Defining Disability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Defining Disability

Description:

... Support Plan (CSP) For Children Who Face Long-term Complex Or Multiple Barriers ... Go Beyond The Traditional Smiley Faces And Sad Faces' Approaches ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:222
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: morayhouse4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Defining Disability


1
Introduction
  • Defining Disability
  • Scottish Guidance And Legislation
  • No Clear Guidance On Disabled Children
  • Implications Of Disagreement On Competency For
    Research
  • Examples
  • Conclusion

2
WHO
  • Prior To 2001
  • Disability - Impairment
  • Impairment - Physical Limitations
  • Handicap - Social Limitation E.G. Cant
    Physically Go Out
  • Since 2001
  • Disability - Impairment, Activity Limitations,
    Participation Restrictions
  • Still Assumption That These Relate To The
    Individual

3
Modern Social Model of Disability
  • ...the disadvantage or restriction of activity
    caused by a contemporary social organisation
    which takes little or no account of people who
    have...impairments and thus excludes them from
    participation in the mainstream of social
    activities. (UPIAS/Disability Alliance, 1976)
  • UPAIS/Disability Alliance (1976) Fundamental
    Principles of Disability. Methuen London.
    http//www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveu
    k/UPIAS/UPIAS.pdf

4
Scottish Legislation
  • 1968 Social Work (Scotland) Act (set up the
    Childrens hearing system in Scotland)
  • Children (Scotland) Act (1995)
  • The Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991,
  • Standards in Scotland's Schools etc. (Scotland)
    Act 2000.
  • Education (Additional Support For Learning)
    (Scotland) Act 2004
  • Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007

5
Children (Scotland) Act 1995
  • Views of children
  • (1) A person shall, in reaching any major
    decision which involves
  • (a) his fulfilling a parental responsibility or
    the responsibility mentioned in section 5(1) of
    this Act or
  • (b) his exercising a parental right or giving
    consent by virtue of that section,
  • have regard so far as practicable to the views
    (if he wishes to express them) of the child
    concerned, taking account of the childs age and
    maturity, and to those of any other person who
    has parental responsibilities or parental rights
    in relation to the child (and wishes to express
    those views) and without prejudice to the
    generality of this subsection a child twelve
    years of age or more shall be presumed to be of
    sufficient age and maturity to form a view.
  • (2) A transaction entered into in good faith by a
    third party and a person acting as legal
    representative of a child shall not be
    challengeable on the ground only that the child,
    or a person with parental responsibilities or
    parental rights in relation to the child, was not
    consulted or that due regard was not given to his
    views before the transaction was entered into.

6
GIRFEC
  • When you are having problems you should be able
    to find out easily what help you can get and how
    to get it.
  • You should be able to say what you feel and know
    that your views are important. You should feel
    sure that people will do all they can to help
    you.
  • You should know that if you keep doing something
    that puts you at serious risk, now or in later
    life, action will be taken. For example, if you
    keep offending or taking drugs.
  • You should be able to find out easily what help
    you can get.

7
Education (Additional Support For Learning)
(Scotland) Act 2004
  • Replaced Assessment And Recording System
  • Widened Concept Of Additional Support
  • More Rights For Parents
  • Mediation And Tribunial
  • Code Of Practice
  • Co-ordinated Support Plan

8
Education (Additional Support For Learning)
(Scotland) Act 2004
  • A child or young person has additional support
    needs for the purposes of this Act where, for
    whatever reason, the child or young person is,
    or is likely to be, unable without the provision
    of additional support to benefit from school
    education provided or to be provided for the
    child or young person

9
Education (Additional Support For Learning)
(Scotland) Act 2004
  • Children And Young People May Require Additional
    Support For A Variety Of Reasons And May Include
    Those Who
  • Have Motor Or Sensory Impairments
  • Are Being Bullied
  • Are Particularly Able Or Talented
  • Have Experienced A Bereavement
  • Are Looked After
  • Have A Learning Difficulty?

10
Education (Additional Support For Learning)
(Scotland) Act 2004
  • Are Living With Parents Who Are Abusing
    Substances
  • Are Living With Parents Who Have Mental Health
    Problems
  • Have English As An Additional Language
  • Are Not Attending School Regularly
  • Have Emotional Or Social Difficulties
  • Are On The Child Protection Register
  • Are Young Carers

11
New Act
  • New Flexible Co-ordinated Support Plan (CSP) For
    Children Who Face Long-term Complex Or Multiple
    Barriers To Learning And Who Require Frequent
    Access To A Diversity Of Services From Outwith
    Education Authority
  • Within 16 Weeks Of Notifying Parent
  • Http//Www.Scotland.Gov.Uk/Library5/Education/Shas
    la-00.Asp

12
Duties On Education Authorities
  • Provide For Additional Support Needs
  • Prepare And Review Csps Every 12 Months
  • Interagency Advice, Assessment And Info
  • Take Into Account The Views Of The Child And
    Parents
  • Provide Independent Mediation
  • Address Transition
  • Publish, Review And Update Their Policies
  • Health Boards And Social Work Have A Duty To Help
    Educational Authorities

13
Benefits of Listening
  • Pedagogical and developmental benefits (children
    can learn educationally, morally and personally
    from the experience)
  • Political benefits (children can change social
    policy, exercise rights and share power with
    adults)
  • Epistemological benefits (dialogue with children
    can produce improved understandings and better
    knowledge for academics and policy makers
    concerning their life conditions
  • Consumer benefits (it has the potential to
    produce services that are better money for value,
    better planned and better staffed)
  • Protectionist benefits (the experience of
    developing respectful dialogue with adults and
    other children will promote child protection and
    help to prevent child abuse)
  • Inclusive benefits (it has the potential to
    foster better relations in communities and to
    develop a more integrated society)

14
Scottish Caveats Davis and Watson 2000
  • Listening related more to guidance than law
  • taking into account age and maturity
  • when in the childs best interest,
  • wherever possible
  • where costs are not prohibitive.
  • safety (when inclusion in decision making
    processes could harm the child)
  • competency (when the child is not thought
    capable of understanding the process)
  • See Lee (1999) Discussion Re Competence

15
Scottish Caveats
  • Assumed Child Of 12 Years Of Age Or More
  • Younger Children -Sufficient Understanding
  • How And Who Assesses Competency Is Unclear
  • Little Said About Disabled Children With
    Exception Of Education Act 2004

16
Corker Davis (2001)
  • There Is Little Mention Of The Rights Of Disabled
    Children In The Various Books About Children And
    The Law
  • The Dominant Discourse In Law Views Disabled
    Children In Terms Of Dependency, Vulnerability
    And Protection
  • Law In Itself Is Very Often Individualising And
    Dehumanising.
  • Law Not Only Simplifies And Reduces Social
    Issues, But Also Absorbs And Neutralises Them

17
What Discourses Prevent Us Listening To Disabled
Children?
  • Disabled Children Are Not Consumers
  • Certain Disabled Children Will Not Learn
  • Disabled Children Are Unaware Of The Social And
    Political
  • Certain Disabled Children Are So Broken They Cant
    Be Included
  • Certain Disabled Children Have No Knowledge

18
Davis et. al. 2000 Professionals
  • Measure Children Against So Called Norms
  • Overlook Cultural And Social Routes
  • Privilege Oral
  • Narratives Of Care, Dependency, Vulnerability And
    Exclusion
  • Dont Differentiate Between Children With Same
    Impairment
  • Not Reflexive

19
Complex Psychology Beginning To See Structure
  • Hogan 2005
  • Structure And Agency
  • Macro And Micro
  • Problem Unware Of Postmodernism Of Rogoff And
    Stanton-rogers
  • Since 2000 Paper Psychologists Starting To Adopt
    Language Of Inclusion But Not Practices

20
Example Of Effect Of Stereotypes
  • Cuskelly, M (2005) Some Children With
    Intellectual Disability
  • Cannot Give Consent
  • No Sense Of Social Model Group Identity
  • Who Cares? (Morris, 1999) 12 out of the 66 SW
    found out the childs views
  • She is unable to verbally communicate and
    therefore her view is not available
  • it is not possible to know what his views are
    owing to his level of disability.

21
Lewis and Kellet Complex Psychology Does Not See
Politics or Power
  • Difficulties Constructing Text When Children Use
    Symbols And Signs
  • Language Delay Relates To Living Away From Family
  • But Fail To See Politics Of Residential Schools
    and Deaf Culture
  • Or Childrens Resistance As Choice

22
Davis and Watson 2000
  • Many Professionals Dont Spend Enough Time With
    Disabled Children To Learn Their Communication
    Methods E.G Tudge And Hogan 2005 24 Hours - Us 6
    Months
  • Emphasis Should Be On Adults To Show They Have
    Exhausted Attempts To Learn Communication Methods
  • Should Not Be Considered A Politically Neutral
    Activity

23
Davis and Watson 2000Key Questions
  • What Did I Do Wrong That Prevents
    Communication?
  • What Professional Assumptions Are Getting In The
    Way
  • What Personal Assumptions?
  • Is The Criteria Appropriate (a test?)
  • Do I Have Preconceptions About Impairment/Disabili
    ty?

24
Alternative Embedded Enabling Mosaic Approach
Alison Clerk
  • Go Beyond The Traditional Smiley Faces And Sad
    Faces Approaches
  • Enables Adults And Children To Adopt A Range Of
    Research Tools (E.G. Observations, Child
    Conferencing, Cameras, Tours, Map Making And
    Interviews)
  • These Form The Basis For Dialogue, Reflection And
    Interpretation.

25
Mosaic Approach
  • Childrens Lives Are Not Separated Out For Study
    In The University Office
  • Analysis Takes Place As Close To The Site Of Data
    Collection As Possible.
  • This Enables Adults And Children To Co-construct
    Meaning Where Both Adults And Children Are
    Learning New Things.

26
In-depth Not Always Possible In Service Evaluation
  • Hospital And SW Respite Research
  • Hospital Different Terminology
  • Learning Disability
  • Symbols And Signs
  • Young Child Complex Impairments Pictures Of
    Nurses, Toys, Soft Play
  • Childrens Society Ill Go First
  • SW - Autisim Girl Biting
  • Parents - Confidentiality

27
Conclusion
  • Lack Of Clarity On Listening To Disabled Children
    In Professional Policy And Practice
  • Stereotypes On Lack Of Ability And Vulnerability
    Promoted By Some Academics
  • Protectionist Approaches Not Generally
    Justifiable But based On Prejudice

28
Conclusion
  • Need To Be Clear On Our Limitations, Aims And
    Methods E.G. Research Or Evaluation
  • Despite Rhetoric Researchers and Professionals
    Inclination Is Still To Avoid Engagement With
    Disabled Children
  • Lack Of Creative Approaches To Overcoming
    Commuication issues

29
References
  • Corker, M. Davis, J.M. (2000) Disabled
    children (Still) invisible under the law,
    Cooper, J (ed) Law, Rights and Disability
    (London Jessica Kingsley).
  • Cuskelly, M (2005) Ethical Inclusion Of Children
    With Disability In Research In Farrell, A (Eds)
    Ethical Research With Children. Open University
    Press Maidenhead Berkshire.

30
References
  • Davis, J M, Watson N, Cunningham-Burley S (2000),
    Learning the lives of disabled children
    developing a reflexive approach, in Christiensen
    P and James A eds., Research With Children,
    FalmerLondon

31
References
  • Davis, J M Watson N, (2000) Disabled Childrens
    Rights in Every Day Life Problematising Notions
    of Competency and Promoting Self-Empowerment,
    International Journal Of Childrens Rights 8
    211-228.
  • Hogan, D (2005) Researching the Child in
    Developmental Psychology in Green, S and Hogan D
    (eds) Researching Childrens Experience, Sage
    london.

32
References
  • Lee, N. (1999) The Challenge of Childhood
    Distributions of Childhoods Ambiguity in Adult.
    Institutions, Childhood 6(4) 45574
  • Lewis, V, and Kellet, M (2004) Disability in
    Fraser, S, Lewis, V, Ding, S, Kellet, M and
    Robinson, C (eds) Doing Research With Children
    and Young People. The Open University/Sage
    London.

33
References
  • Morris, J. (1999) Disabled Children and the
    Children Act. London The Who Cares? Trust
  • Tudge, J and Hogan, D (2005) An Ecological
    Approach To Observations Of Childrens Every Day
    Lives, in Green, S and Hogan D (eds) Researching
    Childrens Experience, Sage London.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com