ECONOMICS 3150B Lecture 12 November 1, 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

ECONOMICS 3150B Lecture 12 November 1, 2005

Description:

... in Y1 (Y1 uses X1 relatively more intensively and A has relative abundance of X1) ... D for X2 (factor used more intensively in production of Y2) in A ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: laz95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECONOMICS 3150B Lecture 12 November 1, 2005


1
ECONOMICS 3150BLecture 12November 1, 2005
2
Heckscher-Ohlin Model
  • 2X2X2 model
  • Two countries
  • 2 factors of production
  • 2 products different factor intensities
  • Identical production technologies and state of
    technology
  • Different relative resource availabilities
    X1/X2A ? X1/X2B
  • Basis for trade different resource
    availabilities which give rise to different
    pre-trade relative prices
  • Comparative advantage interaction between
    relative abundance (supply) of resources (factors
    of production) and technology of production
    (relative intensity with which different factors
    of production used in production of different
    goods)

3
Heckscher-Ohlin Model
  • Factor intensity X1/X2i
  • Min TC P(X1)X1 P(X2)X2
  • s.t. 0Y1 F1(X1, X2, T)
  • Factor intensity determined by intersection of
    isoquant and budget line
  • Constant returns to scale and factor intensity
  • Factor intensity X1/X21 depends upon
    P(X2)/P(X1)
  • If P(X2)/P(X1) ? ? X1/X21 ?
  • Relative prices of factors of production depend
    upon relative availabilities of factors of
    production
  • If X1/X2A ? ? P(X2)/P(X1)A ?

4
Heckscher-Ohlin Model
  • Relative prices of products P1/P2 depend upon
    relative prices of factors of production PMC
    P(X1)/P(X2) and relative factor intensities
  • Assume Y1 uses X1 relatively more intensively
    than Y2 ?
  • X1/X21 gt X1/X22
  • As P(X1)/P(X2) ? so too does P1/P2
  • If X1/X2A gt X1/X2B then P(X1)/P(X2)A lt
    P(X1)/P(X2)B and P1/P2A lt P1/P2B
  • A has comparative advantage in Y1 (Y1 uses X1
    relatively more intensively and A has relative
    abundance of X1)
  • A will export Y1 and import Y2
  • Specialization not necessary outcome even if one
    of the countries is a small country and the other
    is a large country
  • Trade will tend to equalize relative prices of
    products and factors of production

5
Heckscher-Ohlin Model
  • Winners and losers
  • Net utility/income gains
  • Full employment and no transition costs
  • ? D for Y1 post-trade ? ? D for X1 in A ?? P(X1)
    in A
  • ? S of Y2 post-trade ? ? D for X2 in A ? ? P(X2)
    in A
  • Welfare effects of changes in terms of trade
    P1/P2 for A
  • Assume improvement in terms of trade for A
  • Leads to improvement in aggregate welfare in A
    and increase in trade volumes
  • Implications for income distribution between X1
    and X2
  • ? D for X1 in A
  • ? D for X2 in A

6
Heckscher-Ohlin Model
  • Increase in availability of factors of production
    in country A
  • Proportionate increase in both factors of
    production ? no change in relative availabilities
  • Increase in volume of trade
  • Change in terms of trade ? deterioration because
    of ? S of Y1 from country A and ? D for Y2 from
    country A
  • Increase in X1 (or disproportionate increase in
    X1)
  • Biased growth
  • Change in shape of PPF for country A ? change in
    relative prices, change in terms of trade
  • Larger impacts on volume of trade and terms of
    trade
  • Growth leads to more trade

7
Heckscher-Ohlin Model
  • Determinants of relative abundance of factors of
    production
  • Natural resources including climate
  • Exploration/development
  • Climate change
  • Labour
  • Skill level
  • Education, training
  • Population growth, demographics
  • Capital
  • Types
  • Investment
  • Technology
  • RD
  • Production, products

8
Tariffs
  • Tax on imports (ad valorem vs. per unit)
  • Increases the relative price of the imported good
    within a country in comparison to the
    international traded prices
  • Relative prices in international market P1/P2
  • Relative prices in country A (A imports Y2)
    P1/(1?)P2
  • Ignores possible effects on terms of trade
  • Reduces demand for Y2 ? if A a large country, P2
    decreases so part of tariff paid by foreign
    producers (improvement in terms of trade) if A
    small country, world prices unaffected, so tariff
    paid by domestic consumers
  • Increase in D for X2 (factor used more
    intensively in production of Y2) in A ? ?
    production of Y2 in A and ? production of Y1
    (because of change in relative prices in A)
  • Country B prefers to impose export tax (? )
    generates same effects on relative prices but
    revenues collected by foreign country

9
Export Subsidy
  • Negative tax on exports (ad valorem vs. per unit)
  • Decreases the relative cost of the exported good
  • Relative prices in international market P1/P2
    ? if unchanged, ? profits in production of export
    product (Y1 for country A)
  • Relative prices facing exporters in country A
    P1(1?)/P2
  • Ignores possible effects on terms of trade
  • Increases S of Y1 ? if A a large country, P1
    decreases so importers in country B benefit
    (decline in terms of trade) if A small country,
    world prices unaffected
  • Increase in D for X1 (factor used more
    intensively in production of Y1) in A ? ?
    production of Y1 in A and ? production of Y2
    (because of change in relative prices in A)
  • Distortions created by need to raise tax revenues
    tax systems creates distortions in
    decision-making and consumes resources ? lowers
    PPF in A (efficiency losses)

10
Export Subsidy
  • Regional Jets (RJs) Canada vs. Brazil
  • Why has Canada attacked Brazils subsidization
    of Embraer and production of RJs?
  • Canada an exporter, not an importer
  • Deterioration in terms of trade
  • Regional income effects since Bombardier a
    Quebec-based company
  • Why does Brazil provide export subsidies which
    reduce relative prices of RJs?
  • Create a comparative/competitive advantage
  • Economic development productivity growth
  • Technology
  • Learning curves
  • Economies of scale
  • Clusters agglomeration effects

11
New Trade Theory
  • Economies of Scale
  • External economies of scale clustering effects
  • Productivity levels within each firm depends on
    size of industry min. AC depends upon size of
    industry
  • Compatible with perfect competition
  • Internal economies of scale production,
    distribution, RD
  • Productivity levels within each firm depends upon
    size of each firm
  • Economies of scale stem from selection of
    production technology
  • Information re. available technologies
  • RD to generate new technologies
  • Not compatible with perfect competition

12
Economies of Scale Imperfect Competition
  • Internal economies of scale
  • Natural monopoly case
  • Pricing P gt MC
  • X-inefficiency ? incentives for senior management
  • Oligopoly case
  • Minimum efficient scale of operations (MES)
  • Interaction between size of market and MES
    determines number of firms
  • P gt MC

13
Models of Imperfect Competition
  • Profit Maximization
  • Monopoly
  • Oligopoly -- interdependence
  • Cournot model output competition ? P gt MC
  • Bertrand model price competition ? P MC
  • Prisoners dilemma ? P MC
  • Repeated version of P.D.
  • Fixed endpoint ? P MC
  • Indefinite endpoint ? P gt MC

14
Prisoners Dilemma
  • Classic Model
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com