THE MORAN COMPANY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

THE MORAN COMPANY

Description:

A significant share of the existing 'cash and carry' traffic at the local pharmacy will go away. ... where orphans are explicitly mentioned is pharmacy access: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: raredi
Category:
Tags: company | moran | the | pharmacy

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE MORAN COMPANY


1
Impact of Medicare Part D on the Fate of Orphan
Products
Donald W. Moran
May 23, 2005
THE MORAN COMPANY
2
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • My assignment today
  • Identify key features of Part D structure that
    will affect pharmaceutical and biotech
    industries, with particular emphasis on
    implications for orphan products.
  • Assess uncertainties in a few critical areas.
  • Offer a prognosis for resolution of these
    uncertainties.

THE MORAN COMPANY
3
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • Overall, the implications are profound
  • By next year, something approaching 40 million
    Medicare beneficiaries will move from wherever
    they were into a new financing channel.
  • A significant share of the existing cash and
    carry traffic at the local pharmacy will go
    away.
  • There will be a significant increase in the share
    of product subject to negotiated price
    concessions.
  • Net effect will vary product-by-product.

THE MORAN COMPANY
4
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • One product space where the immediate impact
    wont be significant is in current Part B
    drugs
  • In general, these will remain in Part B, and be
    subject to emerging coverage and payment policies
    there.
  • A significant number of current and pending
    orphan products are or will be Part B drugs, and
    hence will remain subject to the shifting
    landscape of payment policies set in motion under
    303 of the MMA.
  • Having said that, there are uncertainties at the
    boundary between B D.

THE MORAN COMPANY
5
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • Uncertainties arise from the following facts
  • Many products previously manufactured solely in
    injectible/infusible form are now available
    increasingly as self-injectibles or even in
    oral form.
  • MMA, however, did not amend the requirement that
    B coverage is limited to drugs that are not
    usually self-administered.
  • CMS adopted patient-centric rule for sorting out
    coverage under B versus D.
  • Prospect that products could be covered under
    both programs for different patients.

THE MORAN COMPANY
6
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • In these circumstances
  • If self-administered forms become significant,
    growing D coverage volume could induce carriers
    to determine that the product fails the not
    usually self-administered test.
  • In that case, the injectible/infusible form could
    lose Part B coverage for all patients.
  • While these scenarios may not be generally
    frequent, they are potentially important in the
    world of orphan products.

THE MORAN COMPANY
7
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • Unresolved questions
  • What happens, in such cases, to reimbursement for
    patients for whom office- (or hospital-) based
    administration is considered medically necessary?
  • Will Federal policy condone brown bagging the
    product back in from the community pharmacy, with
    coverage under Part D?
  • Can manufacturers forestall loss of B coverage by
    distinctive labeling of different product forms?
  • CMS regulatory efforts to date have not reached
    these questions.

THE MORAN COMPANY
8
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • For orphan products (present or future) that make
    it over to the Part D side
  • Theres a general presumption that if a script is
    submitted in a community pharmacy setting, it
    will be covered.
  • Exactly how it is covered, however, may turn out
    to matter a lot and will vary from drug plan to
    drug plan.

THE MORAN COMPANY
9
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • Like existing commercial plans, Medicare drug
    plans will have formularies
  • Some sponsors (particularly HMOs) may have true
    closed formularies, under which coverage for
    non-formulary products is zero.
  • Most others can be expected to have semi-closed
    formularies, in which formulary placement is
    enforced by differential cost sharing tiers.
  • Statute and rules offer PDPs wide latitude to
    innovate.

THE MORAN COMPANY
10
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • CMS will scrutinize formularies for
    non-discrimination
  • A safe harbor therapeutic class structure
    with very broad classes was adopted by rule
    there is no explicit protection for orphan drugs.
  • CMS has said that it will look more deeply to
    determine whether formulary exclusions threaten
    access for discrete classes of patients.
  • Orphan designation, per se, however, has not
    been given explicit standing in either the
    statute or the regulations of formularies.

THE MORAN COMPANY
11
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • It is important to emphasize that
  • CMS scrutiny regarding non-discrimination
    against orphan drug users, even if stringent,
    need not necessarily go beyond the product label.
  • It would be fully consistent with their rules to
    require plans to cover a product for on-label
    uses, while still permitting it to be excluded
    from the formulary or subjected to
    non-preferred cost sharing tiers -- for off-label
    use.
  • In this regime, use for off label orphan
    indications may have no standing.

THE MORAN COMPANY
12
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • One area where orphans are explicitly mentioned
    is pharmacy access
  • CMS notes that some products, such as those for
    orphan diseases, may only be available in
    specialty pharmacies.
  • Plan networks will not be required to include
    these pharmacies, but will be required to offer
    access under out of network provisions.

THE MORAN COMPANY
13
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • Out of network access will be complicated
  • Almost certainly requires paper claims (since out
    of network pharmacy will by definition not be
    tied into the relevant systems).
  • Also requires beneficiary to pay any difference
    in cost sharing between the dispensing pharmacys
    usual and customary costs and normal plan
    pharmacy reimbursement.
  • Plans are permitted to establish restrictions on
    this access, and the access may not be routine.
  • In some instances, this issue could prove quite
    significant.

THE MORAN COMPANY
14
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • In my experience, implications of cost sharing
    rules are under-appreciated
  • Most audiences concerned about high-cost products
    expressed concern throughout the genesis of the
    program about the donut hole in coverage.
  • These concerns were addressed by assurances that
    plan sponsors could offer actuarially-equivalent
    coverage that smoothed out the cost sharing.

THE MORAN COMPANY
15
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • Yet its generally not appreciated that
  • Smoothing will require an average copayment
    well in excess of the 25 cost sharing applicable
    to the first coverage tranche in the standard
    benefit package in order for the overall plan to
    be actuarially equivalent to the standard design.
  • Particularly true if plans want to offer
    sweetened cost sharing for preferred choices
    (e.g., generics).
  • Cost sharing for non-preferred options could,
    therefore, be quite high.

THE MORAN COMPANY
16
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • This was telegraphed in the recent controversy
    over the specialty tier exemption
  • In general, CMS will permit beneficiaries to
    request an exception for reduction in cost
    sharing of non-preferred drugs if medically
    necessary.
  • The final rule, however, permits plan sponsors to
    have a specialty tier exempt from this cost
    sharing exceptions process.
  • Industry has correctly identified access
    concerns.
  • If plans want to do smoothing, however, they
    have to have some way to hit actuarial
    equivalence.

THE MORAN COMPANY
17
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • All this suggests focus on obscure TrOOP Rules
  • Both statute and regulations require
    beneficiaries to spend 3,600 (2006) out of their
    own pocket before catastrophic coverage kicks in.
    (Low income subsidies are available).
  • Question is whether manufacturer-sponsored
    foundations can provide financial assistance with
    copays while still allowing beneficiaries to
    reach catastrophic benefit.
  • For high cost products, a lot is potentially
    riding on this decision.

THE MORAN COMPANY
18
Impact of Medicare Part D
  • Summing up from the manufacturers perspective
  • Even for Part B drugs, the B/D interface issue
    may already be influencing pipeline
    decision-making.
  • For Part D products, formulary placement may be
    critical (particularly for off label orphan
    indications.)
  • For this reason, beneficiary plan enrollment
    decisions may influence coverage of specific
    products.
  • Once in plans, cost sharing considerations will
    be critical.

THE MORAN COMPANY
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com