Spring 2002 Multiple Choice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Spring 2002 Multiple Choice

Description:

1. Tiger Woods can mow the grass of a golf course in 2 hours. ... C) They would trade if Tiger Woods pays Forrest Gump between US$40 and US$100,000. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: suema9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Spring 2002 Multiple Choice


1
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 1. Tiger Woods can mow the grass of a golf course
    in 2 hours. In these 2 hours he could be taping a
    commercial for Nike and earn US100,000. Forrest
    Gump can mow the grass in 4 hours and in these 4
    hours he could earn US40 working at McDonalds.
  • A) Tiger Woods has an absolute advantage in
    mowing grass.
  • B) Forrest Gump has a comparative advantage in
    mowing grass.
  • C) They would trade if Tiger Woods pays Forrest
    Gump between US40 and US100,000.
  • D) All of the above.

2
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 1. Tiger Woods can mow the grass of a golf course
    in 2 hours. In these 2 hours he could be taping a
    commercial for Nike and earn US100,000. Forrest
    Gump can mow the grass in 4 hours and in these 4
    hours he could earn US40 working at McDonalds.
  • A) Tiger Woods has an absolute advantage in
    mowing grass.
  • B) Forrest Gump has a comparative advantage in
    mowing grass.
  • C) They would trade if Tiger Woods pays Forrest
    Gump between US40 and US100,000.
  • D) All of the above.

3
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 2. England and Italy produce only butter and
    potatoes according to the following table
  • England Italy
  • Butter (lbs. per unit of worker) 2 1
  • Potatoes (lbs. per unit of worker) 2 1
  • Number of workers 1000 3000
  • a. England has an absolute advantage in the
    production of butter and Italy has an absolute
    advantage in the production of potatoes
  • b. England has an absolute advantage in the
    production of potatoes and Italy has an absolute
    advantage in the production of butter
  • c. England has an absolute adv. in both the prod.
    of butter potatoes
  • d. Italy has an absolute adv. in both the
    production of butter potatoes.

4
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 2. England and Italy produce only butter and
    potatoes according to the following table
  • England Italy
  • Butter (lbs. per unit of worker) 2 1
  • Potatoes (lbs. per unit of worker) 2 1
  • Number of workers 1000 3000
  • a. England has an absolute advantage in the
    production of butter and Italy has an absolute
    advantage in the production of potatoes
  • b. England has an absolute advantage in the
    production of potatoes and Italy has an absolute
    advantage in the production of butter
  • c. England has an absolute adv. in both the prod.
    of butter potatoes
  • d. Italy has an absolute adv. in both the
    production of butter potatoes.
  • Reason England can produce more of each with the
    same number of resources. The number of workers
    is immaterial.

5
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 2. England and Italy produce only butter and
    potatoes according to the following table
  • England Italy
  • Butter (lbs. per unit of worker) 2 1
  • Potatoes (lbs. per unit of worker) 2 1
  • Number of workers 1000 3000
  • England Italy will agree to trade if the price
    of 1 lb. of butter is
  • A) Between 1 2 lbs. of potatoes.
  • B) Between 1/2 2 lbs. of potatoes.
  • C) Between 1/2 1 lbs. of potatoes.
  • D) None of the above.

6
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 2. England and Italy produce only butter and
    potatoes according to the following table
  • England Italy
  • Butter (lbs. per unit of worker) 2 1
  • Potatoes (lbs. per unit of worker) 2 1
  • Number of workers 1000 3000
  • England Italy will agree to trade if the price
    of 1 lb. of butter is
  • A) Between 1 2 lbs. of potatoes.
  • B) Between 1/2 2 lbs. of potatoes.
  • C) Between 1/2 1 lbs. of potatoes.
  • D) None of the above the opportunity cost of the
    two is the same.

7
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 4. The following table shows Lynns utility from
    days skiing
  • Total Days Skiing Total Utility
  • 0 0
  • 1 200
  • 2 300
  • 3 350
  • 4 340
  • If each day skiing will cost Lynn 60 what will
    be her consumer surplus from skiing?
  • a. 350 b.180
  • c. 170 d. We dont know how many days Lynn will
    choose, so we cannot calculate C.S.

8
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 4. The following table shows Lynns utility from
    days skiing
  • Total Days Skiing Total Utility
  • 0 0
  • 1 200
  • 2 300
  • 3 350
  • 4 340
  • If each day skiing will cost Lynn 60 what will
    be her consumer surplus from skiing?
  • a. 350 b.180 CS TU - TE 300 - 120 180 for
    Q3
  • c. 170 d. We dont know how many days Lynn will
    choose, so we cannot calculate C.S.

9
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 5. Which of the following could not shift out the
    market demand curve for a good?
  • a) Increase in income of the population.
  • b) Increase in price of the good.
  • c) Increase in population.
  • d) Increase in the price of substitutes for the
    good.

10
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 5. Which of the following could not shift out the
    market demand curve for a good?
  • a) Increase in income of the population.
  • b) Increase in price of the good.
  • c) Increase in population.
  • d) Increase in the price of substitutes for the
    good.
  • Reason a change in the price of a good results
    in a shift along the demand curve, not a shift of
    the demand curve.

11
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 6. If the supply curve is perfectly inelastic
    and the demand curve has an elasticity (in
    absolute value) of 0.7 and we impose a per-unit
    tax in this market on the demand side, then
  • a. Consumers and Producers share the burden of
    the tax.
  • b.Consumers pay the whole tax, while producers do
    not pay anything.
  • c. Producers pay the whole tax, while consumers
    do not pay anything.
  • d.None of the above.

12
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 6. If the supply curve is perfectly inelastic
    and the demand curve has an elasticity (in
    absolute value) of 0.7 and we impose a per-unit
    tax in this market on the demand side, then
  • a. Consumers and Producers share the burden of
    the tax.
  • b.Consumers pay the whole tax, while producers do
    not pay anything.
  • c. Producers pay the whole tax, while consumers
    do not pay anything. Reason supply perfectly
    inelastic.
  • d.None of the above.

13
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 7. Suppose that the supply and the demand for
    blank CDs can be characterized by
  • Supply Qs 100 3P
  • Demand Qd 160 P
  • where Qs is the supply of CDs, and Qd is the
    demand for CDs. What is the equilibrium price?
  • a. 10 b. 30
  • c. 15 d. 75

14
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 7. Suppose that the supply and the demand for
    blank CDs can be characterized by
  • Supply Qs 100 3P
  • Demand Qd 160 P
  • where Qs is the supply of CDs, and Qd is the
    demand for CDs. What is the equilibrium price?
  • The equilibrium price is a P such that Qs(P)
    Qd(P), or
  • 100 3P 160 P
  • 4P 60
  • P 15.

15
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 8. Suppose that the supply and the demand for
    blank CDs can be characterized by
  • Supply Qs 100 3P
  • Demand Qd 160 P
  • where Qs is the supply of CDs, and Qd is the
    demand for CDs. If a tax of 5 is imposed per CD,
    the number of CDs purchased after the tax will
    be
  • a. Less than 145 CDs. b. 145 CDs.
  • c. More than 145 CDs. d. We do not have
    enough information to answer this.

16
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 8. Suppose that the supply and the demand for
    blank CDs can be characterized by
  • Supply Qs 100 3P
  • Demand Qd 160 P
  • where Qs is the supply of CDs, and Qd is the
    demand for CDs. If a tax of 5 is imposed per CD,
    the number of CDs purchased after the tax will
    be
  • At a price of 15, without tax there would be
  • Qs(15) Qd(15) 100 315 145
  • Taxes will reduce the number bought, so less than
    145 CDs will be bought.

17
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 9. Which one of the following could not occur if
    there was a price ceiling on a good?
  • A).A surplus would develop
  • B).Equilibrium price would be below the ceiling
  • C).A black market would arise
  • D).Less firms would enter the industry

18
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 9. Which one of the following could not occur if
    there was a price ceiling on a good?
  • A).A surplus would develop
  • B).Equilibrium price would be below the ceiling
  • C).A black market would arise
  • D).Less firms would enter the industry
  • Reason a surplus only occurs when the quantity
    supplied is greater than the quantity demanded.
    Normally, this would cause prices to drop, and a
    price ceiling wont prevent this. A price floor
    would.

19
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 10. In January, 2,500 quarts of ice cream are
    sold in Boston at 2 a quart. In February, the
    price went down by 10 and the quantity sold
    increased by 2. This means that the price
    elasticity for ice cream (disregarding the minus
    sign) is
  • A. 1
  • B. .2
  • C. 2
  • D. .1

20
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 10. In January, 2,500 quarts of ice cream are
    sold in Boston at 2 a quart. In February, the
    price went down by 10 and the quantity sold
    increased by 2. This means that the price
    elasticity for ice cream (disregarding the minus
    sign) is
  • A. 1
  • B. .2 Elasticity DQ/DP 2/10
  • C. 2
  • D. .1

21
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 11. A consultant has suggested that the Eatwell
    food truck lower its prices to increase revenue.
    The consulted must be assuming that
  • a. The food at Eatwell has close substitutes and
    thus demand elasticity is greater than 1.
  • b. The food at Eatwell has few close substitutes
    and thus demand elasticity is greater than 1.
  • c. The food at Eatwell has close substitutes and
    thus demand elasticity is less than 1.
  • d. The food at Eatwell has few close substitutes
    and thus demand elasticity is less than 1.

22
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 11. A consultant has suggested that the Eatwell
    food truck lower its prices to increase revenue.
    The consulted must be assuming that
  • a. The food at Eatwell has close substitutes and
    thus demand elasticity is greater than 1.
  • b. The food at Eatwell has few close substitutes
    and thus demand elasticity is greater than 1.
  • c. The food at Eatwell has close substitutes and
    thus demand elasticity is less than 1.
  • d. The food at Eatwell has few close substitutes
    and thus demand elasticity is less than 1.

23
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 12. One of the benefits of the market system in
    allocating goods is that
  • a. Everyone who can produce a good produces it.
  • b. Everyone who wants a good buys it.
  • c. Consumers who value the good the most buy
    it.
  • d. Producers with the highest opportunity
    costs produce it.

24
Spring 2002 Multiple Choice
  • 12. One of the benefits of the market system in
    allocating goods is that
  • a. Everyone who can produce a good produces it.
  • b. Everyone who wants a good buys it.
  • c. Consumers who value the good the most buy
    it.
  • d. Producers with the highest opportunity
    costs produce it.

25
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • 1. Over the Christmas shopping season of 2000 a
    local department store sold 250 scarves at 35
    each. The following year (2001) they sold only
    220 scarves despite a lower price of 30 each.
    Use the general model of supply demand curve to
    explain this change by answering the following
    questions
  • a. Draw typical Supply Demand curves for
    scarves with an equilibrium price quantity that
    reflect the situation in year 2000.
  • b. What shift of the demand curve is consistent
    with the change between 2000 2001? Show this
    graphically explain.
  • c. Suppose that only thing that changed between
    2000 2001 is that incomes declined. What does
    this imply about income elasticity? Is this a
    normal or an inferior good?
  • d. Now suppose incomes did not change between
    2000 2001. What other reason may cause the
    shift in demand you described in part b?
  • e. Could the changes from 2000 to 2001 be
    explained by a shift of the supply curve alone?
    Explain.

26
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • 1. Over the Christmas shopping season of 2000 a
    local department store sold 250 scarves at 35
    each. The following year (2001) they sold only
    220 scarves despite a lower price of 30 each.
    Use the general model of supply demand curve to
    explain this change by answering the following
    questions
  • a. Draw typical Supply Demand curves for
    scarves with an equilibrium price quantity that
    reflect the situation in year 2000.
  • Answer graph a supply demand that intersect at
    Q250 P35
  • 6 points as follows
  • D S curves 2 points
  • Label Axis (ex P Q scarves) 2 points
  • Show correct equilibrium (Q250, P35) 2 points.

27
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • 1. Over the Christmas shopping season of 2000 a
    local department store sold 250 scarves at 35
    each. The following year (2001) they sold only
    220 scarves despite a lower price of 30 each.
    Use the general model of supply demand curve to
    explain this change by answering the following
    questions
  • b.What shift of the demand curve is consistent
    with the change between 2000 2001? Show this
    graphically explain.
  • Answer In the new equilibrium prices are lower
    but quantity demanded is lower too, this is
    consistent with a shift in of the D-curve.
  • 5 points as follows
  • New D-curve 2 points
  • New equilibrium 2 points
  • Explanation 1 point.

28
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • 1. Over the Christmas shopping season of 2000 a
    local department store sold 250 scarves at 35
    each. The following year (2001) they sold only
    220 scarves despite a lower price of 30 each.
    Use the general model of supply demand curve to
    explain this change by answering the following
    questions
  • c. Suppose that only thing that changed between
    2000 2001 is that incomes declined. What does
    this imply about income elasticity? Is this a
    normal or an inferior good?
  • Answer We see that as income declined demand
    shifted in. That means that income elasticity is
    positive so this is a normal good. Note that
    E(I)?Q/?I, here both numerator denominator
    are negative so that E(I) must be positive.
  • 5 points as follows
  • Income elasticity positive 3 points (1 for
    stating fact, 2 for explanation as above)
  • Normal good 2 points.

29
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • 1. Over the Christmas shopping season of 2000 a
    local department store sold 250 scarves at 35
    each. The following year (2001) they sold only
    220 scarves despite a lower price of 30 each.
    Use the general model of supply demand curve to
    explain this change by answering the following
    questions
  • d. Now suppose incomes did not change between
    2000 2001. What other reason may cause the
    shift in demand you described in part (b)?
  • Answer Thee are many possible correct answers
    here. Examples include A change in the taste for
    scarves such as a decline in their trendiness,
    global warming and there by a reduced need for
    scarves.
  • 5 points as follows
  • 3 for a possible change
  • 2 for relating that change to the correct shift
    in demand.
  • Clarification An answer that states that tastes
    changes without explaining in which direction
    would get only 3 points.

30
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • 1. Over the Christmas shopping season of 2000 a
    local department store sold 250 scarves at 35
    each. The following year (2001) they sold only
    220 scarves despite a lower price of 30 each.
    Use the general model of supply demand curve to
    explain this change by answering the following
    questions
  • e. Could the changes from 2000 to 2001 be
    explained by a shift of the supply curve alone?
    Explain.
  • Answer No. If only supply changed we would have
    to get from the original equilibrium to the new
    one by moving along the demand curve. And that
    would mean D-curve is upward sloping which
    contradict our assumptions.
  • 5 points as follows
  • 2 for this would mean a movement along D-curve
    (or similar notion)
  • 3 for rest of logic.
  • Note If you wrote yes, as long as demand is
    upward sloping you can get a maximum of 4 points
    here.

31
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • 2. Italy has three workers. They can all produce
    wine and/or beer but they have different
    abilities, according to the following table
  • ITALY Worker 1 Worker 2 Worker 3
  • Wine (barrels) 1 1 4
  • Beer (Kegs) 2 5 1
  • a. Draw Italys PPF. (Explain briefly).
  • b. What is the opp. cost of increasing the prod
    of wine from 2 to 3 barrels?
  • c. Suppose that in Italy wine and beer are
    consumed in equal amounts. Identify the
    consumption point in the PPF graph derived in
    part a above. (Explain briefly.)
  • d. Suppose Spain (a country that also produces
    wine beer) is prepared to trade with Italy at a
    price of 2 barrels of wine for every keg of beer.
    Would Italy agree to trade? Would it change its
    production point (and if so, to what)? Would it
    export or import wine from Spain? Explain.

32
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • 2. Italy has three workers. They can all produce
    wine and/or beer but they have different
    abilities, according to the following table
  • ITALY Worker 1 Worker 2 Worker 3
  • Wine (barrels) 1 1 4
  • Beer (Kegs) 2 5 1
  • a. Draw Italys PPF. (Explain briefly).
  • 6 Points as follows
  • 2 points for any PPF (as long as axis correct)
  • 2 extra pints for correct PPF
  • 2 points for explanation/calculation etc.

beer
ITALY
8 7 5
wine
4 5 6
33
beer
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • 2. Italy has three workers. They can all produce
    wine and/or beer but they have different
    abilities
  • ITALY Worker 1 Worker 2 Worker 3
  • Wine (barrels) 1 1 4
  • Beer (Kegs) 2 5 1
  • b. What is the opportunity cost of increasing the
    production of wine from 2 to 3 barrels?
  • Answer As you increase production of wine from 2
    to 3 barrels you must shift an extra part of
    worker 3 from beer making to wine making.
    Specifically you must give up ¼ of his time
    making beer, so you give up ¼ barrels of beer.
    The O.C. of wine at that point is therefore ¼
    kegs of beer.
  • 6 points as follows
  • 2 for correct answer.
  • 4 for explanation (either algebraic, graphic or
    in words as above).

ITALY
8 7 5
wine
4 5 6
34
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • 2c. Suppose that in Italy wine and beer are
    consumed in equal amounts. Identify the
    consumption point in the PPF graph derived in
    part a above. (Explain briefly.)
  • Answer Italy would produce consume 5 barrels
    of wine and five barrels of beer. You can see
    this by either finding the intersection of the
    45-degree line with the PPF, or by noting that if
    workers 1 3 produce wine and worker 2 produces
    beer we have 5 units of each. This point must be
    indicated in the PPF correctly.
  • 6 points as follows
  • 2 for (5,5)
  • 2 for adding it to PPF as requested
  • 2 points for explanation (graphic or algebraic).

Beerwine
beer
ITALY
8 7 5
Consumption point
wine
4 5 6
35
  • Spring 2002 Short Answer
  • d. Suppose Spain (a country that also produces
    wine beer) is prepared to trade with Italy at a
    price of 2 barrels of wine for every keg of beer.
    Would Italy agree to trade? Would it change its
    production point (and if so, to what)? Would it
    export or import wine from Spain? Explain.
  • Answer Yes. Italy would be prepared to trade.
    Italy would now produce wine with worker 3 as
    their O.C. of wine is greater that the price
    ratio of 2 wine to 1 beer (or 1 wine to ½ beer).
    Workers 1 2 would produce beer. Italy is now
    producing 4 units of wine 7 units of beer. In
    order to continue the consumption at a ratio of
    11 it must sell (or export) beer and buy (or
    import) wine.
  • 8 points as follows
  • 2 for yes to trade.
  • 2 for new production point (4 wine, 7 beer)
  • 2 for explanation of how to get new production
    point
  • 2 points for Italy exporting beer

Beerwine
beer
ITALY
8 7 5
Consumption point
wine
4 5 6
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com