Title: Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz:
1Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Case
Study Quiz
- C. Michael White, Pharm.D., FCP, FCCP
- Professor and DirectorUniversity of Connecticut
/ Hartford HospitalEvidence-based Practice
Center
Author has no actual or potential conflicts of
interest in relation to this activity
2Interactive Case Quiz Instructions
- Open this presentation as a slideshow. This will
activate the hyperlinks. - When you come to a decision slide, choose the red
box corresponding to the correct choice. If you
are correct you will be directed forward in the
case. If you are incorrect, you will be directed
back to the decision slide to choose again. - Click on forward hyperlinks (Red Boxes) to follow
through case based on your responses - Click on home hyperlink (Blue House Icon) to go
back to the last correct step in the series
3Case Study Quiz Searching the Literature
- You are interested in evaluating the benefits and
harms associated with the use of thrombectomy
devices in acute coronary syndromes. You need to
determine what literature is available to conduct
your review.
4Participation Quiz Question 1
- You decide to conduct a systematic review (SR).
What are two ways in which SRs differ from
narrative reviews? - They are the same thing
- Systematic reviews use comprehensive searches and
explicit methods - Systematic reviews always employ quantitative
synthesis (meta-analysis
5They are the Same
- This is incorrect, narrative reviews do not, as a
rule, employ comprehensive literature searches or
explicit methods for conducting the review
Click on Blue Box to go Back
6Comprehensive Search and Explicit Methods
- You are correct! Systematic reviews employ
comprehensive searches and use explicit methods
for conducting the review.
SELECT RED BOX
7Meta-Analysis
- This is incorrect. While some systematic reviews
employ quantitative synthesis such as
meta-analysis, others do not.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
8Participation Quiz Question 2
- So a comprehensive search is required. When
conducting this search, what do you need to
assure? - You balanced precision and recall
- You have gotten every possible relevant citation
regardless of the workload involved - That you limit the search so that only relevant
citations are found
9Precision and Recall
- This is correct! Precision is the proportion of
retrieved articles that are relevant while recall
is the proportion of potentially relevant
articles retrieved by the search. You want to
employ methods to maximize precision and recall.
Overly restrictive searches increase recall but
compromise precision. Overly broad searches
increase precision but compromise recall.
SELECT RED BOX
10Youve Gotten it All
- This is incorrect. While it is laudable to want
to acquire every possible relevant citation, this
approach compromises precision and makes the SR
unnecessarily onerous. You need to balance
precision and recall.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
11You Only Have Relevant Citations in your Search
- This is incorrect. Every citation found is
relevant but it is likely that many relevant
citations were missed by this overly restrictive
search strategy. You need to balance precision
and recall.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
12Participation Quiz Question 3
- Given the need to balance precision and recall.
What should you do before initiating a search? - Enter in the search as thrombectomy AND acute
coronary syndromes - Enter the search as thrombectomy OR acute
coronary syndromes - Understand the topic, devise an analytic
framework, pose clearly defined key questions,
and understand the scope of the review before
devising your strategy
13Thrombectomy AND ACS
- This is incorrect. Searching based only on
readily known disease and treatment information
would be problematic. You need to understand the
topic area before starting your search.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
14Thrombectomy OR ACS
- This is incorrect. This would be a voluminous
search for citations for thrombectomy anywhere in
the body in addition to any citation published on
acute coronary syndromes.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
15Due Diligence
- This is correct. Understanding the topic and
devising an analytic framework drive clearly
defined key questions. Combining this with a
understanding the scope of the project allows an
optimal balance between precision and recall when
sculpting the search.
SELECT RED BOX
16The Power of Due Diligence
- Your due diligence pays off, you now realize that
your initial search thrombectomy AND acute
coronary syndrome would have the compromised
recall. ((Thrombectomy OR MerciClot.mp OR other
devices names) AND (acute coronary syndromes OR
myocardial infarction OR angina, unstable)) would
assure better recall without appreciably
impacting precision.
17Participation Quiz Question 4
- You try to decide whether to do one search or two
searches (one for benefits and another for
harms). Which of the following would cause you
to perform two searches? - Performing two searches is redundant and should
be avoided - You decide a priori to only allow RCT data when
evaluating benefits but allowing RCTs and
observational trials for harms - If the available literature base on the topic is
extensive
18Never Do Multiple Searches
- This is incorrect. If the size of the available
literature is small, it may be appropriate to
conduct one single broad search. However, if the
literature is extensive and observational trials
are allowed in the harms but not the benefits
evaluations, a single broad search would reduce
precision for studies reviewing efficacy
endpoints without appreciably improving the
recall.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
19Separate Benefits and Harms Search
- This is correct! Benefits searches is usually
limited to randomized controlled trials since
they have greater internal validity. Searches
usually include the disease in question, the
intervention, and a hedge for controlled trials.
Harms searches are usually broader and include
observational trials. Searches usually include
the harm (or subheadings for general harms) and
the intervention. When the available literature
is extensive, two searches improves precision
without appreciably impacting recall.
SELECT RED BOX
20Participation Quiz Question 5
- You need to decide which databases to use. The
minimum requirement for a thorough search of the
literature would include which two databases? - MEDLINE TOXNET
- MEDLINE CINAHL
- MEDLINE Cochrane CENTRAL
21MEDLINE TOXNET
- This is incorrect. Searching MEDLINE and the
Cochrane CENTRAL databases are needed to fulfill
the minimum broad search requirements. TOXNET is
a database for adverse events or toxicology and
can be used in addition to these others databases.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
22MEDLINE CINAHL
- This is incorrect. Searching MEDLINE and the
Cochrane CENTRAL databases are needed to fulfill
the minimum broad search requirements. CINAHL is
a database that focuses on nursing literature and
can be added to these other databases.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
23MEDLINE Cochrane CENTRAL
- This is correct. Combining MEDLINE with Cochrane
CENTRAL would be a minimum requirement for a
thorough search of the literature. Using MEDLINE
alone may miss between 12 and 25 of relevant
citations found in other databases and may
produce a North American bias.
SELECT RED BOX
24Participation Quiz Question 6
- You decide to use hand searching of references
from identified systematic reviews, studies, and
abstract booklets from prominent meetings within
the field of interest. Why would you do this? - Hand searching can capture citations that are not
indexed or are improperly indexed. - Limiting hand searching to these sources can
target this time intensive activity to areas
where the yield will be the greatest.
25Both are Correct
- You are correct! Hand searching can yield up to
13-25 of citations that do not come up in
database searches. Since hand searching is the
most time intensive search strategy, it should be
targeted to maximize the yield.
SELECT RED BOX
26Participation Quiz Question 7
- You decide to search the FDA website and
ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies that might
be appropriate for your systematic review. These
website are an example of - Black literature
- Grey literature
- SIPs
27Black Literature
- This is incorrect. You chose the wrong color.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
28Grey Literature
- This is correct! Grey literature can be important
for identifying trials that were conducted but
are, as of now, unpublished or incompletely
published. Searching for grey literature is a
useful way to minimize publication bias.
SELECT RED BOX
29SIPs
- This is incorrect. SIPs are Scientific
Information Packets provided by the manufacturer
of a drug or device.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
30Participation Quiz Question 8
- You conduct a thorough search of MEDLINE and
Cochrane CENTRAL, use two searches (one for
benefits and another for harms, and employ
targeted hand searching and grey literature
evaluation. What is the last thing you need to
remember to do germane to searching. - Only choose citations that agree with your
preconceived notions - Selectively report aspects of your search
strategy - Provide transparent reporting of search
strategies and the citations you identified
31Preconceived Notions
- This is incorrect. This would be akin to a
narrative review and should not be used in a
systematic review.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
32Selective Reporting
- This is incorrect. In order to build confidence
in the systematic review results, transparent and
defensible methods need to be employed. You need
to report enough information about your search
strategy so that a person, skilled in the art,
could reproduce it.
Click on Blue Box to go Back
33Transparent Reporting
- This is correct! Transparent reporting is
important in supporting the credibility of
systematic review results. Reporting of search
strategies and disposition of the citations
should allow a person, skilled in the art, to
reproduce the search you conducted.
SELECT RED BOX
34Congratulations!
- You have successfully maneuvered through the
pitfalls of literature searching. A comprehensive
understanding of the topic, the use of multiple
searches, multiple databases, use of hedges, use
of hand searching and grey literature, and
development of a transparent reporting structure
will give readers confidence in your systematic
review.