Psy 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Psy 1

Description:

Stroop Spy Test. ROUGE. VERT. NOIR. JAUNE. VERT. BLANC. ROUGE. VERT. NOIR. JAUNE ... Slow, hard, serial, post-attentive search (must inspect each item in turn) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: patrickc
Category:
Tags: psy | search | spy

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Psy 1


1
Psy 1
  • Today
  • Attention
  • Learning conditioning

2
Psy 102
  • Today
  • Attention
  • Visual Search
  • Change Blindness

3
Limited capacity processor
4
One way to study attention is to
measureREACTION TIMES
5
Stroop Effect
Fig. 8.29
6
Stroop Spy Test
ROUGE VERT NOIR JAUNE VERT BLANC ROUGE VERT NOIR
JAUNE ROUGE
BLEIKT GULT SVART GULT BLEIKT HVITT SVART BLEIKT
SVART GULT HVITT
7
What causes the Stroop effect?
  • Response competition.
  • Overlearned name that word reading response
    competes with unfamiliar name that ink task

8
Attention andVisual Search
9
Finding Laura Bush at a Jesse Jackson rally is
hard
10
But your friend with the green scarf at Pamplona
jumps out at you
11
Visual Search
  • Looking for a target in a display containing
    distracting elements
  • Target the goal of visual search
  • Distractor any stimulus other than the target
  • Set Size the number of items in a visual display

12
Reaction times in visual search
  • Fast, easy, parallel, pre-attentive search
  • Slow, hard, serial, post-attentive search (must
    inspect each item in turn)

13
Selection based on color is easy
14
Selection based on upright vs upside down is not
easy
15
(No Transcript)
16
Visual search experiments
One target present on half the trials Vary the
number of items in display Subject reports
whether target is present or absent Measure the
time from the appearance of the display to the
response
17
Visual search experiments
If reaction time is unaffected by number of
distractors (slope0) Then target identity was
available preattentively and drew attention to
itself
18
Visual search experiments
If reaction time increases with number of
distractors Then identity not available
preattentively, had to be determined by
selecting each item in turn and analyzing it for
match to target
19
Visual Search (contd)
20
But high-level properties may also be easy to
find, scene properties like surface curvature
from shading
Preattentive identification not not limited to
properties extracted by cells in striate cortex
21
It is not just the features, the same pattern
with accentuated features is hard to find here
At either orientation. It is the shaded depth
that was the easily found surface, or scene
property.
22
Preattentive to Attentive Stages
23
How long does it take you to react when driving?
Reaction time
  • Chronometry (Measuring reaction times) can tell
    us about brain processes
  • Typical reaction times .01 sec to 1 sec
  • Broomstick demonstration

24
Reaction time
  • Nerve conduction time
  • Muscle movement time
  • CHOICE DECISION TIME in brain

25
To measure short reaction time
  • Get an accurate timer
  • OR
  • Measure a series of reaction times and take the
    average Class demonstration
  • Ankle vs. Shoulder measure neural conduction
    velocity!

26
Why should attention move independently of
eyes?Useful for multiple targets, covert
surveillance
Tracking, individuationOnce captured, attention
tracks moving and/or changing targets
How many can you track?
27
Pylyshyn Storm, 1988 Yantis, 1992
Intriligator Cavanagh, 2001.
28
Spatial resolution of attention
You can shrink the area of selection to be
small But not as small as the smallest detail you
can see
While looking in the center, you can see the bars
but you cannot attend to individual bars try
counting them without moving your eyes
29
Region of selection can zoom in or out but has a
minimum size that is surprisingly coarse
30
Region of selection can zoom in or out but has a
minimum size that is surprisingly coarse
31
5. Temporal Attention
individuate events at slow speed
vs a rush of undifferentiable flicker
Focused attention improves representation in time
as well
32
Deficits in attention
33
Right parietal damage leads to inattention to
objects on the left (Spatial Neglect)
  • Clothes
  • Medawar slides
  • Dinner plate
  • Draw a clock

34
Artists self portraits as he recovers from
neglect
35
Right-parietal patient shows spatial neglect of
left side
36
Imagery and neglect
37
(No Transcript)
38
  • LEFT hemisphere sees the TREE
  • RIGHT hemisphere sees the FOREST

39
Balints syndrome
  • Bilateral parietal damage
  • Can only attend to one thing at a time

40
Attentional Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Problems with attention span, concentration,
distractibility, impulsivity, and
hyperactivity Difficulty remaining seated, easily
distracted, fidgets, often interrupts, can't play
quietly, loses things, talks impulsively or
excessively, doesn't seem listen. Affects about
3 to 5 percent of all children, can continue to
adulthood. Different attentional style Moderated
by stimulants
41
Change Blindness
  • demonstrations
  • Helicopter
  • Boats

42
Real-life change blindness
  • Dan Simons DOOR experiment

Cav 21.rm
43
Change blindness attention
  • We dont see changes until we ATTEND to specific
    part of field where change is
  • Suggests we do NOT see the detailed picture of
    the world that we think we do.

44
Thank you.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com