Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz:

Description:

Searching based only on readily known disease and treatment information would be ... Since hand searching is the most time intensive search strategy, it should be ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: whi185
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz:


1
Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Case
Study Quiz
  • C. Michael White, Pharm.D., FCP, FCCP
  • Professor and DirectorUniversity of Connecticut
    / Hartford HospitalEvidence-based Practice
    Center

Author has no actual or potential conflicts of
interest in relation to this activity
2
Interactive Case Quiz Instructions
  • Open this presentation as a slideshow. This will
    activate the hyperlinks.
  • When you come to a decision slide, choose the red
    box corresponding to the correct choice. If you
    are correct you will be directed forward in the
    case. If you are incorrect, you will be directed
    back to the decision slide to choose again.
  • Click on forward hyperlinks (Red Boxes) to follow
    through case based on your responses
  • Click on home hyperlink (Blue House Icon) to go
    back to the last correct step in the series

3
Case Study Quiz Searching the Literature
  • You are interested in evaluating the benefits and
    harms associated with the use of thrombectomy
    devices in acute coronary syndromes. You need to
    determine what literature is available to conduct
    your review.

4
Participation Quiz Question 1
  • You decide to conduct a systematic review (SR).
    What are two ways in which SRs differ from
    narrative reviews?
  • They are the same thing
  • Systematic reviews use comprehensive searches and
    explicit methods
  • Systematic reviews always employ quantitative
    synthesis (meta-analysis

5
They are the Same
  • This is incorrect, narrative reviews do not, as a
    rule, employ comprehensive literature searches or
    explicit methods for conducting the review

Click on Blue Box to go Back
6
Comprehensive Search and Explicit Methods
  • You are correct! Systematic reviews employ
    comprehensive searches and use explicit methods
    for conducting the review.

SELECT RED BOX
7
Meta-Analysis
  • This is incorrect. While some systematic reviews
    employ quantitative synthesis such as
    meta-analysis, others do not.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
8
Participation Quiz Question 2
  • So a comprehensive search is required. When
    conducting this search, what do you need to
    assure?
  • You balanced precision and recall
  • You have gotten every possible relevant citation
    regardless of the workload involved
  • That you limit the search so that only relevant
    citations are found

9
Precision and Recall
  • This is correct! Precision is the proportion of
    retrieved articles that are relevant while recall
    is the proportion of potentially relevant
    articles retrieved by the search. You want to
    employ methods to maximize precision and recall.
    Overly restrictive searches increase recall but
    compromise precision. Overly broad searches
    increase precision but compromise recall.

SELECT RED BOX
10
Youve Gotten it All
  • This is incorrect. While it is laudable to want
    to acquire every possible relevant citation, this
    approach compromises precision and makes the SR
    unnecessarily onerous. You need to balance
    precision and recall.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
11
You Only Have Relevant Citations in your Search
  • This is incorrect. Every citation found is
    relevant but it is likely that many relevant
    citations were missed by this overly restrictive
    search strategy. You need to balance precision
    and recall.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
12
Participation Quiz Question 3
  • Given the need to balance precision and recall.
    What should you do before initiating a search?
  • Enter in the search as thrombectomy AND acute
    coronary syndromes
  • Enter the search as thrombectomy OR acute
    coronary syndromes
  • Understand the topic, devise an analytic
    framework, pose clearly defined key questions,
    and understand the scope of the review before
    devising your strategy

13
Thrombectomy AND ACS
  • This is incorrect. Searching based only on
    readily known disease and treatment information
    would be problematic. You need to understand the
    topic area before starting your search.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
14
Thrombectomy OR ACS
  • This is incorrect. This would be a voluminous
    search for citations for thrombectomy anywhere in
    the body in addition to any citation published on
    acute coronary syndromes.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
15
Due Diligence
  • This is correct. Understanding the topic and
    devising an analytic framework drive clearly
    defined key questions. Combining this with a
    understanding the scope of the project allows an
    optimal balance between precision and recall when
    sculpting the search.

SELECT RED BOX
16
The Power of Due Diligence
  • Your due diligence pays off, you now realize that
    your initial search thrombectomy AND acute
    coronary syndrome would have the compromised
    recall. ((Thrombectomy OR MerciClot.mp OR other
    devices names) AND (acute coronary syndromes OR
    myocardial infarction OR angina, unstable)) would
    assure better recall without appreciably
    impacting precision.

17
Participation Quiz Question 4
  • You try to decide whether to do one search or two
    searches (one for benefits and another for
    harms). Which of the following would cause you
    to perform two searches?
  • Performing two searches is redundant and should
    be avoided
  • You decide a priori to only allow RCT data when
    evaluating benefits but allowing RCTs and
    observational trials for harms
  • If the available literature base on the topic is
    extensive

18
Never Do Multiple Searches
  • This is incorrect. If the size of the available
    literature is small, it may be appropriate to
    conduct one single broad search. However, if the
    literature is extensive and observational trials
    are allowed in the harms but not the benefits
    evaluations, a single broad search would reduce
    precision for studies reviewing efficacy
    endpoints without appreciably improving the
    recall.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
19
Separate Benefits and Harms Search
  • This is correct! Benefits searches is usually
    limited to randomized controlled trials since
    they have greater internal validity. Searches
    usually include the disease in question, the
    intervention, and a hedge for controlled trials.
    Harms searches are usually broader and include
    observational trials. Searches usually include
    the harm (or subheadings for general harms) and
    the intervention. When the available literature
    is extensive, two searches improves precision
    without appreciably impacting recall.

SELECT RED BOX
20
Participation Quiz Question 5
  • You need to decide which databases to use. The
    minimum requirement for a thorough search of the
    literature would include which two databases?
  • MEDLINE TOXNET
  • MEDLINE CINAHL
  • MEDLINE Cochrane CENTRAL

21
MEDLINE TOXNET
  • This is incorrect. Searching MEDLINE and the
    Cochrane CENTRAL databases are needed to fulfill
    the minimum broad search requirements. TOXNET is
    a database for adverse events or toxicology and
    can be used in addition to these others databases.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
22
MEDLINE CINAHL
  • This is incorrect. Searching MEDLINE and the
    Cochrane CENTRAL databases are needed to fulfill
    the minimum broad search requirements. CINAHL is
    a database that focuses on nursing literature and
    can be added to these other databases.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
23
MEDLINE Cochrane CENTRAL
  • This is correct. Combining MEDLINE with Cochrane
    CENTRAL would be a minimum requirement for a
    thorough search of the literature. Using MEDLINE
    alone may miss between 12 and 25 of relevant
    citations found in other databases and may
    produce a North American bias.

SELECT RED BOX
24
Participation Quiz Question 6
  • You decide to use hand searching of references
    from identified systematic reviews, studies, and
    abstract booklets from prominent meetings within
    the field of interest. Why would you do this?
  • Hand searching can capture citations that are not
    indexed or are improperly indexed.
  • Limiting hand searching to these sources can
    target this time intensive activity to areas
    where the yield will be the greatest.

25
Both are Correct
  • You are correct! Hand searching can yield up to
    13-25 of citations that do not come up in
    database searches. Since hand searching is the
    most time intensive search strategy, it should be
    targeted to maximize the yield.

SELECT RED BOX
26
Participation Quiz Question 7
  • You decide to search the FDA website and
    ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies that might
    be appropriate for your systematic review. These
    website are an example of
  • Black literature
  • Grey literature
  • SIPs

27
Black Literature
  • This is incorrect. You chose the wrong color.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
28
Grey Literature
  • This is correct! Grey literature can be important
    for identifying trials that were conducted but
    are, as of now, unpublished or incompletely
    published. Searching for grey literature is a
    useful way to minimize publication bias.

SELECT RED BOX
29
SIPs
  • This is incorrect. SIPs are Scientific
    Information Packets provided by the manufacturer
    of a drug or device.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
30
Participation Quiz Question 8
  • You conduct a thorough search of MEDLINE and
    Cochrane CENTRAL, use two searches (one for
    benefits and another for harms, and employ
    targeted hand searching and grey literature
    evaluation. What is the last thing you need to
    remember to do germane to searching.
  • Only choose citations that agree with your
    preconceived notions
  • Selectively report aspects of your search
    strategy
  • Provide transparent reporting of search
    strategies and the citations you identified

31
Preconceived Notions
  • This is incorrect. This would be akin to a
    narrative review and should not be used in a
    systematic review.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
32
Selective Reporting
  • This is incorrect. In order to build confidence
    in the systematic review results, transparent and
    defensible methods need to be employed. You need
    to report enough information about your search
    strategy so that a person, skilled in the art,
    could reproduce it.

Click on Blue Box to go Back
33
Transparent Reporting
  • This is correct! Transparent reporting is
    important in supporting the credibility of
    systematic review results. Reporting of search
    strategies and disposition of the citations
    should allow a person, skilled in the art, to
    reproduce the search you conducted.

SELECT RED BOX
34
Congratulations!
  • You have successfully maneuvered through the
    pitfalls of literature searching. A comprehensive
    understanding of the topic, the use of multiple
    searches, multiple databases, use of hedges, use
    of hand searching and grey literature, and
    development of a transparent reporting structure
    will give readers confidence in your systematic
    review.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com