Title: Market Research
1Market Research
2- This class
- Experiments and t-tests
- Analyze some data
- Midterm question examples will be posted
- Debate teams will be posted
- Next class
- Midterm review quiz
- General questions
3Debate Topics
- Marketing to children
- Marketing of harmful goods
- Marketing promotes materialism
- Price discrimination
- Marketing creates unnecessary needs
- Marketing adjusts perceptions of ideal body types
- The use of low-cost labour for competitive
advantage - Marketers promote meaningless attributes to help
with differentiation - Marketers should provide full information about
their products and practices
4Experiments Defined
- What is an experiment?
- Surveys, observational research, and even focus
groups involve the assembly of existing data - In experiments, the researcher actually changes
things
5Experiments Defined
- An experiment is the form of research used to
establish causality - It involves manipulating (controlling) the level
of one variable and observing the response in
another
6Experiments Variables
- Any characteristic on which observational units
(e.g. people, firms, etc.) differ - Observable (concrete, manifest) or unobservable
(conceptual, abstract, latent) - Categorical (discrete), e.g. religion
- Dichotomous, e.g. gender
- Continuous, e.g. attitude, age, income
7Experiment Variables
- Independent Variable (IV)
- A variable whose value is systematically varied
by the experimenter - Dependent Variable (DV)
- A variable that is assumed to be affected by the
IV - Mediator variables (intervening) are one class of
DVs
8Experiments Variables
- Mediator (Intervening)
- A variable that is affected by the IV that in
turn affects the DV - Moderator
- A variable that defines the scope of the
relationship between the IV and DV - Extraneous
- Any other variable that may affect the
relationship being studied
9Experiments Types
- Laboratory experiments
- Can control extraneous causal factors
- Minimize unwanted influences
- Field experiments
- Realistic setting
- Control some aspects of situation but not all
- e.g. Mars offered different candy bars to
different markets
10Experiments Causality
- Experiments are designed to demonstrate that a
change in one variable causes a change in another - What does A causes B mean?
- A is one cause of B
- A makes occurrence of B more probable
- Relationship is inferred, never certain
- How do we establish causality?
11Experiments Causality
- Concomitant variation (correlation)
- A and B vary together
- e.g. advertising and sales, price and sales, etc.
- Temporal antecedence
- A occurs before B
- e.g. ? advertising occurs before ? sales
- No plausible alternative explanation
- Known as internal validity
- ? B not caused by ? C, ? D, ? E, etc.
- e.g. ? sales not caused by ? price of a substitute
12Note Correlations
- Whats the difference between correlation and
covariation? - Both are measures of the extent to which two
variables change together - Covariation is the average of the cross-product
of the deviation scores (not bounded) - Correlation is the same, but of the standardized
scores (bounded by -1 and 1)
13(No Transcript)
14ExperimentsCorrelation-Causality Fallacy
- Correlation alone does not imply causality
- Children who watch violent movies appear to be
more violent - Do violent movies increase childrens violence?
- Implication do not let children watch violent
movies - There are more fire trucks at larger fires
- Do fire trucks cause larger fires?
- Low income groups are less intelligent
- Does low income cause lower intelligence? Does
lower intelligence cause lower income?
15Experiments Validity
- Experiments that rule out competing explanations
are said to have a high degree of internal
validity - What might threaten the internal validity of an
experiment?
16Internal Validity Threats
- History
- Influence of extraneous variables during
experiment - e.g. Ragu changed advertising when Campbells
tested Prego - Maturation
- Changes in individuals over time
- Testing
- Testing or observing individuals may change their
behaviour - Instrument decay
- Changes that affect measuring technique
17Internal Validity Threats
- Selection bias
- Differences may exist in groups ahead of time
without randomization - Mortality
- Loss of individuals over course of experiment
- Regression towards the mean
- Extreme individuals tend to regress towards mean
- Interactive effects
- Any of the above threats may be stronger within
treatment levels
18Experiments Designs
- System of notation
- Xi Experimental treatment i
- The variable whose effects we want to measure
- e.g. different prices, package designs, ad.s,
etc. - Oi Observation of test units i
- Involves taking measurements of individuals,
groups, or entities whose response to the
experimental treatment is being tested
19Pre-Experiments Designs
20Pre-Experiments Designs
- One-shot design
- Expose individuals to treatment variable and then
measure dependent variable - No comparison either beforehand or to another
group - No basis for a judgment of causality
21Pre-Experiments Designs
- One-group pretest-posttest design
- Measure DV before and after treatment
- Vulnerable to history, maturation, testing,
instrument decay, regression towards mean,
mortality
22Pre-Experiments Designs
- Static-group comparison design
- Measure DV in two groups, one of which has been
exposed to treatment - Comparison to different group helps remove
history, maturation, testing, instrument decay,
regression, and mortality effects - Vulnerable to selection bias and interaction
effects
23Experiments Designs
24Experiments Designs
- Posttest control group design
- Static group comparison inc. randomized groups
- Removes effects of selection
- Cannot measure testing or interaction effects
- Effect of treatment O2 - O1
25Experiments Designs
- Pretest-posttest control group
- Measure DV for two randomized groups, apply
treatment to one and then measure DV again - Can measure effects of testing
- Cannot measure interaction effects
- Treatment effect (O2 O1) (O4 O3)
26Experiments Designs
27Experiments Designs
- Solomon four-group design
- Removes threats to internal validity
- Treatment effect (O2 O1) (O4 O3)
- Treatment w/o testing O5 O6
- Treatment with testing O2 O4
- Can measure interaction (O2 O4) (O5 O6)
28Experiments Validity
- Experiments are used to maximize internal
validity - However, should also consider external validity
- External validity refers to the extent to which
we can generalize to the population - Depends on extent to which sample and setting are
representative
29Research Samples
- Ideally we want to be able to generalize to the
population from which our sample came - Random sample each member of population has an
EQUAL probability of being selected - Stratified random sample each member of a
specific group has an equal probability of being
selected - Convenience sample
- Judgment sample
30External Validity Threats
- Selection ( mortality)
- Typically university students
- Unformed sense of self
- Uncrystalized attitudes
- Stronger need for peer approval
- Adept cognitive skills
- Less experienced consumers
- Cash and time poor
- Setting
- Demand effects (testing effects)
- Effects of being in lab
- Cognitive mindset (feeling of being tested)
- Compliance and / or suspicion
- Low motivation
- Simplified information
31Football
- You may have noticed that when the season
starts, the weather is always warm and summery.
But after the fullbacks, halfbacks, quarterbacks
and any other fraction backs have thundered from
goalpost to goalpost a few times, nature gets
upset, and cold weather begins. You may also
notice that countries where football isnt
played, such as Mexico, Jamaica and Egypt, do not
have cold weather. In Canada, on the other hand,
where they have one additional player on each
side, winters are worse than here. Small
wonder, Benjamin concludes, that during the NFL
strike we had freakishly mild weather across much
of the northern U.S. - Alan L. Benjamin in a Letter to the Chicago
Tribune
32Questions
- What is the independent variable?
- What is the dependent variable?
- What are the mediating variables?
- What elements of causality do we have?
33Questions
- What is the hypothesis?
- What is the theory?
- What is problem?
34Experiments Hypotheses
- A statement that describes a relationship between
two variables - Causal or correlational
- Should be testable
- Should be better than its rivals
- Occams Razor (Ockhams) simpler
- Greater range
35Experiments Theories
- A set of systematically interrelated concepts,
definitions and propositions that are advanced to
explain and predict phenomena - Theories tend to be abstract and involve multiple
variables - Hypotheses tend to be simple, two variable
propositions involving concrete instances - Hypotheses flow from the theory
36- How would we test the hypothesis that football
causes winter?
37Example
- Research question
- Do media images affect individuals perceptions
of their ideal body type? - Hypothesis
- Advertisements showing overly slim females and
males cause consumers to attempt to attain or
desire such body forms - What moderator variables could there be?
- Do we expect this relationship to be stronger for
males or females? Age? ?
38Example
- Possible mediator variables
- Self-esteem, clothing tastes, etc.
- Alternative hypotheses
- Individuals are already concerned with body
image, but changes in clothing taste have made
appearance more important - Direction of causality
- Experiment to examine hypothesis
39Features of Experiments
- Random assignment
- Controls for extraneous variables
- Measure other extraneous variables
- Including possible mediators and moderators
- External validity (generalizability)
- Extent to which findings are generalizable to
other populations and settings - Random sampling
40Statistical Methods
- Descriptive versus Inferential
- Descriptive
- Mean, median, mode
- Variance, standard deviation
- Correlation, covariance, regression
- Inferential
- T-test, ANOVA, chi square, etc
41Statistical Methods T-Test
- Differences between means
- e.g. Are men taller than women? Are short people
happier than tall people? - Group is categorical variable (only 2 groups for
t-test) - e.g gender, religion, tall vs. short, etc.
- Variable of interest is continuous
- e.g. height, happiness, age, income, etc.
42Data Analysis
- Are men taller than women?
- Mean height of men 178 cm
- Mean height of women 165 cm
43Females
Males
44Data Analysis
- How do we know whether the difference in the
samples reflects a difference in the actual
populations? - That is, do the two populations (males and
females) actually differ along this dimension
(height)? - By making some assumptions we can calculate the
probability that the difference we observed would
occur given there was in actual fact no
difference in height
45Data Analysis
- How do we calculate this probability?
- We can calculate the number of standard
deviations the difference is above the mean
difference - If we know what this distribution looks like we
determine the probability that the difference
came from that particular distribution
46Analysis Example
- What is the probability that someone has an IQ
greater than 130? - If we know what the distribution of IQs looks
like we can calculate the probability - We need to know the mean, standard deviation, and
shape of the distribution - In this case µ 100, s 15, and normal
47Analysis Example
- 130 is 2 standard deviations above the mean
- (130-100)/15 2
- This is known as the z-score
- This formula tells us how many standard
deviations our data point is from the mean
48Analysis Example
- Under a normal distribution
- 68 of points lie within 1 standard deviation of
the mean - 96 of points lie within 2 standard deviations
2s
1s
49Analysis Example
- What is the probability that someone has an IQ
greater than 130? - p (1 - .96)/2
- p .02 or a 2 chance
- i.e. 2 of the population has an IQ 130
50Data Analysis
- Rather than looking at the difference between an
individual data point and the mean, we are
looking at the difference between a mean
difference and the mean of the mean differences - If we assume there are no differences, then the
mean of the mean differences is zero - Thus, we want to calculate how many standard
deviations our mean difference is from zero - To do this we need to know the standard deviation
of the mean differences
51Data Analysis
52T-Test Formula
Because we dont know the actual standard
deviation of the mean differences, the statistic
is no longer normally distributed
The new statistic has a Students t-distribution
53T-Tests
- The denominator is the standard deviation of the
mean differences - Imagine we took many samples (of men women)
- We could calculate the mean differences between
each pair of samples - Each mean difference will be different
54T-Tests
- What would they look like if they were plotted?
- Normally distributed
- What would the variance be in this new
distribution relative to the variances within
each sample? - The variance of the mean differences would be
less than the variance in each sample - This variance is known as the standard error of
the mean difference
55T-Tests
- However, we dont know the standard error
- So we estimate it from the information we do have
(the standard deviations of the samples) - The standard error is the s.d. divided by the
square root of the sample size
56T-Tests
- But first we must calculate the s.d.
- We assume that the s.d. in each population (i.e.
men and women) is identical - So it is more efficient to pool them into a
single estimate of the s.d. - We pool them into one s.d.
57T-Test Variances
Generally, the variance is calculate as follows
We can pool the variances from two samples
58T-test Standard Error
- Now we have a single estimate of the s.d.s in the
population, we can calculate the standard error
of the mean differences
59T-tests
- Now we have everything we need to calculate the
t-statistic - This tells us how many s.d.s our mean difference
is away from the mean in the t-distribution - All that remains is to calculate the probability
this could have occurred by chance alone
60T-Test Procedure
- What t-distribution must we look at?
- Depends on the degrees of freedom, v (nu)
- v (n1 -1) (n2 1) n1 n2 2
- We must then find the critical t-statistic
- This is the minimum t-statistic that would be
necessary for us to infer that our mean
difference did not occur by chance alone - Scientific standards dictate that there can be no
more than a 5 chance of this
61T-tests Critical t-values
- Here are the critical ts for a range of degrees
of freedom - v 5, t 2.571
- v 10, t 2.228
- v 20, t 2.086
- v 100, t 1.984
- Note that we do not distinguish whether our
t-statistic is above or below the mean, unless we
have a strong reason to predict this a priori
62T-tests Critical t-values
- T-distribution for v 20
- Critical t 2.086
95 of points are between
2.086
-2.086
97.5 of points are below this level
63Statistical Methods T-Test
- Hypothesis being tested
- H0 (Null Hypothesis) Means are equal in
population - We either accept or reject H0
- If we reject H0, we implicitly accept H1
- H1 (Alternative Hypothesis) Means are different
in population
64Statistical Assumptions
- Normality the data in each population is
normally distributed - Homogeneity of variance the two population
variances are identical - Independence of observations data within or
between the two groups are not associated in any
way
65Data Analysis
- Are men taller than women?
- Mean height of men 178 cm
- (s.d. 8.62, n 47)
- Mean height of women 165 cm
- (s.d 7.65, n 38)
- Standard error of mean difference 1.79
- v 83, critical t80 1.99
66Data Analysis
- Are men happier than women?
- Mean happiness men 1.91
- (s.d. 1.10, n 47)
- Mean happiness women 1.58
- (s.d. .79, n 38)
- Standard error of mean difference .21
- v 83, critical t80 1.99
67Data Analysis
- Did question order matter?
- Mean happiness first 1.79
- (s.d. .83, n 43)
- Mean happiness second 1.74
- (s.d. 1.13, n 42)
- Standard error of mean difference .21
- v 83, critical t80 1.99
68Data Analysis
- Are taller people happier than shorter people?
- Mean happiness taller 2.02
- (s.d. .67, n 43)
- Mean happiness shorter 1.50
- (s.d. 1.17, n 42)
- Standard error of mean difference .21
- v 83, critical t80 1.99