Title: Measuring Development Outcomes in Low Income Countries
1Measuring Development Outcomes in Low Income
Countries
- Conference on Improving Statistics
- for Measuring Development Outcomes
- June 4-5, 2003
- Ellen Goldstein
- Operations Policy and Country Services
- World Bank
2 Managing for Results Key Questions
- What do we mean by results?
- Sustained improvement in development outcomes at
the country level (e.g., families lifted out of
poverty). - How do we get better results?
- Improve results by increasing management
attention to them - in countrieswhere results are achieved.
- within the Bankto be a more relevant and
effective agency. - across agenciesto scale up impact via
collaborative action.
3 IDA Results Measurement System What is it?
- IDA13 arrangement calls for an enhanced
International Development Association (IDA)
results measurement system as part of a broader,
Bank-wide results agenda. The IDA system is
expected to - reflect priorities of Poverty Reduction
Strategies. - link clearly to MDG framework.
- allow aggregation across IDA countries.
- assess contribution of IDA to results.
4 IDA Results Measurement System What is it?
- Purpose is to focus IDA donors and borrowers
attention on the development effectiveness of IDA
support, through assessment of - aggregate development outcomes in IDA countries
- IDAs contribution to these outcomes through
results-based country assistance strategies. - Does not influence country-specific IDA
allocations (based on country performance rating
formula).
5Guiding Principles in Selecting Aggregate
Outcome Indicators
- Consistency with country priorities as
articulated in national poverty reduction
strategies. - Alignment with MDG indicators and other
international monitoring efforts. - Relevance to IDAs activities in borrowing
countries. - Development of monitoring primarily through
national statistical systems.
6Monitoring Country Outcomes Proposed Indicators
- Population below 1/day poverty line
- Underweight children, under 5
- Child Mortality, under 5
- Measles immunization rate
- HIV prevalence of pregnant women,
- 15-24
- Births attended by skilled personnel
- Ratio of girls to boys in primary and secondary
school - Primary school completion rate
- Sustainable access to improved water sources
- Fixed lines and cell phones per 1,000
- Formal cost required for business start-up
- Time required for business start-up
- Public expenditure management
- Growth of value-added in agriculture
- Growth of GDP per capita
To be adapted as knowledge base improves
7Consistency of Proposed Indicators
- With PRSPs. Coverage of key PRSP priorities,
taking into account diversity of indicators. - With MDGs. 10 of 15 are MDG indicators, others
are complementary, reflecting activities that
accelerate growth to reduce poverty. - With other international monitoring. Incorporates
9 of 10 indicators suggested by European
Commission for monitoring development
effectiveness. - With interim system. Reflects IDAs support for
activities that accelerate growth (infrastructure
development, private sector development, and
public sector management) in order to reduce
poverty. -
8Monitoring Country Outcomes Data Issues
- Less than half of IDA countries have data for all
indicators. - In some cases, most recent data are six or seven
years old. - For some indicators, only half the IDA countries
(or less) can calculate a trend line in the
1990s based on two data points - 43 can calculate underweight children under five
- 56 can calculate primary school completion rates
- 44 can calculate proportion of population with
access to an improved water source - Assessing change during a three year PRS or IDA
cycle is imperfect and sometimes impossible.
9Monitoring of Country Outcomes Reporting Issues
- Diversity of PRSP indicators reflects
country-specific prioritiesbut also lack of
international norms and/or lack of data in some
areas. - 60 of PRSPs have childhood nutrition as a
priority but only 35 use underweight children
indicator. - All PRSPs have safe motherhood as a priority but
only 48 use attended births indicator (none use
maternal mortality). - Highest diversity where norms are still being
defined private sector development, rural
development, infrastructure and public sector
management.
10Borrowing Countries Perceptions of IDA Results
Measurement System
- PRS process has enhanced country ownership,
stakeholder participation and donor alignment. - Tracking IDA indicators would not influence PRS
priorities or alter strategic directions. - Proposed indicators are largely consistent with
PRS priorities (suggestions on transport, private
sector). - they are very relevant because they tend to
answer critical questions about delivering
results to the people. - Measuring and monitoring across countries was
encouraged - It is useful to measure outcomes across
countries in similar circumstances to learn from
others and to see what they are doing in their
strategies. -
11Borrowing Countries Perceptions (cont.)
- Capacity to measure and monitor PRS results at
the country level needs strengthening. - Countries beset by multiple, fragmentary and
duplicative international reporting requirements. - Better harmonization of international results
reporting requirements among agencies is
essential. - Plea for coordinated support to build capacity of
national statistical institutions and systems. - Our enemy is this endeavor is to seek
perfection. We need flexibility, pragmatism and
realism.
12Key Issues for Development Agencies
- Recognize that managing for results begins at the
country level and requires statistical demand
from policy makers. - Harmonize international results reporting around
a manageable set of outcome indicators. - Identify data gaps and reporting inefficiencies
related to this core set. - Develop a time-bound and costed global action
plan to build sustainable institutional capacity
to generate core indicators. - Foster political buy-in within agencies on global
collaboration to improve statistics for managing
for results.