Measuring Dignity in Care Homes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring Dignity in Care Homes

Description:

'Not being funny but do we really have to do it... Budgets The Big Squeeze': Economies of Scale, Time and Motion Studies,Value for ... Re vamped rights statements, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:242
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Ict49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring Dignity in Care Homes


1
  • Measuring Dignity in Care Homes
  • Taking the Dignity Campaign Forward in Brighton
    and Hove
  • Sara Fulford
  • Sara.fulford_at_brighton-hove.gov.uk
  • Tel.01273 295036

2
Measure Dignity????!
3
Dignity
  • Not being funny but do we really have to do it
    I mean Is it a Performance Indicator or
    Something?

4
Competing Priorities?
  • Budgets The Big Squeeze Economies of Scale,
    Time and Motion Studies,Value for Money,
    Efficiency Savings
  • Expediting Hospital Discharge
  • Independence,
  • SDS,
  • Infection Control
  • Performance Indicators, Targets Throughput,
    Turnover, Occupancy,Efficiency

5
Competing Priorities?
6
Contradictions?Pressures?Tensions?Compromises
or Challenges?How do we keep personalised
services that afford dignity?
7
Measure Dignity??
  • ??!

Designed tools to measure the Challenges
8
MethodsSources of evidence collated to
contribute to the evaluation
  • Service user and informal carer dignity surveys
    -guided interviews focussed on the Challenges
  • Info. from regularly administered questionnaires
  • Anonymous carer/visitor surveys during
    consultation week

9
Methods (cont)
  • Staff consultation Session
  • Staff anonymous surveys focussed on Dignity.
  • Stakeholder surveys e.g. to G.P.s, D/Ns,
    therapists hairdressers and other regular
    visitors to the home.

10
Methods (cont)
  • Extended Regulation 26 visits to the home
    focussed on Dignity observations, met with the
    manager and staff, and examined documentation
    and records
  • Evidence from past years quality assurance
    visits and CQC reports. 

11
Common ThemesPositives
  • Very high levels of satisfaction expressed with
    staff attitude, patience and treatment of service
    users .
  • Nearly everyone reported they had been treated
    with dignity and respect , very well, all of
    the time.

12
  • very caring and always find time for you,
  • Mum always comments that she is treated with
    kindness
  • All appear, sincere, polite and helpful I feel
    well understood by staff, They are wonderful
    friends to me
  • We have always felt able to say what is
    important to mum

13
  • Difficult to improve something so perfect.
  • Staff said we try to make people feel special
    while they are with us

14
  • High levels of respectful interactions between
    staff and residents observed. Offering choices.
    Negotiating care timing.
  • People using the services reported being made to
    feel very welcome when they arrived.
  • Several services had strong multi- disciplinary
    support within ICS service to assist
    rehabilitation and independence. Care staff have
    also been trained in assisting independence.

15
  • Flexibility re routines observed in practice-
    including where and when to eat. (Try to adapt
    round individual).Service user comments included,
    Staff work with you, rather than making you fit
    in with them.
  • Generally high standard of dignified décor and
    environment- most areas, addressed promptly
    where lacking.
  •  Recording detailed, respectful and non-
    judgemental.

16
  • Comprehensive staff training reported to help in
    meeting peoples needs.
  •  Robust staff safeguarding training.
  • Welcome of Diversity statement is advertised well
    in posters some services.
  • Visitors and Carers are welcomed well

17
Dignity Audit Brighton and Hove City Council
Older Peoples ServicesCommon Development Themes
  • 1.Greater attention to monitor pain control.
  •  
  • 2. Opportunity for activities/ engagement need to
    be developed further .
  • 3. Furniture and general equipment should be
    reviewed by OTs/Sensory team to maximise
    independence.
  •  

18
  • 4. Statements of rights and welcoming diversity.
  • 5.Translation of brochures information, and
    different formats.
  • 6.Choice of male/ female staff for personal care.
  •  

19
  • 7.Culture of recording low level complaints
    officially as complaints/ comments. 
  • 8. Waiting for an answer to knock before entry.
  • 9. Service users tend to feel that use of
    kitchenettes is a staff domain
  •  

20
  •  
  • 10. Service users tend to feel that use of
    kitchenettes is a staff domain
  • 11 Service users tend to report that care plans,
    and how their needs will be met, are decided by
    staff rather than themselves.

21
  • 12. Approximately 30 of all people admitted in
    night clothes or hospital gowns, and without
    their own possessions with them.
  • 12. Further develop some holistic, person
    centred, care planning

22
Examples of Improvements
  • Knocked doors being answered,
  • Pain management
  • Activities programmes,
  • Staff photo boards , name badges
  • Admissions to our services in own clothes - get
    possessions.
  • Better recording of low level comments and
    complaints

23
  • Revision of service user information to achieve
    more accessible formats,
  • Re vamped rights statements,
  • Care support plans to ensure they give a better
    sense of the person and their life history and
    preferences.
  • Encourage more use of Kitchenettes

24
Is it a Performance Indicator or
Something?The SAS wants to know
  • What have Brighton and Hove Been Doing About
    Dignity??
  •  
  •  

25
  • Nominated Adult Social Care Lead Dignity
    Champions
  •  Corporate Lead Dignity Champion
  •  USED OTHER PEOPLES IDEAS AND METHODS
  • eg Sarah Restall, Catherine Mullins, Warwick,
    Health Champion colleagues, Used Website

26
KEEPING THE DIGNITY IN CARE AGENDA LIVE 
  • Dignity Updates
  • Part of Personalisation briefings
  • Dignity Challenges are advertised in posters
  • Dignity workshops at yearly Safeguarding
    Conferences
  • Dignity Workshop as part of a Senior Managers
    Forum

27
SPECIFIC DIGNITY MEETINGS 
  • Dignity Champions forums
  • High Level overarching Dignity Meetings
  •         Director / Lead Councillor Chairs
  • Joint meetings with the health trust lead
    champions
  • Joint meetings with Independent Providers

28
What else do we do?
  • Dignity Audits 2007-Action plans - still live and
    Monitored
  • Dignity and Empowerment Training
  •  Continuous quality monitoring,
  • Care Home quality assurors meet
  • Robust restrictive practices procedures
  •  

29
What do our Contracts Dept Do?
  •     Home Care - tendering process Contract,
    Service Specification
  •    Incentive payments for continuity of care
  •    Evaluation Surveys/interviews

30
  • Fairer Contracting initiative
  • Dignity in care is implicitly tested in all
    quality monitoring.

31
Rewarding Dignity in Care??
  • RR
  • Incentives
  • Publicising Good Practice
  • FEEDBACK - PRIDE

32
Not being funny but do we really have to do it?
  • Front Line Staff do Small Things that make
    Dignity all the Time
  • The Right Quality Measures and PIs audit Dignity
    and ensure improvement
  • Yes, We Really Have to (and already do a lot of
    the time).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com