Title: Binational Border Tuberculosis Case Management
1Binational Border Tuberculosis Case Management
- Gary L. Simpson MD, Ph.D, MPH
2TB Case Rates, United States, 2005
D.C.
3.64.8
4.8 (national average)
Cases per 100,000.
3Our Shared Southern Border
4POPULATION US-MX BORDER
1900 - 53,000 1990 -
7,000,000 2000 - 11,500,000 2025 -
23,000,000
- Projected
- Border is approximately 2000 miles
5TB Rates Along the US-Mexico Border
Country Averages US 5.2 MX 15.1
9.0
3.1
4.8
48.1
7.1
21.7
18.2
Border States Averages US 6.0 MX 28.2
17.2
27.9
35.8
Rate Cases per 100,000 Sources Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, and Sistema Único
de Información para la Vigilancia Epidemiológica
(SUIVE)
6(No Transcript)
7Case Summary
- 26 y/o Mexican National arrested for marijuana
smuggling. - Incarcerated in Luna County Detention Center
(U.S. Marshalls custody). - Six weeks later, inmate evaluated for cough.
- Diagnosis of MDR-TB, subsequently established
(19/23 contacts TST ).
8Case Summary (contd)
- Inmate transferred to Dona Ana County Detention
Center. - Treatment initiated with amikacin (I.V.), and
PZA, EMB, ethionamide, cycloserine and ofloxacin. - Patient responded clinically.
9Case Summary (contd)
- During the 3rd month of therapy, patient began
acting out separate psych. Evaluations - adverse reaction to meds, paranoid
schizophrenia, streetwise punk. - Patient refused all medications.
- Time Passes.
- Criminal charges dropped.
-
10Case Summary (contd)
- Inmate transferred to ICE facility (El Paso,
TX.). - Despite extraordinary efforts to assure
continuity of care, inmate was deported late at
night, and was lost to follow-up. - Contact with patient re-established during a
transnational contact investigation.
11Characteristics Common to Binational Tuberculosis
Patients
- Largely non-US-born, frequently without legal
status. - Commonly with outstanding criminal charges.
- Maybe marginalized, stigmatized, homeless and
have poor access to medical care.
12Characteristics Common to Binational Tuberculosis
Patients
- Significant, undiagnosed and/or untreated,
comorbid, medical/psychiatric conditions. - Major cultural and language barriers.
- Environments favoring mistrust, fear and secrecy.
- High prevalence of drug resistance.
13Collaborators
- NM Dept. of Health (Santa Fe, Las Cruces, Deming)
- El Paso City-County Dept. of Health
- Texas Dept of State Health Services (Austin)
- Dona Ana County Detention Center
- Luna County Detention Center
- NM Border Health Office
- US-Mexico Border Health Commission
- Pan-American Health Organization
- Juntos Project, Juarez
14Collaborators
- ICE Facility, El Paso
- Mexican Consulate, El Paso
- Div. Of Immigration Health Services (Washington,
D.C.) - Migrant Clinicians Network
- Juarez General Hospital
- Chihuahua public health clinicians
- TBNet (Austin)
- CureTB (San Diego)
- Quarantine Div., C.D.C.
- TB Elimination Div., C.D.C.
15Challenges of Binational Tuberculosis Case
Management
- Lack of consensus on tuberculosis treatment
guidelines (esp. MDR-TB) - Major issues of information management (esp. the
need for internet-based, secure, confidential
EMR/EHR)
16Challenges of Binational Tuberculosis Case
Management
- Lack of funding of excess morbidity/case burden
of binational, tuberculosis case management - Uncertain statutory authorities in regional,
complex, interstate and international public
health jurisdictions
17Challenges of Binational Tuberculosis Case
Management
- Absence of secure, inpatient isolation and
treatment facilities - - (e.g. T.C.I.D.)
18Binational Public Health Statutory Questions
- Can state (district court) jurisdiction be
asserted over patients in federal custody (i.e.
ICE, US Marshalls, etc.)? - Is there federal authority (e.g. Quarantine
Division, CDC) to compel isolation of persons
with a threatening communicable disease?
19Binational Public Health Statutory Questions
- Can Mexico (and/or Chihuahua state) refuse entry
of a patient with a threatening communicable
disease (e.g. MDR-TB patient, etc)? - Do public health officials in Mexico (by federal
or state statute) have the authority to isolate,
by court order, patients with a threatening
communicable disease ?
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)