Title: Concepts, Stereotypes, and the Totalitarian Ego
1Concepts, Stereotypes, and the Totalitarian Ego
- The Hot-Dog Vendors
- Darrell Worthy
- Tyler Davis
- Anushka Pai
- Cindy Stappenbeck
2Concepts The building blocks of cognition
- A concept is
- A mental representation of a category. Things
that belong together. - Concepts can be about objects, people, or
behavior - Can be accurate or inaccurate. They arent
necessarily what the world is like, theyre what
we think its like. - Other than concepts about people, can you think
of some concepts that you have, or individuals in
American culture hold that are inaccurate?
3What concepts do
- Help us make sense of the world
- Facilitate communication
- Classification
- Inference
- Guide attention
- Promote reasoning
- Have you ever been in a situation where you were
conceptless, as in Kundas example of being
baffled by another cultures practices?
4How you activate a concept
- Activation depends on stimulus properties, the
context, and the observer - Stimulus features.
- Salience- what stands out
- What goals you have
- What has been primed.
- Priming- a general term for activating a concept
used to explain how a concept is activated.
Comes in several varieties.
5More about priming
- If a concept is primed, it is likely that it will
be used to interpret subsequent events. - Example- Hearing a talk on a certain phenomenon
and then seeing nothing but that phenomenon in
your own research. Do you have any of your own? - Priming can be subliminal
- Attitudes and feelings can be primed
- Chronic accessibility (always primed)
- Character traits. Example- Chronic paranoia that
leads to classifying strangers behavior as
suspicious. - Chronic way of classifying others. Example-
Psychiatrists who see ADHD everywhere they turn.
6Basic level categories
- Natural level to talk about objects
- Highest level that someone can create an image of
the category as a whole - Can be different depending on
- Expertise
- Goals
- Not as clear in social psychology
- Very flexible
- Context dependant
- Impossible to create hierarchies
- More like a tangled web
7Models of representation
- Social psychologists are not as interested in
mapping the architecture as describing its
implications - Associative network Models
- Made up of links and nodes
- Activation spreads to nodes via links
- Activation gradually decays in activated nodes
- Activation can only spread so far. It either
just peters out or runs into some sort of barrier - Our interpretation of events is determined which
nodes have been activated. - Explains priming phenomena
8Parallel constraint satisfaction models
- Connectionist models
- Involve excitatory and inhibitory links. A node
can be activated as well as deactivated. - Constrains spreading activation
- Higher-level concepts are spread out
- In addition to the phenomena that associative
networks can explain, parallel constraint
satisfaction models can explain higher level
reasoning within the same models as mental
representation. - Can you think of any phenomena where architecture
might be important for social psychologists to
think about?
9Stereotypes
10Stereotypes
- Definition
- cognitive structures that contain our knowledge,
beliefs, and expectations about a social group - These stereotypes guide our expectations about
group members and can color our interpretations
of their behavior and traits.
11Stereotype Activation
- We may activate a groups stereotype
automatically, with little awareness and
intention. - Study by Patricia Devine (1989)
- Do White Americans activate the stereotype
aggressive for African Americans automatically? - White participants exposed subliminally to words
related to African American stereotype, but that
werent directly associated with aggressive
12Stereotype Activation
- Either presented with 80 or 20 of stereotype
words out of 100 - Then asked to form an impression of a person who
performed a series of ambiguously hostile
behaviors (ethnicity not specified) - Those who received 80 of primed words rated
Donald as more hostile than those with 20 of
primed words.
13Stereotype Activation
- Devines finding is disturbing because if we are
unaware of these associations, we have no control
over them - How might this influence our behavior towards
different groups of people? - Is there a way we can use this information to
promote positive associations?
14Fulfilling a Stereotype
- As we behave in keeping with a stereotype, we may
cause the stereotyped individual to respond in
kind, thereby fulfilling the stereotype - Stereotype
- Behavior Of Our
Behavior - Stereotyped Person
15Fulfilling a Stereotype
- White participants exposed subliminally to photos
of either African American or white men. - Paired with partner to play a word-guessing game
- Individuals shown African American photos were
more aggressive. - Partners (not primed with photos) were also more
aggressive - The behavior of one individual influences the
behavior of another.
16Inhibiting Stereotypes
- When we want to, we can inhibit a stereotype that
would otherwise be activated. - An African American man praised white
participants abilities - These participants suppressed negative
stereotypes to maintain credibility. - The opposite also true (negative feedback led to
stereotype activation) - Do you think we can only inhibit stereotypes when
its for personal gain?
17Stereotypes on the Rebound
- Suppressing a thought may make us especially
likely to entertain that thought - White bear phenomenon
- A series of studies in Britain focused on
stereotypes of skinheads - Participants shown photo of skinhead and asked to
write a brief description of his typical day - Half told to suppress stereotypical assumptions
18Stereotypes on the Rebound
- Subsequent tasks revealed that initial
suppression of stereotype led to increase in
activation and use later on. - Word recognition tasks
- Behavioral tasks
- Is this really suppression of a stereotype (could
it be activation)? - Given this finding, should people try to suppress
stereotypes?
19Differing Interpretations
- The same ambiguous behavior will be interpreted
differently for differently stereotyped groups. - Does this necessarily reflect prejudice?
- How might this lead to racial profiling?
- Is racial profiling useful?
20Individuating Information
- People can base their impressions on
individuating information when it is there, and
ignore stereotypes. - John the construction worker vs. John the
accountant - Who is more aggressive?
- Stereotypes may influence predictions about a
persons trait-related behavior even when
individuating information impacts the trait. - Who is more likely to engage in working-class
aggressive behavior in the future?
21Ambiguity vs. Unambiguity
- Stereotypes can determine the meaning we attach
to the individuating information. - A construction worker or a housewife hits someone
who annoys him or her. - A construction worker or a housewife
- decked a neighbor
- spanked his/her son
- Most social behavior is ambiguous, how much can
individuating information influence impressions?
22Stereotype Application
- When our cognitive resources are strained, our
impressions of individuals may be especially
likely to be colored by our stereotypes. - Why do we become more likely to apply our
stereotypes to stereotyped individuals when our
cognitive capacity is taxed? - Should we have people judge crimes without
knowledge of race or gender?
23Motivated Application and Inhibition
- We may also be more likely to use negative
stereotypes if we are motivated to disparage the
individual. - However, we will only do so if we feel we have a
good justification for this. - Can we make strides to avoid this when people are
in positions of power?
24The Targets Perspective
- Attributional Ambiguity- After receiving positive
or negative feedback, stigmatized individuals may
remain uncertain about their abilities and how
they are perceived. - So, what clues will people use to regulate
behavior? - Is it better for the indiv. to remain in this
uncertainty or to assume that negative feedback
is always because of a negative stereotype?
25Stereotype Threat
- Stereotype threat- the fear that one will be
reduced to the negative stereotypes of ones
group can influence performance. - Remedial vs. Honorific Programs
- Do you think that stereotype threat has an
influence in social behaviors? Friendships?
Dating?
26Stereotype Change
- The Contact Hypothesis
- Subtyping counterstereotypic individuals
- Extreme vs. moderate deviations
- Stereotypes can evolve over time.
- Is there a way to prevent certain stereotype
formations in the first place? - Can we change a stereotype we dont want to have?
27Discussion Questions
- If you were in a negatively stereotyped group,
would there be something you could do in your
behavior to decrease the likelihood of being
stereotyped? - Is it better to socialize with/work with people
of your own stereotyped group? - Do we stereotype within our groups?
28The Totalitarian Ego
- How your ego uses biases in a selfish and
manipulative manner
29Organization of Knowledge
- Self defined by beliefs, goals, values etc.
- Desire for unity, consistency, continuity
- Resist major attitude changes
- Self uses biases to preserve self-concept
30Three cognitive biases
- Egocentricity self as the focus of knowledge
- Beneffectance responsible for good, but not bad
outcomes - Cognitive conservatism resistance to cognitive
change
31Egocentricity
- Past is remembered from our perspective,
necessary for autobiographical memories - Rogers et al. information is well remembered if
considered in relation to ourselves - Brenner memory decline for persons preceding or
following us - Better memory for things related to ones self of
social group
32Beneffectance
- Take credit for success, deny blame for failure
- Judging ones contributions to the group
- Johnson (1967) subjects took credit for good
scores, but blamed partner for bad scores - Vicarious beneffectance fair weather sports fans
33Cognitive Conservatism
- Tendency to preserve existing knowledge
structures (including stereotypes) - Confirmation bias promotes information that
confirms current judgments - Snyder Swann selected questions that were
biased toward confirming hypothesis - Scientists biased to confirm existing theory
- Memory search better for info consistent with
current belief
34More Cognitive Conservatism
- Knew-it-all-along effect
- Fischhoff subjects first informed of the
correct answer claimed to have known it all along - Rewrite memories without registering the
occurrence of change
35Fear of change
- Orwell to change ones mind, or even ones
policy, is a confession of weakness. - Why are we afraid to admit that our opinions have
changed? - Should it be considered weak to change ones
mind? - Do people differ in cognitive conservatism like
they do in political conservatism?
36Scientific Paradigm
- Does the stability of a scientific paradigm
reflect the stability of the ego? - Do we shift paradigms with the same reluctance
that we change attitudes and let go of
stereotypes? - Does a stereotypical belief mirror a null
hypothesis that requires significant evidence to
be rejected?
37Is it advantageous?
- Do people gain by possessing these biases?
- Are people who dont employ biases at a
disadvantage? - Prolongs the life of an incorrect theory
- Bandura inflated efficacy expectations may lead
to better performance