Title: EMERGING COMPETITION LAWS IN INDIA: AN ACADEMICIANS PERSPECTIVES
1EMERGING COMPETITION LAWS IN INDIA AN
ACADEMICIANS PERSPECTIVES
Dr.(Mrs.) Vijaya Katti Professor Chairperson
(MDPs) Indian Institute of Foreign Trade New
Delhi - 110 016
2Competition
- Is a situation in a market in which firms or
sellers independently strive for the buyers
patronage in order to achieve a particular
business objective for example, profits, sales or
market share (World Bank, 1999) - Is an essential hand maiden to efficient trade.
- The ultimate raison d etre of competition is the
interest of the consumer.
3Contd
- Is the foundation of an efficient working market
system, which has several advantages over a
planned economy and constitutes the pre-condition
which prevents freedom of decision and action of
self interested individuals or entities from
leading to anarchy or chaos but rather to
economically optimal socially fair and desirable
market results. (Report of High Level Committee
on Competition Policy, Deptt. of Company Affairs,
2000). - Competition leads to greater dynamic efficiency
in the economy by bringing about innovation,
technological development, lower price and better
quality and service for the consumer.
4WHAT IS COMPETITION POLICY?
- Competition in economic parlance signifies a
market structure involving a large number of
players such that no single player is in a
position to significantly influence the market. - At the other extreme is Monopoly where a single
firm rules the market and earns super normal
profit by controlling output and/or supply and by
charging higher than cost of production from the
consumers - At the intermediate level is Oligopoly where a
few market players are available. Oligopolists
manage to control the market by colluding among
themselves since none of them alone may be in a
position to control the market. Such collusions
are generally tacit.
5Contd
- It is not necessary that there are a large number
of producers/suppliers to have competition
conditions. - A single producer can exist and provide a
competitive atmosphere provided entry of new
firms is easy and not costly. - Entry barriers can be due to the market position
of incumbent firms, legal barriers or strategic
barriers - Incumbent firms may use their power as first
Movers to block entry. - Legal barriers include licensing and other
Government regulations
6Contd
- Strategic barriers are generally erected by
incumbent firms in the form of artificial and
sudden price reduction with a view to thwarting
new entry. - Contestability of markets ensure competitive
conditions in the market. - Competition is expected to enhance allocated and
productive efficiency so as to maximize economic
welfare. - Monopoly (market) power tends to lead to
inefficient allocation of sources and discourages
innovation or introduction of better technology.
7OBJECTIVES OF COMPETITION LAW POLICY
- Promoting economic efficiency in both static and
dynamic sense - protecting consumers from the undue exercise of
market power - facilitating economic liberalization, including
privatization. Deregulation and reduction of
external trade barriers - Preserving and promoting the sound development of
a market economy - ensuring fairness and equity in market place
transactions - Protecting the public interest including in
some cases considerations relating to industrial
competitiveness and employment - Protecting opportunities for small and medium
business
8Competition Law
- It is a tool to implement and enforce competition
policy and to prevent and punish anti-competitive
business practices by firms and unnecessary
Government interference in the market. - Competition Law generally covers 3 areas
- Anti - Competitive Agreements, e.g., cartels,
- Abuse of Dominant Position by enterprises,
e.g., predatory pricing, barriers to entry and - Regulation of Mergers and Acquisitions (MAs).
9Contd
- The need for Competition Law arises because
market can suffer from failures and distortions,
and various players can resort to
anti-competitive activities such as cartels,
abuse of dominance etc. which adversely impact
economic efficiency and consumer welfare. - Thus there is need for Competition Law, and a
Competition Watchdog with the authority for
enforcing Competition Law.
10CONFLICT OF OBJECTIVES
- The objectives of competition policy in any
country may be conflicting among themselves. For
example, the objective of protecting the
interests of small and medium industries may
conflict with the objective of efficiency. - Therefore, the concept of core values for
promoting competition policy has evolved. - The anti-competitive nature of a market behaviour
is decided based on whether it is in conformity
with the core values or not.
11Promotion of Competition
- For promotion of competition in the market an
appropriate competition policy is required. - Competition policy includes those government
measures that directly affect behaviour of
enterprises and structure of industry. (Khemani
and Mark Dutz 1996)
12Elements of Competition Policy
- Competition policy has two elements -
- Putting in place a set of Policies that enhance
competition in local and national markets. - A Law designed to prevent anti competitive
business practices and unnecessary government
intervention.
13RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES INVOLVING INTERNATIONAL
TRADE
- Market Access for Imports
- Import cartels
- State trading, exclusive or special privileges
and monopolies - Problems of access to downstream market
- Problems of access to upstream market
- Cross subsidization
14Cont
- Export cartels
- International cartels, mergers and abuses of
dominant positions - Predatory pricing, price discrimination,
cross-subsidization and dumping
15Competition Policy
- It includes Reforms in certain Policy areas to
make these more pro-competition- - Industrial policy
- Trade policy
- Privatization/disinvestment
- Economic Regulation
- State aids
- Labour policy
- Other such policies
16Industrial Policy
- Industrial Policy has to address and reform
licensing requirements, restrictions on
capacities, or on foreign technology tie ups,
guidelines on location of industries,
reservations for small scale industry, etc. These
adversely affect free competition in the market.
17Trade Policy
- Trade policy has important implications for
development of competition in the markets.
Measures for liberalisation of trade promote
greater competition e.g. reducing tariffs,
removal of - quotas/physical controls, investment controls,
conditions relating to local content etc.
18Privatisation/Disinvestment
- Empirical research has found that state- owned
enterprises generally tend to be less efficient
than private owned firms, for reasons such as
manager compensation, low incentives, lack of
direct accountability, hard budget constraints
for managers, etc. - State owned enterprises are generally insulated
from market forces and receive protection/benefits
such as government imposed barriers to entry,
price regulation and subsidies. - Thus privatization of state owned enterprises is
important element of competition policy. - However, in privatization/ disinvestment process,
care is to be taken that state monopoly is not
replaced by private monopoly.
19Economic Regulations
- New legislation and regulations to promote
competition and to bring about restructuring of
major industrial sectors is essential.
Legislation to aim at separating natural monopoly
elements from potentially competitive activities,
and the regulatory functions from commercial
functions, and also create several competing
entities through restructuring of essential
competition activities and to create a
competitive environment in following sectors. - Examples
- Electricity sector
- Telecommunications sector
- Ports
20State Aids
- Several state aids create unequal operating
conditions for businesses. Examples - Subsidies
- Tax rebates
- Preferential loans
- Capital injection
- Public procurement
- Experience suggests that such policy measures
rarely have successful results and destroy
incentives for firms to become efficient. - Temporary specific state- aid for well stated
public purpose can be justified.
21COMPETITION POLICY IN THE WTO CONTEXT
- Havana Charter and the still born International
Trade Organization (ITO) - Chapter V of the Havana Charter entitled
Restrictive Business Practices contained
Articles on the obligations of member governments
to address such practices. ITO WAS TO FACILITATE
COMPLAINTS LODGED BY MEMBERS. However, ITO never
came into being
22COMPETITION POLICY IN THE WTO CONTEXT
- The Charter defined the purpose of the obligation
provisions as follows - . To prevent, on the part of private or
commercial public enterprises, business practices
affecting international trade which restrain
competition, limit access to markets, or foster
monopolistic control, whenever such practices
have harmful effects on the expansion of
production or trade "
23Contd
- Since the Havana Charter did not enter into force
the GATT contracting parties agreed to a Decision
on Arrangements for Consultations on Restrictive
Business Practices, in November 1960. - The various WTO agreements especially the main
GATT, GATS and TRIPS agreements provide for
consultations and cooperation on anti-competitive
practices
24WORKING GROUP ON TRADE COMPETITION POLICY
- The Singapore Ministerial Conference (December
1996) brought the issue of trade and competition
policy more explicitly into the work programme of
WTO. - This working group was established to undertake a
study process related to the interaction between
trade and competition policy, including
anti-competitive practices, in order to identify
any areas that may merit further consideration in
the WTO framework. - The Ministerial decision specified that the work
of the working group will not pre-judge whether
negotiations will be initiated in the future and
that future negotiations, if any, will take place
only after an explicit consensus decision by
among WTO members.
25Contd
- As mandated by the Singapore Ministerial
Conference the progress of the Working Group was
reviewed at the end of 1998 on completion of two
years of study process. - Subsequently, the General Council of WTO agreed
to continued study by the Working Group, but with
focussed attention on the following three areas
26Contd
- 1.The relevance of fundamental WTO principles of
national treatment, transparency and most
favoured nations treatment to competition policy
and vice versa - 2.Approaches to promoting cooperation and
communication among members, including in the
field of technical cooperation and - 3.The contribution of competition policy to
achieving the objectives of WTO, including
promotion of international trade
27Background to Indias Competition Law
- Earlier Law
- MRTP Act enacted in 1969
- Belongs to the era of controlled economy, as
against the market based economy - Objectives were to prevent concentration of
economic power, to control monopolies, and to
prohibit monopolistic and restrictive trade
practices - Major amendments to MRTP Act undertaken in
- 1984 major addition was relating to Unfair
Trade Practices, - 1991 deletion of Chapter relating to Mergers
and Acquisitions, and - Addition relating to Award of Compensation.
28Competition Act 2002
- An Act to establish a Commission to prevent
practices having adverse effect on competition,
to promote and sustain competition in markets, to
protect interest of consumers and to ensure
freedom of trade carried on by other participants
in markets, in India - Under the Act the Commission can enquire and
adjudicate in respect of - Anti-Competitive Agreements
- Abuse of Dominant Position
- Regulation of Mergers and Acquisitions
- Commission also has responsibility to undertake
Competition Advocacy
29Anti-Competitive Agreements
- These are agreements which cause or are likely
to cause an appreciable adverse effect on
competition within India - Horizontal Agreements
- These are between and among competitors who are
at the same stage of production, supply,
distribution, etc. - These are presumed to be illegal
- Examples cartels, bid rigging, collusive
bidding, sharing of markets, etc.
30Contd
- Vertical Agreements
- Vertical Agreements are between parties at
different stages of production, supply,
distribution, etc. - These are not presumed illegal are subject to
rule of reason. - Examples tie-in arrangements, exclusive
supply/distribution agreements, refusal to deal.
31Abuse of Dominant Position
- Includes practices like
- Unfair or discriminatory conditions or prices,
- Limiting or restricting production or
technical/scientific development, - Denial of market access, and
- Predatory pricing.
32Relevant Product Market
- Physical characteristics or end-use of goods
- Price of goods or service
- Consumer preferences
- Exclusion of in-house production
- Existence of specialised producers
- Classification of industrial products
33Relevant Geographic Market
- Regulatory trade barriers
- Local specification requirements
- National procurement policies
- Adequate distribution facilities
- Transport costs
- Language
- Consumer Preferences
- Need for secure or regular supplies or rapid
after-sales services.
34Combinations Regulation
- Combinations, in terms of the meaning given to
them in the Act, include mergers, amalgamations,
acquisitions and acquisitions of control. - Horizontal Mergers
- It must first be established as to what the
relevant market is. - To establish whether the higher concentration in
the market resulting from the merger will
increase the possibility of collusive or
unilaterally harmful behaviour. - Potential contestability
- Even mergers that lead to an uncompetitive
outcome could result in certain efficiencies
that more than make up for the welfare loss
resulting from this.
35Contd
- Vertical Mergers
- Competition law must not normally have any
objections to vertical mergers. - Conglomerate Mergers
- A conglomerate merger is a merger that is neither
horizontal nor vertical. - Pre-Notification
- The requirements for prior notification.
36Contd
- There are two possibilities
- The first is that approval or disapproval of the
merger may be obtained (possibly within a
specified time) before going ahead with the
merger. - The second option is that no notification of
permission is required and that the threat of
action in case of a violation should generally
enforce legal behaviour.
37Competition Advocacy
- The Competition Commission of India, in terms of
advocacy provisions in the Act, is enabled to
participate in the formulation of the countrys
economic policies and to participate in the
reviewing of laws related to competition at the
instance of the Central Government. - Commission is required to take measures for
promotion of Competition Advocacy, creating
Awareness and imparting Training about
competition issues Section 49(3)
38Contd
- Advocacy means competition promotion through
nonenforcement measures - For promotion of competition advocacy and
creation of awareness about competition issues,
the Commission may- - i) Undertake appropriate programmes / activities
etc. - ii) Encourage and interact with the
organizations of stakeholders, academic community
etc. to undertake activities, programmes,
studies, research work, etc. on competition
issues
39cont
- iii) Encourage the academic / professional
institutions to include competition policy law
in the curriculum - iv) Undertake appropriate capacity building
programmes and arrange training for its officers
/ staff and stakeholders etc. - The Commission is required to give opinion to the
Central Government on matters relating to
Competition Policies, but such opinion is not
binding on the Central Government Section
49(1).
40Academicians Perspective
- Competition should be a factor to be reckoned
with in the trade and market policies of a
country. - There should be a competition policy and of
course a competition law, which should be
structured that they subserve by and large the
consumers, consumer interest and consumer welfare.
41Contd
- There should be a enough flexibility in the
competition and trade policies to deal with the
specific needs and requirements of a country. - Public interest dimension can have primacy over
the consumer interest dimesion, in exceptional
circumstances. Care should be taken not to allow
public interest to be abused to circumvent
competition. - Competition policy should inhere the development
dimension in its approach and implementation.
42THANK YOU
Contact Dr. (Mrs.) Vijaya Katti Professor and
Chairperson (MDPs) IIFT, New Delhi E-mail
vijayakatti_at_iift.ac.in vckatti_at_yahoo.com