Title: CDCs Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs
1CDCs Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco
Control Programs
- Jerelyn Jordan
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Office on Smoking and Health
2Environment -- U.S.A.
- Master Settlement Agreement, November 23,
1998 - Settled state lawsuits against tobacco industry
- Extends to 46 states (4 settled individually)
- Provides 206 billion over 25 years to states
- Limited public health provisions
- No funds specifically earmarked for tobacco
control
3Basis for Lawsuits
- Recoup costs states paid to treat ill smokers
- Companies violated antitrust laws
- Violated consumer protection laws
- Conspired to withhold information about adverse
health effects of tobacco - Manipulated nicotine levels to keep smokers
addicted
4Post-MSA Spendingper Federal Trade Commission
5Major Issues for States
- Funding competition between tobacco control and
other state priorities - Restrictions in state legislation (e.g.,
earmarking funds for youth activities only) - Need for future renewal of legislation
- Shortened start up timeline for increased funding
and activity - Increased scrutiny of programs
6Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control
Programs
- U.S. tobacco control resources are expanding
- CDC/Office on Smoking and Health has received
increased requests for guidance on effective
programs - Response Best Practices for Comprehensive
Tobacco Control Programs
7Whats in Best Practices?
- Program recommendations
- Funding recommendations
- References for more information
- State comparison information
- State specific information, by program area
8Origin of Best Practices
- Recommendations are evidence based
- Analysis of excise tax funded programs in
California and Massachusetts - CDCs involvement in planning programs
- Activities in 4 states that individually settled
with the tobacco industry
9Best Practices
- Tobacco control program key attributes
- Comprehensive
- Sustainable
- Accountable
10Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Work
- Dose response relationship between levels of
spending and program effect - Increase in spending per capita associated with
larger tobacco control program effect - Increased efficiency from lessons learned
11Best Practices
- Programmatic elements
- Community programs to reduce tobacco use and
denormalize smoking - School programs
- Enforcement of existing regulations and laws
- Statewide programs
- Cessation programs
12Best Practices
- Programmatic elements (continued)
- Countermarketing programs,
including paid broadcast and print media, media
advocacy, public relations, public education, and
health promotion activities - Surveillance and evaluation
- Administration and management
13Best Practices
- Goals of community programs
- To reduce exposure to environmental tobacco smoke
- To prevent initiation in youth
- To promote cessation in adults and youth
- To identify and eliminate health disparities
among populations
14The potential for combined effects underscores
the need for comprehensive approaches.
- Reducing Tobacco Use
- A Report of the Surgeon General
- August, 2000
15Young people will perceive contradictory or
inconsistent messages in our prevention efforts
if programs do not address the smoking behavior
of parents and other adult role models and the
public health risks of environmental tobacco
smoke.
- Reducing Tobacco Use, 2000
16Investment in Tobacco ControlState Highlights
2001
- State information
- Adult smoking rates
- Youth tobacco use
- Health impact and cost
- Tobacco control legislation/tobacco taxes
- Tobacco economy (sales, agriculture,
manufacturing) - Sources of funding for tobacco control
17Simply stated, our recent lack of progress in
tobacco control is attributable more to the
failure to implement proven strategies than it is
to a lack of knowledge about what to do.
- Reducing Tobacco Use, 2000
18CDC WebsiteHttp//www.cdc.gov/tobacco
- Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control
Programs - Investment in Tobacco Control State
Highlights 2001 - Reducing Tobacco Use A Report of the Surgeon
General, 2001