Title: Mentoring Clinician Scientists and Scientists in Clinical Departments
1Mentoring Clinician Scientistsand Scientists in
Clinical Departments
- Thomas K. Henthorn, M.D.
- University of Colorado
- Health Sciences Center
2Mentor Qualities
- Mentor was the name of the close friend to whom
Homers Odysseus, during a protracted absence,
entrusted his children - Educate
- Tutor
- Prepare for succession
- Protect
trust
Protect
3Developing the Young Academic Surgeon Kevin
Staveley-OCarroll M.D., Ph.D., et al. Journal of
Surgical Research, October 2005
- Physician-Scientists need mentorship in 3 areas
- - academic, scientific, clinical
- - usually means 3 different mentors
- Academic mentor
- - senior faculty with milestones
- - organizing time
- - balance between research and clinical
- Scientific mentor
- - learning science, methods, technologies, etc
- - writing, grantsmanship, presenting results,
etc. - Clinical mentor
- - cannot be ignored
- - credibility in a clinical department depends
on clinical prowess - - can help ensure critical protected time is
available share time
4Developing the Young Academic Surgeon Kevin
Staveley-OCarroll M.D., Ph.D., et al. Journal of
Surgical Research, October 2005
 Strategic Milestones in Transition to
Scientific Independence
5(No Transcript)
6Mentoring Faculty in Academic Medicine, A New
Paradigm? Pololi L, Knight S. J Gen Int Med
20866 2005
- 33-50 of faculty report being mentored
- Informal vs formal?
- How long?
- "Where have all the mentors gone?" (Dunnington
GL. Am J Surg. 1996) - Gone with the recent changes in medicine
- Potential mentors need training
- Result is a decline in junior faculty prepared as
clinician-scientists
7Mentoring Faculty in Academic Medicine, A New
Paradigm? Pololi L, Knight S. J Gen Int Med
20866 2005
- In GIM only 11 are now Professors and 58 are
Assistant Professors - Unlikely that all junior faculty can be assigned
a senior faculty mentor - Conflict of interest between senior protector
of the division/department and a junior faculty
members professional aspirations - Although informal mentoring provides a more
effective mentoring model the recognition that
many faculty lack mentors has led institutions to
increasingly implement formal mentoring programs.
8Mentor Qualities
- Today, there is no agreed upon definition of a
Mentor - This is an increasing issue recognized by the
leadership in Biomedical Science - Part of the problem of the countrys lagging
efforts in training the next generation of
clinical scientists - How do we fix this?
9NIH Roadmap for Medical ResearchInstitutional
Clinical and Translational Science Awards
(CTSA) Building an Academic HomeOctober 17,
2005
10NIH CTSA Awards A Home for Clinical and
Translational Science
Clinical Research Ethics
Trial Design
Advanced Degree-Granting Programs
Biomedical Informatics
CTSA HOME
Participant Community Involvement
Clinical Resources
Biostatistics
Regulatory Support
11NIH Efforts
- NIH conference to specify the new RFA
requirements for CTSAs (Clinical Translational
Science Awards) -
T-32
K-12
6 million
CTSA
K-30
GCRC
12NIH Efforts
T-32
K-12
6 million
CTSA
K-30
GCRC
? New emphasis on mentoring for institutional
training (T32 K12 and K30).
? New requirement for a graduate school
accredited to award degrees in clinical research.
? New emphasis translational science, systems
biology, bioinformatics and industry studies
(GCRC).
13Mentor Qualities
- "Mentors are
- advisors, people with career experience willing
to share their knowledge - supporters, people who give emotional and moral
encouragement - tutors, people who give specific feedback on
one's performance - masters, in the sense of employers to whom one is
apprenticed - sponsors, sources of information about and aid in
obtaining opportunities - models, of identity, of the kind of person one
should be to be an academic."
The Council of Graduate Schools (1995), Morris
Zelditch
14 Enhancing the Discipline of Clinical and
Translational Sciences Meeting, May 23, 2005
- Clinical and Translational Science Program
Descriptions -
- 16 Programs were presented and discussed
15Colorado Clinical Science Program Laurie
Shroyer, Ph.D.
16Colorado Clinical Science Program Ronald Sokol,
M.D.
Young Investigators Guide to Research Mentoring
Protocol Writing and Submission
Meet With Your Mentor About The Nature of
Clinical Research Plan to spend sufficient time
with your mentor to discuss clinical
research..
BOOKS Principles and Practice of Clinical
Research, Ed. John I. Gallin, Academy Press,
2002, ISBN 0-12-274065 Ethical and Regulatory
Aspects of Clinical Research Readings and
Commentary, Ed. Ezekiel J. Emanuel et al, The
Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003, ISBN
0-8018-7813-6 ON-LINE RESOURCES St. Judes
Childrens Research Hospital http//www.cure4kids.
org/ums/home/courses/detail/content.php?courses_id
10 Registration and use of resources is free.
NIH Clinical Center Training and Education,
http//www.cc.nih.gov/ Colorado Pediatric
General Clinical Research Center, electronic
application, http//www.uchsc.edu/pedsgcrc/
Public Health Service Form 398,
http//grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398
.html Colorado Multiple Institutional Review
Boards, http//comirbweb.uchsc.edu/
17Colorado Clinical Science Program Ronald Sokol,
M.D.
Young Investigators Guide to Research Mentoring
Protocol Writing and Submission
Meet With Your Mentor To Review And Critique
Protocol Draft Have a draft of your protocol to
your mentor 5-7 days before the scheduled
Draft Meeting time .
The Protocol Draft Meeting - Your mentor
will want to know answers to questions like What
issues arose while writing the Methods
section?. He/she is looking for evidence that
you are growing. - The result of this
meeting should be a clear understanding,
preferably articulated by you regarding
modifications - Once the essential components
of the scientific portion of the protocol are at
least in rudimentary form it is time for
you to seek additional expertise
biostatistics, human subject issues,
bioinformatics, regulatory, etc. - Whatever
your research, data will be collected and must be
stored. Expert assistance in setting up
databases and data collection advice - Set a
time to meet again with your mentor for the
purpose of reviewing and discussing
the full best-possible draft of your protocol
18Colorado Clinical Science Program Ronald Sokol,
M.D.
Mentoring the Young Investigator (YI) Protocol
Writing and Submission
? Meet With YI About The Nature of Clinical
Research review research-treatment ? Meet With
YI About His/Her Research Idea purpose, design
issues, background, significance, ? Provide YI
With Protocol Writing Resources on-line
resources (NIH, PHS), names of local experts ?
Meet With YI To Review And Critique Protocol
Draft examine and discuss all sections ?
Provide YI With Information about Additional
Resources and Expertise contact info for experts
? Meet With YI to Review And Critique The Full
Protocol Draft examine and discuss each
section ? Instruct YI To Personally Contact GCRC
Core Managers ? Meet With YI Post-GCRC
Pre-Review based upon readiness for submission,
advise YI to proceed or delay. ? Meet With YI
Prior To The Review Meeting Discuss the review
process, what to expect from reviewers ? Attend
Review Meeting With YI This is required by the
GCRC. ? Meet With YI Post-Review Meeting
debrief and discuss YIs experience of the review
process ? Meet With YI To Review And Assess
Adequacy of Responses to Reviewers advise YI to
proceed or delay. ? Protocol Approval or
Disapproval Proceed to protocol initiation, or
regroup.
19PENN Training Program in Translational
ResearchEmma Meagher, MD
- Identification of the lead mentor at the outset
is a critical feature for a successful training
experience. - In consultation with the lead mentor, and with
the approval of the MTR Advisory Committee, the
candidate selects from the PENN faculty an
individualized candidate MTR mentoring committee.
- This three person committee functions as an
ongoing monitoring group for the candidates
progress. - The committee meets on a trimester basis to
review progress reports submitted by the trainee.
Thus the students MTR Program Committee
functions analogously to a graduate students
thesis committee.
20Vanderbilt Physician-Scientist Development
ProgramJeff Balser, M.D., Ph.D.
- Program is fully integrated with the coursework,
seminars, and mentoring infrastructure of our
K-30 supported Masters in Clinical Investigation
and Masters in Public Health programs. - A key feature of the VPSD is that participants
are closely monitored (at 6 month intervals) by
the VPSD Advisory Committee, which actively seeks
input from both the awardee and the research
mentor on progress. - The program director directly engages the
awardee, mentor, and clinical department chair
when problems are identified. - 47 of VPSD K-awardees are successfully
converting to R-awards, more than twice the
national average. - Recognizing the value of the central monitoring
and organization this program provides, they are
developing plans to expand the oversight of the
VPSD beyond the 2 year initial period, into years
3-7, to include the K-award support period that
almost always follows VPSD program participation.
21Department of Anesthesiology What we do now.
- Every Physician-Scientist or Basic Scientist
(anyone with a lab and a start-up package) - - must have a senior mentor outside of the
Department - - key (strategically) to extending our reach
and our value - - key (tactically) to the academic development
of the individual - - must have a mentor within the Department
- - key to developing within the specialty
- - key to maximizing the benefit of the research
to the Department - - key to developing citizenship within the
Department - - increasingly, looking for mentorship outside
the institution
22 Mentoring through professional organizations
- FAER Academy of Anesthesia Mentors
Established in 2004 - - Objective is to recognize those individuals
who, through their activities as mentors, have
contributed importantly to the development and
advancement of academic anesthesiologists in the
areas of research and education. - - Additionally, the Academy seeks to promote the
activities of mentoring among others in
anesthesiology to increase academic activities in
research and education as well as promoting the
academic image of anesthesiology. - IARS Mentorship Initiative
- - Effort to provide interdepartmental mentoring
23Department of Anesthesiology What we need to do
- Every Physician-Scientist or Basic Scientist
- - must be part of a structured mentoring program
run centerwide - - key to getting best chance at a productive
mentoring team - - key to holding all parties accountable
- - key to getting long term success
-
Laurie Shroyer, the Graduate School Dean, and
myself have applied to the Presidents Fund for a
grant to launch such a program at Colorado - we
can learn from pediatrics and internal
medicine - but they are in a world of their
own - anesthesiology is one of the larger small
departments - what we develop is suitable for
export to the smaller departments
24The End
25National Shortage of Mentoring
- Science to lead Anesthesiology into the future
26Mentoring Session Record
Mentor _______________________________________
Date ___________ Mentee _________________________
_____________Session ___________
Topics Covered at Present Session
Present Issues Current Actions Future
Agendas Other Subjects
Topics for Later Reference