Missouri Reading Initiative - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Missouri Reading Initiative

Description:

K = 171. 1st = 195. 2nd = 169. 3rd = 177. Reading = 30. Special Ed. = 30. Title 1 = 36 ... K 4.08 4.24 1st 3.79 3.93. 1st 3.75 4.10 2nd 4.15 4.06. 2nd 4.01 4.16 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Kri973
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Missouri Reading Initiative


1
Missouri Reading Initiative
  • Spring 2003 Survey Results

2
Sample 912 respondents from 69 schools1st
208 (17) 2nd 383 (32) 3rd 199 (20)
  • Reading 30
  • Special Ed. 30
  • Title 1 36
  • Administrators 27
  • Other 53
  • K 171
  • 1st 195
  • 2nd 169
  • 3rd 177

3
Sample ProfileLength of Service
  • Years Teaching
  • 2002 2003
  • K 15.5 12.7
  • 1st 14.0 12.6
  • 2nd 11.7 12.7
  • 3rd 10.4 11.9
  • Reading 18.5 14.5
  • Sp. Ed. 8.1 16.1
  • Title 1 20.5 17.4
  • Admin. 18.3 19.6
  • Years at School
  • 2002 2003
  • K 10.3 8.8
  • 1st 10.0 9.1
  • 2nd 8.4 9.4
  • 3rd 7.8 8.6
  • Reading 11.3 10.5
  • Sp. Ed. 4.2 8.9
  • Title 1 14.3 13.3
  • Admin. 8.5 7.6

4
(No Transcript)
5
24 Trainers 4.1 Average
6
School Ratings 01-03 Reflecting on the
effectiveness of the MRI program as a whole, how
would you rate it?
7
August Training
8
How has MRI changed or reinforced your teaching?
  • Grade Level 2002 2003 Year 02 03
  • K 4.08 4.24 1st 3.79 3.93
  • 1st 3.75 4.10 2nd 4.15 4.06
  • 2nd 4.01 4.16 3rd ---- 4.33
  • 3rd 3.75 3.92
  • Reading 4.29 4.34
  • Sp. Ed. 3.65 3.97
  • Title 1 4.40 4.44
  • Admin. 4.44 4.52
  • Total 4.01 4.11

9
Did you feel you had a part in setting up MRI?
  • Grade Level 2002 2003 Year 02
    03
  • K 2.88 3.05 1st 2.76 2.70
  • 1st 2.69 2.83 2nd 3.09 2.82
  • 2nd 2.87 2.75 3rd --- 3.05
  • 3rd 2.64 2.94
  • Reading 3.64 3.45
  • Sp. Ed. 2.76 3.13
  • Title 1 3.45 3.24
  • Admin. 4.40 4.85
  • Total 2.85 2.87

10
Do you feel you have a voice in how MRI develops?
  • Grade Level 2002 2003 Year 02 03
  • K 3.00 3.05 1st 2.86 2.87
  • 1st 2.96 2.92 2nd 3.07 3.06
  • 2nd 3.04 2.99 3rd ----- 3.14
  • 3rd 2.86 2.94
  • Reading 3.62 3.74
  • Sp. Ed. 2.60 3.20
  • Title 1 3.86 3.62
  • Admin. 4.32 4.69
  • Total 2.93 3.06

11
Parental Involvement/Quantity
  • Grade Level 2002 2003 Year 02 03
  • K 1.77 1.93 1st 1.64 1.67
  • 1st 1.66 1.84 2nd 1.91 1.84
  • 2nd 1.62 1.68 3rd ----- 1.92
  • 3rd 1.64 1.56
  • Reading 2.24 2.29
  • Sp. Ed. 1.57 1.93
  • Title 1 2.42 2.22
  • Admin. 2.88 2.90
  • Total 1.73 1.82

12
Parental Involvement/Quality
  • Grade Level 2002 2003 Year 02 03
  • K 1.96 2.20 1st 1.86 1.91
  • 1st 1.95 2.03 2nd 2.15 2.08
  • 2nd 1.92 1.96 3rd ----- 2.16
  • 3rd 1.86 1.78
  • Reading 2.35 2.88
  • Sp. Ed. 1.67 2.28
  • Title 1 2.79 2.44
  • Admin. 3.04 3.09
  • Total 1.96 2.06

13
Are students reading and writing better?
  • Grade Level 2002 2003 Year 02 03
  • K 3.95 4.08 1st 3.61 3.75
  • 1st 3.67 3.92 2nd 3.88 3.90
  • 2nd 3.66 3.92 3rd ----- 4.08
  • 3rd 3.50 3.65
  • Reading 4.04 4.07
  • Sp. Ed. 3.30 3.77
  • Title 1 4.24 4.19
  • Admin. 4.10 4.41
  • Total 3.80 3.90

14
Reflecting on the effectiveness of the MRI
program as a whole, how would you rate it?
  • Grade Level 2002 2003 Year 02 03
  • K 4.10 4.22 1st 3.80 3.86
  • 1st 3.81 4.04 2nd 4.13 4.01
  • 2nd 3.80 3.98 3rd ------
    4.27
  • 3rd 3.68 3.81
  • Reading 4.54 4.52
  • Sp. Ed. 4.00 4.10
  • Title 1 4.43 4.34
  • Admin. 4.44 4.59
  • Total 3.98 4.04
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com