Title: UW-ACE Survey Results: Students
1UW-ACE Survey Results Students Experiences of
Using Technology in Learning
- Vivian Schoner and Katrina Strampel
- Centre for Learning and Teaching through
Technology (LT3) - University of Waterloo
2The Setting Teaching, Technology, and UW-ACE
- Student Encounters with the Blended Learning
Experience - Technically Viable? Yes
- Pedagogically Sound? Yes, No, Maybe, Depends
- Survey Research Results
3The UW-ACE Survey
- We asked students to tell us about their
experiences with - Online Learning Activities
- Online Collaborative Learning (small group)
- Technology Function
- Student Satisfaction
- Online Instructor Feedback
4Students Completing Survey
- Faculty Quest Enrolment Survey
- AHS 1525 6
- Arts 3041 6
- ENG 739 5
- ENV 1414 7
- MATH 3170 4
- SCIENCE 9474 4
5Comparisons of Scales
6Technology Function Access Ease of Use
Navigation
- 26. logging in to be
- 27. accessing my courses to be
- 28. navigating around the UW-ACE course pages to
be - 29. accessing the course tools/announcements to
be - 30. posting, reading, responding to messages in
the online discussion forum to be - 31. accessing feedback on submissions to be
- 32. accessing my grades to be
- 33. submitting assignments to be
- 34. accessing quizzes to be
- 35. accessing team or small group resources to
be
7Scale Results
8Technology Accessibility and Ease of Use
- quick access to grades and assignment feedback,
access to past lecture notes, announcements,
additional resources - UW-ACE helped a lot in centralizing my courses
online - the fact that you can connect anytime/anywhere
- a safe online environment
- easy to use, helpful, good interactions with
profs and peers - I could sign in and have everything at my
fingertips
9Appreciation for Technical Potential
- it enhances the learning process by offering
supplemental resources for course related topics - it is certainly appropriate to post lecture
notes and other resources, but the absolute most
important thing to remember is not to invent uses
just because the UW-ACE software is there.
Legitimate uses are great, but online activities
just for the sake of doing them are frustrating - it is desirable because it gives students an
alternative way to find information about the
course, also allows them to communicate with
others who need help and who can offer help - if you have a question, but hate raising your
hand and asking in front of all your peers, it
can be asked and answered online - I believe its an integral part of the
university to have students using technology
which will be useful once we are out there in the
workforce. Developing this skill is essential for
us to be able to learn to be technologically
diverse
10Overall Student Satisfaction Course
Organization Instructions Workload Technical
Support
- 36. the organization of the course content and
activities? - 37. the instructions for completing learning
activities? - 38. the number of course learning activities
through the term? - 39. the distribution of course learning
activities through the term? - 40. the technical support?
- 41. the professional look of the course web
page(s)
11Scale Results
- Overall Student Satisfaction (alpha .916)
12Online Instructor Feedback Helpful Informative
Appropriate Timely
- 42. instructor feedback helped me learn and
understand difficult concepts - 43. the frequency of instructor feedback met my
information needs - 44. the quality of instructor feedback was
helpful and informative - 45. the timeliness of instructor feedback was
appropriate for my needs - 46. the amount of instructor feedback was
appropriate for my needs
13Scale Results
- Online Instructor Feedback (alpha .972)
14Online Instructor Feedback
- I got assignments back sooner and easier with
the site - the professor always kept us informed of news by
posting announcements frequently on the UW-ACE
website - the immediate feedback from quizzes written as
well as the correct answers is a definite asset - took too long for marks to be posted
- not being able to see answers on actual quizzes
- grades are not properly recorded
- there was an announcement that marks for an
important section would be posted which they
never were
15Online Learning Activities Learning Support
Features, Concepts, Skills, Applications
Integrated Parts Study Time Performance Level
- 1. Discussion forum activities
- 2. Self-Assessment (un-graded)
- 3. Self-assessment (graded)
- 4. Collaborative/Peer Review submissions
- 5. Individual Submissions
- 6. Lecture notes
- 7. Links to external resources
- 8. Information literacy/library modules
- 9. Lab modules/activities
- 10. helped me learn the new skills and concepts
for this course - 11. helped in that it reduced the amount of time
spent studying text or notes in order to grasp
the material to be learned - 12. helped me to better analyze and apply key
points in the material to be learned - 13. encouraged me to take responsibility for my
own learning - 14. I found that working online improved my
performance on graded course assessments - 15. I found that the online component(s) were
well integrated with the other course components
not offered online
16Scale Results
- Online Learning Activities (alpha .965/.935/.919)
17Online Learning Activities
- Im sure there are situations where it would be
desirable to use technology to support teaching
and learning, but that in itself is too broad a
goal. You should be using technology to solve a
particular problem, or to compensate for a
recognized weakness in existing methods. In the
case of my course, I cant see how UW-ACE has
added anything to the course. I found the written
quizzes far more helpful than the online ones,
and I prefer to read printed course notes rather
than getting course material from the web (you
cant highlight/underline/scribble on a webpage) - it helped me develop the habit of studying for
the course regularly. It allowed me to learn
course material through practice questions. A
chance to do the same quizzes again and again
which helped me learn and understand course
concepts better. Unlimited time to do the quiz - a good way to practice concepts learned in
class. Particularly I found the fill in the
blank type exercises to be very helpful - the information was very complete and organized.
I feel that the textbook for the course would not
have been sufficient on its own to learn all the
course material. The resources offered on UW-ACE
enhanced my ability to learn the material
18Online Collaborative Learning Learning
Activities Peer Interaction Reflective
Learning Community
- 16. Team or small group graded assignments
- 17. Whole class discussion activities
- 18. Peer review submissions
- 19. Team or small group un-graded assignments
- 20. Giving/receiving peer feedback
- 21. I was able to develop a better understanding
of the material because of my interaction with my
peers - 22. I put more thought into my comments when
interacting with others online - 23. I felt part of a learning community when
working online - 24. I found that working online encouraged me to
take responsibility for my group contribution - 25. I am more comfortable asking questions to
members of my group in an online setting
19Scale Results
- Online Collaborative Learning (alpha
.961/.964/.895)
20Online Collaborative Learning Benefits
- the group discussion page made it a lot easier
to communicate with my group members since we are
all in different classes and communication for
projects is an issue - I dont mind the discussions online, Im more
comfortable since it gives the sense of anonymity
(privacy thing) - It depends on what type of activities I think
group tutorials are a good way to learn, whereas
group projects are hard to realize - they allow me to communicate with others,
evaluate their thoughts and compare them to my
own - the addition would benefit learning because it
would provide a place for quick review and
knowledge testing as well as the style of the
lecturers questions
21Construct Validity Pearson Correlation Matrix
22Identifying Patterns
- Science
- Technology (85) and Student Satisfaction
(77) 81 - Instructor Feedback (64), Learning Activity (57),
Collaborative Learning (53) 57 - Applied Health Sciences
- Technology (82) and Student Satisfaction
(77) 80 - Instructor Feedback (67), Learning Activity (58),
Collaborative Learning (53) 59 - Environmental Studies
- Technology (83) and Student Satisfaction
(74) 79 - Learning Activity (62), Instructor Feedback (55),
Collaborative Learning (49) 55 - Arts
- Instructor Feedback (72), Technology (83),
Student Satisfaction (74) 76 - Learning Activity (57) and Collaborative Learning
(54) 56 - Math
- Technology (74) and Student Satisfaction
(62) 68 - Learning Activity (49), Instructor Feedback (43),
Collaborative Learning (39) 44 - Engineering
- Technology (67), Student Satisfaction (67),
Learning Activity (62) 65 - Instructor Feedback (54) and Collaborative
Learning (49) 52
23All Faculties, All Scales
24General Patterns
- Technology function and student satisfaction
scales represent the more straightforward scales
group addressing technical support and student
workload in all Faculties - Online Learning Activity, Online Collaborative
Learning (Small Group) and Instructor Feedback
scales represent the teaching and learning
pedagogy group in four of the six Faculties - Exceptions
- Instructor Feedback, a pedagogy scale, grouped
with technical support and student workload - Learning Activity, a pedagogy scale, grouped with
technical support and student workload
25Faculty Scales
26Faculty Scales
27Faculty Scales
28Survey Results 865 Students 113 Courses 6
Faculties
29Percent Student Response Ratings by Faculty
30Overview of Student Commentary
- Students are aware of the benefits of technology
in the classroom and commented frequently on
instructors under use of this resource. - They responded positively to technology use
perceived to add real value to learning outcomes
as evidenced in improved performance on quizzes,
tests, assignments or projects. - Students provided suggestions for improvements
and/or described new features they would like to
see developed for UW-ACE. - They did not see value-added in working in small
groups or teams online when they could readily
interact with their peers in person.
31Recommendations for Online Pedagogy
- We need to further explore ways to improve
instructional design and teaching techniques for
online learning and collaborative learning
activities. (LT3 Centre interface) - Some of the needed changes suggested by the
students should be considered for implementation
either in the technology itself, using the
technology more fully to support learning, and
reducing the ambiguity (undecided) noted in all
the Scales except Technology Function.
32Looking Ahead
- We need to think how to reduce the undecided
rates, - Rethink providing this as a response choice
- Forced choice is one option
- Use intermediate instead of undecided
- Provide instructors with key information on the
pedagogy of online teaching and learning - Encourage instructors to direct their students to
the online survey available in students course
pages - Analysis of the features of individual course
profiles should be undertaken (Liaisons)
33THE Capstone Statement
- Learning technologies should be used to
support, enhance, supplement and/or expand
learning opportunities Technology should NEVER
be used to replace teaching and learning in the
classroom setting.