What Works in Police Policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

What Works in Police Policy

Description:

This explains why people get upset about the idea of racial profiling (not neutral) ... This explains why people dislike it when the police give no explanation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: tomt79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What Works in Police Policy


1
What Works in Police Policy?
  • Tom Tyler
  • Department of Psychology
  • And
  • Law School
  • New York University
  • 12/21/2009

2
What Works in Police Policy?
  • Suppose that you have some resources that you
    want to deploy.
  • How should you deploy them?

3
What Do You Want From the People in Your
Community?
  • You want the trust and confidence of the public
  • You want public support for the exercise of
    police authority (discretion)
  • You want people to cooperate with the police
  • You want people to support increases in the
    police budget
  • You want people to obey the law

4
What factors influence public reactions to the
police?
  • Level of public fear of being crime victims.
  • The perceived crime rate.
  • Views about whether the police are effectively
    fighting crime.
  • Whether law breakers think that they face a
    strong risk of being caught and punished.
  • Do you allocate police services equally
    (distributive justice).
  • Do you exercise police authority fairly/treat
    people fairly (procedural justice).

5
Look at What Works?
  • Use a study of the residents of New York all
    five boroughs
  • Asked to evaluate the NYPD
  • n 586
  • White 327
  • Minority 243
  • Refused 16

6
Trust and Confidence
7
Ethnic group differences?
  • The members of both majority and minority groups
    responded in similar ways.
  • This was generally true throughout, so ethnic
    differences will be ignored.

8
Public Support for Police Discretion
9
People Cooperate With the Police
10
Support Budget Increases for the Police
11
People Obey the Law
12
Two drivers of public feeling
  • The police are effective
  • The police exercise their authority fairly
    (procedural justice)

13
The Importance of Being Seen As Effective in
Fighting Crime Is No Surprise
  • But, the key additional role of procedural
    justice is less widely known
  • Potential value-added for police officials
  • Even when you cannot control crime, you can make
    decisions in ways that people think are fair

14
A New Strategy
  • Process based policing.
  • Focus on communicating to the public that the
    police exercise their authority fairly.

15
What Leads the Public to Think That the Police
Are Exercising Their Authority Fairly?
  • The police are neutral
  • The police treat community residents with respect
  • People trust the motives of the police
  • People can participate in decisions

16
What Shapes Judgments About How Fairly the Police
Are Exercising Their Authority?
17
Similar Findings Across Ethnic Groups
  • Whites
  • Minorities

18
Neutrality
  • Making decisions using objective criteria
  • Absence of personal bias/ideology
  • Consistent rule application
  • This explains why people get upset about the idea
    of racial profiling (not neutral)

19
Respect
  • Treatment with dignity, politeness, and respect
  • Acknowledgement of rights
  • This explains why people dislike
  • Harassment,
  • verbal abuse,
  • Disrespectful/demeaning treatment

20
Trust in the Motives of the Police
  • Evidence that the police care about the needs,
    concerns, and well-being of the people about whom
    they are making decisions.
  • What shows this
  • Accountability/explanation
  • This explains why people dislike it when the
    police give no explanation for their behavior.

21
Participation
  • People want to have a chance to present their own
    views about how decisions should be made (voice).
  • More important than control over decisions.
  • People like forums that allow voicemediation,
    even plea bargaining.

22
These Same Process Issues Also Matter in Everyday
Policing.
  • Here the public has personal contact with police
    officers who are enforcing the law/ resolving
    disputes.

23
Consider the Case of Deference to the Police
During Personal Experiences.
  • People who personally deal with the police.
  • Sometimes receive undesired outcomesarrest,
    citation.
  • Peoples problems sometimes remain unsolved.
  • Outcomes negative around 30 of the time.

24
Personal Experiences With the Police?
  • Why do people defer to police officers and
    voluntarily accept the decisions they make?
  • Study in California (Oakland and Los Angeles
    1,656 interviewsTyler and Huo, in press).
  • Personal experiences with the police.

25
What Shapes The Willingness to Accept Decisions?
26
Implication
  • Police officers on the street gain when people
    generally have trust and confidence in the police.

27
What Shapes Willingness to Accept Decisions?
28
Implication
  • As with general willingness to cooperate with the
    police, deference in a particular situation is
    linked to how fairly the police are seen as
    exercising their authority.

29
What Is Fairness in Personal Experiences?
  • Same elements.
  • Treatment with respect is the most important.

30
Trust and Confidence
  • Address it with a process-based approach to
    policing.
  • Gain general public support.
  • Gain deference in particular situations.

31
This Is All About Subjective Support From the
Public
  • Police performance can be viewed either objective
    or subjective.
  • Objective
  • Do the police adhere to appropriate norms of
    conduct?
  • Are the police effectively fighting crime?
  • Subjective
  • Does the public feel the police act fairly?
  • Do people think the police are controlling
  • crime?

32
Why Focus on Subjective Issues?
  • The public expresses low levels of trust and
    confidence in the police.
  • This is especially true among minorities.
  • We want to get buy in / cooperation from the
    public.
  • This focus is not meant to suggest that objective
    issues do not matter.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com