Title: The Age Dynamics of Voting Behavior
1The Age Dynamics of Voting Behavior
- D. Sunshine Hillygus
- Department of Government
- Harvard University
2Larger Project The Persuadable Voter
- Who is persuadable in electorate? How do
candidates attempt to sway them? - The persuadable voters are cross-pressured
- Independents and partisans who disagree with
party on policy issue - Strategic candidates will try to exploit the
tensions that make campaigns matter - Will use wedge issues to appeal to these
persuadable voters - New information technologies contribute to
greater use of wedge issues - Campaign strategy shapes issue agenda of
candidates - Todays presentation
- Case study partisanship and social security in
2000
3Partisan Support for Party Nominee
4Partisanship in the Electorate
5Party Identification
- Partisan identification an affective
orientation towards a political party - Often compared to religious identity
- Forms early in life and is stable over time
- From panel survey 90 of individuals who
self-identified as Republican in 1965 voted for
Reagan in 1980 - Only gradual updating of partisan identification
based on policy and performance evaluation - Consequences
- The behavior of self-identified partisans is
predictable
6Strength of Partisanship by Age
7Some people have suggested allowing individuals
to invest portions of their Social Security taxes
on their own, which might result in more money
for their retirement but would also involve
greater risk. What do you think about this idea?
8How high a priority would you personally want the
next president to give Social Security?
Highest Priority (7 point scale)
9Campaign Learning Social Security
10Cross-Pressures on Social Security
11 If a candidate for President took a position
different from yours on Social Security, would
it...
12Predicting Partisan Defection
13Effect of Cross-Pressure on Probability of
Defecting
14Over-times Correlation Social Security
cross-pressure and support for opposition party
15Predicted Probability of Defecting Over time
16Implications for candidate behavior?
- To win over persuadable voters, candidates will
try to prime cross-pressured issues - Contrasts with median voter theorem
- Contrasts with base strategy
- But, taking a stand on issue is risky (you win
some but lose others) - Two factors today help reduce risk
- Increased information about the preferences of
voters - VoterVault (RNC) and Datamart (DNC) matches voter
registration data to consumer and survey data - Technologies that allow microtargeting of voters
- In 2004, Bush campaign had 30 target groups
identified by their anger points (issue
priorities)
17Direct Mail Microtargeting in 2004
18TV Ads vs. Direct Mail
Note Direct mail estimates calculated from
Campaign Communication Survey Television ad
estimates provided by Joel Rivlin of Wisconsin
Advertising Project using CMAG data
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23Candidate strategy base mobilization or
persuasion?
24What gets targeted? By age
25Who gets targeted? By vote history
Note these estimates include all sources of mail
(candidate, party, interest group)
26Party Contact Over Time Age
27Party Contact Over Time Registration
28Conclusions
- Recap
- Candidates must win swing voters to win White
House - These swing voters are often cross-pressured
rather than moderate - Candidates try to win over these cross-pressured
voters by priming wedge issues that advantage
them over their opponent - The information environment allows for greater
use of wedge strategy - Potential implications of microtargeting
- Individuals outside the political process are
less likely to be brought in - Candidates take stands on more and more divisive
issues than in past - Makes it more difficult to interpret election
outcomes