FREIGHT CORRIDOR PROGRAMS

1
FREIGHT CORRIDOR PROGRAMS

Presented By Ing. Juan Jose Erazo Garcia Cano
March 18, 2009
2
INTRODUCTION
1. The North American Region has an important
strategy at world level. This region generates
35.5 of its Net World Product, which translates
to 17 trillions of dollars.
2. For the last 25 years, the average percentage
of annual growth for international commerce is 6.
3. The Mexican International Commerce is
equivalent to a 54 to its Internal Net Product.
4. 74 of Mexicos International Commerce is with
the United States.
5. For the last 7 years, Mexican Customs has been
maintaining its process for International
Commerce and even gone up to 13 superior.
6. Time and money for transferring along the
border area has nearly gone up to 30 of its
costs in exports for logistics.
7. It is important to make the border more
efficient, transparent and secure supported with
a competitive economy by providing
instruments/programs to expedite the process like
the C-TPAT, FAST and SENTRI.
8. Mexico has nearly 300 exporters registered at
the C-TPAT program, in which, 41 of its total
exports are done by this program.
9. Likewise, in the FAST program, nearly 500
certified companies leads 43 of imports and 71
of exports.
10. For the SENTRI program, there are about
165,000 users registered, that means that 7 of
trans border traffic is covered by this program.
3
GENERAL STRATEGY FOR BINATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
Develop Strategic Corridors
Strengthen Regional Competitiveness
Secure and efficient operation at the border
4
GENERAL STRATEGY FOR BINATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
1
Develop Strategic Corridors
Integrate strategic corridors with sea ports, bor
ders
and important cities
Secure and efficient operation at the border
5
PRINCIPAL STRATEGIC CORRIDORS
6
PROJECTION TO YEAR 2020 MOVEMENT OF TRUCK BETWEEN
MEXICO-USA
FLUJO DE CAMIONES 2020
100 210,000
210,000 530,000
530,000 1,100,000
1,100,000 2,200,000
Mayor de 2,200,000
SOURCE SCT MEXICO, DIRECCION GENERAL DE
DESARROLLO CARRETERO, 2005
7
SOURCE Presidencia de la República, México,
Programa Nacional de Infraestructura 2007-2012.

8
EXPORTS BETWEEN MEXICO CHINA
TO THE UNITED STATES (INDEX YEAR 2000100)
SOURCE U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade
Division, Data Dissemination Branch, Washington,
D.C. 20233
9
SITUATION IN 2006 MAIN HIGHWAY CORRIDORS
Tapachula
Ciudad Hidalgo
10
SITUATION IN 2006ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
Tijuana
Mexicali
San Luis Río Colorado
Ensenada
Cd. Juárez
Sonoyta
Nogales
Santa Ana
Bahía de los Ángeles
Piedras Negras
Hermosillo
Chihuahua
Guerrero Negro
Nava
Guaymas
Nuevo Laredo
Loreto
Reynosa
Monterrey
Torreón
Matamoros
Los Mochis
Saltillo
Culiacán
Linares
Durango
Cd. Victoria
La Paz
Río Grande
Matehuala
Cabo San Lucas
Mazatlán
San José del Cabo
Zacatecas
Tampico
San Luis Potosí
Cancún
Aguascalientes
Tepic
Tuxpan
Guanajuato
Mérida
Guadalajara
Querétaro
Campeche
Pachuca
Annual Average Daily Traffic
Jalapa
Tlaxcala
Chetumal
D.F.
Morelia
0-3,000 vehículos 3,000-5,000 vehículos 5,00
0-10,000 vehículos 10,000-20,000 vehículos 2
0,000 en adelante vehículos
Veracruz
Colima
Toluca
Coatzacoalcos
Manzanillo
Cuernavaca
Puebla
Villahermosa
Lázaro Cárdenas
Oaxaca
Chilpancingo
Tuxtla Gutiérrez
Arriaga
Acapulco
Salina Cruz
Huixtla
Tapachula
Ciudad Hidalgo
11
GENERAL STRATEGY FOR BINATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
2
Strengthen Regional Competitiveness
Secure and efficient operation at the border
12
VISION 2012 INTRA-REGIONAL CORRIDORS
4
1
15.- Calvillo-San Luis Potosí
16.- Acapulco-Zihuatanejo 17.- Villahermosa-Com
itán 18.- Tulúm-Coba 19.- Atlacomulco-San Juan
del Río-Ixmiquilpan-Pachuca 20.- Puebla-Tulanc
igo con Ramal a Amozoc 21.- Toluca-Zitacuaro 22
.- El Chihue-San Luis Potosí 23.- Salina Cruz-Hua
tulco 24.- Tuxtla Gutiérrez-San Cristóbal de las
Casas 25.- San Cristóbal de la Casas-Palenque
3
2
5
7
6
8
12
22
9
10
13
1.- Mexicali- Chapala 2.- San Luis Río Colo
rado-Guaymas 3.- Santa Ana - Agua Prieta 4.-
Puerto Peñasco-Sonoyta 5.- Topolobampo-Ojin
aga 6.- Badiraguato-Parral 7.- Acuña-Salti
llo 8.- Matamoros - Ciudad Victoria 9.- Du
rango-Tepic 10.- Zacatecas-Ruiz 11.- Aguascali
entes Tepic 12.- Saltillo-Cihuatlán 13.- Duran
go-Zacatecas-San Luis Potosí 14.- San Juan del R
ío -Ebano 15.- Calvillo-San Luis Potosí
11
15
14
18
19
20
21
16
17
25
24
23
13
VISION 2012 PRINCIPAL PROJECTS FOR
INTRA-REGIONAL CORRIDORS
21

• INTERSECTIONAL
• Durango-Mazatlán, Entronque Otinapa-Concordia
• Nuevo Necaxa-Ávila Camacho
• La Venta-Colegio Militar
• Mitla-Tehuantepec
• Tuxpan-Tampico y Libramiento de Tampico
• Atizapán-Atlacomulco
• Libramiento Sur de Guadalajara
• Arriaga-Ocozocuautla
• La Ventosa-Acayucan
• Arriaga-La Ventosa
• Zacatecas-Saltillo
• Arco Norte de ZMVM
• Río Verde Ciudad Valles

25
22
15
19
INTRA-REGIONAL

• Ruíz, Nay. Zacatecas, Zac.
• Badiraguato, Sin.-Parral, Chih.
• Aguascalientes, Ags. Tepic, Nay.
• Angel Albino Corzo Siltepec
• Durango (Dgo.) Tepic (Nay.)
• Los Herrera Tamazula, Dgo.
• Arramberi (N.L.)Villa Hidalgo
• Puerto Peñasco-Golfo Santa Clara
• Topolobampo (Sin.)Ojinaga (Chih.)
• Las Margarita Nuevo Momon San Quintin
• Motozintla - Niquivil Barrio Carrizal, Chis
• Aboreachi Morelos, Chih.
• La Estancia (Hgo.) Pacula, (Qro.)
• Km. 89000 E. C.(MitlaZacatepec)Santa Maria
  Yacochi, Lim Edo. Ver/Oax.
  
• San Felipe Tilpan San José Independencia,
  Oax
  
• Km. 30400 E.C. (Miahuatlan San Jose Lachiguiri)
  San Andrés Mixtepec Santa Catarina
  Quioquitani
  
• Camino viejo a la Huasteca (San DiegoE.C.
  (HuejutlaPlatón Sánchez))

20
18
14
16
30
26
28
27
23
29
17
24
14
VISION 2012 SECUNDARY AND INTRA-REGIONAL
CORRIDORS
Puente Internacional
Tijuana
Mexicali
San Luis Río Colorado
Ensenada
Cd. Juárez
Sonoyta
Nogales
Santa Ana
Bahía de los Ángeles
Piedras Negras
Hermosillo
Chihuahua
Guerrero Negro
Nava
Guaymas
Nuevo Laredo
Puente Internacional
Loreto
Reynosa
Monterrey
Torreón
Matamoros
Los Mochis
Saltillo
Culiacán
Linares
Durango
Cd. Victoria
La Paz
Río Grande
Matehuala
Cabo San Lucas
Mazatlán
San José del Cabo
Zacatecas
Tampico
San Luis Potosí
Cancún
Aguascalientes
Tepic
Tuxpan
Guanajuato
Mérida
Guadalajara
Querétaro
Campeche
Pachuca
Chetumal
Jalapa
Tlaxcala
D.F.
Morelia
Troncal Interegional
Veracruz
Colima
Toluca
Coatzacoalcos
Manzanillo
Puebla
Cuernavaca
Villahermosa
Lázaro Cárdenas
Oaxaca
Chilpancingo
Tuxtla Gutiérrez
Arriaga
Acapulco
Salina Cruz
Huixtla
Tapachula
Ciudad Hidalgo
15
GENERAL STRATEGY FOR BINATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
3
Secure and efficient operation at the border
16
STRATEGY FOR BRIDGES AND BORDER CROSSINGS

• The strategy to modernize the existing border
  crossings has 2 directions.
  

SCTs STRATEGY
MODERNIZE EXISTING PORTS
BUILD NEW PORTS
WIDEING INFRASTRUCTURE
PUBLIC INV.
ADD EXPRESS LANES
PRIVATE INV.
MODERNIZE ACCESS
IMPLEMENT APPLICATIONS AND TECNOLOGIES
17
DAILY AVERAGE WAIT TIME IN PORTS SELECTED IN MEXI
CO AND CANADA
SOURCE Elaboración propia con base en
Transportation Statistics Annual Report
2005,Customs and Border Protection, personal
communication, April 2005.
CANADA incluye Port Huron-Bluewater Bridge, MI
Blaine-Pacific Highway, WA Detroit-Ambassador
Bridge, MI Buffalo/Niagara Falls-Peace Bridge,
NY Champlain, NY Sumas, WA Buffalo/Niagara Fa
lls-Lewiston Bridge, NY Sweetgrass, MT Derby
Line, VT Pembina, ND Houlton, ME Sault Ste.
Marie, MI Highgate Springs, VT Detroit-Windsor
Tunnel, MI Calais-Ferry Point, ME Jackman, ME
MEXICO incluyeLaredo-World Trade Bridge, TX
Nogales-Mariposa, AZ Otay Mesa, CA El
Paso-Ysleta, TX Brownsville-Veterans
International, TX Hidalgo/Pharr, Pharr, TX
Calexico-East, CA Tecate, CAEl Paso-Bridge of
the Americas (BOTA), TX Laredo-Colombia
Solidarity, TX Del Rio, TXRio Grande City, TX
Brownsville-Los Indios, TX Santa Teresa, NM
Progreso, TX Presidio, TX Eagle PassBridge I,
TX
18
DAILY AVERAGE WAIT TIME AT PORTS OF ENTRY SELECTE
D IN MEXICO
SOURCE Elaboración propia con base en
Transportation Statistics Annual Report
2005,Customs and Border Protection, personal
communication, April 2005.
19
INSPECTION RANGES 2002-2006 BY CBP
BY DIFFERENT MODES OF TRANSPORTATION
SOURCE CBP, Customs-Trade Partnership Against
Terrorism (C-TPAT) ,Cost/Benefit Survey, Report
of Results 2007
20
(No Transcript)
21
MAYOR FLOWS AT BORDER ZONES BETWEEN MEXICO-USA
NORTH BORDER
TIJUANA SAN DIEGO
MEXICALI - CALEXICO
NOGALES - NOGALES
CD. JUAREZ EL PASO
P.NEGRAS EAGLE PASS
N LAREDO, COLOMBIA - LAREDO
REYNOSA - MCALLEN
MATAMOROS-BROWNSVILLE
22
ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRUCK TRAFFIC AT 8
PRINCIPALS BORDER PORTS and MAX. CAPACITY
SOURCE SCT. ANALISIS DE LA NECESIDAD DE
AMPLIACION DE LA CAPACIDAD EN LOS PRINCIPALES
PUERTOS DE CARGA DE LA FRONTERA NORTE. INCLUYE TI
JUANA, MEXICALI, NOGALES, CD. JUAREZ, P. NEGRAS,
N. LAREDO, REYNOSA Y MATAMOROS
23
PORCENTAGE OF SATURATION AT 8 PRINCIPALES
COMMERCIAL PORTS
FUENTE SCT. ANALISIS DE LA NECESIDAD DE
AMPLIACION DE LA CAPACIDAD EN LOS PRINCIPALES
PUERTOS DE CARGA DE LA FRONTERA NORTE. INCLUYE TI
JUANA, MEXICALI, NOGALES, CD. JUAREZ, P. NEGRAS,
N. LAREDO, REYNOSA Y MATAMOROS
24
EXAMPLE OF AN INTEGRAL APPLICATION OF SCTs
STRATEGY AT THE BORDER
SENTRI PROGRAM
Puente Reynosa - Hidalgo
FAST PROGRAM
Puente Reynosa - Pharr
BOTTLE NECK SOLUTIONS ITS
Libramiento Sur Reynosa
Acceso al puente Pharr
Proyecto de Aplicación ITS

NEW BRIDGES
Puente Reynosa - Anzaldúas
Acceso al puente Anzaldúas
Puente Río Bravo - Donna

Acceso al puente Donna
URBAN CONST.
Circuito Interior Reynosa
25
THANK YOU !

Ing. Juan José Erazo Garcia Cano
Director of Multimodal and Border Infrastructure
Projects Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transpo
rtes Dirección General de Desarrollo Carretero I
nsurgentes Sur 1089, Piso 10
Col. Noche Buena Del. Benito Juárez 03720 México
, D.F. Teléfono 52 (55) 5482-4367 jerazog_at_sct.g
ob.mx