Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P2025, P2026, O2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P2025, P2026, O2004

Description:

Concentration of cases near LKP and destination ... Flying damage assessment sorties is not much different from our SAR search patterns ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: stankegela
Learn more at: http://www.mncap.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P2025, P2026, O2004


1
Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training Tasks P-2025,
P-2026, O-2004
  • Search Coverage
  • Disaster Assessment

2
Search Coverage
3
Definitions
  • Search Involves
  • Estimating the position of the wreck or survivors
  • Determining the area to be searched
  • Selecting the search techniques to be used
  • Last Known Point
  • Critical Information
  • A newly learned LKP can completely reshape a
    search
  • Possibility Area (Theoretical)
  • Circle around the Last Known Position (LKP)
  • The radius is equal to the endurance of the
    aircraft
  • Correct for wind
  • Probability Area (Statistical)
  • Where is the aircraft likely to be

4
Determining the Possibility Area
No wind endurance
Flight level winds 330/20 Aircraft Speed
100 Kts Endurance 2 Hours Therefore,
range of aircraft 200 miles radius of
circle Winds cause circle to be offset by 40
miles
40NM
LKP
200 NM
Wind vector
Corrected for wind
Maximum possibility area
5
Probability Area
  • Based on past searches
  • CSAD Canadian Search Area Definition
  • 77 Probability of Area (POA) within 10 NM of
    intended track
  • 83 POA within 15NM

6
Probability Area (cont.)
  • Concentration of cases near LKP and destination
  • Slightly more in last half, especially last
    quarter

7
Narrowing the Probability Area
  • Flight plan (even if not on file with the FAA)
  • Is there an ELT?
  • Weather information
  • Last point where RADAR had the aircraft
    identified
  • Radar coverage as a limiting factor
  • Airports along the intended flight track
  • Aircraft performance
  • Pilots flying habits
  • Nature of terrain along the flight track
  • Position reports fuel stops, etc.
  • Reports of sightings
  • Other aircraft
  • People living along the intended route of flight

8
The Balancing Act
  • Limited Resources
  • Choosing Patterns, spacing, altitudes, etc.
  • Planning Time in Search Area how much time does
    it take to complete a search assignment?

9
Search Priorities
  • Areas of bad weather
  • Low clouds and poor visibility
  • Areas where weather was not as forecast
  • High terrain
  • Areas not covered by radar
  • Reports of low flying aircraft
  • Survival factors
  • Radio contacts or MAYDAY calls

10
Search Visibility
  • Not the same as meteorological visibility
    (distance at which large objects can be seen)
  • Distance at which an object on the ground can be
    seen and recognized from an aircraft in flight.
    It is always less than meteorological visibility
  • Track spacing should never be more than two times
    search visibility

11
Search Visibility
12
Probability Of Detection (POD)
  • POD expressed as a percent search object was
    detected
  • Four interrelated factors used to calculate
  • Track Spacing
  • Search Visibility
  • Search Altitude
  • Type of Terrain
  • Cumulative POD calculated using a chart
  • Effectiveness must also be considered

13
Probability of Detection (POD)
14
Cumulative POD
Cumulative Probability of Detection Chart
Previous POD
  • 5-10 15
  • 11-20 20 25
  • 21-30 30 35 45
  • 31-40 40 45 50 60
  • 41-50 50 55 60 65 70
  • 51-60 60 65 65 70 75 80
  • 61-70 70 70 75 80 80 85 90
  • 71-80 80 80 80 85 85 90 90 95
  • 80 85 85 90 90 90 95 95 95 95
  • 5-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70
    71-80 80

POD For This Search
15
Disaster Assessment
  • Natural and man-made
  • Examples of CAP services
  • Air and ground SAR services
  • Air and ground visual and/or video imaging
  • Flood boundary determination
  • Air and ground transportation
  • Courier flights
  • Radio communications support

16
How Disasters Can Effect CAP Operations
  • Effects of extreme weather
  • Physical landscape may be so altered as to make
    maps obsolete or make navigation difficult
  • Damage or destruction of area infrastructure
  • Effects of biological, chemical or radiological
    terrorism (or accidental release)

17
Assessment
  • Flying damage assessment sorties is not much
    different from our SAR search patterns
  • The big difference is what you look for
  • Should be asking questions such as
  • What is the geographical extent and severity of
    the damage?
  • Is the damage spreading? If so, how far and how
    fast?
  • How has access/egress been affected?
  • What are the primary and secondary hazards?
  • Is the disaster threatening critical structures
    or areas?
  • Have utilities been affected or are they
    threatened?
  • Can you see alternatives to problems?

18
Assessment
  • Some specific things to be looking for are
  • Breaks in pavement, railways, bridges, dams,
    levees, pipelines, runways and structures
  • Roads/streets blocked by water, debris or
    landslide
  • Downed power lines
  • Ruptured water lines
  • Motorists in distress or major accidents
  • Alternate routes for emergency vehicles or
    evacuation
  • Distress signals from survivors

19
Assessment
  • At each site, besides sketching or highlighting
    the extent of the damage and identifying access
    and egress routes, you should record
  • Latitude and longitude
  • Description
  • Type and extent of damage
  • Photo number, or time reference for videotape
  • Status and trends

20
Aerial survey of WTC
21
Aerial survey of WTC
22
Aerial survey of WTC
23
Aerial survey of WTC
24
Aerial survey of WTC
25
Aerial survey of WTC
26
Aerial survey of WTC
27
Flooding over levee
28
Seeping behind levee
29
Flooded approach
30
Bridge damage
31
Tornado
32
Tornado
33
Tornado leaves slabs
34
Close-up of tornado damage
35
Wide image of train wreck
Chemical spill (hazmat)
36
Close image of train wreck
37
Close image of train wreck
38
Infrared image of train wreck
39
Plume from train wreck
40
Missing Person Search
  • A person is very difficult to spot from the air
    if they are not actively trying to be spotted
  • Lost children and people with diminished capacity
    can be especially difficult to spot from the air
    often they will hide from searchers
  • Lost people often fight topography children
    under five years frequently travel uphill
  • Important to know what color clothes they were
    wearing (not just the outer clothes) and their
    habits

41
Person on the Ground
PLAIN SHIRT, 1000 AGL
42
Person on the Ground
PLAIN SHIRT, 500 AGL
43
Person on the Ground
CAMO SHIRT, 500 AGL
44
Person on the Ground
YELLOW SHIRT, 500 AGL
45
Person on the Ground
BLUE SHIRT, 500 AGL
46
Person on the Ground
ORANGE SHIRT, 500 AGL
47
Person on the Ground
SIGNAL MIRROR, 500 AGL
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com