High Performance Facilities

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

High Performance Facilities

Description:

Construction alone generates 136M tons of waste per year ... Madison, WI used UW-M to assist in solving violation of Clean Air Act. What are we doing today? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: lmed9
Learn more at: http://www.nacubo.org

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: High Performance Facilities


1
High Performance Facilities
  • Are we embracing the challenge of
    sustainability?
  • E. Lander Medlin, EVP, APPA
  • November 3, 2005

2
PURPOSE
  • To focus on high performance facilities in the
    broader context of environmental sustainability
    and the shift in thinking and action needed in
    higher education, its operations and practices.

3
What we will cover
  • What is sustainability?
  • Why is sustainability even more important today?
  • Highlight effective innovative greening
    practices, the associated cost savings, funding
    approaches.
  • Identify basic design elements of high
    performance facilities their cost/benefit.
  • Discuss importance of these operational
    activities to the educational experience.

4
Definition of SUSTAINABILITY Meeting the needs
of the present generation without compromising
the ability of future generations to meet their
own needs,
5
We must seek to mimic the way nature operates!
6
Sustainability Its not just a pretty word,
its a sobering challenge maybe the ultimate
challenge!
7
Understanding the Higher Education Market/
Industry
  • 4,100 colleges universities
  • 15M students
  • 3M faculty staff
  • 2 of U.S. Workforce
  • 300B enterprise
  • 3 of gross domestic product
  • 20B Operations/Maintenance and Energy/Utilities,
    alone
  • 14B Construction projects estimated annually

8
Understanding Higher Education Facilities
  • 240,000 existing buildings
  • Comprising 5B sf of floor space
  • Median age 32 years
  • Current Replacement Value - 500B
  • Deferred Maintenance backlog - 26B
  • ALL types of facilities/spaces
  • Like managing a small city or municipality!

9
Buildings consume our precious natural resources
  • 1/6th freshwater withdrawals
  • 1/4th worlds wood harvest
  • 1/3rd of all energy in U.S.
  • 2/3rd of all electricity generated in U.S.

10
Buildings are a major source of air pollution and
greenhouse gas emissions
  • 49 of sulfur dioxide emissions
  • 35 of CO2 emissions
  • 25 of nitrous oxide emissions
  • 10 of particulate emissions
  • Construction alone generates 136M tons of waste
    per year
  • Buildings A chief pollutant blamed for climate
    change.

11
Buildings have a significant negative impact on
the environment based on
  • Systemic design failures
  • Poor engineering
  • Choice of materials manner used (most energy
    materials originate in the natural world)
  • Inefficient technologies operations
  • Little relationship to life cycle environmental
    impacts

12
WHY SHOULD WE CARE?
  • Fits with culture and values of campus (64)
  • Good public relations (47)
  • Cost effective (41)
  • Student recruitment (17)

13
What have we been doing?
  • Upgrade lighting efficiency (81)
  • Reduce use of hard paper copies (69)
  • Use native plants (51)
  • Start micro-scale labs (43)
  • Restore habitat (36)
  • Specify recycled with high post-consumer content
    (25)

14
What are we doing today?
  • Smarter Transportation Practices
  • Adequate and protected bike racks (59)
  • Free or discounted bus passes for students (23)
    and/or staff
  • Carpooling programs (17)
  • Incentives not to drive alone (13)
  • Bicycle lanes (13)
  • All reducing need for new parking/ roads

15
CURBING EMISSIONS COSTS
  • CU eliminated 750 parking spaces and 1,500 car
    trips per day offering student bus passes saving
    8,000/space
  • Cornell commuters drive 10 million fewer miles
    annually reducing CO2 by 6.7 million pounds
  • Madison, WI used UW-M to assist in solving
    violation of Clean Air Act

16
What are we doing today?
  • Improving Energy Efficiency Conservation
  • SUNY-Buffalo
  • Tulane University

17
CUTTING CARBON?
  • Over 300 energy conservation projects at
    SUNY-Buffalo
  • Save 9 million annually
  • Reduce CO2 by over 63 million pounds annually
  • All with help of 200 Building Conservation
    Coordinators (BCCs)

18
Tulanes Energy Star Dorm Room
  • Using Energy Star rated appliances, this model
    dorm room saves 130/room (times 1700 rooms!)
  • Student-created leadership position,
    Environmental Coordinator

19
What are we doing today?
  • Purchasing Renewable Energy
  • Colorado University, Boulder
  • Georgetown University

20
USING RENEWABLES?
  • CU Students vote to increase tuition by
    1/semester
  • Purchase output of a wind turbine
  • Power 3 student buildings
  • Reduce CO2 by 1,400 tons/year

21
Renewables
  • Georgetown University, Intercultural Center, uses
    large solar array to produce 10 of buildings
    needs, saving 45,000 annually and reducing CO2
    emissions

22
What are we doing today?
  • Curbing Water Waste Restoring Habitat
  • Brown University
  • Mesa Community College

23
CURBING H20 WASTE?
  • Students at Brown U audit residences
  • Replace 750 showerheads
  • Save the university 45,800 annually
  • Reduce water consumption by over 12.6 million
    gallons annually

24
RESTORING HABITAT?Before and After at Mesa
Community College, AZ
25
OTHER HABITAT EXAMPLES
  • Nebraska Wesleyan restores native prairie grasses
  • St. Olaf College restores wetland
  • Ohio State University constructs river wetland
  • Mesa Community College replaces turf with native
    flora
  • Texas AM students study wetland cells
  • University of Florida restores a wetland

26
What are we doing today?
  • Recycling Efforts/ Curbing Waste
  • MIT
  • Various materials percentages recycled
  • 83 high grade paper
  • 78 low grades
  • 80 cardboard
  • 87 aluminum
  • 50 glass
  • 47 plastic
  • 49 food
  • 48 construction waste

27
Recycling Efforts
  • When the facilities staff teamed up with
    students, it achieves results and students learn
  • MIT increases use of post-consumer paper from
    5-64 percent of campus

28
  • As you can see, environmental improvements also
    save our institutions money!

29
Elements of High Performance Facilities
  • Sustainable design IS about
  • Improving public health reducing environmental
    impacts
  • Maximizing energy efficiency conserving natural
    resources
  • Integrating technology common sense into
    building design
  • Incorporating sustainability issues throughout
    the design process
  • Involving key stakeholders in all phases of the
    process

30
Elements of High Performance Facilities
  • Sustainable design IS NOT about
  • Adding green elements to an existing process
  • Focusing only on design elements
  • Relying solely on technological solutions
  • Focusing on environmental issues at the expense
    of occupants, health safety

31
Elements of High Performance Facilities
  • What can sustainable design do for you?
  • Reduce capital costs
  • Lower operating maintenance costs
  • Increase occupant productivity, lower
    absenteeism, improve employee job satisfaction
  • Minimize exposure to toxic emissions

32
Elements of High Performance Facilities
  • Building design, appropriate technologies,
    siting, land use, materials, equipment,
    construction methods, and operations
    maintenance practices all contribute to a
    buildings sustainability.
  • Use LEED (USGBC established guidelines rating
    system for green buildings)
  • Use Building Blocks of High Performance School
    Buildings (developed by the Sustainable Buildings
    Industry Council)

33
Building Blocks of High Performance Facilities
  • Acoustic comfort
  • Commissioning
  • Daylighting
  • Durability
  • Energy analysis tools
  • Energy-efficient building shell
  • Environmentally preferable materials products
  • Environmentally responsive site planning
  • High-performance HVAC
  • High-performance electric lighting
  • Life Cycle cost analysis
  • Renewable energy
  • Safety Security
  • Superior IAQ
  • Thermal comfort
  • Visual comfort
  • Water efficiency

34
Green construction addresses challenges such as
  • Growing costs of transmission distribution
    congestion
  • Reduced energy demand (from slowing dependence on
    natural gas markets)
  • Cut pollution
  • Meet emission reductions targets
  • Improved quality of education environment
  • Superior health comfort work environment
  • Enhance productivity competitiveness

35
Perception
  • Green buildings are substantially more costly
    than conventional design and not worth the extra
    cost.

36
FACTS
  • Average premium for green buildings is slightly
    less than 2 or 3-5/sqft
  • Average annual cost of energy in buildings is
    about 2/sqft
  • Green buildings use 30 less energy
  • More likely to generate 2 power on-site
  • Therefore, 30 reduced consumption at 0.08/kwh
    electric price is equivalent to 0.30/sqft/yr (20
    yr NPV 5/sqft)
  • (NOT accounting for environmental health costs
    associated with air pollution fossil fuel use)

37
Case Studies
  • Mueller Building at Penn State
  • Green Building Costs Financial Benefits
    report of 33 LEED buildings (State of
    Massachusetts) by G. H. Kats
  • Harvards Revolving Loan Fund for Sustainability
    Projects

38
Financial Benefits
  • Energy water savings
  • Reduced waste
  • Improved indoor environmental quality
  • Greater employee comfort productivity
  • Reduced employee health costs
  • Lower operations maintenance costs

39
  • Its no longer green design its just good
    design!

40
Why should we lead the way?
  • Education role for current future leaders
  • Collective purchasing power
  • Collective environmental impacts
  • Setting an example/ social responsibility

41
Why should we lead the way?
  • Not a problem in education
  • It is of education.
  • Must not only see ourselves in the community
  • Must see ourselves of the community.

42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
  • We cannot solve the significant problems we face
    today at the same level of thinking in which they
    were created.
  • (Einstein)

45
Strategy
  • Requires an approach that is interdependent
    integrated, conscious visible linking all
    organizations operations sustainability
    efforts to the formal curriculumcommunicating
    everything were doing to everyone.

46
Conclusion
  • New paradigm
  • New strategy/approach
  • Collective change synergistic effect
  • What we do individually will never come close to
    the impact and influence we can have
    collectively.

47
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)