mostly protons with some
helium nuclei (alpha particles) and a small
fraction heavier nuclei (up to Fe) - 1950 - 1960-ies wide use of emulsion technique
in both CR and accelerator experiments. Further
developments (emulsion plate stacks - 3D
detectors, emulsion chambers, etc.)
10- . . .
- Emulsion Chamber (EC) consists of a sandwich
structure made of thick metal plates (passive
material) and thin emulsion layers (tracking
device). Most of the detector mass consists of
metal plates, allowing for a substantial cost
reduction (1/100) compared with stacks of pure
emulsions and allowing to reach higher detector
masses. In addition, the EC allows the
identification of particles and the measurement
of their kinematical parameter by observing in
detail specific ionization, showering and
multiple Coulomb scattering. - EC combines features of a calorimeter and a high
resolution tracking detector.
11History of EC technique and its development.
Main milestones.
- . . .
- In 1971, K. Niu of Nagoya University observed
X-particles (open-charm) in CR with emulsions
three years prior to the discovery of the hidden
charm particle, J/?, at CERN and Fermilab - In1977, hadro-produced B B pair event observed
in nuclear emulsions by WA75 at CERN, using a p-
beam of 350 GeV. - In 2000, the DONUT experiment at Fermilab allowed
the first direct observation of tau-neutrino.
12CR studies with XREC
- XRECs use a specific type of emulsions, i.e.,
X-ray films as more cheep sensitive materials
enabling to simplify the measuring procedure.
XREC technique, combining features of that of a
calorimeter and a high resolution tracking
detector, makes it possible to assemble
large-scale (1000 m2) detectors at mountain
altitudes and thus to move CR researches to
energy region E0 1015 1017 eV where direct
measurements in stratosphere or in outer space
are practically impossible due to low PCR flux - I (E0 1016 ) 1 particle/m2/sr/year
13Main principles and scheme of XREC experiments at
mountain elevations
- XRECs detect highest energy (g,e/- ) and charged
hadrons within EAS cores initiated by the PCR
particles in the thick air target above the
chamber - The higher the altitude, the weaker is the
shielding effect of the atmosphere and the higher
is the sensitivity of observed events to the PCR
particle origin and its initial interactions
thanks to less number of nuclear interactions
contributing to the events being recorded.
14XREC technique. Some details.
- XREC, made of a sandwich of various material
plates such as lead or iron interleaved with
X-Ray films, is a passive tracking coordinate
detector which enables experimentalists to
measure track geometry parameters of high energy
particles - Dx, Dy 50 mm, Dq 3?, Dj 15?
- High energy electromagnetic particles (Eth 2-4
TeV) induce shower cascades in lead/iron which
produce darkness spots on films placed deep in
the absorber. Optical density DR of a spot within
diaphragm of radius R measured with a
microphotometer DR DR(E,t), where t is the
depth of observation in absorber in radiation
lengths. Energy determination accuracy - sE/E0.2-0.3
15XREC technique and conclusions
- Physical conclusions from XREC experiments, i.e.,
on characteristics of hadron interactions as well
as PCR mass composition and energy spectrum, are
derived from comparison of experimental results
with those of simulations calculated in various
models of nuclear and strong interactions under
assumption of different PCR mass composition and
spectrum shape and accounting for the chamber
response. - Detailed simulations revealed higher sensitivity
of observables in XREC experiments to parameters
of strong interaction models and mass composition
as compared to EAS experiments due to less
number of successive interactions contributing to
an event. - Due to the high energy threshold (Eth 4 TeV),
XREC experiments study production of the most
forward particles, i.e., they study the kinematic
fragmentation region of a projectile particle
XREC experiments should be considered as
complementary ones to colllider experiments.
16Calibration of XREC technique
- The method of energy determination by XREC has
been calibrated in accelerator beams of electrons
and pions and proved in the fixed target
experiment on reconstruction of p0 mass in the
decay p0 ?2g by means of measuring of energy of
two initial g-rays and opening angle F
- Calibration of XREC technique with nuclear
emulsions. - Mutual calibration of XREC technique applied in
Pamir and Chacaltaya experiments.
17Mutual calibration of XREC technique applied in
Pamir and Chacaltaya experiments
- Joint Soviet- Japanese experiment
- Notations
- R(EP-ECh)/ (EPECh)
- Dashed (blakened) area is for (EPECh)/ 2 15
TeV
18Simulation of XREC response
- Simulation of XREC response with GEANT and
similar original programs allowing for detailed
structure of XREC calorimeters. - Simulation of XREC technique accounting for
overlapping of neighboring showers and finite
spatial resolution and recognition ability. - Simulation of measuring procedure.
19Simulation of XREC response with GEANTGHEISHA
Notations S Efall incident (genious) family
energy S Ereley measured (observed)
energy
20CR studies with XREC
- Mt.Chacaltaya EC experiment started by
Brazil-Japan collaboration in 1962 operated EC
which contained simultaniously nuclear emulsions
and X-Ray films (5200 m a.s.l., 560 g/cm2) - Aircraft-borne experiment with XREC by Smorodin
et al. (conducted in 1965-1968) - Mt.Fuji EC, started in 1968, exposed thick-type
lead EC (3750 m a.s.l., 650 g/cm2 ) - Pamir experiment, launched in 1971-1973, exposed
the largest XREC (4370 m a.s.l., 595 g/cm2 ) - Mt.Kanbala (5500 m) XREC experiment conducted by
Japan-China collaboration in 1981-1993 with
thick-type iron EC.
21Chacaltaya two-storey chamber(5200m a.s.l.,
Bolivia)
Calibration of XREC technique with emulsions
22Pamir experiment
Observables n?,h, E?,h, ?E?,h, x, y, R?,h? and
various combinations
- A family definition and selection criteria
- a collimated (Dq?3?, Dj?15?) bundle of particles
originated from one PCR particle - ?E? ? 100 TeV, n? ? 3, E? ? Eth 4 TeV, Eh(?) ?
Eth, R?,h?? 15 cm - Total exposition ST 4000 m2yr
- Available statistics Nf ? 2000
23The Pamir-Chacaltaya experimental results
- Since 1980, the members of the Pamir
collaboration worked side by side with physicists
engaged in the Mt.Chacaltaya Experiment in the
framework of the Pamir-Chacaltaya Joint EC
Experiment and carried out several joint
expositions both at the Pamirs and Mt.Chacaltaya
the results of which were analyzed in numerous
joint papers
- In the energy range E051014 31015 eV which
corresponds to released energies ?E? 100 400
TeV, QGS model-inspired simulation codes (MC0,
MQ, etc.) incorporating hard jet production and
based on extrapolation of accelerator data
produce a good fit to the main experimental
results - estimation of the inelastic cross-section for
p14N interactions gave a value of 360 ? 40 mb - increase of the inelasticity coefficient K for
p14N reactions from K0.5 at accelerator energies
up to K 0.78 at E0?1016 eV
24The Pamir-Chacaltaya experimental results
- scaling violation in the fragmentation region for
pion production was established, i.e., the
inclusive cross-section falls 2-3 times at x
0.3, when the energy increases from that
attainable with accelerators, due to
re-scattering of particles from nucleons inside a
nucleus - estimation of transversal cross-section for
quark-gluon string production ?jet (24 ? 7) mb
at jet transverse momentum ptjet ? 3 GeV/c and
XjF gt 0.05 - existence of the Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect
was confirmed. - Still, even in the low energy range E051014
31015 eV experimental data exhibit larger
fluctuations than simulated ones which can be
account for by under estimation of chamber
response only partially (Centauro events,
penetrating particles, etc).
25Unusual events
In the energy range 41015-1017 eV
significant discre-pancies between experimental
and simulated data are observed. The most
challenging phenomena are
- a high intensity of multi-core halo events
- the coplanar emission of the most energetic
hadrons and g-rays in the multiple particle
production - Centauro events with abnormal ratio of charged to
neutral particles - abnormal behavior of a hadron absorption curve,
which significantly deviates from exponential law
at large depth in lead absorber.
26Halo events
- If E0 1016 eV, a sufficiently high number of
overlapping under-the-threshold EPhC may overlap
creating an optical halo, i.e., a large diffuse
optical spot inside the corresponding g-family
with a visible energy ?E? ? 500 TeV. Sometimes
area of a halo S cm2 The fraction of halo
events increases with family energy and, at
?E??1000 TeV, amounts up to 70 .
Scanner image of FIANIT halo event
SD0.5 1017 mm2 visible energy E (23)?1016
eV (Isodence D0.5 corresponds to particle
density 0.04 mm-2)
Halo event selection criteria ?E? ? 500 TeV, n?
? 3, E? ? 4 TeV, SD0.5 ? 4 mm2 or ?Si D0.5 ? 4
mm2, Si D0.5 ? 1 mm2 R? ?? 15 cm Statistics
NH 61, ST3000 m2?year Nf tot (?E? ??
500 TeV) 143
27Simulation of Halo events
- MC0 is a QGS-model which
- satisfactory reproduces the main characteristics
ofg-families with ?E? 100400 TeV - describe well the halo size spectrum of
g-families with ?E? ? 500 TeV - Assumed PCR mass composition
28Simulation of Halo events
Energy spectra of protonsaccording KASCADE and
Tibet data
Contribution of primary particlesfrom different
energy intervalsto intensity of halo
gamma-families
All particles
protons
Pamir
Fraction of halo g-families with ?E? ? 500 TeV
produced by different PCR nuclei
29Conclusions based on halo g-family intensities
- Proton fraction in the PCR mass composition at
E0 ?? 1016 eV is not less then 15. - The results of the Pamir experiment contradict
to claims for drastic vanishing of protons and
?-particles at energies around 1016 eV. - Significant increasing of proton fraction in the
PCR at energies ? 1017 eV is not enough to agree
experimental data with the simulations.
30Phenomenon of coplanar emission of hadrons
- The effect, first observed in the Pamir
experiment, manifested itself as a strong
tendency for tracks of the most energetic
particles in ?-h families as well for their
narrow bundles (family cores) to be aligned along
a certain straight line in the target plane . - The highest energetic cores (HEC) in a family can
be represented by - halo cores
- ?-clusters or reconstructed ?0
- single gamma-ray or hadron.
An example of aligned 3-core halo event
31- For quantitative definition of events with N
cores aligned along one straight line, the
following criterion was introduced
where ?ijk is the angle between the straight
lines connecting the i-th and j-th cores with the
k-th core.
The parameter ?N 1 in the case of complete
alignment of N cores along one straight line and
tends to -1/(N-1) in an isotropic distribution
case.
Families containing N-core structures, composed
of the HEC and characterized by ?N ? ?C 0.8 are
referred to as aligned events.
32Aligned g-families
Example of the target diagram of an aligned
superfamily. Circles schematically show particles
unified into clusters.
l4-distribution of experimental and simulated
g-families in two energy ranges after applying of
clusterization procedure
33At ?E? ? 700 TeV the fraction of the events with
?4 ? 0.8FhEXP(l4gt0.8) 0.26?0.09for
C-chambersFhEXP(l4gt0.8) 0.43?0.17for
Pb-chambers
Nalign/Ntotal,
?E?, TeV Dependence of the fraction of families
with alignment on ?E? Experiment Pb-chamber
data, C-chamber of the Pamir Joint
Experiment, Pamir C-chamber Simulations simul
ated families with MC0-model randomly incident
objects
34Electromagnetic clustering procedure for gs and
p0 reconstruction
1.2 TeVcm for gammas 3.4 TeVcm neutral
pions
Dependence of aligned event fraction F(?4c gt 0.8)
and efficiency for p0 reconstruction on
decascading parameter zc.
Simulated family dissection efficiency of p0
reconstruction is the highest at zc3.6 TeV cm,
i.e. ltPgtltEgt0.8860.03 almost 90 where P
ncp / nc - purity of extracted electromagnetic
clusters E ncp/ ncp - efficiency
of gathering of all e-m particles ncp related to
a given p0
into a single cluster nc total
number of particles in a cluster ncp-
number of particles in a cluster originated from
p0 dominating in the
extracted cluster
35 Dependence of primary cosmic ray particle
energy E0 and fraction F(?4c gt 0.8) of
? -families with aligned four highest energy
neutral pions on total number Np0 of
extracted pions with Ec gt 10 TeV.
36Main treats of coplanar production of hadrons in
the most forward region
- existence of an energy threshold for aligned
event production (?E? 700 TeV ? E0 ??
(58)1015 eV) - related to most energetic particles
- large transverse momentum (about several GeV/c)
- A ratio of longitudinal component ltptgt of the
average transverse momentum of secondaries to
transverse component ltptgt-, determined in
reference to the coplanarity plane, can be
estimated as ltptgt/ltptgt- ltRcgt4/ltRcgt4-12?3 - considerable cross-section for the production
(spcopl spinel).
37Aligned events in Stratosphere
Two superfamilies induced by the PCR particles
with E0 ?? 81015 eV were once detected at the
balloon and aircraft-borne EC experiments by
chance and both of them appeared to be extremely
aligned
38Aligned events in Stratosphere
Estimation of production heights Hprod above the
chamber by various methods (triangulation,
invariant mass distributions, etc.)
39Strana
Baloon-borne experiment carried out by Prof.
Dobrotin and his colleagues of Lebedev Physical
Institute in 1975
Estimated primary energy E0 ? 21016 eV
40JF2af2 (Concorde)
- Lego plot with the 4 most energetic Gamma s
34 g s are aligned (about 50 of the visible
energy) 3 most energetic clusters (A,AP,B) each
containing the highest energy gammas (about 33
of the visible energy) are aligned
41Penetrating hadrons with abnormal absorption
- In the range of 0?70 rad. lengths, the absorption
curve obeys the standard exponential law with
index ?1(200?5) g/cm2. However, at larger depths
(gt70 c.u.), the absorption length of had-rons in
lead changes and becomes as high as ?2(340?80)
g/cm2. - This unusual phenomenon seems to be similar to
that discovered earlier at the Tien Shan Mountain
Station when absorption of EAS hadron cores in a
hadron calorimeter was studied (a hypothesis of
long-flying component of cosmic rays introduced
by V.I.Yakovlev).
dN/dt, m-2
t, c.u.
Distribution of the cascade origin points for
hadrons with Eh(?)? 6.3 TeV obtained in the
Pamir experiment by means of homogeneous
Pb-chambers 110 cm thick.
42RHIC experiments (STAR, PHENIX)
STAR 1,4?0,2?0,4 mb PHENIX
0,92?0,15?0,54 mb
43Testing of the charmed origin of penetrating
particles
Hypothesis Excessive cascades are initiated by
charm particles (
?2 mb/nucleon )
44Two-storeyed X-ray emulsion chamber with air gap
A section view of ionization-neutron calorimeter
with 2-storied X-ray emulsion chamber at the
top of it.
45Upper storey of XREC with 2.2 m air gap at Tien
Shan
46Lower storey of XREC with 2.2 m air gap at Tien
Shan
47Centauro-type events
- Centauro events first observed by the
Japan-Brazil Collaboration in a two-storied
emulsion chamber exposed at the Mt.Chacaltaya
are distinguished by abnormally high fraction of
energy carried by charged hadrons as compared to
that of gammas.
The Pamir experiment 88 ?-h families were
analysed with visible energy SEg?Eh(?)? 100 TeV
which were detected by Pb-chambers of 60 cm thick
with total exposition 132 m2?year.
Nh vs. Qh?Eh(?)/(SEg?Eh(?)) (Dots stand for
experimental events while crosses refer to
simulated ones. Candidates for Centauro-type
events in the Pamir and the Chacal-taya
experiment data are marked by squares and
circles, respectively).
48CENTAURO original data and interpretation
Nh100, lt pt gt 1.5 GeV/c , non-p0 production
49(No Transcript)
50re-analysis
Shower-cluster in S55 is not an upper body of
that in I12 !!
51gap-passing atmospheric family ??
52atmospheric jet produced at 50m above the chamber
?
V.V.Kopenkin et al. PRD68(2003) 052007
impossible !!
53C-jet with very large pt and multiplicity ?
no geometrical convergence to target layer !!
54again very exotic !!
a bundle of hadrons w/o accompanying g-rays
no collisions in the upper chamber !!
28 collisions In the target layer !!
55CONCLUSIONS
- Several new phenomena are observed in CRs with
XREC at energies around and beyond the knee
energy which are hard to explain within SM. - All unusual events and phenomena observed in EC
experiments can be accounted for by an assumption
of presence of highly penetrating particles in
CRs which are able to penetrate deep in the
atmosphere and then interact (or decay) nearby
XREC producing halo events, coplanar events or
Centauro-type events.
56Thank you for attention !
57Hybrid (combined) experiments
- Mt.Norikura (2770m a.s.l., 740 g/cm2), started
since 1958, ECAir Shower array - Hadron experiment at Tien Shan
- SYS at Mt.Chacaltaya Chacaltaya EAS array of
Saitama-Yamanashi-San Andres universities - 5200m a.s.l., 550 g/cm2, from 1977
- Hadron-M experiment within ATHLET project at Tien
Shan - MAKET detector within ANI experiment (1985-89)
- Since 1996, a hybrid experiment consisting of
emulsion chambers, burst detectors and the
Tibet-II air-shower array was carried out at
Yangbajing (4300 m a.s.l., 606 g/cm2) in Tibet
(3-year operation)
58- Development of emulsion technique and new
experiments - Hybrid (combined) CR experiments (Hadron, Tibet,
SYS) - OPERA experiment Emulsion cloud chambers
- accelerator experiments with hybrid detectors
where nuclear emulsions are combined with
electronic detectors and profit is taken of the
remarkable technological progress in automated
analysis (CHORUS, etc.)
59OPERA Experiment
- OPERA is a long-baseline neutrino oscillation
experiment designed to perform a nt appearance
search in the nm beam from CERN to Gran Sasso
underground laboratory, 730 km from CERN - Identification of the t lepton produced by a nt
CC interaction is based on the use the Emulsion
Cloud Chamber (ECC) which consists of a modular
structure made of a sandwich of passive material
plates (Fe, Pb) interleaved with emulsion films.
The emulsion is used only for tracking and t
decays are identified by a direct kink detection - Algorithm of electron shower reconstruction
developed in OPERA makes it possible to obtain a
nice e/p separation and good shower energy
estimation (dE0.1-0.2).
60OPERA Experiment
Detection of t leptons Sensitivity to Dm2
1.6-4.0 x 10-3 eV2 High background rejection and
Mtarget O(1 kton)
61YBJ hybrid experiment
62YBJ hybrid experiment
- Tibet-II air shower array consisted of 697
scintillation counters which are placed at a
lattice with 7.5 m spacing and 36 scintillation
counters which are placed at a lattice with 15 m
spacing. Each counter has a plate of plastic
scintillator, 0.5 m2 in area and 3 cm in
thickness, equipped with a 2-inch-in-diameter
photomultiplier tube (PMT). - At the center of air shower array, burst
detectors and emusion chambers were set up to
closely observe the core region of an air shower
event. The total area of them is 80 m2. Each
burst detector is composed of a plate of plastic
scintillator 160 cm (length) x 50 cm (width) x 2
cm (thikness) and 4 photodiodes attached to each
corner of the plate. On each burst detecter,
placed were 6 layers of emulsion chambers (x-ray
film interleaved with Pb plate). This hybrid
experiment incorporating the air shower array,
burst detectors emulsion chambers enables us to
select and measure the proton component in
primary cosmic rays in the "knee" region (10
15-1016 eV).
63Balloon-borne CR experiments with EC
- JACEE (1980-1996)
- 1Z26, E01012 - 51014 eV, W2-5 m2sr,
ST107(H,He)/65(Zgt2) m2day - MUBEE (1993-1995)
- 1Z26, E01013 - 31014 eV, W0.6 m2sr
- ST22 m2day
- RUNJOB (1995-1999)
- 1Z26, E01013 - 1015 eV, W1.6 m2sr
- ST575 m2hr
64JACEE detector
65RUNJOB detector