Title: Nuts
1Nuts Bolts of Data Sets/Electronic Records
- Margret Amatayakul
- Margret\A Consulting, LLC
- 2000 WEDI National Conference
- Atlanta, March 23, 2000
- 345-500 PM
2Session Learning Objectives
- Understand the challenges faced by healthcare
providers to better manage healthcare data - Appreciate the current state of electronic health
records (EHRs) - Learn about current and potential HIPAA
requirements for exchange of patient medical
record information - Discuss what WEDI can do to help the healthcare
delivery system better utilize data
3- Healthcare Data
- Background
4What is healthcare data?
- According to HIPAA...
- Any information, whether oral or recorded in any
form or medium, that - is created or received by a health care provider,
health plan, public health authority, employer,
life insurer, school or university, or health
care clearinghouse and - relates to the past, present, or future physical
or mental health or condition of an individual,
the provision of health care to an individual, or
the past, present, or future payment for the
provision of health care to an individual - It is individually identifiable when it
- identifies the individual or
- with respect to which there is the reasonable
basis to believe that the information can be used
to identify the individual
5What does that mean?
- Clinical information
- Patient demographics
- Health history and health status indicators
- Details of present illness or injury
- Orders for care and treatment
- Observations
- Results of diagnostic studies
- Records of medication administration and other
procedures - Conclusions about diagnoses/problems
- Plans for future care/patient instructions
- Administrative information
- Authorizations, consents, advanced directives
- Clinical guidelines, protocols, pathways
- Financial information
- Eligibility
- Claims
6Industry Needs
- Consolidation requires sharing data
- Who owns what information?
- How will merged clinical
- financial data be protected?
- Competition demands
- more data
- Payers are employers
- providers
- How is confidentiality
- ensured w/multiple hats?
- Networks are more
- expansive
- How is data integrity
- ensured?
- Technology is
- heterogeneous
- How is security managed
- w/disparate mixed
- paper/electronic systems?
7What are the uses?
- Documents course of patients illness and
treatment - Safeguards confidential health information
- Communicates between caregivers and with patients
- Provides reminders for health services
- Supports users through alerts, problem solving,
links to knowledge - Assists in evaluating adequacy and
appropriateness of care - Substantiates claims for payment
- Protects legal interests of all concerned parties
- Provides case studies for education and data for
research - Contributes to public health surveillance,
disease prevention, and health promotion
8How well do we collect and use healthcare data?
- A patient died because information on allergy to
anesthetic was not in hospitals standard format
and missed when preparing patient for surgery - A patients life was at risk when a change in
status could not be communicated directly from
the home care system to the hospital system - A patient had a severe reaction to a medication
when a nurse administered an incorrect dosage
because the standard tablet size described in the
formulary at the nursing unit was different than
that used by the pharmacy - A hospitals admitting office turned away
patients because its system reported over 100
occupancy, while the executive information system
reported 80
9Yet,
- Automated smoking cessation reminders linked to
every family members records reduced smoking
prevalence in a region by 12 over 6 months - Automatic display of charges for lab tests being
ordered prompted physicians to choose less
expensive tests, resulting in a cost savings of
1M per year - Computerized adverse drug event monitoring
prevented 569 adverse drug events in a year that
would have added 1,104 extra inpatient days
10- Electronic
- Health Records
11What is it called?
CPR - EMR - CHR - CIS - PPR - AMRS - ABC - XYZ
- Some consider terms synonymous
- Some attempt to define a migration path with
different terms - Automated medical record - paper and electronic
in parallel - Computerized medical record - scanned documents
eliminate paper - Electronic medical record - electronic processing
of data - Electronic patient record - multiple settings
- Electronic health record - moves focus from just
medical to health - Computer-based patient record coined by Institute
of Medicine - describes the vision - Consumer health records
- Suffering same naming fate
- Some want to be distinguished
- Others want to be integrated
12What is an EHR?
13It takes all these to build a house!
- Electronic health record is a system
specifically designed to support users by
providing accessibility to complete and accurate
data, alerts, reminders, clinical decision
support systems, links to medical knowledge, and
other aids
14Characteristics of EHR
- Encompasses a broader view of record than current
today, moving from the notion of a location or
device for keeping track of patient care events
to a resource with much enhanced utility - Provides longitudinal (i.e., lifelong) access to
events that may have influenced a persons
health. The CPR is a virtual core of a healthcare
delivery system information infrastructure - Supports patient care and improves quality,
enhances productivity and reduces administrative
costs, supports research, accommodates future
health care technology developments, and ensures
patient data confidentiality - Merely automating the form, content, and
procedures of current patient records will
perpetuate their deficiencies and will be
insufficient to meet emerging user needs
. . . Institute of Medicine
15 16Hospitals, in general . . .
- Have automated patient registration, ancillary
services (lab, x-ray, pharmacy), and order
communication - Have automated diagnostic study results, and some
communicate these to physician office affiliates - Some have automated patient care systems which
are essentially nursing documentation systems - Few have been successful in getting physicians to
access results online, let alone do order entry
or documentation - A few are achieving some success with electronic
authentication of transcribed dictation - Most use paper systems, potentially with
offline/retrospective database support, for care
management - Most manually abstract charts for most clinical
studies - Virtually all print and archive paper medical
records - Most batch and transmit claims in flat files
17Next steps for hospitals
- Keep ahead of new regulations, upgrades, and
integrated delivery system requirements - HCFA compliance
- Enterprise-wide master patient index
- Manage the paper flow better
- Digital dictation systems
- Document imaging systems
- Demonstrate value to nurses/address data capture
- Islands of information are still focus (e.g.,
PACS) - Physician office connectivity
- Consumerism
- Internet portals
- E-commerce
- Confidentiality and security concerns
- Communication concerns
18Ambulatory care is different . . .
- The ambulatory environment is mixed
- Some have virtually no automation
- Many have practice management systems that
automate front desk functions - Some have sophisticated electronic health record
systems - Ambulatory care is becoming more complex
- Next steps for physician offices
- Many are looking to acquire clinical systems
- Many are looking for more comprehensive systems
19Barriers to Adoption
- Cost
- Return on investment
- Incremental value of another system is difficult
to quantify - Threshold level of activity required to prove
value - Balanced Budget Act
- Confidentiality and security
- Timing
- Build upon legacy systems
- Adopt new technology
- Risk tolerance
- Historical level of expenditures low
- Systems arent really ready for prime time anyway
20Vendor Offerings
- Hospital market
- A few giants
- Fairly tightly integrated HIS
- Niche players for specialty areas
- All scrambling to adopt Internet technology
- Ambulatory market
- Many start ups
- A few solid companies
- Many different product offerings
- Major vendors
- Consolidating to compete
- Consolidating to address integrated delivery
systems
21Different Environments . . .
one size doesnt fit all
22Vendor Decision Making
New Technology
Stable Vendor
Best of Breed
Full Suite
Acute
Ambulatory
Niche
Best of Fit
New Entrant
Established Technology
23Vendor Marketplace
24- Challenges in Managing
- Healthcare Data
25Why arent we further along?
- Computers are designed to crunch large volumes of
numbers very quickly - Healthcare data are narrative, contextual, and
temporal - To date, attempts to structure data - through
data sets - have been unsatisfactory - Data capture methods do not match clinician use
of information - Clinicians scan large volumes of data and
integrate mentally - In general, clinicians are mobile with respect to
data entry - Time is most important to clinicians
- No information system has yet felt like it was
improving productivity, most take longer to
document - Clinicians have resisted decision support as the
return on their investment for using systems - Continued concern about privacy and
confidentiality - Concerns about availability and usability
26Data capture is biggest challenge
- Structured data required to produce useful
information - Most popular solutions do not produce structured
data - Dictation
- Document imaging
- Speech recognition
- Structured data entry now required for structured
data - Text processing still in its infancy
- Some intelligence being applied to structured
data entry in the most sophisticated of systems - Goal is to capture data
- once at the point of care,
- at the most granular, or precise level, and
- all information required for other purposes, such
as reimbursement, public health, research,
derived therefrom
27Data Quality Issues
- Erroneous data and variation in rigor of editing
- Missing data
- Lack of standardized data definitions
- Lack of uniformity in units of measure
- Use of nonstandard codes
- Modification of standard codes
- Limitations of current coding systems
- Lack of accountability mechanisms
- Inconsistent use
- Incomplete
- Inconsistent retention
- Limited protections for data integrity
28Data Comparability Issues
- Comparability of data is a huge issue
- Uniform data sets, definitions, and data
dictionaries - Arent uniform
- Contain limited volume of data
- Currently, only classifications are in use to
encode data for processing - Reference terminology is required to produce
precise and accurate interpretation - Relates terms to one another (set of
relationships), and - Qualifies terms (set of attributes)
- Relationships and attributes are represented in
an information model - Multiple terminologies need to be harmonized
29Interoperability Issues
- Disparate systems must communicate
- at a minimum at the functional level (messages
transmitted) - ideally at the semantic level (content is
interpretable) - Message format standards provide protocols to
exchange data - Current standards embed options
- Each implementation has to negotiate its own
interface agreement, which is different from all
others and costly - Since there are no standard implementation
guides, there can be no conformance testing - Message format developers are beginning to
address content, and creating a reference
information model - New technology may surpass need for current
protocols - Legacy systems will continue to require
interoperability protocols for some time to come
30 31Quick Overview of HIPAA
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996 (PL 104-191) - Provides
- Continuity of healthcare coverage
- Administrative Simplification
- Requires use of
- Standards for electronic transactions and code
sets - Unique health identifiers
- Security (and electronic signature) standards
- Privacy standards
- Uniform data standards for patient medical record
information and the electronic exchange of such
information - Proposed rules for some standards have been
published. No final rules have been published
32Potential Benefits of HIPAA
- Transaction standards
- (ASC X12N and NCPDP)
- Eliminate the need for multiple, proprietary
systems - Improve productivity
- Reduce cost of systems ownership
- Real time access to eligibility, referral, and
coordination of benefits improves cash flow - Real time claims submission improves cash flow
- Official coding guidelines eliminates dual coding
systems - Claims attachment standards will contribute to
privacy protection - Standardize some data elements
33Potential Benefits
- Identifiers
- (Federal Employer Identification Number)
- (HCFA National Provider Identifier)
- (Health Plan Identifier TBD)
- Reduce cost of systems ownership
- Reduce errors
- Improve productivity
34Potential Benefits
- Security standards
- (Administrative, physical and technical services
and mechanisms) - Establish baseline to standardize products
thereby lowering total cost of systems ownership - Reduce risk of wrongful disclosure, minimizing
liability - Reduce risks associated with data integrity
problems, improving patient safety, improving
productivity, and minimizing liability - Promote adoption of lower cost Internet-derived
technology that promotes connectivity to enhance
availability of information, improving quality
and cost of care - Electronic signature standards
- Would ensure legal acceptance of electronic
health information
35Benefits
- Privacy standards
- (Use, disclosure, individual rights)
- Reduce cost of processing of release of
information forms for all but what should be a
small number of requests - Engage the consumer in responsibility for
accuracy and potentially reduce misunderstandings
and potential lawsuits - Reduce risk of wrongful disclosure
36Potential Benefits
- Patient medical record information (PMRI)
standards - (Under study by National Committee on Vital and
Health Statistics NCVHS) - Interoperability standards (message format
protocols that achieve full semantic
interoperability) - would lower total cost of ownership for systems
- custom interfaces would not have to be developed
- vendor development costs would be lower
- would promote adoption of more disparate systems
- would enhance data interpretability
37Potential Benefits - PMRI
- Comparability standards (vocabularies converged
to a reference terminology) - would support expanded capabilities of systems to
provide decision support, outcome analysis and
variance - would improve quality of data for establishing
best practices
38- Role for
- Industry Consortia
39How can WEDI help?
- Put pressure to bear on getting final rules
- Most providers will not adopt standards without
- Some vendors are recognizing value beyond another
set of regulations - It will take a long time for convergence of
provider and vendor attitudes to achieve benefits - Promote adoption of standards
- HIPAA standards are good business practice
- Transaction standards could easily be adopted
without regulation - An industry consortium could accept the role of
identifier enumerator - Proposed security standards require individual
risk assessment and standards selection anyway
40Help?
- Help ensure success
- Promote education
- Develop standard implementation guides
- Establish conformance testing
- Serve as a watchdog to standards efforts (ANSI
HISB) - Create incentives to achieve compliance
- More positive than enforcement
- Better data helps everyone
41 42 Contact
- Margret Amatayakul
- Margret\A Consulting, LLC
- 1817 Georgia Ct. 202 ? Schaumburg, IL 60193
- Tel. 847-895-3386 ? Fax. 603-853-6571
- E-Mail Margretcpr_at_aol.com ? www.Margret-A.com