Ravens Rock and the Tanawha Trail - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ravens Rock and the Tanawha Trail

Description:

At or near Tanawha Trail and Raven's Rock ... of Trips to Raven's Rock. 1.907 0. ... Number of trips to Ravens Rock: x = 1.908; CS = 1.908/.0015 = $1272 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: appst5
Learn more at: http://www.appstate.edu
Category:
Tags: raven | ravens | rock | tanawha | trail

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ravens Rock and the Tanawha Trail


1
Ravens Rock and the Tanawha Trail
  • Sarah Dochow
  • Andrew May
  • Callie Safley

2
Purpose
  • Estimate Value
  • Determine Demand for the Environmental Resources
  • Investigate Factors
  • Permit
  • Ranger Presence
  • Maintenance

3
(No Transcript)
4
Theory
  • Demand Curve
  • Created by putting trips on the horizontal axis
    and the travel cost on the vertical axis
  • Consumer surplus
  • Region below the demand curve and above the
    average price level

5
Theory

?CS
CS
TRIPS
6
Method
  • Random Interviews
  • At or near Tanawha Trail and Ravens Rock
  • Hypothetical questions used to establish shifts
    in the demand curve
  • Demand curve
  • Derived from interview responses
  • Confirmed confidentiality
  • Made results available if requested

7
Data
  • Sample size 38 people
  • Average Number of Trips to Tanawha Trail
  • 3.13 0.67
  • Average Number of Trips to Ravens Rock
  • 1.907 0.464

8
Data (cont.)
  • Average Willingness to Pay for hiking permit
  • 7.59
  • SD 10.81
  • Average Travel Cost (.36roundtrip distance)
  • 79.08
  • SD 113.76

9
Data (cont.)
  • 63 were male participants
  • Average Education level was 3.5 years of college
  • Average age was 34
  • 74 were willing to pay for a permit

10
Statistical Results
  • We took the natural log of RP-trips and add one
    to get the values for the horizontal axis
    ln(trips1)
  • We had travel cost on the vertical axis
    calculated by (.36roundtrip distance)
  • We had three possible demand shifters but only
    one was statistically significant at the 92
    level (1-pvalue) (1-.08).92

11
Demand Model
12
Demand Model
13
Consumer Surplus
  • Consumer Surplus
  • Semi-log x/b where x Number of Trips, b
    travel cost coefficient
  • b -.0015
  • Number of trips to Ravens Rock x 1.908 CS
    1.908/.0015 1272
  • Number of trips to Ravens Rock with the quality
    improvement ?x 1.36 ?CS 1.36/.0015 908

14
Aggregate CS
  • Individual ?CS 908
  • Population of 5 counties 903,568
  • We assume that 5 are hikers (Outdoor Recreation
    Participation Study)
  • Aggregate ?CS 41,021,987.2

15
Analysis
  • Major Factor
  • People are more concerned with trail maintenance
    than costs
  • Bias
  • People live in these locations due to the fact
    that they enjoy activities, like hiking
  • Improvement for further Research
  • Larger sample size
  • More diversity among survey participants
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com