GEOG 3515 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

GEOG 3515

Description:

Political geography refers to the interplay of politics and related factors such ... terrorist group) and the Sendero Luminoso and Tupac Amaru movements of Peru. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: mlee4
Category:
Tags: geog | tupac

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GEOG 3515


1
GEOG 3515
  • The Geography of South America

Class 12 Politics and Geography in the
Republican Era
2
Political Geography
  • Political geography refers to the interplay of
    politics and related factors such as
    socio-cultural attributes, across space.
  • In South America, as previously discussed,
    important phenomena have included the colonial
    histories, demographic trends, ethnic variations,
    and differential concentrations of economic
    power, for example, between rural and urban
    elites.
  • A wide-ranging set of topics, for the purpose of
    this class, we will try and narrow it down by
    picking some key themes for a little more
    elaboration, particularly the struggle between
    conservatism and liberalism (frequently manifest
    as capitalinos v. regionales or rural
    latifundista v. urban intellectual), between
    oligarchies and the masses, and between criollo
    and indigena.
  • Woven into this is the complex history of the
    major global political struggle of the 20th
    century that between the forces of capitalism
    and communism.

3
Conservatives and Liberals
  • Our textbook has characterized the prevailing
    characteristic of many South American political
    environments
  • Conservatives favored status quo, preferred
    oligarchic power (supporting caudillos), resisted
    land reform, favored strong national governments,
    defended close links between church and state
    (for example, in providing education), and
    promoted rule from the capital city.
  • Liberals sought change, promoted democratic
    reform, proposed land reform and break up of
    latifundios, favored federalism and devolution of
    authority to states/regions, wanted separation of
    church and state, and (later) favored
    nationalization of major industries (especially
    foreign owned).

4
Conservatives and liberals
  • Conservatives were usually based in the capital
    city although frequently were owners of vast
    tracts of land in the rural provinces managed by
    caretakers.
  • Their family members dominated the military
    officer ranks and the catholic church hierarchy.
  • Their absentee status made them relatively blind
    to the plight of the rural peasants and their
    privileged status largely insulated them from the
    squalor and poverty of the urban poor.
  • Contrastingly, liberals were often
    foreign-educated upper classes, disillusioned,
    principled clergy (frequently Jesuits), and the
    more marginal middle-classes neglected and/or
    exploited by the oligarchs and based out in the
    under-developed regional centers.
  • The general success of the conservatives was a
    factor in promoting primatism of cities in South
    America.

5
The Capitalinos
  • Historically, the urban framework of South
    America became dominated by a few large cities,
    frequently the largest being the capital in which
    most of the important functions and economic
    wealth creation was located.
  • The dominance of a single large city over all the
    others in a region is known as primatism.
  • This was a common characteristic of the South
    American region in the colonial era.
  • It is estimated that the regional capitals in the
    1600s contained more than half of the Spanish
    populations.
  • It is still the case that the economic elites
    allocate the majority of financial resources to
    the traditional urban centers where they reside,
    exacerbating a push and pull phenomenon that has
    encouraged mass rural-urban migration from
    neglected regions that continues unabated.

6
Oligarchs and Peasants
  • Economic power has become very stratified and
    increasingly geographically polarized in South
    America.
  • Oligarchies predominate, with a high degree of
    wealth concentrated among a relatively small
    number of families.
  • Caudillo politics and a history of corruption,
    nepotism and political patronage and largesse
    have accentuated the concentration of wealth into
    the hands of the minority.
  • South American gini coefficients (measures of
    wealth distribution) are very skewed and high
    compared to most industrialized nations, even the
    highly skewed USA.
  • Peasant classes in many former Spanish colonies
    are frequently the indigenous peoples both the
    rural farmers working subsistence plots and as
    export-farm laborers, and the former peasants
    turned urban poor living in shanty towns.
  • Economic inequality frequently takes on an ethnic
    character with wealth being dominated by the
    Europeans and light-skinned mestizos - in the
    Guianas it is often the Asians that dominate.

7
Recap on Equality Measures
8
Mega-Political Geography South America and the
United States
  • The United States has been a powerful force on
    the political geography of the region throughout
    the 19th and the 20th centuries.
  • Directly in Central America and the Caribbean,
    and more indirectly in South America, the United
    States has played a key role in supporting
    particular political trends and in suppressing
    others.
  • The 1823 Monroe Declaration, made at the time of
    the drive for colonial independence, stated that
    the USA would not tolerate European military
    involvement in the neighboring nations of the
    Western Hemisphere.
  • This has led to repeated military invasions and
    occupations of selected Latin American and
    Caribbean nations and covert efforts to thwart
    left-wing rebel groups and socialist governments
    in South America.

9
US National Security
  • US national security interests have been widely
    interpreted by American Presidents to encompass
    political (strategic), economic and social
    dimensions.
  • US governments have defended US democratic ideals
    by the backing of right-wing governments against
    left-wing rebels.
  • US governments have defended US economic
    interests in Latin America by thwarting
    nationalization efforts aimed at US corporations
    (from the banana companies of Honduras to the
    mining and banking interests in Chile).
  • US governments have pursued US social objectives
    by interfering in domestic policies and land use
    (for example, by dealing with the issue of
    illegal drug problems at home by pursuing source
    eradication policies in South America).
  • US domestic agendas are promulgated in South
    America using combinations of force, diplomacy,
    economic incentives and disincentives, and covert
    operations (e.g. CIA operations, School of the
    Americas, etc.).

10
Socialism in South America
  • Varying forms of socialism have manifest
    themselves in South America over the last 100
    years.
  • Political parties/leaders a number of nations
    have had leftist political reform parties that
    gained power and instigated nationalization
    programs and land-reform (the degree of
    radicalism distinguishes the liberal from the
    socialist) e.g. parties of Betancourt (1940s) and
    Chavez (1990s) of Venezuela, MNR movement of
    Victor Paz Estnessoro of Bolivia (1950s), Marxist
    party of Salvador Allende of Chile (1970s).
  • Labor movements leftist trade unions have
    played a major role in politics, especially in
    Argentina (flourished under Perón) and Brazil
    (union leader Lula da Silva is now President)
    currently opposing globalization and US
    exploitation.
  • Marxist/Leninist/Maoist revolutionaries e.g.
    Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia/FARC
    (discredited as more of a paramilitary,
    drug-financed terrorist group) and the Sendero
    Luminoso and Tupac Amaru movements of Peru.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com