Differentiated Reliability in Distributed Survivable Optical Mesh Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Differentiated Reliability in Distributed Survivable Optical Mesh Networks

Description:

Differentiated Reliability in Distributed Survivable Optical Mesh Networks. Dhruvish Shah, Dr. Marco Tacca and Dr. Andrea Fumagalli ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: nkra
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Differentiated Reliability in Distributed Survivable Optical Mesh Networks


1
Differentiated Reliability in Distributed
Survivable Optical Mesh Networks Dhruvish Shah,
Dr. Marco Tacca and Dr. Andrea Fumagalli Optical
Networks Advanced Research (OpNeAR) Lab
Node Architecture
Network Architecture
Distributed Control Plane
  • Advantages
  • No Central Controller
  • Less signaling compared to centralized
    counterpart
  • Less set-up delay
  • Limitations
  • More connection blocking
  • Complex Node Architecture

Distributed Control Plane
  • IP Over WDM Mesh Network with Distributed Control
    Plane
  • Multiple wavelengths and fibers per link
  • Per source node queue for fairness in blocking
  • On-Line Optimized Routing and Wavelength
    Assignment (RWA) based on Differentiated
    Reliability (DiR) and Shared Path Protection (SPP)

Simulation Scenario
Network Protocols (Contd.)
Network Protocols
  • Berkeley Network Simulator (NS2)
  • 19 Node European Topology with 39 bidirectional
  • links
  • Poisson arrivals, uniformly distributed among
    nodes,
  • exponential demand lifetime
  • One fiber in each direction of propagation
  • Maximum Conditional Failure Probability (MCFP)
  • of 0.03 assuming single link failure scenario
    allowing
  • single unprotected link on working lightpath
  • RWA
  • Source computes lightpath resources
  • Optimize network resources with Simulated
    Annealing
  • Linear (LB) and Matrix DPM approach
  • CRANKBACK
  • Contentions cause lightpath set-up failure
  • Reattempt to set-up lightpath until successful
  • Avoid using the resource which was contended
  • for successive RWA computations
  • Aggressive reattempts
  • Ensures fairness for longer lightpaths
  • RSVP and Modified OSPF
  • Destination initiated reservation
  • Event driven node based OSPF for data
    synchronization

Summary
Comparison of DSPP-DiR with DSPP
Probability Distribution
Distributed and Centralized Control Planes
  • With only one unprotected link the
  • DSPP-DIR scheme reduces blocking
  • dramatically
  • As traffic becomes faster, due to lack of
  • faster synch blocking increases
  • The Distributed Control Plane performs
  • almost same as its Centralized counterpart
  • at light load, blocking increases more
  • rapidly at higher load
  • Single buffer queue at each source node
  • and CRANKBACK ensure fairness among
  • nodes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com