Title: Mike Bell Met Office, UK
1 GODAE Status
Mike Bell (Met Office, UK) Pierre-Yves Le Traon
(Ifremer, France) Co-chairs of the International
GODAE Steering Team (IGST)
2Content
- The mission vision for GODAE
- Achievements and Successes
- Priorities for GODAE
- Recent European developments (Euro-Argo, GMES
My Ocean)
3The Global Ocean Data Assimilation Experiment
The Mission for GODAE
A practical demonstration of the feasibility
utility of high-resolution, global analyses
short-range forecasts of 3D temperatures,
salinities and currents
Timetable
1997 1999 Conceptual development 2000
2003 Prototype development 2004 2008
Operational demonstration consolidation
4 Main GODAE activities (2002-2007)
- Develop/consolidate national systems
- From prototype and regional systems to global and
pre-operational systems - High resolution for mesoscale and coastal
applications (e.g. Mercator, NCOF, Mersea) - Low resolution advanced data assimilation for
climate research (e.g. ECCO) - Develop links with users and applications
- Development of data and product serving
capability - Standardisation, harmonization format, grid,
distribution (opendap/LAS) -
- Product assessment and intercomparison
- Define/agree/implement common internal metrics
- Continue development of ocean state estimation
methodologies and modelling - International collaboration
- Pilot projects
- Argo, GHRSST-PP
International GODAE Steering Team (IGST) (11
meetings) GODAE conference (Biarritz, 2002), User
Symposium (St Petersburg, 2004), GODAE Summer
School (2004), Symposium/workshop (Beijing, 2006)
5Achievements and Successes
- Implementation of observing and data processing
system - Argo, altimetry, GHRSST-PP, in-situ
- Implementation of global modelling and data
assimilation capabilities - Implementation of data and product serving
capabilities and standardization -
- Demonstrations of feasibility and utility
- - see examples
- Scientific advances
- - Modelling, data assimilation,
scientific validation
6- The pre-GODAE in-situ ocean observing system was
clearly inadequate for the global scope of GODAE
gt Development of Argo a joint GODAE/CLIVAR
pilot project.
Outstanding progress so far thanks to
international cooperation. A global array (3000
floats) is targeted in mid 2007 An efficient
data management system is in place.
http//argo.jcommops.org
7Impact of Argo data in the MERCATOR multivariate
data assimilation system (Benkiran et al., 2005)
- Assimilation of in-situ and satellite data vs
assimilation of satellite data (SLA and SST)
only. - Statistics for year 2003
Rms of differences between in-situ data and model
forecast (7-day)
Reference
Without T/S assimilation
8Implementation Forecast systems
- National systems involving research operational
institutes - BlueLink Australia
- Canadian consortium
- NLOM and NCOM - USA
- HYCOM consortium - USA
- Move COMPASS-K systems Japan
- MERCATOR France
- MFS - Italy
- NCOF consortium (FOAM) UK
- TOPAZ - Norway
- European coordination
- MERSEA consortium
9Feasibility Forecasting of ocean mesoscale
using altimeter data
SeaWiFS ocean color
1/32 NLOM sea surface height (SSH) and surface
currents
26N
26N
24N
24N
Altimeter data assimilated
No assimilation
22N
22N
20N
20N
18N
18N
16N
16N
56E
56E
56E
58E
60E
62E
58E
60E
62E
58E
60E
62E
(in mg/m3)
(in cm)
1.0
1.6
2.5
4.0
0.6
0.4
0.3
Composite of most recent data Oct 2-Oct 6 2002,
mostly Oct 6
Oct 6 2002
Oct 6 2002
http//www.ocean.nrlssc.navy.mil/global_nlom
Shriver et al. (JMS, 2007)
10Feasibility improved understanding of the ocean
- Tropical-subtropical Exchange
Pycnocline transport at Pacific 10N showing
counteracting effect of boundary interior flow
in regulating tropical heat content on
interannual-decadal time scales (Lee Fukumori
2003, J. Climate)
This causes anomalous off-equatorial circulation,
with opposite boundary interior flows
Wind stress curl anomaly develops off the
equator during El Nino
11Utility Forecast of Kuroshio Large Meander
- In 2004 the Japan Meterological Agency made a
60-day forecast - of the largest Kuroshio Large Meander for 10
years - A large meander induces strong upwelling with
impacts on fisheries and - the local climate
- The forecast was front-page news and praised by
fisheries agencies
12Model improvements Sensitivity Analysis for
Re-evaluation of Ocean Observing System
Integrating the singular vector with
eddy-resolving adjoint model
- The Japan Meterological Agency (Meteorological
Research Institute) - have continued a series of OSE/OSSE sensitivity
experiments of singular vector - analysis for examining the cause/sensitivity of
the Kuroshio Large Meander and - examining the ocean observing system.
- The singular vector shows a cause or sensitivity
for the meander. The information - improves initial condition and forecasting,
and gives a candidate of target - observation
Result Kuroshio Large Meander
Cause or Sensitivity
Color 1200m Temperature Right singular
vector Black line 0.2m contour of the SSH in
background state
(Fujii et al., 2007)
13Utility Simulation of lobster larvae tracks
Useful information for fisheries managers on
inter-regional dependence of fish stocks
The red box means larval tracks stop here
Larvae come from both sides
The green box means larval tracks start here
Larvae only go east
Credit to david.griffin_at_csiro.au
14Other examples of feasibility and utility
- Surface drift and dispersion predictions for
marine safety and counter-pollution - Intensification of hurricanes over warm pools
- Current profile forecasts for off-shore industry
- Thermal structure forecasts for Defence
- Research
15Working with intermediate usersMarine Pollution
(the Prestige case)
A MERSEA Strand 1 experiment
3D Ocean Analysis
N. .Atlantic Monitoring and Forecasting
systems
Oil Spill Drift
Oil Spill Operational Systems
OBS
Météo-France (France)
FOAM (UK) (12 km resol)
Met.No (Norway)
MERCATOR (F) (6 km resol)
Courtesy of B.Hackett
16Model improvements Intercomparisons and
metrics
System intercomparisons are important - to
speed up improvement of systems - to develop
international standards
WOCE
Denmark Strait Section Potential
Temperature
System 1
System 2
System 3
System 4
Buffer Zone North of Denmark Strait With
Relaxation to Climatology
17METRICS in GODAE (from MERSEA work)
Class 1 (regional vertical/horizontal
grids) Class 2 (moorings, gliders, XBT,
WOCE/CLIVAR lines..) Class 3 (volume
transport) Class 4 (forecasting skills in
observation and model space)
18- GODAE Priorities 2006-2008
- GODAE demonstration
- Establish and consolidate base-line systems
(GODAE standards). - Demonstrations of Impact/Utility main focus of
GODAE. Develop a series of good examples of
GODAE successes (from observations to users). - GODAE products
- Error characterisation consolidate work on
metrics and intercomparison (GODAE label). Make
sure a minimum set is internationally
implemented. - Develop product standardization. Ensure
interoperability between systems. - Observing Systems
- Use the experiment for an improved design of the
observing system. Provide clear demonstration of
added value and impact on applications. Promote
results (space agencies, GMES, GEOSS). - Transition from demonstration to operational
systems - Work with JCOMM on the transition
- Promote examples of transition to operational
systems for the different nations - Contribute to the definition of operational
oceanography architecture - New projects/initiatives coastal and ecosystems
19Advance The GODAE Coastal and Shelf Seas
Working group (CSSWG)
- The usefulness of GODAE systems to coastal and
shelf seas forecasting will be one of the
measures of the success of GODAE. - The mission of the GODAE CSSWG is to define,
monitor and promote actions, within GODAE, aimed
at the assessment and demonstration of the value
of GODAE results for regional, coastal and shelf
seas models and forecasting systems
- Position paper "Towards the assessment and
demonstration of the value of GODAE results for
coastal and shelf seas models and forecasting
systems" P. De Mey, ed., 74pp. - 2007 GODAE Coastal workshop, Liverpool, UK, 10-11
Octoberhttp//cobs.pol.ac.uk/cobs/CSSWG - 2008 GODAE Coastal workshop, planned in
Newfoundland, Canada
20The GODAE IMBER initiative (Ecosystem
modelling)
- To facilitate dialogue between those developing
new - ecosystem models and the developers of the
operational systems. - To promote mutual understanding of the
requirements of the two communities.
- Areas of importance
- Ecosystem modelling data assimilation
- - Schemes for assimilation of
biogeochemical data are under development - - Current assimilation schemes degrade the
biogeochemistry - - Overall high horizontal and vertical
resolution models for the upper ocean are - needed.
- - Advanced schemes for a finer vertical
structure are a key issue for nutrient - transport.
- Interaction with coastal and shelf seas systems
- Support for B-Argo (see friends of Oxygen on
Argo) - Reanalysis
First GODAE-IMBER Meeting Paris, France, 12-13
June 2007
Establishment of GODAE-IMBER Working Group
desired to coordinate modelling and
observations
21GODAE in 2007/2008
- Four workshops in 2007 (preparation of final
conference) - IMBER/GODAE Summer 2007
- OSSEs/OSEs Observing system (GODAE/CLIVAR) in
Fall 2007 - GODAE Coastal workshop in Fall 2007 and mid 2008
- IGST meeting, Canada, August 2007 and Spring 2008
- Final conference in Fall 2008 jointly held with
OSTM meeting - Special journal issue on GODAE achievements
- 2nd summer school in Spring 2009
22Final GODAE conference in Fall 2008 jointly held
with OSTM meeting (to be discussed at next IGST
meeting)
- Review of achievements (data systems,
modelling/assimilation systems, data and product
serving, science issues, applications and users) - Observing systems review, utility and impact,
refined requirements, main issues, - The future GODAE legacy, transition towards
operational systems, role of JCOMM, research
coordination - Probably over three days
- Issues on observing systems could/should be
jointly held with a St Raphael follow on
conference (could the two/three events be linked
over one week ?)
23Summary
- The essence of GODAE is a practical
- demonstration of feasibility and utility
- There have been major achievements in
- implementing observing and forecasting
- systems, establishing collaborations and
- demonstrations of feasibility
- We are adapting our targets for and approach to
- demonstrations of utility learning from
successes - Sustainability of the observing system - remains
a most critical issue
24Future European initiatives
- Euro-Argo
- GMES Marine Core Services (My Ocean)
25EURO-ARGO
- Context ESFRI (European Strategy Forumon
Research Infrastructures) (European Commission).
Roadmap for new large research infrastructures of
pan-European interest. - Euro-Argo selected (35 projects 7 environment
sciences) - Proposal Europe establishes an infrastructure
for ¼, i.e. 800 floats in operation - Requirement 250 floats per year including
regional enhancements (Nordic, Mediterranean and
Black seas)
26Preparatory Phase Proposal
- Main expected outcomes
- Agreement for long term (10-20 years) operation
of Euro-Argo (financial, legal, governance,
organisation, technical). Member States
(ministerial level) - Agreement with EC (GMES, GEO, DG Research) for
additional long term EC funding - Main technical and organizational issues to be
solved - Links with international structure
27GMES Marine Core Serviceand European operational
oceanography
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
...
Operational
Implementation
Initial
GMES Phases
Demonstrate the European maturity of oceanography
Build the GMES marine system, integrating the
core capacities (MERSEA)
Run the GMES marine core service, on an
operational basis
- Challenge (1) run the European core service on
an operational basis - Challenge (2) link definitively with the
European and member states main services and
applications - Challenge (3) organise an a sustainable basis
the link between this operational European
service and the existing research networks
28MY OCEAN a 3-year project to set up and operate
the GMES Marine Core Service
The down stream Cut off
The upstream cut-off
downstream to our service ... is done (duty), or
will be better done (skill) by a specialized
agency, a European agency or a national center
usually already in place Example COASTAL
SYSTEMS
upstream to our service ... is done (duty) by an
observation agency or center (raw data) Example
Eumetsat SAF or the ESA PAC
Data, Model European added-value
29- MyOcean will
- deliver regular and systematic reference
information (processed data, elaborated products)
on the state of the oceans and regional seas - at the resolution required by intermediate users
downstream service providers, of known quality
and accuracy, - for the global and European regional seas.
- Physical state of the ocean, and primary
ecosystem - For global ocean, and main European basins and
seas - Large and basin scale mesoscale physics
- Hindcast, Nowcast, Forecast
- Data, Assimilation and Models
30Modelling and Forecasting centers and regions
- 1. Global
- 2. Arctic
- 3. Baltic
- 4. NWS
- 5. IBI
- 6. Med Sea
- 7 Black Sea
Arctic GOOS
2
NOOS
4
3
BOOS
1
GOOS/ GODAE
1
7
1
6
Black Sea GOOS
5
6
IBI-ROOS
MOON MedGOOS
31Example
32(No Transcript)
33- GODAE-OOPC OSSE/OSE meeting
- Paris, November 5-7 2007
- The GODAE initial requirements and a strategy for
a global observing system have been described in
the OceanObs99 conference book. By the end of
GODAE, more specific requirements should be made
on the basis of improved understanding of data
utility and a series of recommendations for an
improved design of the global ocean observing
system should be delivered. - Global ocean state estimation systems are a
powerful means to assess the impact of the
observing system, to identify gaps and to improve
the efficiency/effectiveness of the observing
system. OSEs (Observing System Evaluations) or
OSSEs (Observing System Simulation Experiments)
are, in particular, useful tools. Impact on
applications is another issue and should also
guide OSEs/OSSEs studies (e.g.optimizing surface
current forecasts for marine safety
applications). - gt hold a GODAE/OOPC workshop on OSEs/OSSEs in
fall 2007 to improve the collaboration and
sharing of OSSEs and OSEs results between GODAE,
OOPC, CLIVAR and other groups.
34Workshop objectives
- Review work done on OSEs and OSSEs over the past
years - Identify robust and common features
- Provide good examples of the contribution of
observing system - Provide preliminary recommendations on the
observing system design. What needs to be
improved ? - Specific topics should include
- Low/high resolution altimetry
- Argo
- Tropical moorings
- High resolution SSTs
- New observing techniques (e.g. salinity,
gliders) - Scatterometry
- Prior to the workshop, specific impact studies
should be defined and carried out by the
different groups so that results can be compared
and discussed at the workshop. - Outcomes of the workshop a first list of
recommendations for the global observing system,
a work plan to prepare the GODAE recommendations
and (mainly) to make a better case to for the
global ocean observing system (final GODAE
conference)