Concepts, Stereotypes, and the Totalitarian Ego

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Concepts, Stereotypes, and the Totalitarian Ego

Description:

A construction worker or a housewife hits someone who annoys him or her. A construction worker or a housewife. decked a neighbor. spanked his/her son ... –

Number of Views:300
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Lind317
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Concepts, Stereotypes, and the Totalitarian Ego


1
Concepts, Stereotypes, and the Totalitarian Ego
  • The Hot-Dog Vendors
  • Darrell Worthy
  • Tyler Davis
  • Anushka Pai
  • Cindy Stappenbeck

2
Concepts The building blocks of cognition
  • A concept is
  • A mental representation of a category. Things
    that belong together.
  • Concepts can be about objects, people, or
    behavior
  • Can be accurate or inaccurate. They arent
    necessarily what the world is like, theyre what
    we think its like.
  • Other than concepts about people, can you think
    of some concepts that you have, or individuals in
    American culture hold that are inaccurate?

3
What concepts do
  • Help us make sense of the world
  • Facilitate communication
  • Classification
  • Inference
  • Guide attention
  • Promote reasoning
  • Have you ever been in a situation where you were
    conceptless, as in Kundas example of being
    baffled by another cultures practices?

4
How you activate a concept
  • Activation depends on stimulus properties, the
    context, and the observer
  • Stimulus features.
  • Salience- what stands out
  • What goals you have
  • What has been primed.
  • Priming- a general term for activating a concept
    used to explain how a concept is activated.
    Comes in several varieties.

5
More about priming
  • If a concept is primed, it is likely that it will
    be used to interpret subsequent events.
  • Example- Hearing a talk on a certain phenomenon
    and then seeing nothing but that phenomenon in
    your own research. Do you have any of your own?
  • Priming can be subliminal
  • Attitudes and feelings can be primed
  • Chronic accessibility (always primed)
  • Character traits. Example- Chronic paranoia that
    leads to classifying strangers behavior as
    suspicious.
  • Chronic way of classifying others. Example-
    Psychiatrists who see ADHD everywhere they turn.

6
Basic level categories
  • Natural level to talk about objects
  • Highest level that someone can create an image of
    the category as a whole
  • Can be different depending on
  • Expertise
  • Goals
  • Not as clear in social psychology
  • Very flexible
  • Context dependant
  • Impossible to create hierarchies
  • More like a tangled web

7
Models of representation
  • Social psychologists are not as interested in
    mapping the architecture as describing its
    implications
  • Associative network Models
  • Made up of links and nodes
  • Activation spreads to nodes via links
  • Activation gradually decays in activated nodes
  • Activation can only spread so far. It either
    just peters out or runs into some sort of barrier
  • Our interpretation of events is determined which
    nodes have been activated.
  • Explains priming phenomena

8
Parallel constraint satisfaction models
  • Connectionist models
  • Involve excitatory and inhibitory links. A node
    can be activated as well as deactivated.
  • Constrains spreading activation
  • Higher-level concepts are spread out
  • In addition to the phenomena that associative
    networks can explain, parallel constraint
    satisfaction models can explain higher level
    reasoning within the same models as mental
    representation.
  • Can you think of any phenomena where architecture
    might be important for social psychologists to
    think about?

9
Stereotypes
10
Stereotypes
  • Definition
  • cognitive structures that contain our knowledge,
    beliefs, and expectations about a social group
  • These stereotypes guide our expectations about
    group members and can color our interpretations
    of their behavior and traits.

11
Stereotype Activation
  • We may activate a groups stereotype
    automatically, with little awareness and
    intention.
  • Study by Patricia Devine (1989)
  • Do White Americans activate the stereotype
    aggressive for African Americans automatically?
  • White participants exposed subliminally to words
    related to African American stereotype, but that
    werent directly associated with aggressive

12
Stereotype Activation
  • Either presented with 80 or 20 of stereotype
    words out of 100
  • Then asked to form an impression of a person who
    performed a series of ambiguously hostile
    behaviors (ethnicity not specified)
  • Those who received 80 of primed words rated
    Donald as more hostile than those with 20 of
    primed words.

13
Stereotype Activation
  • Devines finding is disturbing because if we are
    unaware of these associations, we have no control
    over them
  • How might this influence our behavior towards
    different groups of people?
  • Is there a way we can use this information to
    promote positive associations?

14
Fulfilling a Stereotype
  • As we behave in keeping with a stereotype, we may
    cause the stereotyped individual to respond in
    kind, thereby fulfilling the stereotype
  • Stereotype
  • Behavior Of Our
    Behavior
  • Stereotyped Person

15
Fulfilling a Stereotype
  • White participants exposed subliminally to photos
    of either African American or white men.
  • Paired with partner to play a word-guessing game
  • Individuals shown African American photos were
    more aggressive.
  • Partners (not primed with photos) were also more
    aggressive
  • The behavior of one individual influences the
    behavior of another.

16
Inhibiting Stereotypes
  • When we want to, we can inhibit a stereotype that
    would otherwise be activated.
  • An African American man praised white
    participants abilities
  • These participants suppressed negative
    stereotypes to maintain credibility.
  • The opposite also true (negative feedback led to
    stereotype activation)
  • Do you think we can only inhibit stereotypes when
    its for personal gain?

17
Stereotypes on the Rebound
  • Suppressing a thought may make us especially
    likely to entertain that thought
  • White bear phenomenon
  • A series of studies in Britain focused on
    stereotypes of skinheads
  • Participants shown photo of skinhead and asked to
    write a brief description of his typical day
  • Half told to suppress stereotypical assumptions

18
Stereotypes on the Rebound
  • Subsequent tasks revealed that initial
    suppression of stereotype led to increase in
    activation and use later on.
  • Word recognition tasks
  • Behavioral tasks
  • Is this really suppression of a stereotype (could
    it be activation)?
  • Given this finding, should people try to suppress
    stereotypes?

19
Differing Interpretations
  • The same ambiguous behavior will be interpreted
    differently for differently stereotyped groups.
  • Does this necessarily reflect prejudice?
  • How might this lead to racial profiling?
  • Is racial profiling useful?

20
Individuating Information
  • People can base their impressions on
    individuating information when it is there, and
    ignore stereotypes.
  • John the construction worker vs. John the
    accountant
  • Who is more aggressive?
  • Stereotypes may influence predictions about a
    persons trait-related behavior even when
    individuating information impacts the trait.
  • Who is more likely to engage in working-class
    aggressive behavior in the future?

21
Ambiguity vs. Unambiguity
  • Stereotypes can determine the meaning we attach
    to the individuating information.
  • A construction worker or a housewife hits someone
    who annoys him or her.
  • A construction worker or a housewife
  • decked a neighbor
  • spanked his/her son
  • Most social behavior is ambiguous, how much can
    individuating information influence impressions?

22
Stereotype Application
  • When our cognitive resources are strained, our
    impressions of individuals may be especially
    likely to be colored by our stereotypes.
  • Why do we become more likely to apply our
    stereotypes to stereotyped individuals when our
    cognitive capacity is taxed?
  • Should we have people judge crimes without
    knowledge of race or gender?

23
Motivated Application and Inhibition
  • We may also be more likely to use negative
    stereotypes if we are motivated to disparage the
    individual.
  • However, we will only do so if we feel we have a
    good justification for this.
  • Can we make strides to avoid this when people are
    in positions of power?

24
The Targets Perspective
  • Attributional Ambiguity- After receiving positive
    or negative feedback, stigmatized individuals may
    remain uncertain about their abilities and how
    they are perceived.
  • So, what clues will people use to regulate
    behavior?
  • Is it better for the indiv. to remain in this
    uncertainty or to assume that negative feedback
    is always because of a negative stereotype?

25
Stereotype Threat
  • Stereotype threat- the fear that one will be
    reduced to the negative stereotypes of ones
    group can influence performance.
  • Remedial vs. Honorific Programs
  • Do you think that stereotype threat has an
    influence in social behaviors? Friendships?
    Dating?

26
Stereotype Change
  • The Contact Hypothesis
  • Subtyping counterstereotypic individuals
  • Extreme vs. moderate deviations
  • Stereotypes can evolve over time.
  • Is there a way to prevent certain stereotype
    formations in the first place?
  • Can we change a stereotype we dont want to have?

27
Discussion Questions
  • If you were in a negatively stereotyped group,
    would there be something you could do in your
    behavior to decrease the likelihood of being
    stereotyped?
  • Is it better to socialize with/work with people
    of your own stereotyped group?
  • Do we stereotype within our groups?

28
The Totalitarian Ego
  • How your ego uses biases in a selfish and
    manipulative manner

29
Organization of Knowledge
  • Self defined by beliefs, goals, values etc.
  • Desire for unity, consistency, continuity
  • Resist major attitude changes
  • Self uses biases to preserve self-concept

30
Three cognitive biases
  • Egocentricity self as the focus of knowledge
  • Beneffectance responsible for good, but not bad
    outcomes
  • Cognitive conservatism resistance to cognitive
    change

31
Egocentricity
  • Past is remembered from our perspective,
    necessary for autobiographical memories
  • Rogers et al. information is well remembered if
    considered in relation to ourselves
  • Brenner memory decline for persons preceding or
    following us
  • Better memory for things related to ones self of
    social group

32
Beneffectance
  • Take credit for success, deny blame for failure
  • Judging ones contributions to the group
  • Johnson (1967) subjects took credit for good
    scores, but blamed partner for bad scores
  • Vicarious beneffectance fair weather sports fans

33
Cognitive Conservatism
  • Tendency to preserve existing knowledge
    structures (including stereotypes)
  • Confirmation bias promotes information that
    confirms current judgments
  • Snyder Swann selected questions that were
    biased toward confirming hypothesis
  • Scientists biased to confirm existing theory
  • Memory search better for info consistent with
    current belief

34
More Cognitive Conservatism
  • Knew-it-all-along effect
  • Fischhoff subjects first informed of the
    correct answer claimed to have known it all along
  • Rewrite memories without registering the
    occurrence of change

35
Fear of change
  • Orwell to change ones mind, or even ones
    policy, is a confession of weakness.
  • Why are we afraid to admit that our opinions have
    changed?
  • Should it be considered weak to change ones
    mind?
  • Do people differ in cognitive conservatism like
    they do in political conservatism?

36
Scientific Paradigm
  • Does the stability of a scientific paradigm
    reflect the stability of the ego?
  • Do we shift paradigms with the same reluctance
    that we change attitudes and let go of
    stereotypes?
  • Does a stereotypical belief mirror a null
    hypothesis that requires significant evidence to
    be rejected?

37
Is it advantageous?
  • Do people gain by possessing these biases?
  • Are people who dont employ biases at a
    disadvantage?
  • Prolongs the life of an incorrect theory
  • Bandura inflated efficacy expectations may lead
    to better performance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com