Controlling Immigration: What Oaxacan Migrants Can Tell Us - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 116
About This Presentation
Title:

Controlling Immigration: What Oaxacan Migrants Can Tell Us

Description:

Controlling Immigration: What Oaxacan Migrants Can Tell Us – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 117
Provided by: waynecor
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Controlling Immigration: What Oaxacan Migrants Can Tell Us


1
Controlling Immigration What Oaxacan Migrants
Can Tell Us Wayne CorneliusCenter for
Comparative Immigration Studies University of
California-San Diego
2
Tunkas, Yuc.
Tlacuitapa, Jal.
San Miguel Tlacotepec. Oax.
Migrant-sending towns being studied by CCIS
3
CCIS field research team, 2007-08
4
Primary research siteSan Miguel Tlacotepec,
Oaxaca
5
821 survey interviews completed, Dec. 2007-Feb.
2008
6
34 life history interviews in San Miguel
Tlacotepec
7
Interviewing Tlacotepensesin Vista, Calif.
8
  • San Miguel Tlacotepec
  • Pre-Columbian origins
  • Indigenous community, but only 18 know any
    Mixteco
  • Remote location, 6 hours drive from
    Oaxaca City

9
A mature, high-emigration community, in 2nd
generation of migration to the U.S. Lost 353
people due to emigration, 1995-1999 Lost 712
people due to emigration, 2000-2004 Remaining
population in 2005 1,696
10
Birth rate in 2005 3.8 children per woman (not
enough to preventpopulation decline, givenhigh
out-migration)
11
Increasingly,a town of oldmen, women, and
young children
12
Most men age 20-50 are working in United States
13
Many SMT women in work in agriculture
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
  • An agriculture-based economy
  • Unmechanized, subsistence agriculture
  • Very little irrigation, crops depend on
    seasonal rains
  • Small plots of land, many of which are idle due
    to emigration

21
Corn is main crop, mostly for household and
livestock consumption
22
Considerable poverty, sharp income inequalities
poorest are families with no U.S. connections
23
Well-off families have members working in U.S.,
receivecash remittances, build houses financed
by U.S. earnings
24
U.S. influences include vehicles purchased in San
Diego
25
and D-Jays trained and equipped in San Diego
26
SMTs economy depends on cash remittances from
U.S.
72 of Tlacotepense migrants sent money to
relativesin SMT during their most recent stay in
the U.S.
27
47 of all adults inSan Miguel
Tlacotepecreceive cash remittancesfrom
relatives in U.S.Used for food
otherhousehold expenses(62),
childrenseducation (11), building/improvingho
uses (7), buyingclothes (4), medicines
medical care (4),paying debts (3) Remittances
decliningdue to poor U.S. economy
28
Tlacotepenses are ambivalent about impacts of
migration to the U.S. on their town
Has migration to the U.S. benefited or harmed
the townseconomy? Benefited 70 Harmed 30
Has migration to the U.S. benefited or
harmed the customsand ways of life in San Miguel
Tlacotepec? Benefited 40 Harmed 60
29
SMTs isolation is beingreduced by
moderntechnology cell phonesand computers
Computer center in San Miguel Tlacotepec
30
Computer literacy is rising, Internet culture is
taking hold
22 of Tlacotepenses (in SMT Vista) have
e-mail 21 of Tlacotepenses (in SMT) have used
computers in kiosk center for Internet
access70 of Tlacotepenses in Vista have a
computer at home 46 of Tlacotepenses in Vista
have a home Internet connection
31
  • Average Tlacotepense adult has completed 7
    years of schooling (vs. their father
    completed 3 years, mother 2 years)
  • Most dropped out of school due to lack of money
    for school expenses (36) or need to work to
    support family (26)
  • 66 want their children to complete university
  • But Keeping children in school after junior
    high is very difficult due to lure of
    migration

Elementary schoolclass in SMT
32
Migration flows from San Miguel Tlacotepec,
Oaxaca
1950-60 Veracruz, Mexico City 1960-70 Baja
California 1970-present San Diego
33
Among all adult Tlacotepenses, 37 have migrated
to U.S. Most important reason for
migration Higher wages in U.S. 26 More jobs
in U.S. 21 Build a house in
Mexico 18 Reunite with relatives 16 Start
business in Mexico 7 Adventuring, to know
U.S. 6 Other 6 Did you leave San
Miguel Tlacotepec because thingswere not going
well for you in the town, or because inthe U.S.
there were more opportunities? Opportunities in
U.S. 78 Conditions in SMT 22
34
Tlacotepense working in agriculture in
Oaxaca or Baja California earns (U.S.)
1.50/hr.
Tlacotepense harvesting crops in California earns
8.00-8.50/hr.
1 hr. in CA 1 day in Mexico
35
Tlacotepenses in Vista, Calif.
Fund-raiser in Vista for annual fiesta of St.
Michael the Archangel.Sept. 29, 2007 fiesta in
Vista attracted over 600 Tlacotepenses.
36
Valente Martinez, age 72, first Tlacotepense in
Vista
  • Irregular rains caused his corn crop in SMT to
    fail
  • Migrated to Ensenada, Baja Calif., to find work
  • Moved on to Tijuana, met friend who had worked
    for a farmer in Vista
  • Arrived in Vista in 1973 brought brothers and
    other family members

37
Vista, Calif. Not a Welcoming Environment for
Migrants
Anti-immigration demonstration in
Vista, October 2006
38
Considerable fear of deportation among
undocumented Tlacotepenses in Vista
  • Occasional presence of Border Patrol agents
    and San Diego Minutemen (vigilantes) on
    Vista streets
  • Local police activity can lead to apprehension
    by Border Patrol
  • Anti-day laborer ordinance passed by Vista city
    council, 2006
  • Anti-immigration legislation passed by
    Congress, 2006-07
  • Anti-immigration presidential candidates,
    2007-08

39
Pew Hispanic Center,Dec. 2007 nationalsurvey of
Latino population
40
What can Oaxacan migrants tell us about U.S.
immigration policy?
How do they perceive U.S. policy? How do they
experience it in their own lives? How do they
respond to the policy?
41
What is the policy? Spend more on border
enforcement!
Concentrated borderenforcement era
Amount spent on border enforcement,
FY1993-2008 30 billion
42
Phase I Increased Manpower and Physical
Obstacles
43
U.S. Border Patrol has tripled in size
14,923 agents by end of FY 2007
Source U.S. Government Accountability Office,
report GAO-07-997T (June 2007)
44
  • Operation Jump Start (started June 15, 2006)
  • Up to 6,000 National Guard troops deployed to
    southwest border, by presidential order
  • Currently about 3,000 deployed

National Guardsman patrols border east of
Nogales, Arizona
45
National Guard troops buildborder fence in
Arizona,November 2007
46
U.S.
Primary fence
MEXICO
47
Stadium-type lighting on U.S.-Mexico border,
east of San Ysidro, Calif.
48
Latest generation of border fencing,San Diego
sector
49
(No Transcript)
50

Steel-tube fence in Altar Valley, Arizona
51
Sealing the BorderSecure Fence Act of 2006
700 miles of new fencingTotal miles of fenced
border, Feb. 2008 302 miles ( 15)Goal by
end of 2008 670 miles ( 34)Total length of
U.S.-Mexico border 1,952 miles
Newest section ofborder fence inYuma
Desert,Arizona
52
Secure Fence Act of 2006 700 miles of new fencing
53
(No Transcript)
54
Phase II Remote Video Surveillance
55
(No Transcript)
56
Border Patrolskybox deployednear Sasabe, AZ
57
Border Patrol has a fleet of 4 Predator B
unmanned aerial vehicles (cost 14 million each)
58
Phase III Virtual Fence(Secure Border
Initiative)
59
Secure Border Initiative
  • Up to 2 billion project Dept. of Homeland
    Security contract to Boeing Co.
  • 1,800 high-tech towers to be built along
    U.S.-Mexico border (none on Canadian border)
  • Equipped with advanced radar systems, video
    surveillance cameras
  • Ground sensors to detect movement, sound
  • Vehicle barriers
  • Small unmanned aerial vehicles to be launched
    from pickup trucks by Border Patrol
  • 28-mile pilot segment built in Arizona entire
    project to be completed within 3-6 years

60
(No Transcript)
61
  • What is Project 28?Along a 28-mile segment of
    the Arizona-Mexico border, at a cost of 84
    million, the Boeing Corporation has installed
  • Redeployable sensor towers with associated
    sensors to improve alien detection identification
    and classification
  • Mobile Command, Control and Communications
    units to enable situation awareness
  • Upgrades to Border Patrol vehicles to provide
    mounted laptop computers to enable displays of
    Operational Picture data
  • Satellite phones to improve communications
  • Rapid Response Transports to increase the speed
    of transportation of illegal immigrants from
    point of capture to processing and detention
    facilities
  • Remote-controlled Ground Sensor Systems to
    provide additional security for the redeployable
    sensor towers.

62
(No Transcript)
63
Increasing penalties for illegal entry Operation
Streamline(zero-tolerance policy of
prosecution and incarceration of apprehended
aliens for 2 weeks to 6 months)
64
Operation Streamline in Action
  • Tucson Sector Up to 42 prosecutions daily
    (goal 100 cases per day 10 of apprehended
    migrants)
  • Yuma Sector Up to 30 prosecutions daily (
    38 of apprehended migrants)
  • Sharp decreases in recidivism rate within areas
    where Operation Streamline has been
    implemented (e.g., from 79 to 46 in
    15-mile target area of Tucson sector)

65
Main constraints on extending OperationStreamline
are lack of capacity in federalcourts and
detention facilities, and 90/day per migrant
incarceration cost
Immigrant detention center in south Texas
66
Displacement of clandestine migration flows from
land borders to maritime borders
67
People-smuggling boat interdicted off San Diego
coast, March 12, 2008, with 12 migrants charged
4,500 each
20 people-smugglers boats intercepted or found
washed ashore San Diego County beaches since
August 2007
6th smugglers boat found on Del Mar, Calif.
beach, March 2, 2008
68
4 out of 5 undocumented Tlacotepenses hired a
people-smuggler for their most recent border
crossing
69
Average people-smuggler fee paid by Tlacotepenses
70
Fees charged by people-smugglers have tripled or
quadrupled since 1993, and keep rising
  • Average fee paid by Tlacotepenses in 2005-2007
    2,050
  • Average fee among those who crossed in 2007
    2,171
  • Fee for crossing through legal port-of-entry
    3,500
  • Fee for maritime entry 4,000

71
Source of funds to pay people-smugglers
Local money-lenderscharge interest of 10 per
month
72
People-smugglers take more dangerous routes
around Border Patrol operations
Major Border Patrol Operations
New Migration Routes
SOURCE Cornelius 2005
73
Deflection of flows away from central Arizona
in 2006
74
Otay Mountains
U.S.-Mexico border
San Diego
Tijuana
75
Imperial Valley desert
U.S.
MEXICO
Gulf of California
NW
76
Deaths due to unauthorized border
crossingsdetected in U.S.-Mexico borderlands
Over 500 deaths in 2007
Total deaths, 1995-2007 4,500
77
Causes of death among unauthorized border
crossers
Environmental causes (hypothermia, dehydration,
sunstroke, asphyxia)
Drowning
Auto accident
Source Mexican Consulates/Mexican Ministry of
Foreign Relations
78
Body of Maria Eugenia Martinez, age 32, being
removed from Californias Imperial Valley desert,
July 2005
79
All American irrigation canal near Calexico,
Calif.
80
Does border enforcement prevent illegal entry?
81
  • Profile of Unauthorized Migration the U.S. from
    San Miguel Tlacotepec
  • On most recent migration to U.S., 87 were
    undocumented
  • Among Tlacotepenses living in U.S., 60 are
    currently undocumented
  • 82 crossed through the desert or mountains of
    San Diego
  • 18 entered through a legal border crossing,
    hidden in vehicle or as passenger in a car

82
More unauthorized entriesare being made through
legal ports of entry
83
Evading Border Patrol is perceived as difficult
  • At present, how easy or difficult is it to
    evade the Border Patrol when crossing the
    border?
  • Very difficult 67
  • Somewhat difficult 13
  • Easy 20

Source CCIS survey ofOaxacan migrants, 2007-08
84
Clandestine border crossings are seen as
dangerous
  • 91 of Tlacotepeneses believe it is very
    dangerous to cross the border without papers
  • 24 of Tlacotepensesknow someone who died
    trying to cross the border

Father of migrant who died in Arizona desert in
1998, at sons gravesite
85
Awareness of border crossing obstacles, dangers
does not discourage unauthorized migration
86
Why take such risks?
We dont care if we have to walk eight days,
fifteen daysit doesnt matter the danger we put
ourselves in. If and when we cross alive, we
will have a job to give our families the best.
Miguel, 28 yr.-old migrant to the
U.S.
87
Tougher border enforcement doesnt keep
undocumented migrants out of United States
Source CCIS surveys of migrants in four rural
Mexican sending communities and U.S. receiving
communities, 2005-2008.
88
Eventual success rates among Oaxacan unauthorized
migrants,by year of most recent trip to the
border
89
IDENT Automated Biometric Identification System
Analysis of data collected by Border Patrol from
apprehended migrants showsProbability of
apprehension in FY 05 and FY 06
33Probability of success on the 2nd or 3rd try
for migrants apprehended at least once 90
90
Border Patrol agent sign-cutting nearTecate,
California
91
Southwest Border Apprehensions
FY 07 871,277
FY 94 1,031,668
92
  • Total (borderwide) apprehensions in FY 2006
    Decreased by 8
  • Total (borderwide) apprehensions in FY 2007
    Decreased by 20
  • FY 2007 Apprehensions of aliens from countries
    other than Mexico Decreased by 37

93
Alternative explanations for fewer Southwest
border apprehensions in 2006-07
  • Reduced circularity Fewer return trips fewer
    apprehensions (if migrants arent going home,
    they arent getting caught when they return to
    their jobs in U.S.). Fewer apprehensions DONT
    true deterrence/Border Patrol efficacy--
    Migrants are bottled up within U.S. by tougher
    border enforcement. Cost (coyote fees) physical
    risks of reentry are prohibitively high.--
    Migrants are delaying return trips in
    anticipation of amnesty legislation, dont want
    to jeopardize their eligibility by being
    apprehended at border
  • Increased use of coyotes higher probability of
    successful entry coyotes eventually will find
    new routes/modes of entry
  • More crossings being made through legal ports of
    entry, concealed in vehicles or using false docs
    lower probability of apprehension (over 224
    million crossings made annually through POES on
    US-Mexico border 105,000 people pass through San
    Diego/San Isidro port daily close scrutiny
    impossible)
  • Less U.S. demand for labor U.S. home
    construction industry is depressed, jobs magnet
    is diminished

94
Undocumented immigrants living in
the U.S.
Concentrated borderenforcement
95
U.S. unauthorized immigrant population
(2007)Estimated number 12 million
30 of total
foreign-born population__________________________
______________________ Composition of
unauthorized population Clandestine
entrants 55 Visa over-stayers
45 Source Pew Hispanic Center, Washington,
D.C.
96
Tlacotepenses are bottled up within the U.S.
  • During last 5 years, where did you spend
    most time? United States 60 San Miguel
    Tlacotepec 38During last 5 years, how many
    times did you return to SMT? Average 1.5
    return visits
  • Last September (2007), did you return to SMT
    for the annual town fiesta? (among those who
    live in U.S.) No 83
  • In the last year, have any of your
    relatives stayed in the U.S. because of tighter
    border enforcement? Yes 61

97
  • Circular migration has declined sharply, as
    costs and risks of illegal entry have
    risen
  • Among undocumented Tlacotepenses, it took 3.4
    months after arriving in U.S. to pay off
    debt to smuggler
  • More Tlacotepenses are extending their stays
    or settling permanently in U.S.
  • House construction in SMT by U.S. migrants is
    down sharply
  • Whole families increasingly migrate together,
    leaving houses in SMT vacant
  • Alternative is very long family separations,
    with wives and children left in SMT

98
  • Male family heads, anticipating long stays in
    U.S., bring dependents to U.S. more quickly
    after arrival

99
Basic supply and demand forces are undermining
border enforcement
  • Strong U.S. demand for immigrant labor, at all
    skill levels
  • Extremely limited worksite enforcement, which has
    no impact on demand for unauthorized migrant
    labor
  • Huge real-wage gap between Mexico and the United
    States (81 - 101 for most low-skilled jobs)
  • Family ties with U.S. promote migration for
    family reunification (in high-emigration towns
    in Mexico, 85 of residents have at least one
    nuclear family member living in the U.S.)

100
(No Transcript)
101
Is there a better way?
  • Emphasize workplace enforcement over border
    enforcement
  • Legalize most unauthorized immigrants already
    here
  • Provide more legal entry opportunities for new
    immigrants, through a guestworker program and
    increasing permanent resident visas (green
    cards)
  • Create alternatives to emigration in
    migrant-sending areas, through targeted
    development projects

102
If there were a new temporary visa program for
Mexican workers, like the bracero program,
would you be interested in participating?
Yes 66
Bracero workers arrive in U.S., 1942
103
Unauthorized migrant apprehensions related to
worksite enforcement
104
Total employers in U.S. 6 million Employers
believed by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office to use undocumented migrant labor
400,000 Employers using E-Verify system to
screen job applicants 52,000
105
New Penalties for Hiring Undocumented Workers
  • Minimum fine, 1st offence 375 per worker
  • Maximum fine, 1st offense 3,200 per worker
  • Maximum fine, repeated offenses
    16,000/worker
  • (effective March 27, 2008)

Homeland SecuritySecretary Michael Chertoff
106
  • Key elements of 2007 U.S. Senate
    immigration reform bill
  • Border Security
  • 370 miles of additional fencing on U.S.-Mexico
    border
  • Increase in Border Patrol to 20,000 agents
  • 80 high-tech electronic surveillance towers,
    UAVs, etc.
  • Building facilities to incarcerate up to 27,500
    aliens per day Border security triggers must
    be in place before anything else is implemented
  • Worksite Enforcement
  • Mandatory electronic employee eligibility
    verification system
  • Much higher financial penalties for employers
  • Guestworker Programs
  • 200,000 visas per year, to work in any
    industry 2-year stay, renewable, with 1
    year in home country between each stay
  • AgJobs special guestworker program for
    agriculture, up to 1.5 million visas
    during first 5 years
  • Legalization of Undocumented Immigrants
  • Most undocumented migrants already in U.S.
    eligible for temporary legal status if
    they pay 5,000 fine back taxes owed, pass
    background check
  • Eligible to get green card after 8 yrs.,
    U.S. citizenship after 13 years must
    return to home country and reenter U.S. legally
    to qualify for green card
  • Permanent legal immigrant admissions
  • More than 50 of all green cards to be awarded
    through point system giving most weight to
    occupational skills, higher education, English
    fluency

107
Explaining the demand for immigrant labor
108
Questions and further informationWayne
CorneliusCenter for Comparative Immigration
Studies, UCSD Tel. 858-822-4447
wcorneli_at_ucsd.eduhttp//www.ccis-ucsd.org
109
U.S.-Canada border Wide open spaces
U.S.-Canada border at Churubusco, New York
110
U.S.-Canada border at Derby Lane, Vermont
111
U.S.-Canada border at Chateaugay, New York
112
U.S.-Canada border at Derby Lane, Vermont
113
U.S.-Canada border at Perry Mills, New York
114
U.S.-Canada border at Trout River, New York
115
(No Transcript)
116
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com