Customers as resource integrators: styles of customer co-creation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Customers as resource integrators: styles of customer co-creation

Description:

1. using 20 interviews and 4 focus groups represents the first in-depth ... identity managing physical appearance to maintain sense of self (eg wig, make up) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Ngu782
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Customers as resource integrators: styles of customer co-creation


1
Customers as resource integrators styles of
customer co-creation
  • Janet McColl-Kennedy
  • Steve Vargo
  • Tracey Dagger
  • Jillian Sweeney
  • Janet McColl-Kennedy
  • Professor of Marketing, Research Director
  • UQ Business School
  • University of Queensland, Australia
  • 2009 Naples Forum on Service Capri, Italy 16-19
    June

2
background
  • Traditional wisdom says value is created by a
    producer and purchased for consumption
  • Consumer behaviour literature has focussed on the
    consumers decision making process rather than on
    what they customer does
  • More recently, the producer-consumer model has
    begun to be replaced by a model of co-creation of
    value
  • That is, where value is created through joint
    activities of providers and customers but also
    through the activities of others in the networks
    of these parties (McColl-Kennedy et al 2009)

3
background
  • shift towards a model of co-creation of value has
    roots in service marketing literature (through
    production and consumption being inseparable (ZBP
    1983) and B2B where the producer-consumer
    distinction is inappropriate
  • But also Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2000) HBR
  • Vargo and Lusch 2004, 2008
  • idea of co-creation of value is part of an
    evolution toward a general re-orientation of
    marketing, value creation and exchange ie S-D
    Logic

4
research purpose
  • To investigate empirically a service provision
    process to tease apart multiple approaches to
    co-creation and suggest a schema
  • To begin to explore relationships between
    co-creation approaches and outcomes
  • Healthcare was chosen as the setting as it
    provides a full range of co-creation and
    co-production activities and styles

5
healthcare context
  • move from cure to preventative health and patient
    self-care which emphasizes the role of the
    customer in the medical service delivery (Roter
    et al 1988).
  • many advantages of inclusion of the customer in
    the service process eg.
  • reduced cost and increased efficiency of the
    process (Jayawardehena and Foley 2000)
  • the customer taking some responsibility for the
    outcome (Auh et al. 2007 Bitner 1990 Dellande,
    Gilly and Graham 2004).
  • reduce unnecessary health costs
  • improve health care outcomes and
  • increase trust in and commitment to the doctor
    (Veranec 1999 McStravic 2000 Michie, Miles and
    Weinman 2003 Ouschan, Sweeney and Johnson 2006).

6
healthcare literature
  • Early literature on participation showed that
    participation in an interchange leads to positive
    outcomes (Vroom 1960)
  • Compliance taking medications
  • Involvement in decision making
  • Coping literature

7
overview
  • Positioning
  • the research is positioned within S-D logic in a
    healthcare context
  • Part of 3 year ARC linkage project

8
contribution
  • 1. using 20 interviews and 4 focus groups
    represents the first in-depth empirical
    investigation of multiple approaches to
    co-creation of value
  • 2. identify range of activities (behavioural and
    cognitive) and six styles
  • 3. some styles associated with high quality of
    life, others with relatively low quality of life

9
definition of co-creation of value in our study
  • Unavoidable, multi-party nature of value creation
  • joint activities in collaboration with members
    of the service delivery network which may include
    , family, friends, other patients, health
    professionals and the outside community
  • Essential features
  • Activities are defined as performing or
    doing
  • Doing has 2 components
  • cognitive behavioural
  • Involves some effort on part of
  • customer

Community
Others
Self
10
definition of co-production
  • The less compulsory, more effortful involvement
    of customers in the process such as in design,
    self-service and other extra-curricula activities
  • (ie the activities traditionally undertaken by
    the firm)

11
conceptual framework
  • Customers can no longer be regarded merely as
    passive recipients of services
  • Customers play an active part of production and
    delivery of services (Prahalad and Ramaswamy
    2000)
  • Yet, little research has addressed the customers
    role what the customer actually does
  • Payne etal. 2008 provide a useful framework
    emotion (feeling), cognition (thinking) and
    behaviour (doing)

12
Payne et al., 2008)
  • Centrality of the process in value creation
  • Longitudinal nature
  • Recognises the customer as feelers, thinkers
    and doers
  • Recognises that the customer engages in
    activities (practices) and that value (to the
    customer) is embedded in these practices

13
gap to be addressed
  • Yet, little is known about how customers actually
    go about doing the co-creating (Payne et al 2008)
  • Little is know about how customers integrate
    resources (Vargo and Lusch 2008)

14
qualitative stage
  • Study 1
  • Cancer one of seven National Health Priority
    Areas
  • Increasingly ageing population, higher prevalence
    of cancer, increasing reliance on services
    devoted to cancer including ambulatory Industry
    partner HOCA (Haemotology and Oncology Clinics
    of Australasia)
  • Two Cancer day clinics
  • 20 in-depth interviews with patients
  • Different stages of the patient treatment
    process 1, 3, 6 and 12months

15
method
  • Data collection took two years across 2 clinics
  • Depth interviews with CEO, oncologists, Director
    of Nursing as well as supervisors of the clinics
    receptionists
  • Participant observation at the two clinics
  • 20 depth interviews with patients (either at the
    clinic or in their own home)
  • Discussions flowed like conversations

16
method
  • 175 pages of typed transcripts
  • 3 researchers plus research officer read the
    transcripts
  • NVIVO using one researcher
  • Traditional content analysis two other
    researchers acting entirely independently
  • Lincoln and Gubas (1985) constant comparative
    method
  • Themes were then listed and categorised using the
    constant comparative method (Lincoln and Guba,
    1985)

17
results - 10 themes (activities)
  • 8 behaviours
  • Information use clients accepting, seeking and
    sharing of core service information sent
    one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-many
  • Action relating to core services client
    activities that facilitate core service provision
  • Additional health activities
  • Participation in non-essential (supplementary) eg
    diet, exercise, alternative therapies
  • Distracting with activities distracting from
    realities eg overseas holiday, hobbies
  • Organising/managing practicalities of life
  • Managing the practicalities of life in the
    circumstances (eg keeping a diary, setting goals,
    time activities)

18
10 themes (activities)
  • 8 behaviours (cont)
  • Managing physical identity managing physical
    appearance to maintain sense of self (eg wig,
    make up)
  • Relationships client putting effort into
    relationships with stakeholders (eg friends,
    family, broader community)
  • Regulating emotions form of behavioural
    management of emotions for sake of interpersonal
    relationships (eg protecting/supporting family,
    avoiding negative situations)

19
10 themes (activities)
  • 2 thinking activities
  • Positive thinking choosing positive emotions and
    applying them (eg self talk)
  • Being philosophical assessing the situation in
    terms of a critical and generally systematic
    approach which relies on reasoned argument (eg
    accepting, dealing with it and moving on)

20
co-creation styles
  • 6 profiles
  • Team manager
  • Passive compliant
  • Isolate controller
  • Partner
  • Spiritualist
  • Adaptive realist

21
team manager
  • typified by Linda and Barry who manage their
    team which includes staff, friends and family.
  • Linda believes in a team approach which she
    coordinates. She says you do it, you dont
    leave it up to fate, God or the doctors. Rather,
    she with her team will make it happen.
  • She has a circle of support people and is very
    open in her communication with her team. For
    example
  • You do it on your own and there is no other way
    for it to be and you have to do it on your own, I
    think you have to. It is not just about inner
    strength , I have still showered myselfI think
    that it is very important just to have a sense
    that you are doing something for yourself. But I
    have a support teammy husband and my sister are
    really the center of my support then it goes out
    in concentric circles, the there is my children,
    then the Bahai community and of course my
    parents I discuss everything with everyone.
    (Linda, 52 years)

22
passive compliant
  • The Passive Compliant first and foremost
    follows orders. They are accepting of what the
    doctors tell them. They do not tend to question
    the doctors.
  • They tend not to take initiatives, such as
    searching the Internet for more information,
    going to a gym, changing their diet. The Passive
    Compliant often will stay close to home as they
    feel safe there. They see little if any choices.
  • Mary is an example of this profile. She is
    accepting of what the doctors say.
  • I am fairly accepting there are not many
    choices, no no, the only real choice was do you
    want your chemo this week or would you want to
    put it off a weekbut otherwise no, this is what
    we want to do and I am reasonably compliant so I
    just said (to the doctor) you know best.I prefer
    to be at home I potter in my garden. You have
    to be pleasant and accepting of what they have
    got to do and you have to get yourself there on
    time even though you might have to wait. So just
    being compliant. (Mary, 60 years)

23
passive compliant
  • My role is to front up every two weeks, and just
    probably proceed to treatment (Neil, 65 years)
  • you dont feel in controlthe doctor teed up
    the other two specialists for me and I felt good
    about the amount they (doctors) knew and
    shared.Whenever I did see him (family doctor) he
    knew what was going onIt is such standard
    treatment in so many waysits what every woman
    after breast cancer getsI see him (the
    oncologist) each time or a say someone elseI
    didnt have any questions or whateveryou cant
    control, well I chose not to control what
    treatment I underwent that was passive you have
    so many testsyou are not in control. (Tina,
    female, 45 years)

24
isolate controller
  • keeps themselves away from close family members
    and chose to work with only certain medical
    staff.
  • like to be alone and not to share their feelings
    and problems with others.
  • restrict the amount of details they tell others
    about the illness, symptoms and problems they are
    experiencing.
  • They would rather do things themselves, such as
    taking vitamins, doing exercise, diet, being
    generally healthy.
  • I make their job easier to make sure that I am as
    healthy as can be apart from what we have to deal
    with as far as cancer goesI ate well, I slept
    well Regarding her mother, Christine said, I had
    to be very careful what I said to her because it
    would get broadcast that night, email right
    around, right around, and then I would get emails
    the next day, and I would just have to answer
    emailsso I have sort of kept them at a
    distance. (Christine, Spring Hill, 49 years).

25
isolate controller
  • Deluce has her own recovery program with a team
    of people that she has selected including an
    oncologist, surgeon, dietician, psychologist,
    personal trainer and gym instructor.
  • She believes that the power is with her and that
    it is up to her to get her team together.
  • Youve got to start your own health program and
    your own exercise program so Ive now got on
    board my own team which include obviously my GP,
    my oncologist from HoCa, my surgeon who did the
    work, and my dietician and my psychologist, my
    gym and in the next few weeks hopefully a
    personal trainer might get on board. but all
    thats come from me I feel as though thats my
    own kind of recovery program that Ive put in
    place. (Deluce, 46 years)

26
partner
  • partners primarily work with the doctors and
    other service providers
  • working with her doctor, being engaged in the
    process, because its a partnership, Im
    working with her (doctor) and pulling my share
    of the weight.
  • Im learning and I'm getting a lot stronger I
    can now think, I can get the doctor's report,
    radiology report, get on the Web and I can look
    up stuff, if I don't like something I ask, I
    went into day with my pen and paper to take no, I
    said to my doctor I want you to listen I went
    in there, and so is the first time I really feel
    in control, being in control, yes it is, to be
    engaged, because it's a partnership, because I
    now feel I am of more benefit to her as the
    patient as well, the relationship to me is more
    equal, in that, I am not a victim. I have never
    been a victim with a disease, I am capable of
    working with her and pulling my share of the
    weight (Christine, New Farm, 56 years)

27
partner
  • I can do it with him (the doctor)I share
    everything with Dr PaulI do my part, I try to
    drink, make sure I am hydrated because I think it
    helps your veins and things I do things that I
    can do I can do everything in my worldwith all
    the support things and all the psychological
    support, then the other part can be dealt with by
    the doctors. (Pamela, 59 years)

28
spiritualist
  • Im a woman of prayer, a woman who believes in
    God you know that I believe in, faith and the
    spirit I think Id prayed every scripture in
    the bible chuckles and thats the end of that.
    God knows best, he does know best I had
    accepted it. (Yvonne, 49 years)
  • Barbara believes in her faith in God and that
    this is her main source of peace. She speaks
    about taking each day at a time being carried
    along on prayer. I am coping today and thats
    all I have got to worry about. She trusts
    implicitly in her doctors I just trusted the
    doctorsThey checked were you happy with your
    surgeon, were you happy with your oncologist and
    I said I was always happy.

29
adaptive realist
  • Life goes on but differently
  • Right now, and when I was diagnosed with cancer
    I was a single mum. it was only 48 hours from
    when I was diagnosed to when I had surgery.the
    motivation to keep on going was my ten year old.
    I had to do all of these things so that I could
    be around, to see him grow up. (Sherryl, 52
    years)
  • Robert - goes to the toilet 21 times in an
    evening, considers wearing long pants instead of
    shorts as he has no bladder control but not once
    does he consider giving up his tennis or his
    golf.
  • so now I can do a lot of things that I did, I
    can play tennis, I remember going to a friend's
    place one night, the worst thing you know was
    white wine, so that, I'll just have one glass
    oh all right one glass and that was itBut I have
    to go to the toilet 21 times some evenings. so
    it had its moments. I could still play golf
    because there were plenty of trees, but never on
    a mixed day, never played mixed golf again. You
    have to adapt don't you?. (Robert, 70 years)

30
Relationship to quality of life
  • Highest
  • Adaptive realist
  • Spiritualist
  • Relatively high
  • Partner
  • Team manager
  • Relatively low
  • Passive compliant
  • Isolate controller

31
conclusions
  • Co-creation extends previous conceptualisations
    of both participation and coping
  • Participation traditionally focused on compliance
    and decision making
  • Coping concerns managing and aiming toward the
    status quo
  • Co-creation includes
  • Thinking and doing
  • Multi-party - involves various other people or
    groups
  • Multiple facets

32
moving forwardnext steps
  • scale development
  • application to other health areas eg heart
    disease, diabetes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com