Title: Introduction to Ethics
1Introduction to Ethics
- Theories of right and wrong
Dan Turton Victoria University of Wellington
2Teaser Questions
- Do you generally know (morally) right from wrong?
- When you disagree with people about a moral issue
what are you really disagreeing about? - Are you ever unsure if an act is morally wrong or
not?
3Morality vs. Ethics
- What is the difference?
- Some important questions related to ethics
- Why do we think certain acts are right/wrong?
- Why be moral?
- What makes an action morally right or wrong?
4The Key Question for Moral Theories
- Q1 What makes right acts right and wrong acts
wrong? - (A theorys answer its moral criterion)
- Terminology
- Wrong Morally Forbidden
- Right Narrow Morally Obligatory
- Wide Morally Permissible
- (includes should do and can do)
5Example Pushing In
- Is pushing in generally wrong?
- What makes pushing in wrong?
- Is pushing in ever morally permissible?
- What can make it (morally) OK?
6Moral Theories
- Not-so-good moral theories
- Better moral theories
7Divine Command Theory
- Right acts are right because
- They are the actions that God commands we perform
- Problem The Euthyphro Dilemma
8The Euthyphro Dilemma
- Either
- (1) The act is right only because God commanded
that we do it - Or
- (2) God commanded that we do it because the act
is right for independent reasons - (1) morality and Gods commands are arbitrary
- (2) abandon Divine Command Theory
9The Law
- Wrong acts are wrong because
- They break the law
- Problem Do we always feel like we have done
something morally wrong when we break the law?
10Cultural Relativism
- Right acts are right because
- your culture approves of them
- Four Problems
- Cant criticize other cultures
- Cant criticize your own culture
- No moral progress
- Its just not how we decide in the hard cases
11The Golden Rule
- Right acts are right because
- they are the ones you would want done to you
- Problems
- People like different things (e.g. Masochists)
- Is it how we decide in the hard cases?
12Utilitarianism
- Type of consequentialism
- What makes right acts right?
- The right act is the one that, out of all of the
alternatives, is most likely to maximize the
overall utility - Utility is
- happiness / the absence of suffering, or
- preference-satisfaction / not dissatisfaction
13An Example Euthanasia
- Assess the options
- 1) Leave them in pain
- 2) Help them to die
- 1 results in less net happiness than 2
- Therefore, Utilitarianism asserts that 2 is the
right choice
14Kantianism
- Type of deontological view
- What makes right acts right?
- An act is right if its maxim treats humanity as
an end in itself and not merely as a means - Maxims are
- Like policies
- What you intend to do in certain situations
15An Example Slavery
- Assess the options
- 1) Endorse slavery
- 2) Repeal slavery
- 1 results in rational beings being used as a mere
means to the slave-owners ends - Therefore, kantianism asserts that 2 is the right
choice
16Break
- Think about the better theories
- Can you see problems with them?
17Problems with the Better Theories
18The Tram Dilemma
- An out of control tram will soon kill 5 people
who are stuck on the track. - You can flick a switch to divert the tram to
another track where only one person is stuck. - Should you flip the switch?
- Should you kill one person to save five?
SWITCH
19The Surgeons Dilemma
- You are a surgeon with six patients.
- Five of them need major organ transplants.
- The sixth, an ideal donor for all the relevant
organs, is in hospital for a minor operation. - Should you kill one person to save five?
20Jungle Dilemma
- You are trekking alone in the Amazon.
- You discover an evil army officer and his troops
rounding up villagers. - Unless you kill one, the troops will kill six.
- Should you kill one person to save five?
21Jungle Dilemma Cont.
- What if there are 2 villagers?
- What if there are 10 villagers?
- What if there are 100 villagers?
- Can you ever kill one innocent person to save
many?
22Summing Up
- At least two moral theories seem plausible
- But they disagree sometimes
- So, they cant both be right all of the time!
- Is there a right and wrong in such situations?
23Summing Up Cont.
- Are some acts just right or wrong (without
explanation)? - What about killing innocent children?
- Innuits do it (for a reason)
- What about torturing innocents?
- The US does this (for a reason)
24The Meaning of Life and the Good Life
Dan Turton Victoria University of Wellington
25Teaser Questions
- Why are we here?
- What makes life worth living?
- What is the meaning of life?
26Clarifying the Question
- What do we really mean when we ask
- What is the meaning of life?
- Probably not
- What does it mean to be alive?
- Probably
- What, if anything, is the purpose for life?
- And possibly
- What, if anything, could make a life meaningful?
27Purposes for Life
- What, if anything, is the purpose for life?
- Religious purposes
- Non-religious purposes
- Survival and reproduction
- Selfish purposes
- Moral purposes
- There is no purpose
28Meaning in Life
- What, if anything, could make a life
meaningful? - Supernaturalism
- Naturalism
- Subjective Naturalism
- Objective Naturalism
- Nihilism
29Meaning vs. Goodness
- What, if anything, could make a life
meaningful? - But is that the most interesting question?
- Does a life have to be meaningful to be good?
- Would you rather your life be good or meaningful?
30The Good Life
- What, if anything, makes a life good?
- What kind of good life?
- A good example of a life
- Aesthetically good
- Causally good
- Morally good
- Subjectively good
31What Theories of Well-Being Do
- Describes the ultimate cause(s) of a life being
good for the one living it - Describes what intrinsically makes someones life
go well - Reduces all instrumentally life-improving things
down to one or more type of ultimately valuable
thing
32Break
- Think about well-being (the subjectively good
life) - What do you think makes a life good for the one
living it?
33Theories of Well-Being
- Mental state accounts
- E.g. hedonism
- Desire-satisfaction accounts
- E.g. informed preference-satisfaction
- Objective list accounts
- E.g. perfectionism
34Making an Objective List
- What things intrinsically make a life go well for
the one living it? - Now check that those things are intrinsically
valuable - By asking why they make someones life go better
for them - What are we left with?
35Is Pleasure the Only Thing of Value?
- Compare the lives of two men
- Similarities
- Both lived long lives, in which they have
experienced equal pleasures from the same sources - Sources being loved by their family and friends,
achieving at work and in hobbies etc. - Differences
- One of them is mistaken about all of the things
he takes pleasure in - The other is not
- Whose life is better?
36Is Informed Preference-Satisfaction the Only
Thing of Value?
- Compare the lives of two very intelligent women
- Similarities
- Up to the age of 25, both women led practically
identical lives - Throughout their whole lives they always made
fully informed decisions - Both learned everything to know about Heroin
- Differences
- At age 25, one of them tried Heroin, became
addicted and went on to live a short life of much
suffering - The other did not try Heroin and went on to live
a normal life - Whose life is better?
37Is Ideal Preference-Satisfaction the Only Thing
of Value?
- What makes a preference ideal?
- Unless we remain very abstract about what is
ideal, then we appear to be making another
objective list - Is it important (for our well-being) to get what
we want?
38Summing Up
- The meaning of life is easy to work out for
religious people - But non-religious people can still find meaning
for their life by - Making their own meaning in their life, or
- Having a good life
39Summing Up Cont.
- Understanding what is fundamentally important in
our lives is important for ethics - These intrinsically valuable things should be at
least considered when doing ethics - An moral theory that ignores what gives our lives
meaning and/or makes them good will be a poor
moral theory
40The Morality of Meddling with Human Life
- What should we want most for our children?
- What, if anything, is morally bad about
un-natural processes? - Is it more loving to accept a child exactly as
they are or to encourage them to alter their
lives for their own benefit?
41Meddling with Human Life
- Meddling interfering where we shouldnt
- Making human life
- Modifying human life
42Technologies for Making Life
- IVF In Vitro Fertilisation
- PGD Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
- SCNT Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
- Artificial wombs
43Technologies for Modifying Life
- Beware the fallacy of Genetic Determinism!
- PGD
- Choosing (genetic dispositions for) specific
characteristics - IVF with GE (Genetic Engineering)
- Creating (genetic dispositions for) specific
characteristics
44Should We be Using These Technologies to Enhance
Our Children?
- Isolating the important moral issue
- Imagine the technology is
- Safe,
- Effective,
- Widely accessible, and
- Cheap
45Should We be Using These Technologies to Enhance
Our Children? Cont.
- Types of enhancements or goods
- Relative goods
- Height
- Absolute goods
- Happiness, intelligence
- Note continuum
- Irrelevant goods
- Hair colour, eye colour
- (Maybe) Deafness, sexuality
462 Reasons for Allowing Enhancement
- Procreative Liberty
- The freedom to decide whether or not to have
offspring and to control the use of ones
reproductive capacity. - Moral analogy with educating our children
- Would you send your children to a school that
guaranteed the best physical, intellectual and
emotional education?
47Break
- Think about how you might object to all or
certain types of enhancement - To object to the moral analogy with education,
you need to show that there is a morally relevant
difference between enhancement by technology and
enhancement by education
48Objections Against All Enhancement
- Wisdom of repugnance (Yuck!)
- Rights of the child (which one?)
- Rights of the child to object (not a difference
e.g. with nutrition) - Slippery slope to babies with wings
- Brave New World (who will clean the toilets?)
- All goods are relative (so enhancements dont
improve things overall) - Too much transforming love and not enough
accepting love
49Objections Against Some Enhancements
- Ban enhancements of some types of goods
- Relative, Absolute, or Irrelevant goods
- Ban enhancements that decrease the autonomy of
the child - Deafness, GE for mathematics
50Some Practical Reasons Against Enhancement
- Can the technology ever really be
- Safe?,
- Effective?,
- Widely accessible?, and
- Cheap?
51Summing Up
- As technology progresses, we need to know if we
should be doing some of the things that we can
do, or soon will be able to do - Can be hard to draw the line
- Moral analogies can be hard to argue with
52A Practical Guide to Ethical Living
Dan Turton Victoria University of Wellington
53Plan for Today
- Morality really up for grabs!
- 1) Why be moral?
- 2) Combine what we have learnt so far
- 3) Construct a prudential/moral grid
- 4) Fill it in
54Teaser Scenario
- Based on Platos Ring of Gygees
- You have a ring that means you
- Can do pretty much anything you please
- Never feel guilt
- Always get away with it
- Would you act morally or immorally?
55What Ought We Do?
- Two main types of ought or should
- Moral oughts
- You should be nice to your grandpa because that
is the right/nice thing to do - Prudential oughts
- You should not drink from that bottle it has
petrol in it!
56Definitions (for today)
- Immoral actions
- Decrease the well-being of others unnecessarily
(without some compensating benefit) - Moral actions
- Increase the well-being of others
- Amoral actions
- Do not affect the well-being of others
57Reasons for Acting Immorally
- Prudential reasons
-
- Feeling good/pleasure
- Fulfilling your desires
58Reasons for Acting Morally
- Altruistic reasons
- Because it is good for others
- Prudential reasons
- Respect and/or friendship of others
-
- Feeling good/pleasure
- Fulfilling your desires
- Fear of going to hell
- Duty
59Prudential Acts
- Prudential acts increase the well-being of the
actor - Anti-prudential acts decrease the well-being of
the actor - Some acts are prudentially neutral
- E.g. spending 5 for an average ice-cream when
you are already full
60Prudential vs. Moral Acts
- All actions can be prudentially and morally
classified or rated if we have a good enough
definition of - Well-being (for prudential acts) and
- Morality (for moral acts)
- Some think objective well-being is enough here
61Prudential vs. Moral Acts
- We can also make a grid
- Useful for a practical guide to ethical living
- Being moral can be over-demanding
62More Definitions (for today)
- Rationality, or acting rationally
- Acting in such a way as to bring about your goal
in a logical manner, considering the information
available to you
63Discuss Grid
- How Well-being/morality fits in
- Why the subjective/objective distinction is
important - Why some actions might be irrational
64Discuss Grid (Cont.)
- Public goods problem
- Why should we be the ones to sacrifice, while
others benefit? - E.g. Public transport
65Break
- Think about how you interpret the grid
- What well-being means to you
- Where you might be on the grid
- Think about actions that are both prudential and
moral (ideal) that some other people might not be
aware of
66Filling in the grid
- Come up with an idea
- Evaluate costs and benefits to yourself and
others - Is it the most rational option?
67Example Light Bulbs
- Kit out your home with Eco-bulbs
- Costs/benefits to you
- Cost 30-50
- Saving approx 200 per year (big home)
- May be cheaper to replace old-style bulbs before
they expire - Costs/benefits to others
- Environmental benefits
- Other options
- Candles
- Carrots
68Your Turn
- Come up with an idea
- Evaluate costs and benefits to yourself and
others - Is it the most rational option?
69Some Ideal Examples
- Environmental
- Kettle water rationing
- Water garden in evening
- Use biodegradable soaps etc
- Recycling (1 can 3 hours of TV)
- Buying secondhand
- Brew your own beer
- Compost (50 of household waste)
70More Ideal Examples
- Charity street collectors
- 2 to make yourself and others happy
- Spending quality time
- With loved ones
- The power of honest compliments
- Start your own compliment chains
- Offering to help others
- Go about it in the right way
- Dont be embarrassed
71Some Moral Examples
- Donating money and/or getting involved with one
charity - Helps you see the difference you are making
- You dont have to feel bad when you dont give
- Car pooling
- www.carpoolnz.org
- The risk makes it hard to know the cost benefit
to you - Reporting things to council
- Vaccines
- Conscious consumption
- Depends on the cost but its worth trying!
72How to Make the Most of Moral Acts
- Acknowledge that you have done a good thing to
yourself - Consciously consider the benefits to others and
yourself at every opportunity - Dont let others take advantage of your charity
- Find like-minded people who appreciate the effort
you are doing for others - Experiment find the moral acts that make you
feel best! - Be careful not to sacrifice too much of yourself
for others and burnout you will help more in
the end if you never give more than you can
73Summing Up
- To live prudentially and/or morally we need to
have some idea of - What a good life is
- What makes acts morally right or wrong
- To live ideally we need our beliefs about these
two things to be true
74Summing Up (Cont.)
- Once we have settled these problems we can easily
work on deciding what we should do (prudentially
and/or morally)