Title: BANK LENDING, BANK PERFORMANCE AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICES
1BANK LENDING, BANK PERFORMANCE AND COMMERCIAL
PROPERTY PRICES
Course on Financial Instability at the Estonian
Central Bank, 9-11 December 2009 Lecture 9
- E Philip Davis
- NIESR and Brunel University
- West London
- e_philip_davis_at_msn.com
- www.ephilipdavis.com
- groups.yahoo.com/group/financial_stability
2PAPER 1BANK LENDING AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
PRICESsome cross-country evidence E Philip
Davis and Haibin Zhu
- Revise and resubmit in Journal of International
Money and Finance
3Introduction
- Growing interest in commercial property cycles
and link to financial stability - Likely to be more volatile than residential given
no intrinsic reservation value - Key role of banks in financing commercial
property, while CP is also widely used as
collateral for non-CP lending - Little empirical evidence on link from commercial
property cycle to credit cycle, notably at
international level
4Literature review
- Explanations of real estate cycles
- Value determined by discounted future rents and
investment by a valuation ratio - Distinctive features of asset market including
heterogeneity, lack of central trading, high
transactions costs, supply constraints - and use as collateral for bank loans
- while external financing needed for construction
and occupancy generally bank debt
5- So optimism raising demand can drive up prices
while supply response slow - when supply comes on
stream may be excessive relative to demand,
driving prices down - Traditionally such a pattern is seen as requiring
not just sticky supplies and rents but also
irrationality basing expected profitability of
construction on current prices - Examples are rules of thumb, myopic expectations,
disaster myopia
6- Some urge cycles impossible with rational
expectations, but following are possible
rational causes - No short selling possible to stabilise market
- Option value of investment in anticipated
uncertainty - Long leases and use of credit
- Collateral effects on borrowing capacity,
including the financial accelerator - Risk shifting behaviour by banks
- Empirical work in real estate literature
illustrates interaction of investment, rents and
prices, as well as scope for bubbles
7- Property prices and bank lending
- Background commercial property price booms and
busts preceding banking crises. Three dimensions
of interaction - (i) Reasons property prices affect credit
- Investment channel
- Wealth effect on borrowers boosting credit demand
- Banks ownership of property boosting capital base
increases banks lending capacity - Financial accelerator effect making lending
procyclical, especially if default risk
underestimated in booms
8- (ii) Reasons lending could affect property prices
- Liquidity effect
- Credit raising real estate demand short term
positive effect - Credit raising real estate supply long term
negative effect - Supply of credit boosted when banks compete, e.g.
after financial liberalisation - Directed to real estate if high quality borrowers
shift to securities market or internal finance - Aggravated by moral hazard
9- (iii) Common economic factors for lending and
real estate prices - Credit affected by shocks to variables such as
GDP and interest rates - which also provoke demand and supply imbalances
in real estate - (iv) Will changing nature of finance affect the
credit-property price interrelation? - Note in particular that in financially-liberalised
regime, effect of credit on prices is less
likely (lending accomodates to demand rather than
being rationed, while prices adjust in forward
looking manner)
10- Extant empirical work
- Country-specific studies of interaction with
banking system - international studies mainly use residential or
mixed prices, including prediction of financial
instability - But no major academic research project has yet
looked at threats to financial stability from the
commercial property sector on a systematic,
empirical, cross-country basis. This is an
important motivation for our own work.
11A model of real estate cycles (based on Carey and
Wheaton)
- Economic environment
- N investors
- Heterogeneous valuation of properties, with a
distribution of F(P) - Banks lending attitude varies over time wt
- Bank lending function for investors L(Y, i, P,
wt) - Supply K is fixed in short run but adjusts slowly
in response to prices exceeding replacement cost,
with separate lending function B(Y,I,P,wt) - Investment depends on current property prices,
for reasons set out above irrationality, bank
capital effects and credit market imperfections
12Model
- Market demand function (1), supply adjustment
(2), new investment (3) and market clearing (4)
13- Relationship between property prices and bank
lending (LtBt) - Higher current property prices increase bank
lending - Higher Lt (e.g. due to financial liberalisation
w) increases current property prices - Higher Bt reduces future property prices
- Both affected by macroeconomic factors (Y, i)
- Simplification 2 equations, 2 unknowns (K, P)
14- Hypothesis I (collateral/financial accelerator
effect) An increase in commercial property prices
has a positive impact on bank credit. - Hypothesis II (liquidity effect) Bank credit can
have offsetting impacts on commercial property
prices. New credit to the demand (investor) side
may increase property prices in the short run,
while new lending to the supply (constructor)
side may tend to reduce property prices in the
long run. - Hypothesis III (macro effect) Commercial
property prices adjust to changes in
macroeconomic conditions. Their dynamic
adjustment depends on the characteristics of the
property market in each country. In particular,
if the supply is more elastic than the demand,
the market reacts to a macro shock in the form of
an oscillation around the new steady state
otherwise property prices overshoot and then
gradually converge to the new steady state. -
15Empirical analysis
- Data
- 17 countries Australia, Belgium, Canada,
Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland,
Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, the UK and the US - Main focus interrelation of real commercial
property prices, GDP, investment, real credit and
real short rates - Most countries true data is annual mainly
used in our work - Stationarity as preliminary all have unit root
except real short rate
16- Determination of commercial property prices
- Error Correction estimation
- Panel estimation, GLS, cross section weights,
White standard errors. ECM tends to be highly
significant - For all countries
- Strong short run effect of GDP and credit growth
implies high cyclical volatility consistent
with model - Long run positive link to GDP and negative to
credit plausible in terms of model - Positive real short rate financial
liberalisation? - Subgroups
- G-7, SOEs, bank and market oriented, crisis
countries broadly similar to full panel - Main contrast is with crisis countries over
1985-95 long run positive credit and negative
investment effect, very high short run
elasticities
17Results of panel estimation
18Interaction between bank lending and commercial
property prices
- Above evidence gives no view on causality links
between credit, commercial property prices and
macroeconomic fundamentals - Granger causality suggests that commercial
property prices most commonly precede credit (9
countries) (possibly via effects on collateral
and capital), but some reverse causality and
interactions (7 countries) - Granger causality needs supplementing as only
bivariate
19- Test for dynamic interaction
- Method VECM if there exists cointegration
(Johansen) VAR otherwise (CA, FI, IT, DK, NO,
CH) - Endogeneity issue
- Need for choice of recursive ordering in order to
undertake Choleski decomposition - Preferred ordering GDP, commercial property
prices, credit, investment, real short rates - GDP first and interest rate last reflects
transmission mechanism lags - Investment after credit and prices due to supply
lags - Prices before credit reflects role of collateral
and price stickiness
20- Variance decomposition shows autonomy of
commercial property prices (47 in 5 years) - Link to credit only significant in BE, IT, SE and
CH - suggests Granger Causality suffered omitted
variables bias - Wider range of countries show link to GDP main
external influence on commercial property prices - Credit less autonomous, main influences on
variance are GDP (33) and commercial property
prices (20) - Overall, confirms influence of external shocks
(GDP) on the nexus and of prices on credit - Variants largely confirm these results
21VECM variance decomposition
22- Impulse response function
- Response of CPP to credit positive short-term
effect but negative long-term impact in most
countries consistent with theory. - Response of CPP to GDP differ by characteristics
of national markets. Two types of responses - Overshooting in 9 countries (Australia is a
typical case) - Oscillation in 5 countries
23Impulse response of prices to credit
24Impulse response of prices to GDP
25Conclusions
- Presented a theoretical model which shows cycles
emerge under plausible assumptions and generating
predictions for effects of GDP, interest rates
and credit - Commercial property prices show degree of
autonomy, link to GDP but influence on credit - Predominant direction of causality is from CPP to
credit rather than vice versa
collateral/financial accelerator and not
liquidity effect latter effect possibly dampened
as financial liberalisation - Important effect of GDP on both CPP and credit.
26- Policy aspects include
- Collateral-based amplification bank credit
policy - Maximum LTV
- Portfolio limits on loan concentration
- Valuation method long run view of valuation vs.
current market value - Financial crises caused by real-estate bubbles
- Further research needed
- effects of property prices on bank profitability
at micro level paper 2 - Can commercial property prices predict banking
crises research to be pursued
27PAPER 2COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICES AND BANK
PERFORMANCEE Philip Davis and Haibin Zhu
- Published in Quarterly Review of Economics and
Finance
28Introduction
- Role of asset prices in bank lending and bank
performance - Particular role of commercial property prices, as
witness major differences in bank behaviour and
performance during the up- and downswings in
commercial property prices - Extensive macro work on commercial property
prices and lending (paper 1), but less micro
estimation on lending and performance - Is there a direct impact on the lending
decisions, risk and profitability of individual
banks?
29(No Transcript)
30- We analyse a sample of 904 banks worldwide over
the period 1989-2002. - Seek to assess the effect of changes in
commercial property prices on bank behaviour and
performance in a range of industrialised
economies, focusing on determination of lending,
margins, ROA, bad debts and provisioning - Consistent with macro-level studies, commercial
property prices have a marked impact on the
behaviour and performance of individual banks,
over and above conventional determinants - Results have implications for risk managers,
regulators and monetary policy makers.
31(No Transcript)
32- Micro work empirical analysis
- Provisioning (Laeven and Majnoni)
- Bank profitability and margins (Demirgüç-Kunt and
Huizinga) - Bad loan ratios (Salas and Saurina)
- Lending (Bikker and Hu)
- Rare studies looking at CPP and bank performance
- Austria (Arpa et al)
- Japan (Gan)
- Hong Kong (Gerlach et al)
- US (Hancock and Wilcox)
33Empirical work
- Our advance on earlier literature
- First international study on how commercial
property price movements affect individual banks
lending strategies and performance after we
control for the effects of conventional
explanatory variables (macro factors,
bank-specific variables and country-specific
factors) - Micro-level data allow us to examine whether the
determination of bank performance and the role of
commercial property prices vary across different
groups of banks and across countries. - Examine whether commercial real estate booms and
busts tend to have asymmetric impacts on bank
performance.
34- Use of panel GLS or GMM (robustness check)
- Control variables
- Macro growth rate of real GDP, inflation and
short-term interest rates - Bank loan-to-asset ratios, real loan growth
rate, capital strength, net interest margin, bank
size dummies - Country dummies
- Growth of real commercial property prices
35Issues of endogeneity
- Basic GLS equations ignore dynamic interaction of
variables - No lagged dependent variable
- Bank specific variables lagged
- Nationwide CPP likely to be exogenous to lending
behaviour of individual bank - Previous results showed CPP largely autonomous of
credit even at macro level - Major loss of observations
- Robustness checks
- Using lagged CPP
- Using difference and levels GMM estimation
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41Conclusions
- Results indicate that commercial property prices
have a major impact on a wide range of bank
performance variables - Signs found are consistent with a view that
commercial property provides important forms of
collateral perceived by banks to reduce risk and
encourage lending - Results hold consistently across a number of
econometric specifications, as well as for
regions.
42- Interesting differences in response of small and
large banks - Commercial property price movements having a
smaller effect on the loan quality and provisions
of small than large banks - Small bank profits less geared to commercial
property prices than are those of large banks.
Consistent with large banks being more willing to
take risk as a consequence of the safety net and
moral hazard. - Generally, results underline crucial relevance of
commercial property prices as macroprudential
variable. Need for good data on prices - Also highlight the need to develop indicators of
individual bank exposure to the property market
for stress testing (note wider than CP lending
per se given use as collateral)
43References
- Davis E P and Zhu H (2004), "Bank lending and
commercial property prices, some cross country
evidence", BIS Working Paper No 150 - Davis E Philip and Haibin Zhu (2005), "Commercial
property prices and bank performance", BIS
Working Paper No 175 and Quarterly Review of
Economics and Finance, 49, 1341-1359