The seven standards of textuality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

The seven standards of textuality

Description:

What distinguish texts is the quality of textuality ... knock of the door, It was the landlady, knocking at Ann's door, as she'd thought, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:3719
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Mika95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The seven standards of textuality


1
The seven standards of textuality
Corso diLingua Inglese 3
2
  • What distinguish texts  is the quality of
    textuality
  • Textuality is the result of seven factors and
    depends on both the writer and the reader to
    varying degrees
  • COHESION and COHERENCE are text-centred notions,
    designating operations directed at the text
    materials.
  • Cohesion concerns the ways in which the
    components of the surface text (the actual words
    we hear or see) are mutually connected within a
    sequence (de Beaugrande Dressler 19813).
  • Coherence on the other hand concerns the ways in
    which the components of the textual world, i.e.
    the concepts and relations which underlie the
    surface text are mutually accessible and
    relevant. 

3
The remaining standards of textuality are
user-centred, concerning the activity of textual
communication by the producers and receivers of
texts
  • Intentionality concerns the text producers
    attitude that the set of occurrences should
    constitute a cohesive and coherent text
    instrumental in fulfilling the producers
    intentions.
  • Acceptability concerns the receivers attitude
    that the set of occurrences should constitute a
    cohesive and coherent text having some use or
    relevance for the receiver.
  • Informativity concerns the extent to which the
    occurrences of the text are expected vs.
    unexpected or known vs. unknown/uncertain.
  • Situationality concerns the factors which make a
    text relevant to a situation of occurrence. 
  • Intertextuality concerns the factors which make
    the utilisation of one text dependent upon
    knowledge of one or more previously encountered
    texts.

4
COHESION
  • The ties that bind a text together.
  • Halliday and Hasan define two general categories
    of cohesion
  • grammatical cohesion (substitution, ellipsis,
    conjunction, reference)
  • lexical cohesion (reitreration and collocation. 

5
Grammatical cohesionREFERENCE
  • The semantic relation that ensures the
    continuity of meaning in a text.
  • It includes items that cannot be interpreted in
    their own right, but which make reference to
    something else for their interpretation.
  • Ex Doctor Foster went to Gloucester in a shower
    of rain. He stepped in a puddle right up to his
    middle and never went there again
  • Exophoric reference Reference to items outside
    the text
  • Endophoric reference Reference to items within
    the text
  • Cataphoric Forward pointing (This is not good
    news for any of you. You are all fired.)
  • Anaphoric Backward pointing (John came in. He did
    x, he did )

6
Grammatical cohesionSUBSTITUTION
  • A grammatical relation, where one linguistic item
    substitutes for a longer one. The substitute item
    is therefore interpretable only by reference to
    the original longer item.
  • Nominal s. (one, ones, the same
  • Verbal s. (do) It might rain but I hope it
    doesnt
  • Clausal s. (they say so)

7
Grammatical cohesionELLIPSIS
  • It is similar to substitution, except that in the
    case of the ellipsis the substitution is by
    nothing.
  • Nominal s. (omission of the head of a noun
    phrase)
  • Verbal s. (omission of the lexical verb)
  • Clausal s. (ellipsis of large part of clauses)
  • I voted for the Greens. Why?

8
Grammatical cohesionCONJUNCTIONS
  • Specific devices for linking one sentence to
    another
  • Additive
  • Adversative
  • Causal
  • Temporal
  • James arrived and sat down.
  • Im hungry but dont want to eat now.

9
Lexical cohesion
  • Lexical cohesion does not deal with grammatical
    or semantic connections but with connections
    based on the words used. It is achieved by
    selection of vocabulary, using semantically close
    items. Because lexical cohesion in itself carries
    no indication whether it is functioning
    cohesively or not, it always requires reference
    to the text, to some other lexical item to be
    interpreted correctly. There are two types of
    lexical cohesion
  • reiteration
  • collocation.

10
Lexical cohesionREITERATION
  • Reiteration includes
  • repetition (often involving reference) A
    conference will be held on national environmental
    policy. At this conference the issue of
    salination will play an important role. 
  • synonymy (often involving reference) A conference
    will be held on national environmental policy.
    This environmental symposium will be primarily a
    conference dealing with water.
  • hyponymy (superordinate vs. subordinate concepts)
    We were in town today shopping for furniture. We
    saw a lovely table.
  • metonymy (part vs. whole) At its six-month
    check-up, the brakes had to be repaired. In
    general, however, the car was in good condition.
  • antonymy The old movies just dont do it anymore.
    The new ones are more appealing.
  • Lahdenmäki (1989) calls these relations
    "(direct) synonym-type relations, since they all
    refer to another word which has the same referent
    (e.g. I met a man yesterday. The bastard stole
    all my money)".

11
Lexical cohesionCOLLOCATION
  • Collocation is any pair of lexical items that
    stand to each other in some recognisable
    lexico-semantic relation, e.g. "sheep" and
    "wool", "congress" and "politician", and
    "college" and "study".
  • Red Cross helicopters were in the air
    continuously. The blood bank will soon be
    desperately in need of donors. The hedgehog
    scurried across the road. Its speed surprised me.
  • Like in the case of synonymous reference,
    collocational relation exists without any
    explicit reference to another item, but now the
    nature of relation is different it is indirect,
    more difficult to define and based on
    associations in the readers mind
  • (e.g. I looked into the room. The ceiling was
    very high). Interpretation of such relations is
    completely based on the knowledge of subject
    fields).

12
Collocations
  • words which tend to occur with other words.
  • language
  • first language, second language, foreign
    language, dead language, classical language,
    modern language, spoken language, written
    language, colloquial language, sign language,
    body language, legal or technical or scientific
    language speak a language, understand a
    language, learn a language, study a language etc.
    are all examples of collocations.
  • A famous quotation on collocations by the
    linguist Firth You shall know a word for the
    company it keeps.

13
Paragraphs are often highly cohesive entities.
The cohesive ties can stand out very clearly if
he sentences are shuffled into a random order.It
may even be possible to reconstitute the original
sequence solely by considering the nature of
these ties, as in the following case
  • However, nobody had seen one for months.
  • He thought he saw a shape in the bushes.
  • Mary had told him about the foxes.
  • John looked out of the window.
  • Could it be a fox?

14
Solution
  • John looked out of the window
  • He thought he saw a shape in the bushes
  • Could it be a fox?
  • Mary had told him about the foxes.
  • However, nobody had seen one for months

15
  • This is the closing paragraph of Joyces short
    story A Painful Case. The sequence of pronouns,
    the anaphoric definite articles and the repeated
    phrases are the main cohesive features between
    the clauses and sentences. Several refer back to
    previous parts of the story, thus making this
    paragraph, out of context, impossible to
    understand.

16
  • He turned back the way he had come, the rhythm of
    the engine pounding in his ears. He began to
    doubt the reality of what memory told him. He
    halted under a tree and allowed the rhythm to die
    away. He could not feel her near him in the
    darkness nor her voice touch his ear. He waited
    for some minutes listening. He could hear
    nothing the night was perfectly silent. He
    listened again perfectly silent. He felt that he
    was alone.

17
  • He turned back the way he had come, the rhythm of
    the engine pounding in his ears. He began to
    doubt the reality of what memory told him. He
    halted under a tree and allowed the rhythm to die
    away. He could not feel her near him in the
    DARKNESS nor her voice touch his ear. He waited
    for some minutes listening. He could hear
    nothing the NIGHT was perfectly silent. He
    listened again perfectly silent. He felt that he
    was alone.

18
Find out all the cohesive devices
  • The first sign of the new man was the knock of
    the door, It was the landlady, knocking at Anns
    door, as shed thought, but on the other door,
    the one east of the bathroom. Knock, knock, kock
    then a pause, soft fotsteps, the sound of
    unlocking. Ann, who had been reading a book on
    canals, put it down and lit herself a cigarette.
    It wasnt that she tried to overhear in this
    house you couldnt help it.

19
  • Ambiguity in texts can derive from the workings
    of cohesion or the
  • lack of cohesion

20
COHERENCE
  • The concepts and relationships expressed should
    be relevant to each other, thus enabling us to
    make plausible inferences about the underlying
    meaning.

21
  • In Text and Context, Teun A. van Dijk (p. 93)
    argues convincingly that coherence is a semantic
    property of discourse formed through the
    interpretation of each individual sentence
    relative to the interpretation of other
    sentences, with "interpretation" implying
    interaction between the text and the reader. One
    method for evaluating a text's coherence is
    topical structure analysis.
  •  
  • Coherence, the sub-surface feature of a text,
    concerns the ways in which the meanings within a
    text (concepts, relations among them and their
    relations to the external world) are established
    and developed. Some of the major relations of
    coherence are logical sequences, such as
    cause-consequence (and so), condition-consequence
    (if), instrument-achievement (by), contrast
    (however), compatibility (and), etc. Moreover, it
    is the general aboutness, i.e., the topic
    development which provides a text with necessary
    integrity even in the absence of overt links, a
    text may be perceived as coherent (i.e., as
    making sense), as in various lists, charts,
    timetables, menus. Contrarily, other types of
    texts are characterized by explicit cohesive
    structure signalling intricate logico-semantic
    relationships (scientific reports, legal texts)
    in literary works, cohesion may be
    programmatically suppressed in order to enhance
    readers enjoyment while discovering these links
    for themselves.

22
Read the following and discuss them in terms of
cohesion and coherence
  • A Have you seen Tom? B The black car is not
    here
  • My father once bought a Lincoln. He did it by
    saving every penny he could. That car would be
    worth a fortune today. However, he sold it to
    help pay for my college education. Sometimes, I
    think Id rather have the Lincoln
  • My father bought a Lincoln. The car driven by the
    police was red. That color doesnt suit her. She
    wrote three letters. However, a letter isnt as
    fast as an e-mail message and my mailing box is
    full of spam.
  • The fear of the enemy upset our plans.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com