From Waitonga to Belfast - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

From Waitonga to Belfast

Description:

Headlines are from Otago Daily Times 1884 and 1886 (Dr Gabrielle Maxwell) ... It is unfortunate that the name 'restorative justice' is liable to be misunderstood. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: dsm1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From Waitonga to Belfast


1
From Waitonga to Belfast
  • Judge David Smyth QC.

2
Cessare Beccaria
  • In order that any punishment should not be an act
    of violence by one person, or by many, against a
    private citizen it is essential that it should be
    public, prompt, necessary, the minimum possible
    under the circumstances, proportionate to the
    crimes and established by law

3
11th June 1800
  • Mary West (and her mother)
  • Charge of theft
  • 14, unrepresented and convicted
  • Sentenced to be hanged
  • Commuted to transportation
  • Now 216 years since the first fleet landed in
    Port Jackson
  • French concept Penal reform and colonisation.

4
Does Detention work?
  • It may be necessary
  • It may be expected
  • It may prevent
  • It may deter
  • It may be the minimum required
  • Public, prompt (?), established by law
  • It should be civilised and humane

5
Dunedin New Zealand 1984 and 1986
  • there are a number of children running the
    streets of Dunedinwithout control of their
    parents. If the Government does not take them in
    handthey will becomemembers of a criminal
    class.
  • there is a definite relationship between the
    increase in the number of children on the streets
    and the increase in juvenile crime.
  • Headlines are from Otago Daily Times 1884 and
    1886 (Dr Gabrielle Maxwell)
  • Anyone who has read Dickens, whether Oliver Twist
    or Bleak House and Jo, the crossing sweeper.

6
Age of Criminal responsibility
  • Wide disparity e.g. Portugal 16 England and
    Northern Ireland 10 Scotland 8
  • UNCROC does not specify a minimum age but the UN
    Committee has criticised jurisdictions in which
    minimum age is 12 or below
  • Cultural norms complex questions of maturation
    and development involved
  • doli incapax, the rebuttable presumption that
    children are criminally incapable has gone in NI.
  • Legitimate area for debate.

7
Two competing themes
  • The desire, and need, for longer sentences in
    prison.
  • The desire to try and find effective, and less
    expensive, alternatives to custody.
  • Examples of first, authoritarian, desire
  • Examples of second, liberal, desire
  • Examples of alternatives that might be regarded
    as authoritarian but not involving custody

8
Children In Conflict with the Law
  • Givens
  • Specialist legislation for child offenders.
  • A separate Children/youth court
  • Specialist protections e.g. restrictions on
    arrest, identification.
  • Specialist should always deal with children
    whether they are police, social workers,
    advocates.

9
Eight Key Questions when children come into
contact with the law
  • At what age should children be held liable for
    their actions in court?
  • To what extent should child offending be
    considered as raising care and protection issues?
  • Do all children who break the law need to be
    charged and brought to court?
  • Should the states power here be (partially)
    transferred to families, victims and communities?

10
Eight questions
  • 5. Should children actively participate in formal
    criminal processes?
  • 6. Should a child ever be transferred to the
    adult criminal court for trial/sentence?
  • 7. Are we consistent with best international
    practice and is our response evidence based?
  • 8. What use should be made of detention
    centres/prison for young offenders?

11
Film Clip Welfare v Crime
  • How do you identify and assess what is more a
    welfare issue?
  • Who does this?
  • In this context where sits the age of criminal
    responsibility and who exactly assesses what
    welfare issues exist and how these issues are
    causative of crime.

12
Restorative Justice?
  • Restorative Justice seeks to balance the
    concerns of the victim and the community with the
    need to re-integrate the offender into society.
    It seeks to assist the recovery of the victim and
    enable all parties with a stake in the criminal
    justice process to participate usefully in it.

13
History in NI.
  • 1994 Portballantrae
  • Restorative Justice Working Group
  • Greater Shankill Alternatives
  • Community Restorative Justice (Ireland)
  • Criminal Justice Conference 1997
  • Criminal Justice Review 2000
  • Justice (NI) Act 2002

14
Continued
  • December 2003
  • Evaluation 2006, Institute of Criminology and
    Justice at Queens.
  • 185 conferences observed
  • Structured and semi-structured interviews
  • 458 ordered Now 1449 (esp last 3 months)
  • 134 by PPS Vast increase 145 in 3 months.
  • 324 by courts (291 last 3 months)
  • 34 acceptance in Belfast courts, 90 now 5

15
Evaluation
  • 53 of referrals related to offences of
    intermediate seriousness against the person and
    against property.
  • 23 were for serious offences and 21 for minor.
  • Concerns about process of court referral and
    consent.
  • Average age 16

16
Queens Institute of Criminology
  • The conference 75 of referrals to YCS result in
    a Conference. Both types completed in time.
  • Significant number of court ordered conferences
    related to children in care!
  • Victim participation rates high at 69. 70
  • Divided between 40 personal attendance, 47
    attendance by a representative and 13 by
    representatives where there was no individual
    victim. Personal attendance 59 (13 GB and 50
    NZ)

17
Opinions
  • Victims and offenders express appreciation for
    high degree of preparation.
  • Victims express overall satisfaction. 79 say
    they attended to help the offender.
  • Of offenders the vast majority express a desire
    to help the victim, to hear what the victim had
    to say, to make up for what they had done and to
    be forgiven.

18
Results
  • Apologies expressed 87. Almost unanimous in
    those where there was an identified victim.
  • Shame 77. Remorse 92.
  • Contributory factors like substance abuse, family
    problems and peer pressure discussed at most
    conferences.
  • After the conference 81 of offenders felt better
    and 48 of victims. This is now 90 October 2006
  • 92 of offenders and 78 of victims felt the
    conference had helped them realise the harm they
    did.
  • The vast majority of both victims (88) and
    offenders would recommend a conference.

19
Court and PPS results
  • Overall two out of three plans were approved, now
    95
  • All plans returned to PPS were approved
  • Most plans that were rejected were rejected on
    the basis that the offence was too serious for
    the imposition of an Order, but in some cases the
    offence was not deemed serious enough.
  • Of these disposal was either by a conditional
    discharge or by a period of youth custody..
  • The average time for a plan to be committed was
    67 days.

20
Two views
  • David Bowes Restorative Justice The Evidence.
    Justice of the Peace 168, 13th November 2004.
  • Hoyle, Young and Hill. Proceed with Caution An
    Evaluation of Thames Valley Police in Restorative
    Cautioning. Joseph Rowntree Foundation 2002.

21
Lord Clyde
  • It is unfortunate that the name restorative
    justice is liable to be misunderstood. It is
    certainly desirable that efforts be made to
    achieve a greater understanding on the part of
    the public about the substance and the advantages
    of restorative justice.the schemes provide an
    opportunity for engagement with the community and
    should not be seen as a threat for the whole
    system. It would be unfortunate if the present
    opportunity for dialogue was missed and the whole
    range of possible methods for dealing with
    problems at a community level in a manner which
    is consistent with and which supplements the work
    of the statutory agencies was lost to Northern
    Ireland.

22
Proposals
  • All those concerned in the progressing of this
    recommendation are to be congratulated on the
    positive steps that they have been taking and in
    particular the readiness of all of them to engage
    in discussion. All that gives room for hope.
  • Now that the opportunities have been grasped for
    serious discussion both in principle and in
    detail, the momentum should not be lost. But all
    parties must recognise the sensitivities in this
    area and the necessity for flexibility. However
    in progressing this recommendation, points of
    difference may be open to resolution as matters
    of practice rather than principle.

23
Crown Court Clip Southwark
  • Adult offenders. Crime of robbery. The
    difficulties experienced. Penalty imposed.
  • Down case in the nineties.
  • Antrim, the case of the gardener and the soldier.
  • Zoe
  • Death by Dangerous Driving.
  • Less serious sex offences in a family context.

24
Three elements of Group Conferencing
  • Partial Transfer of sentencing power from the
    State, principally the courts power, to the
    community.
  • The conference is a mechanism for producing a
    negotiated, community based response that allows
    welfare issue to be addressed.
  • The key is to involve victims as key
    participants, without risk to them, making the
    process impact on the offender with solace for
    the victim.

25
Conclusion
  • Less use of courts
  • Every juvenile case gets a conference
  • Evaluation is essential. It seems that early
    suggestions are that re-offending rates have
    certainly not increased.
  • Satisfaction expressed is high.
  • NZ experience from 1989 has shown youth crime
    static despite a vast decrease in use of
    detention and a universal system of FGC together
    with a huge diversion from courts.

26
Problems
  • Scope for manipulation
  • Effect on morale of multiple conferences
  • Lack of a discretion advantages and
    disadvantages.
  • Increase in age from 17 to 18 and arrival of more
    minor motoring offences.
  • Need for monitoring and enforcement and
    application of resources.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com