Why do consequences influence behavior - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Why do consequences influence behavior

Description:

Water non-deprived rats - increased licking. Problems ... Consequence - they increase licking sweeter solution to get access to less sweeter solution. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: chsbs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why do consequences influence behavior


1
Why do consequences influence behavior?
  • Because our behavior is rational.
  • Cost - Benefit analysis
  • Take into account - value and probability.
  • Example
  • Food - 10
  • Shock - -25
  • Exercise - 1

2
(No Transcript)
3
  • Bar
  • .67 x 10 .33 x -25 -1.55
  • Wheel
  • 1 x 1.0 1.0
  • Nothing
  • .10 x 10 .90 x 0 1.0
  • Alternate Wheel and Nothing

4
How do we learn contingency?
  • Learning does not depend on reinforcement.
  • We learn by paying attention to association.
  • Experiment
  • G. Loftus (1972)
  • Asked subjects to learn pictures
  • More pictures - more reinforcement

5
  • Pictures were presented in pairs.
  • Each picture had different reinforcement value
  • e.g. 1 - 9
  • Expectation
  • More reinforcing value - more learning

6
  • Results
  • more reinforcing value - more learning
  • but, the amount of time they viewed the pictures
    differed depending on reinforcing value.
  • Equated the amount of viewing time - no
    difference in learning
  • Conclusion
  • Attention determines learning

7
What are consequences?
  • Positive Negative
  • Reinforcement
  • Punishment

8
Aversive Control What are the variables that
affect punishment?
  • 1. Delay
  • 2. Severity
  • 3. Consistency
  • 4. Noncontingent punishment
  • 5. Available alternative response
  • 6. Response produced by punishing stimulus

9
But..
  • Dont use punishment was a primary control
    method.
  • A number of problems
  • General inhibiting effect
  • Become angry at the person and motivated to
    deceive
  • Lie to get even and avoid future punishment
  • Effect doesnt last long (Skinner, 1938)

10
Negative reinforcement
  • Another form of aversive control.
  • Avoidance conditioning.
  • E.g., Shuttle box
  • Interesting - Very difficult to extinguish
  • Two ways of extinguishing
  • Learn a response does not lead to escape.
  • Learn no response does not lead to shock.

11
Positive Reinforcement
  • Big Question
  • What makes reinforcer reinforcing?
  • Big Answer
  • Dont know
  • A number of theories

12
Drive reduction theory
  • Clark Hull
  • We have a number of needs.
  • How do we know when to fulfill these needs?
  • Sense the level of drive
  • Drive internal energy that forces you to
    respond.

13
  • How do you know you made a right response?
  • You sense - reduction in drive
  • Reinforcer - A stimulus that reduces drive.

14
Problems
  • Some reinforcers do not reduce drive.
  • Saccharin (Sheffield et al., 1959)
  • Looking out the window (Butler, 1953)
  • Some reinforcers increase drive
  • Copulation (Sheffiled et al., 1951)

15
Premack theory
  • New idea - it is not the stimulus that
    reinforces.
  • Rather it is a response.
  • What kind?
  • More probable response
  • e.g., Studying Playing
  • Playing reinforces studying because it is more
    probable

16
Premack
  • Gave 1 graders free access to
  • Pinball machine and Candy dispenser
  • Some spent more time - pinball.
  • Others spent more time - candy dispenser.
  • Contingency
  • Need to spend more time with less preferred
    activity in order to access to more preferred one.

17
  • They spent more and more time with less preferred
    activity because it was reinforced with preferred
    activity.
  • Reinforcer - more probable activity

18
Weisman Premack (1966)
  • Two activities - drinking and running
  • Water deprived rats - drinking
  • Water non-deprived rats - running
  • Introduced contingency
  • 15 licks requires 5 sec of running
  • Water deprived rats - reduced licking
  • Water non-deprived rats - increased licking

19
Problems
  • Less probable response reinforces more probable
    response.
  • Timberlake and Allison (1974)
  • Sweeter solution - Less sweeter solution
  • Rats prefer sweeter solution
  • So, if the contingency is 11
  • Increase licking of less sweet solution to get
    access to sweeter solution

20
  • Change contingency to 101
  • They usually dont drink that much sweeter
    solution.
  • So, they cannot get access to less sweet solution
    as much as they like.
  • Consequence - they increase licking sweeter
    solution to get access to less sweeter solution..
  • Sweeter solution Less sweet solution

21
Equilibrium theory
  • An activity becomes reinforcing when you cannot
    engage in that activity at a normal level.
  • Every activity has a baseline.
  • Food
  • if you cannot eat a normal level, you do whatever
    to return it to the normal level.
  • Food becomes reinforcing, increase other activity.

22
Behavioral Allocation
  • Two activities A and B.
  • Normal - 150 As and 50 Bs (3 1).
  • Blisspoint
  • To do one A, have to do one B (1 1).
  • How many time, you do A?
  • 50? 100? 150?
  • A reinforced B and B punished A

23
Neural basis of reinforcement
  • Stimulation to hypothalamus can serve as a
    reinforcer (Olds and Milner, 1954).
  • No obvious biological function.
  • Contradicts drive reduction theory.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com