Wounded Nucleons, Wounded Quarks, and Relativistic Ion Collisions

1
Wounded Nucleons,Wounded Quarks,and
Relativistic Ion Collisions

• Helena Bialkowska
• Institute for Nuclear Studies
• Warsaw

2
What is a wounded nucleon?

• Classic definition, given by Bialas, Bleszynski
  Czyz in 1976
• It is a nucleon that underwent at least one
  inelastic collision

3
The WNM (1976!) as usual started from
experimental observation

• Series of Fermilab expts on h-A
• also European NA5
• and lots of emulsion data
• Average multiplicity and
• increases more slowly than the
  number of collisions

4
Observation ratio of multiplicities (hA/hp)
behaves as
And this is just the ratio of participants in
p-A (1 from p and n from nucleus A) and in p-p
(2 protons)
5
The Model
Particle production in a nuclear collision - a
superposition of independent contributions from
the wounded nucleons in the projectile and the
target
Thus you can 1 just measure NN 2 count the
participants in h - A 3 and you have particle
multiplicity in h A!
6
Notice we check here both Npart scaling and pp
scaling
For p-A works surprisingly well. from AGS
energies up to RHIC!
7
New idea not wounded nucleons but wounded quarks
Andrzej Bialas et al., 1977, Vladimir Anisovitch
et al., 1978
8
Additive Quark Model
1982 Bialas et al. Specific predictions for
nuclear collisions on the basis of the Additive
Quark Model - with particle production from three
sources Breaking of the color strings between
quarks from the projectile and the
target Fragmentation of wounded quarks
Fragmentation of spectator quarks
9
Thus for central region
Ratio of multiplicities in A-B to that in pp
given by
10
Pre-history 1980
AQM
Model 3.0
Model 1.6
P,d,?,C on Ta, 4.2 GeV/N JINR DUBNA
11
More history NA35
First real high energy nuclear beams 200 GeV/c
O and S from SPS
K. Kadija et al., ZPhysC66,393(1995) consistent
parametrization of production rates of negatives
proportional to the No of wounded nucleons and
of kaons proportional to wounded quarks
12
WNAB works for negatives
and it does not for K0s
13
For kaons - need Wq
14
Now for RHIC A A data
PHOBOS White Paper
Notice AuAu scaled by pp at twice the energy!
(to account for leading baryon)
15
Almost the same plot
Here it looks better but read the fine print!
AuAu normalized to ee-
16
Intriguing scaling/universality for
multiplicity/participant
ee
pp
AA central
17
Look more closely at total multiplicity per Npart
for Au - Au
Proportionality, but higher than for pp at the
same energy
pp systematically lower
WNM does not work
18
Still, the scaling with Npartis surprising
and not only for total multiplicities
19
This geometric scaling with Npart works not
only for soft (low pt) data!
PHOBOS AuAu PRL 94,082304(2005)
PLB578,297(2004) CuCu
PRL(2006) accepted
(courtesy of Barbara Wosiek)
20
I jeszcze nowe dane
(PHOBOS, nucl-ex z 30.09.06)
Gestosc barionów netto (ale tylko w
midrapidity) tez sie skaluje z Npart
21
A very specific come-back of WNM
A.Bialas W.Czyz, first presented in Zakopane
in 2004 a two-component WNM to describe d-Au at
200 GeV/c
Basic assumption Superposition of independent
contributions from WN in the projectile and the
target Applies not only to the total charged
multiplicity but longitudinal spectra also
22
Density of particles in A B collision
The model requires
(F is a contribution from a single wounded
nucleon)
And the first consequence is
23
PHOBOS dAu 200 GeV
A. Bialas, W. Czyz, Acta Phys. Pol. B36,
905(2005)
24
For full (pseudo)rapidity range construct
symmetric and antisymmetric component
The Model predicts
where
(c centrality
25
Symmetric and antisymmetric part of the inclusive
xsection for several centralities dAu
centrality
Comparison Model vs data (PHOBOS)
for several centralities
26
Next step
Model looks OK for d hemisphere not so good for Au
Next step determine contribution from a single
wounded nucleon
27
The contribution from one wounded
nucleon extends over (almost) full rapidity
range There is a big difference between its
symmetric and antisymmetric part
Authors interpretation

• Two step particle production
• Multiple color exchanges between partons from
  projectile
• and target
• Particle emission from color sources created in
  step 1
• (ABMarek Jezabek, Phys.Lett.B590,233 (2004))

28
Revival of wounded quarks concept for A - A
S. Eremin S.Voloshin, Phys.Rev.C67, 064905
(2003)
Recall at midrapidity increase of dN/dh per
participant with Npart
As
29
Try Nq-part instead of NNpart
To calculate use same Nuclear Overlap
Calculation (K.J.Eskola et al.,Nucl.Phys.B323,37(1
989)) as for N-N, but change density and s
30
Calculating Nn-part and Nq-part
Mass numbers of colliding nuclei are 3 times
larger, but their size is the same.
For pp the same procedure with AB3, hard sphere
R0.8fm.
31
(No Transcript)
32
Compare NN, Nq
two versions of
33
Eremin Voloshin
Scale by nucleon participants
increase
Scale by quark participants
perhaps slight decrease
(full vs empty different s)
34
How does it work at SPS?
Nucleon participants
Netrakanti Mohanty, PRC70(2004)027901 look at
WA98 data 158 GeV/n Pb-Pb
Quark participants
35
Bhaskar De S.Bhattacharyya PRC 71(2005)
024903 look at NA49 data (SPS)
nucleons
Notice log scale
quarks
36
Caveat D B write about integrated yields in
figure caption, but show integrated yields for
p, K and midrapidity values for pbar, d
(plots to be re-done by NA49)
37
Moreover...
When you put together light and heavy nuclei, you
see that Npart is not a good scaling variable for
strange particles
38
Now for the energy dependence
One step further energy dependence R.Nouicer
nucl-ex/0512044
Midrapidity charged particle density normalized
to
R.Nouicer, nucl-ex/051244,2005
Nucleon participants Quark
participants
39
Again Caveat
The author normalizes pp data by the number of
quark participants for most central pp
collisions
Is this a correct procedue?
40
pp 200 GeV (Nq-part)inclusive ?2.4
(Nq-part)central ?3.5
(plot stolen from Barbara Wosiek, who noticed
the problem)
41
An attempt at a summary

• Wounded nucleons remarkably successful in
  parametrization of global characteristics of
  particle production
• Nobody expects everything to be just a
  multiplication of N-N but the proportionality
• looks intriguing
• Wounded quarks - perhaps better scaling?