Title: Leverage or Power In Negotiation Preliminary Considerations
1Leverage or Power In NegotiationPreliminary
Considerations
- What are power and influence?
- Power Source of direct or indirect pressure
exerted to advocate interests or win conflict - Influence Tactics to apply this pressure
- Why is power important to negotiators?
- Provides advantage or leverage to gain greater
share of outcomes or preferred solution - Usually sought for one of two reasons
- Equalization To counterbalance opponent power
- Enhancement To secure desired outcomes, to win
2Power In NegotiationPreliminary Considerations,
contd
- Defining power
- Simple definition Ability to bring about
desired outcomes (in face of resistance) - Alternative definition Ability to satisfy
purposes in a situation relative to that
situation - Relational aspect is important
- Not simply a characteristic of an actor or party
- Stresses how one derives power from a situation
or context - Definition leads to emphasis on sources of power
3Sources Of PowerInformation and Expert Power
- Information
- Facts, evidence, viewpoints, data
- Used to persuade the other to accept a particular
view (perhaps a particular frame), solution - Expert power
- Special case of info power -- person assumes
importance apart from info - Interprets facts for us, makes them persuasive
- Watch out for the snow job -- a variation of
good guy/bad guy?
4Sources Of PowerResource Control Whoever has
the gold
- Money Cash, salary, bonuses, expenses, etc.
- Supplies Raw materials, parts, components
- Time If the opponent is under time pressure
- Equipment Tools, software, vehicles, etc.
- Critical services Installation, maintenance,
technical support, transportation, training, etc. - Human capital Labor, staff
- Interpersonal support Praise and encouragement,
or criticism for bad performance
5Sources Of PowerLegitimate Power
- Authority is usually derived from the social
structure (e.g., organizational position, ones
place in the hierarchy or network). Can be
obtained through inheritance (tradition),
election, or appointment - Derivative sources Reputation based on past
performance enhances formal authority.
Conversely, people stop listening to ineffective
authorities
6Sources Of PowerInformal Authority
- Derives from ones place in the structure or
network even without formal authority - Key characteristics lending informal authority
- Centrality Amount of information passing
through the node - Criticality and relevance The key info and its
processing - Flexibility Discretion they can exercise
- Visibility Is the function known to others?
7Sources Of PowerPersonal Power
- Credibility Qualifications and expertise,
trustworthiness and integrity, presence - Personal attractiveness (friendliness)
Establishes personal relationship, showing
warmth, empathy - Emotion Appealing to passions, values, sense of
whats right - Persistence and tenacity Dogged determination
-- children are good at this!
8Managing Information Power The Persuasion
Process
- Traditional model emphasizes characteristics of
the message, source (sender), and receiver - More recent model emphasizes two paths
- Central route Conscious, cognitive (integrated
with existing thought structures), e.g., Our
cell-phone service is useful if your car breaks
down - Peripheral route More subtle, less conscious,
less permanent as not integrated in thought
structures, Jamie Lee Curtis wants to party with
you/Women are mechanically competent
9Characteristics of Messages Three Main Issues
- Content Facts and topics to be covered, the
what to be communicated - Structure How the message is constructed, or
form - Persuasive Style How the message is delivered
10Message Content Making It Persuasive
- Make the offer attractive What do they gain?
Defuse their objections in advance - Frame it for a yes One yes leads to another
(build cooperative and agreeable spirit) - Make it normative People want to do the right
thing. Make agreement the right thing that
should be done. Even just saying it is helps! - Suggest agreement in principle as an interim step
11Structuring The Message For Persuasion
- Order Not in the middle. Primacy and recency
effects - Attractive, familiar, controversial messages at
beginning - Uninteresting, unfamiliar, unimportant to
receiver at end - Two-sided message Recognize alternate view and
preempt it in advance (I.e., anticipate
objections) - Big ideas may be more digestible in small doses,
especially if parts are known to be tasty (or
previously accepted) - Repetition. Repetition.
- Conclusions Most effective if theyve drawn
them. Can you count on that? If so, leave it
open.
12Persuasive Style How To Pitch The Message
- Encourage active participation
- Use metaphors, with due caution
- Incite fears, possibly with threats
- Create distractions to absorb energy they
normally devote to building counter-arguments - Use more intense language, but theres an optimal
level thats not always the most intense - Violate receivers expectations
13Characteristics of Sources
- Credibility
- Qualifications and competence
- Trustworthiness
- Self-presentation or presence
- Composure
- Sociability (friendly and open)
- Extroversion
- Personal attractiveness
- Friendliness Establish personal relations
(Ingratiation Excess flattery, taking
friendliness a bit too far?) - Strategies
- Compliments
- Attractiveness
- Helping the other
- Perceived similarity
- Emotion
14Receiver Characteristics
- Attending to the other
- Eye contact
- Body position
- Other nonverbal cues
- Exploring or ignoring the others position
- Selectively paraphrase
- Reinforce points you like in their position
- Resisting the others influence
- Develop your BATNA
- Public commitments
- Inoculation against their arguments
15Context FactorsCompliance Strategies
- Strategies used to gain compliance
- Reciprocity - normally expected in concessions
- Commitment - let them sample, try it on, borrow
it - Social proof - we look to others to guide us,
e.g., celebrities, stars - Use of reward and punishment, or threats
involving these (pressure tactics) - Scarcity - offer something unique and rare
- These can be used to manipulate or deceive
- We resent such use on us. Should we use them?
- Stay tuned for chapter on ethics
16Application of PowerStrategies of Influence
- Persuasion Using info and expertise
- Exchange Resources, quid pro quo
- Legitimacy Position in authority structure
- Friendliness and ingratiation
- Friendliness Developing a relationship, showing
support, concern, liking, appreciation, respect - Ingratiation Expedient friendliness is often
resented, but some can use it effectively - Praise or verbal reinforcement
17Application of PowerStrategies of Influence,
continued
- Assertiveness Strong, forceful style and manner
- Inspirational appeal Info with an emotional
message and a vision of the future - Consultation (ACBD) -- Redundant?
- Pressure Using strategic info plus sanctions
- Tends to be used by parties high in power, but
also as a response by less powerful to power
escalation? - Short-term compliance, but alienates the other
- Coalitions Endorsement or coordinated use of
other influence tactics
18Power In Negotiation -- Summary
- Its important to negotiators for different
reasons, depending on their intent - To neutralize a power disadvantage
- To gain a competitive advantage
- Power is perhaps best understood in terms of its
sources - Various influence strategies can be used,
separately or in combination, to apply power or
exert leverage